Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

Number-Phase Uncertainty Relations for Optical Fields

R. Tanaś

Published Jan 1, 1996• 0 citations
OpenAlex

Abstract

The Hermitian phase formalism of Pegg and Barnett allows for direct calculations of the phase variance and, consequently, the number-phase uncertainty product. This gives us a unique opportunity, inaccessible before, to study the number-phase uncertainty relations for optical fields in a direct way within a consistent quantum formalism. A few examples of fields generated in nonlinear optical processes are studied from the point of view of their number-phase uncertainty relations.

Related papers

Quantum phase properties of nonlinear optical phenomena

R. Tanaś, Adam Miranowicz, Ts. Gantsog

We review some quantum-phase descriptions of optical fields. We focus on real fields that can be generated in practice in various nonlinear optical processes. Thus, we rather avoid discussions of phase formalisms as such and try to exploit their practical applicability in the description of optical fields. In the description of the phase properties we use two different, though related formalisms: the Pegg-Barnett Hermitian phase formalism and the formalism based on $s$-parametrized phase distributions.

arXiv:1110.4602•Oct 20, 2011•5 citations

Phase properties of excited coherent states

Ravinder Nath, Satish Kumar Muthu

The phase properties of states generated by excitations on a coherent state have been studied by evaluating the expression for the phase probability distribution, using the recent formalism of Pegg and Barnett in which the existence of a Hermitian optical phase operator has been shown. This distribution has been further used to evaluate the variance of the phase operator and the number - phase uncertainty product.

Quantum and Semiclassical Optics Journal of the European Optical Society Part B•Aug 1, 1996•8 citations

Unitary and Hermitian phase operators for the electromagnetic field

Yee Kin Tsui, Michael F. Reid

Pegg and Barnett [Phys. Rev. A 39, 1665 (1989)] have proposed a formalism for a Hermitian optical phase operator, constructed from the so-called phase states. In this paper we give an alternative derivation. We begin by defining a unitary phase operator ${e}^{i\stackrel{^}{\ensuremath{\varphi}}}$ from the relationship $\stackrel{^}{a}={e}^{i\stackrel{^}{\ensuremath{\varphi}}}R(\stackrel{^}{N})$ ($\stackrel{^}{a}$ is an annihilation operator for a single-mode boson field), but borrow the idea of a finite- (but arbitrarily large) dimensional space from Pegg and Barnett. Finally, we comment on an experiment to determine quantum phase uncertainty. Our analysis uses the operator ${e}^{i\stackrel{^}{\ensuremath{\varphi}}}$, which we feel is a more natural choice than $\stackrel{^}{\ensuremath{\varphi}}$. The use of ${e}^{i\stackrel{^}{\ensuremath{\varphi}}}$ also avoids the multivalued problems associated with $\stackrel{^}{\ensuremath{\varphi}}$.

Physical Review A•Jul 1, 1992•11 citations

Number-phase uncertainty product for displaced number states

Istok P. Mendaš, Duska B Popovic

The number-phase uncertainty product for displaced number states of the harmonic oscillator is examined within the framework of three different approaches: (i) the Carruthers-Nieto number-phase uncertainty relation in terms of the Susskind-Glogower sine and cosine phase operators, (ii) a similar relation to this calculated with the Pegg-Barnett unitary phase operator, and (iii) the number-phase uncertainty relation arising from the Pegg-Barnett Hermitian phase operator. The corresponding number-phase uncertainty product is calculated extending from average photon numbers 30 down to m for the first few classes of displaced number states (m=0,1,...,5). It is found that, for a displaced number state with a reasonable average number of excited quanta, all three rival phase formalisms yield similar number-phase uncertainty products, tending, for increasingly large magnitude of the displacement parameter, to the constant value m+1/2. On the other hand, for a small number of excited quanta it is found that, according to the first two formalisms, the number-phase uncertainty product for a given class of displaced number states tends to the maximum value \ensuremath{\surd}2m+1 /(\ensuremath{\surd}m+1 - \ensuremath{\surd}m ), while the third phase formalism predicts an entirely different behavior; with decreasing magnitude of displacement parameter, after passing through a maximum, the number-phase uncertainty product falls off eventually to zero making, in particular, the search for minimum number-phase uncertainty states futile. It is argued in favor of this last result, and the possibility of experimental verification, in the realm of quantum optics, is briefly considered.

Physical Review A•Aug 1, 1994•7 citations

Phase Dynamics and Uncertainties

Stephen M. Barnett, John A. Vaccaro

As soon as it was introduced, the Pegg-Barnett phase formalismwas applied to the analysis of quantum phase in a variety of situations. We review the seminal studies in this chapter. We beginwith the analyses of special classes of stateswhose phase properties are optimised in some way, for example, by having the minimum variance of the phase angle subject to various constraints. We then look at the connection between the phase observable and amplitude quadrature observables of an optical field. We end with the dynamics of the phase of a single-mode optical field under diffusive and non-diffusive evolution. These studies paved the way for the application of the new formalism to the theoretical analysis of quantum phase in general.

CRC Press eBooks•Apr 27, 2007•1 citation

Even and Odd Phase Coherent States Associated with the Pegg-Barnett Hermitian Phase Theory

Jiu-Yun Zhu, Le‐Man Kuang

Even and odd phase coherent states associated with the Pegg-Barnett Hermitian phase theory are introduced. Even and odd coherent-state formalism of the Pegg-Barnett phase operator is given in terms of the projection operator in the even and odd coherent-state space. The number-phase uncertainty relation is investigated for these states.

Chinese Physics Letters•Apr 1, 1996•0 citations
The Hermitian phase formalism of Pegg and Barnett allows for direct calculations of the phase variance and, consequently, the number-phase uncertainty product. This gives us a unique opportunity, inaccessible before, to study the number-phase uncertainty relations for optical fields in a direct way within a consistent quantum formalism. A few examples of fields generated in nonlinear optical processes are studied from the point of view of their number-phase uncertainty relations.
We review some quantum-phase descriptions of optical fields. We focus on real fields that can be generated in practice in various nonlinear optical processes. Thus, we rather avoid discussions of phase formalisms as such and try to exploit their practical applicability in the description of optical fields. In the description of the phase properties we use two different, though related formalisms: the Pegg-Barnett Hermitian phase formalism and the formalism based on sss-parametrized phase distributions.
Pegg and Barnett [Phys. Rev. A 39, 1665 (1989)] have proposed a formalism for a Hermitian optical phase operator, constructed from the so-called phase states. In this paper we give an alternative derivation. We begin by defining a unitary phase operator ${e}^{i\stackrel{^}{\ensuremath{\varphi}}}$ from the relationship $\stackrel{^}{a}={e}^{i\stackrel{^}{\ensuremath{\varphi}}}R(\stackrel{^}{N})$ ($\stackrel{^}{a}$ is an annihilation operator for a single-mode boson field), but borrow the idea of a finite- (but arbitrarily large) dimensional space from Pegg and Barnett. Finally, we comment on an experiment to determine quantum phase uncertainty. Our analysis uses the operator ${e}^{i\stackrel{^}{\ensuremath{\varphi}}}$, which we feel is a more natural choice than $\stackrel{^}{\ensuremath{\varphi}}$. The use of ${e}^{i\stackrel{^}{\ensuremath{\varphi}}}$ also avoids the multivalued problems associated with $\stackrel{^}{\ensuremath{\varphi}}$.
The number-phase uncertainty product for displaced number states of the harmonic oscillator is examined within the framework of three different approaches: (i) the Carruthers-Nieto number-phase uncertainty relation in terms of the Susskind-Glogower sine and cosine phase operators, (ii) a similar relation to this calculated with the Pegg-Barnett unitary phase operator, and (iii) the number-phase uncertainty relation arising from the Pegg-Barnett Hermitian phase operator. The corresponding number-phase uncertainty product is calculated extending from average photon numbers 30 down to m for the first few classes of displaced number states (m=0,1,...,5). It is found that, for a displaced number state with a reasonable average number of excited quanta, all three rival phase formalisms yield similar number-phase uncertainty products, tending, for increasingly large magnitude of the displacement parameter, to the constant value m+1/2. On the other hand, for a small number of excited quanta it is found that, according to the first two formalisms, the number-phase uncertainty product for a given class of displaced number states tends to the maximum value \ensuremath{\surd}2m+1 /(\ensuremath{\surd}m+1 - \ensuremath{\surd}m ), while the third phase formalism predicts an entirely different behavior; with decreasing magnitude of displacement parameter, after passing through a maximum, the number-phase uncertainty product falls off eventually to zero making, in particular, the search for minimum number-phase uncertainty states futile. It is argued in favor of this last result, and the possibility of experimental verification, in the realm of quantum optics, is briefly considered.
As soon as it was introduced, the Pegg-Barnett phase formalismwas applied to the analysis of quantum phase in a variety of situations. We review the seminal studies in this chapter. We beginwith the analyses of special classes of stateswhose phase properties are optimised in some way, for example, by having the minimum variance of the phase angle subject to various constraints. We then look at the connection between the phase observable and amplitude quadrature observables of an optical field. We end with the dynamics of the phase of a single-mode optical field under diffusive and non-diffusive evolution. These studies paved the way for the application of the new formalism to the theoretical analysis of quantum phase in general.