Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1106.0440 · Scientific Reports

Solving Quantum Ground-State Problems with Nuclear Magnetic Resonance

Zhaokai Li, Man‐Hong Yung, Hongwei Chen, Dawei Lu, James Daniel Whitfield, Xinhua Peng, Alán Aspuru‐Guzik, Jiangfeng Du

Published Sep 9, 2011• 63 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Quantum ground-state problems are computationally hard problems for general many-body Hamiltonians; there is no classical or quantum algorithm known to be able to solve them efficiently. Nevertheless, if a trial wavefunction approximating the ground state is available, as often happens for many problems in physics and chemistry, a quantum computer could employ this trial wavefunction to project the ground state by means of the phase estimation algorithm (PEA). We performed an experimental realization of this idea by implementing a variational-wavefunction approach to solve the ground-state problem of the Heisenberg spin model with an NMR quantum simulator. Our iterative phase estimation procedure yields a high accuracy for the eigenenergies (to the 10⁻⁵ decimal digit). The ground-state fidelity was distilled to be more than 80%, and the singlet-to-triplet switching near the critical field is reliably captured. This result shows that quantum simulators can better leverage classical trial wave functions than classical computers.

DOI
10.1038/srep00088

Related papers

Arbitrary Ground State Observables from Quantum Computed Moments

Harish J. Vallury, Lloyd C. L. Hollenberg

The determination of ground state properties of quantum systems is a fundamental problem in physics and chemistry, and is considered a key application of quantum computers. A common approach is to prepare a trial ground state on the quantum computer and measure observables such as energy, but this is often limited by hardware constraints that prevent an accurate description of the target ground state. The quantum computed moments (QCM) method has proven to be remarkably useful in estimating the ground state energy of a system by computing Hamiltonian moments with respect to a suboptimal or noisy trial state. In this paper, we extend the QCM method to estimate arbitrary ground state observables of quantum systems. We present preliminary results of using QCM to determine the ground state magnetisation and spin-spin correlations of the Heisenberg model in its various forms. Our findings validate the well-established advantage of QCM over existing methods in handling suboptimal trial states and noise, extend its applicability to the estimation of more general ground state properties, and demonstrate its practical potential for solving a wide range of problems on near-term quantum hardware.

arXiv:2312.06975•IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE)•Sep 17, 2023•1 citation

Simulating NMR Spectra with a Quantum Computer

Joaquín Ossorio-Castillo, Alexandre Rodríguez-Coello

The procedure for simulating the nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum linked to the spin system of a molecule for a certain nucleus entails diagonalizing the associated Hamiltonian matrix. As the dimensions of said matrix grow exponentially with respect to the spin system's atom count, the calculation of the eigenvalues and eigenvectors marks the performance of the overall process. The aim of this paper is to provide a formalization of the complete procedure of the simulation of a spin system's NMR spectrum while also explaining how to diagonalize the Hamiltonian matrix with a quantum computer, thus enhancing the overall process's performance. Two well-known quantum algorithms for calculating the eigenvalues of a matrix are analyzed and put to the test in this context: quantum phase estimation and the variational quantum eigensolver. Additionally, we present simulated results for the later approach while also addressing the hypothetical noise found in a physical quantum computer.

arXiv:2410.20836•Oct 28, 2024•1 citation

Implementation of a Quantum-simulation Algorithm of Calculating Molecular Ground-state Energy on an NMR Quantum Computer

Jiangfeng Du, Nanyang Xu, Xinhua Peng +3 more

It is exponentially hard to simulate quantum systems by classical algorithms, while quantum computer could in principle solve this problem polynomially. We demonstrate such an quantum-simulation algorithm on our NMR system to simulate an hydrogen molecule and calculate its ground-state energy. We utilize the NMR interferometry method to measure the phase shift and iterate the process to get a high precision. Finally we get 17 precise bits of the energy value, and we also analyze the source of the error in the simulation.

arXiv:0907.3642•Jul 21, 2009•1 citation

Accelerating Quantum Chemistry through Compressed Hamiltonian Representation and Efficient Quantum Analytic Energy Gradient Algorithms

Oumarou Oumarou

In ab-initio quantum chemistry, solving the electronic structure problem of a molecular system of interest to obtain an approximation of the ground and, in some cases, the excited state energies is a core and central task in various quantum chemistry processes. These include, but certainly not limited to, the calculation of the activation energy–that is the minimal energy required to launch a given chemical reaction–, the dipole and multipole moments which describe the polarity of the molecule, performing the optimization of the geometry of the molecule and searching for transition states. Furthermore, many quantum chemistry applications are predicated, not merely on the approximation of the ground state energy, but also on the corresponding first order derivatives. The body of literature of classical algorithms approximating the ground state energy and its first order derivative is extensively rich with a plethora of methods such as self-consistent mean-field methods, coupled-cluster methods, density matrix renormalization group and many more, each of which has intrinsic set of properties and characteristics that makes it suitable for specific tasks and cases. However, classical methods face a practically insurmountable challenge: the efficient computation of high accuracy approximation of ground state energies of large system sizes. This is fundamentally because the electronic structure problem provably belongs to the complexity class of QMA-hard problems. Which also means that it is out of reach for quantum algorithms as well in general. However, with certain assumptions that are expected to hold molecules of interest–that so far proved to be classically challenging because the required accuracy set by the standard of chemical accuracy threshold (generally held in quantum chemistry)– quantum algorithms can efficiently treat such cases. While originally theorized by Richard Feynmann as a potentially efficient way of simulating some classically intractable many-body systems, quantum computing has since proven to have a stronger and richer potential paving the way for the inception of new algorithms such as Shor’s algorithm for integer factorization, HHL for solving linear system of equation and Grover’s algorithm for constrained binary search, just to name a few. These algorithms provably exhibit an improvement rate that goes respectively exponentially and quadratically in the time complexity. Quantum chemistry is considered a prominent candidate to benefit from quantum computing given the variety of quantum algorithms put forth to solve the electronic structure problem of particular systems of interest. These quantum algorithm proposals can be broadly categorized in three main categories that span the spectrum: from noisy intermediate scale quantum (NISQ) computers to early and full scale fault tolerant quantum ((E)FTQC) computers. Firstly, the variational quantum eigensolver (VQE) family of quantum algorithms which variationally search for the ground state energy through the optimization of the energy of a parametrized state prepared in a quantum computer using an ansatz. Secondly, the quantum Krylov subspace diagonalization (QKSD) methods, which generate a subspace of the original Hilbert space and efficiently produce the lowest energy in said subspace as its output. Lastly, we have the quantum phase estimation (QPE) algorithms, which provably produce the ground state energy in Heisenberg scaling presenting hence a provable efficient solution. In this thesis, we firstly set to work on the problem of efficient Hamiltonian linear combination of unitaries (LCU) representation. This is mainly motivated by the wide-range impact an efficient compression of the Hamiltonian can potentially have on several quantum algorithms such as VQE, QPE...etc. We designed a method that efficiently compress the Hamiltonian representation in a way that is beneficially impactful across the set of the aforementioned quantum algorithms. Namely, we motivate and present in Sections 1.3 and 1.4 respectively, the regularized compressed double-factorization (RC-DF) and show how it reduces the energy measurement complexity both in terms of number of distinct observables and number of samples. Moreover, it also reduces the total depth of the quantum phase estimation circuit thanks to its low normalization factor. Secondly, given the importance of the energy derivatives, in Sections 2.1 and 2.2, we introduce and present an efficient quantum algorithm for the calculation of the analytic gradient of VQE energies of double-factorized Hamiltonians. Furthermore, in Section 2.1, we expand on the utility of RC-DF by presenting a quantum algorithm that determines the analytic gradient of energies measured with respect to RC-DF Hamiltonains. Third, in Section 3.1, we summarize the theoretical results of purification error-mitigation techniques, namely echo verification and virtual distillation. In Section 3.2, we report on the results of the experimental bench mark, of said techniques, performed on on Google’s Sycamore device to validate the theoretical scaling of error suppression and extrapolate the resources needed for classically intractable system sizes. Fourth, in Section 4 we establish the challenges of computing energy gradients in a quantum Krylov frame work. To overcome the problem, we provide, in Section 4.3, an efficient quantum algorithm for calculating energy derivative obtained through QKSD procedures. Our approach shows how the QKSD ground state can be prepared using quantum signal processing (QSP) and reduces the number of observables to O(1) per reduced density matrix (RDM). Lastly, in light of the importance of quantum RAMs due to their utility in a variety of quantum algorithms that require efficient initial state preparation, as explained in Section 5.5, we address the problematic exponential depth of the bucket-brigade QRAM (when decomposed). We present in Section 5.6 a very efficient Clifford+T decomposition of the bucket-brigade QRAM, which preserves the linear scaling of the depth of the circuit without introducing any additional ancilla.

•Aug 8, 2026•0 citations

Effective matrix model for nuclear physics on a quantum computer

Raffaele Miceli, Michael McGuigan

In this project we studied a simplified potential from [1] describing nuclear physics from quark and gluon fields, where spatial degrees of freedom have been integrated over. This potential deals with the phase structure of the strong interaction. We created a matrix representation of the Hamiltonian for this theory using discrete quantum mechanics [2]. We then feed this Hamiltonian to IBM's Qiskit package [3]. We run on IBM's 32-qubit quantum simulator, which approximates the ground state energy using the variational quantum eigensolver (VQE) algorithm [4]. This result is then compared with the exact ground state energy, which we can calculate classically since the matrices we use are still small enough. The bosonic Hamiltonian for a 6-qubit representation took over 1000 Pauli factors to represent fully. To improve our performance, we can look for a more efficient representation of this model's Hamiltonian. We will develop a better variational trial wave function and initial state, as well as include the effect of fermions and heavy quarks on the potential.

New York Scientific Data Summit (NYSDS)•Jun 1, 2019•5 citations

Quantum simulation of Hamiltonian eigenstates

Riccardo Manenti, Mário Motta

Abstract In this chapter, we present quantum algorithms to approximate Hamiltonian eigenstates. We start discussing the quantum phase estimation algorithms, an important subroutine that allows us to approximate eigenpairs of a Hamiltonian operator given an initial guess and a quantum circuit implementing the time evolution operator. We then present the adiabatic state preparation, a technique to transform the ground state of a Hamiltonian into the ground state of another Hamiltonian. We describe two important heuristic methods, the quantum approximate optimization algorithm, and the variational quantum eigensolver. The second part of the chapter discusses concrete applications in the field of quantum chemistry. After introducing the Born-Oppenheimer Hamiltonian in second quantization and the Hartree-Fock method, we illustrate how a chemical problem can be mapped onto a quantum computer. We conclude the chapter with the simulation of the hydrogen molecule in a minimal basis with the iterative phase estimation algorithm.

•Aug 25, 2023•0 citations
Quantum ground-state problems are computationally hard problems for general many-body Hamiltonians; there is no classical or quantum algorithm known to be able to solve them efficiently. Nevertheless, if a trial wavefunction approximating the ground state is available, as often happens for many problems in physics and chemistry, a quantum computer could employ this trial wavefunction to project the ground state by means of the phase estimation algorithm (PEA). We performed an experimental realization of this idea by implementing a variational-wavefunction approach to solve the ground-state problem of the Heisenberg spin model with an NMR quantum simulator. Our iterative phase estimation procedure yields a high accuracy for the eigenenergies (to the 10⁻⁵ decimal digit). The ground-state fidelity was distilled to be more than 80%, and the singlet-to-triplet switching near the critical field is reliably captured. This result shows that quantum simulators can better leverage classical trial wave functions than classical computers.
The determination of ground state properties of quantum systems is a fundamental problem in physics and chemistry, and is considered a key application of quantum computers. A common approach is to prepare a trial ground state on the quantum computer and measure observables such as energy, but this is often limited by hardware constraints that prevent an accurate description of the target ground state. The quantum computed moments (QCM) method has proven to be remarkably useful in estimating the ground state energy of a system by computing Hamiltonian moments with respect to a suboptimal or noisy trial state. In this paper, we extend the QCM method to estimate arbitrary ground state observables of quantum systems. We present preliminary results of using QCM to determine the ground state magnetisation and spin-spin correlations of the Heisenberg model in its various forms. Our findings validate the well-established advantage of QCM over existing methods in handling suboptimal trial states and noise, extend its applicability to the estimation of more general ground state properties, and demonstrate its practical potential for solving a wide range of problems on near-term quantum hardware.
The procedure for simulating the nuclear magnetic resonance spectrum linked to the spin system of a molecule for a certain nucleus entails diagonalizing the associated Hamiltonian matrix. As the dimensions of said matrix grow exponentially with respect to the spin system's atom count, the calculation of the eigenvalues and eigenvectors marks the performance of the overall process. The aim of this paper is to provide a formalization of the complete procedure of the simulation of a spin system's NMR spectrum while also explaining how to diagonalize the Hamiltonian matrix with a quantum computer, thus enhancing the overall process's performance. Two well-known quantum algorithms for calculating the eigenvalues of a matrix are analyzed and put to the test in this context: quantum phase estimation and the variational quantum eigensolver. Additionally, we present simulated results for the later approach while also addressing the hypothetical noise found in a physical quantum computer.
It is exponentially hard to simulate quantum systems by classical algorithms, while quantum computer could in principle solve this problem polynomially. We demonstrate such an quantum-simulation algorithm on our NMR system to simulate an hydrogen molecule and calculate its ground-state energy. We utilize the NMR interferometry method to measure the phase shift and iterate the process to get a high precision. Finally we get 17 precise bits of the energy value, and we also analyze the source of the error in the simulation.
In ab-initio quantum chemistry, solving the electronic structure problem of a molecular system of interest to obtain an approximation of the ground and, in some cases, the excited state energies is a core and central task in various quantum chemistry processes. These include, but certainly not limited to, the calculation of the activation energy–that is the minimal energy required to launch a given chemical reaction–, the dipole and multipole moments which describe the polarity of the molecule, performing the optimization of the geometry of the molecule and searching for transition states. Furthermore, many quantum chemistry applications are predicated, not merely on the approximation of the ground state energy, but also on the corresponding first order derivatives. The body of literature of classical algorithms approximating the ground state energy and its first order derivative is extensively rich with a plethora of methods such as self-consistent mean-field methods, coupled-cluster methods, density matrix renormalization group and many more, each of which has intrinsic set of properties and characteristics that makes it suitable for specific tasks and cases. However, classical methods face a practically insurmountable challenge: the efficient computation of high accuracy approximation of ground state energies of large system sizes. This is fundamentally because the electronic structure problem provably belongs to the complexity class of QMA-hard problems. Which also means that it is out of reach for quantum algorithms as well in general. However, with certain assumptions that are expected to hold molecules of interest–that so far proved to be classically challenging because the required accuracy set by the standard of chemical accuracy threshold (generally held in quantum chemistry)– quantum algorithms can efficiently treat such cases. While originally theorized by Richard Feynmann as a potentially efficient way of simulating some classically intractable many-body systems, quantum computing has since proven to have a stronger and richer potential paving the way for the inception of new algorithms such as Shor’s algorithm for integer factorization, HHL for solving linear system of equation and Grover’s algorithm for constrained binary search, just to name a few. These algorithms provably exhibit an improvement rate that goes respectively exponentially and quadratically in the time complexity. Quantum chemistry is considered a prominent candidate to benefit from quantum computing given the variety of quantum algorithms put forth to solve the electronic structure problem of particular systems of interest. These quantum algorithm proposals can be broadly categorized in three main categories that span the spectrum: from noisy intermediate scale quantum (NISQ) computers to early and full scale fault tolerant quantum ((E)FTQC) computers. Firstly, the variational quantum eigensolver (VQE) family of quantum algorithms which variationally search for the ground state energy through the optimization of the energy of a parametrized state prepared in a quantum computer using an ansatz. Secondly, the quantum Krylov subspace diagonalization (QKSD) methods, which generate a subspace of the original Hilbert space and efficiently produce the lowest energy in said subspace as its output. Lastly, we have the quantum phase estimation (QPE) algorithms, which provably produce the ground state energy in Heisenberg scaling presenting hence a provable efficient solution. In this thesis, we firstly set to work on the problem of efficient Hamiltonian linear combination of unitaries (LCU) representation. This is mainly motivated by the wide-range impact an efficient compression of the Hamiltonian can potentially have on several quantum algorithms such as VQE, QPE...etc. We designed a method that efficiently compress the Hamiltonian representation in a way that is beneficially impactful across the set of the aforementioned quantum algorithms. Namely, we motivate and present in Sections 1.3 and 1.4 respectively, the regularized compressed double-factorization (RC-DF) and show how it reduces the energy measurement complexity both in terms of number of distinct observables and number of samples. Moreover, it also reduces the total depth of the quantum phase estimation circuit thanks to its low normalization factor. Secondly, given the importance of the energy derivatives, in Sections 2.1 and 2.2, we introduce and present an efficient quantum algorithm for the calculation of the analytic gradient of VQE energies of double-factorized Hamiltonians. Furthermore, in Section 2.1, we expand on the utility of RC-DF by presenting a quantum algorithm that determines the analytic gradient of energies measured with respect to RC-DF Hamiltonains. Third, in Section 3.1, we summarize the theoretical results of purification error-mitigation techniques, namely echo verification and virtual distillation. In Section 3.2, we report on the results of the experimental bench mark, of said techniques, performed on on Google’s Sycamore device to validate the theoretical scaling of error suppression and extrapolate the resources needed for classically intractable system sizes. Fourth, in Section 4 we establish the challenges of computing energy gradients in a quantum Krylov frame work. To overcome the problem, we provide, in Section 4.3, an efficient quantum algorithm for calculating energy derivative obtained through QKSD procedures. Our approach shows how the QKSD ground state can be prepared using quantum signal processing (QSP) and reduces the number of observables to O(1) per reduced density matrix (RDM). Lastly, in light of the importance of quantum RAMs due to their utility in a variety of quantum algorithms that require efficient initial state preparation, as explained in Section 5.5, we address the problematic exponential depth of the bucket-brigade QRAM (when decomposed). We present in Section 5.6 a very efficient Clifford+T decomposition of the bucket-brigade QRAM, which preserves the linear scaling of the depth of the circuit without introducing any additional ancilla.
In this project we studied a simplified potential from [1] describing nuclear physics from quark and gluon fields, where spatial degrees of freedom have been integrated over. This potential deals with the phase structure of the strong interaction. We created a matrix representation of the Hamiltonian for this theory using discrete quantum mechanics [2]. We then feed this Hamiltonian to IBM's Qiskit package [3]. We run on IBM's 32-qubit quantum simulator, which approximates the ground state energy using the variational quantum eigensolver (VQE) algorithm [4]. This result is then compared with the exact ground state energy, which we can calculate classically since the matrices we use are still small enough. The bosonic Hamiltonian for a 6-qubit representation took over 1000 Pauli factors to represent fully. To improve our performance, we can look for a more efficient representation of this model's Hamiltonian. We will develop a better variational trial wave function and initial state, as well as include the effect of fermions and heavy quarks on the potential.
Abstract In this chapter, we present quantum algorithms to approximate Hamiltonian eigenstates. We start discussing the quantum phase estimation algorithms, an important subroutine that allows us to approximate eigenpairs of a Hamiltonian operator given an initial guess and a quantum circuit implementing the time evolution operator. We then present the adiabatic state preparation, a technique to transform the ground state of a Hamiltonian into the ground state of another Hamiltonian. We describe two important heuristic methods, the quantum approximate optimization algorithm, and the variational quantum eigensolver. The second part of the chapter discusses concrete applications in the field of quantum chemistry. After introducing the Born-Oppenheimer Hamiltonian in second quantization and the Hartree-Fock method, we illustrate how a chemical problem can be mapped onto a quantum computer. We conclude the chapter with the simulation of the hydrogen molecule in a minimal basis with the iterative phase estimation algorithm.