We consider open quantum systems with dynamics described by master equations that have perturbative expansions in the system-environment interaction. We show that, contrary to intuition, full-time solutions of order-2n accuracy require an order-(2n+2) master equation. We give two examples of such inaccuracies in the solutions to an order-2n master equation: order-2n inaccuracies in the steady state of the system and order-2n positivity violations. We show how these arise in a specific example for which exact solutions are available. This result has a wide-ranging impact on the validity of coupling (or friction) sensitive results derived from second-order convolutionless, Nakajima-Zwanzig, Redfield, and Born-Markov master equations.
We consider open quantum systems with dynamics described by master equations that have perturbative expansions in the system-environment interaction. We show that, contrary to intuition, full-time solutions of order-2n accuracy require an order-(2n+2) master equation. We give two examples of such inaccuracies in the solutions to an order-2n master equation: order-2n inaccuracies in the steady state of the system and order-2n positivity violations. We show how these arise in a specific example for which exact solutions are available. This result has a wide-ranging impact on the validity of coupling (or friction) sensitive results derived from second-order convolutionless, Nakajima-Zwanzig, Redfield, and Born-Markov master equations.
We put forth a new class of quantum master equations that correctly reproduce the asymptotic state of an open quantum system beyond the infinitesimally weak system-bath coupling limit. Our method is based on incorporating the knowledge of the reduced steady state into its dynamics. The correction not only steers the reduced system toward a correct steady state but also improves the accuracy of the dynamics, thereby refining the archetypal Born-Markov weak-coupling second-order master equations. In case of equilibrium, we use the exact mean-force Gibbs state to correct the Redfield quantum master equation. By benchmarking it with the exact solution of the damped harmonic oscillator, we show that our method also helps correct the long-standing issue of positivity violation, albeit without complete positivity. Our method of a canonically consistent quantum master equation opens a new perspective in the theory of open quantum systems leading to a reduced density matrix accurate beyond the commonly used Redfield and Lindblad equations, while retaining the same conceptual and numerical complexity.
Understanding system-environment correlations in open quantum systems is vital for various quantum information and technology applications. However, these correlations are often overlooked or hidden in derivations of open-quantum-system master equations, especially when applying the Born approximation. To address this issue, given a microscopic model, we demonstrate how to retain system-environment correlation within commonly used master equations, such as the Markovian Lindblad, Redfield, second-order time convolutionless, second-order Nakajima-Zwanzig, and second-order universal Lindblad-like equations. We show that each master equation corresponds to a particular approximation on the system-environment correlation operator. In particular, our analysis exposes the form of the hidden system-environment correlation in the Markovian Lindblad equation derived using the Born approximation. We also identify that the processes leading to the Redfield equation yield an inaccurate initial-time system-environment correlation approximation. By fixing this problem, we propose a corrected Redfield equation with an improved prediction for early stages of the time evolution. We further illustrate our results in two examples, which imply that the second-order universal Lindblad-like equation captures correlation more accurately than the other standard master equations. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
We investigate the exact solution, perturbation theory and master equation of open system dynamics based on our serial studies on quantum mechanics in general quantum systems [An Min Wang, quant-ph/0611216 and quant-ph/0611217]. In a system-environment separated representation, a general and explicit solution of open system dynamics is obtained, and it is an exact solution since it includes all order approximations of perturbation. In terms of the cut-off approximation of perturbation and our improved scheme of perturbation theory, the improved form of the perturbed solution of open systems absorbing the partial contributions from the high order even all order approximations is deduced. Moreover, only under the factorizing initial condition, the exact master equation including all order approximations is proposed. Correspondingly, the perturbed master equation and its improved form different from the existed master equation are given. In special, the Redfield master equation is derived out without using Born-Markov approximation. The solution of open system dynamics in the Milburn model is also gained. As examples, Zurek model of two-state open system and its extension with two transverse fields are studied.
The reduced dynamics of an open quantum system obtained from an underlying microscopic Hamiltonian can in general only approximately be described by a time-local master equation. The quality of that approximation depends primarily on the coupling strength and the structure of the environment. Various such master equations have been proposed with different aims. Choosing the most suitable one for a specific system is not straightforward. By focusing on the accuracy of the reduced dynamics we provide a thorough assessment for a selection of methods (Redfield equation, quantum optical master equation, coarse-grained master equation, a related dynamical map approach, and a partial-secular approximation). We consider secondary, here, whether or not an approach guarantees positivity. We use two qubits coupled to a Lorentzian environment in a spin-boson-like fashion modeling a generic situation with various system and bath time scales. We see that, independent of the initial state, the simple Redfield equation with time-dependent coefficients is significantly more accurate than all other methods under consideration. We emphasize that positivity violation in the Redfield equation formalism becomes relevant only in a regime where any of the perturbative master equations considered here are rendered invalid anyway. This implies that the loss of positivity should in fact be welcomed as an important feature: it indicates the breakdown of the weak-coupling assumption. In addition we present the various approaches in a self-contained way and use the behavior of their errors to provide further insight into the range of validity of each method.
The perturbative master equation (Bloch–Redfield) is used extensively to study dissipative quantum mechanics—particularly for qubits—despite the 25-year-old criticism that it violates positivity (generating negative probabilities). We take an arbitrary system coupled to an environment containing many degrees-of-freedom and cast its perturbative master equation (derived from a perturbative treatment of Nakajima–Zwanzig or Schoeller–Schön equations) in the form of a Lindblad master equation. We find that the equation's parameters are time dependent . This time dependence is rarely accounted for and invalidates Lindblad's dynamical semigroup analysis. We analyse one such Bloch–Redfield master equation (for a two-level system coupled to an environment with a short but non-vanishing memory time), which apparently violates positivity. We analytically show that, once the time dependence of the parameters is accounted for, positivity is preserved.
Quantum master equations are an invaluable and highly successful tool for the approximate, yet accurate, description of undriven open quantum systems weakly coupled to their environment. In contrast, results on the description of the equally important case of driven open quantum systems using quantum master equations remain scarce. Existing approaches typically impose restrictions on the driving protocol, including, for instance, Floquet master equations for periodic driving and adiabatic master equations for slow driving. However, no generally accepted formulation for arbitrary driving has yet been established. A promising candidate from which all existing approaches can be derived by approximations based on protocol constraints is the driven Redfield master equation. Strikingly, it has received very little attention so far. A main reason is that, in analogy to its undriven counterpart, the driven Redfield master equation notoriously violates complete positivity. In the undriven case, this problem can be successfully addressed using the rotating wave approximation (RWA). For approaches derived from the driven Redfield master equation for specific protocols, such as Floquet master equations and adiabatic master equations, a generalized form of the RWA can still be applied. However, a full generalization directly applicable to the driven Redfield master equation under arbitrary driving has not yet been developed. To address this issue, we propose a straightforward and natural generalization of the RWA based on the version of the RWA used for adiabatic master equations. We then apply the driven Redfield master equation to the paradigmatic, exactly solvable model of a driven quantum harmonic oscillator coupled to a bosonic bath and benchmark it against the exact solution. In particular, we compare the original driven Redfield master equation without an RWA to its generalized RWA version. We find that the driven Redfield master equation without an RWA exhibits excellent agreement with the exact solution across all driving speeds, while the violation of complete positivity shows no notable effect. By contrast, the RWA-based version of the driven Redfield master equation fails to reproduce the dynamics accurately beyond slow driving at short times. Additionally, we analyze known adiabatic master equations, both without and with an RWA. Remarkably, the non-RWA versions agree with the exact dynamics far beyond the strictly adiabatic regime, while the RWA-based versions already show noticeable deviations even for slow driving, contrasting previous observations in the literature. Taken together, these results indicate that the driven Redfield master equation and adiabatic master equations without RWA have been significantly underestimated in their practical usefulness, whereas RWA-based approaches in driven settings may have been overestimated. This strongly suggests that future work should focus on alternative approximation methods applied to the driven Redfield master equation that preserve its high numerical accuracy while restoring complete positivity.