Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:0808.3177 · Foundations of Physics

On EPR-type Entanglement in the Experiments of Scully et al. II. Insight in the Real Random Delayed-choice Erasure Experiment

F. Herbut

Published Dec 24, 2009• 8 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/s10701-009-9395-5

Related papers

On EPR-Type Entanglement in the Experiments of Scully et al. I. The Micromaser Case and Delayed-Choice Quantum Erasure

Fedor Herbut

arXiv:0808.3176•Foundations of Physics•Oct 22, 2008•9 citations

Entanglement and Delayed-choice Quantum Erasure

김재완, 이해웅

New Physics Sae Mulli•Jan 1, 2002•0 citations

Demonstration of Scully–Drühl-type quantum erasers on quantum computers

Bo‐Hung Chen, Dah-Wei Chiou, Hsiu-Chuan Hsu

Abstract We present a novel quantum circuit that genuinely implements the Scully–Drühl-type delayed-choice quantum eraser, where the two recorders of the which-way information directly interact with the signal qubit and remain spatially separated. Experiments conducted on IBM Quantum and IonQ processors demonstrate that the recovery of interference patterns, to varying degrees, aligns closely with theoretical predictions, despite the presence of systematic errors. This quantum circuit-based approach, more manageable and versatile than traditional optical experiments, facilitates arbitrary adjustment of the erasure and enables a true random choice in a genuine delayed-choice manner. On the IBM Quantum platform, delay gates can be employed to further defer the random choice, thereby amplifying the retrocausal effect. Since gate operations are executed sequentially in time, the system does not have any involvement of random choice until after the signal qubit has been measured, therefore eliminating any potential philosophical loopholes regarding retrocausality that might exist in other experimental setups. Remarkably, quantum erasure is achieved with delay times up to ∼ 1 μ s without noticeable decoherence, a feat challenging to replicate in optical setups.

arXiv:2409.08053•New Journal of Physics•Jun 27, 2025•1 citation

A Conceptual Review of Quantum Entanglement and the EPR Paradox

Md Anwarul Islam Aion

•Jan 1, 2024•0 citations

Delayed “Choice” Quantum Eraser

Yoon-Ho Kim, Rong Yu, S. P. Kulik +2 more

We report a delayed "choice" quantum eraser experiment of the type proposed by Scully and Druhl (where the "choice" is made randomly by a photon at a beam splitter). The experimental results demonstrate the possibility of delayed determination of particlelike or wavelike behavior via quantum entanglement. The which-path or both-path information of a quantum can be marked or erased by its entangled twin even after the registration of the quantum.

arXiv:quant-ph/9903047•Physical Review Letters•Jan 3, 2000•554 citations

Bootstrap Predictions for Quantum Entanglement: Delayed Choice, Quantum Erasure, and the One-Wave Hypothesis

Clifford Keeble

The Bootstrap Universe framework treats the electron as an extended geometric structure with a physical field reach of 83,733 lattice units ≈ 4.4 pm. A natural consequence is the one-wave hypothesis: entangled particles are not two systems mysteriously correlated but one wave structure with multiple detection possibilities. This paper derives five testable predictions from the one-wave hypothesis. (1) Delayed-choice experiments should show exact timing independence. (2) Partial quantum erasure should restore interference visibility exactly as V = √(1 − D²), with no threshold or hysteresis. (3) Entanglement swapping fidelity should depend on intermediate measurement quality, not spatial separation. (4) Multi-particle (GHZ) decoherence should scale with wave-environment interaction surface, not particle count. (5) Electron entanglement across the 200–500 keV transition should show a qualitative shift in correlation structure. All predictions are falsifiable. The paper also resolves the EPR argument, delayed-choice experiments, and quantum erasure without retrocausality.

•Jan 11, 2026•0 citations
Abstract We present a novel quantum circuit that genuinely implements the Scully–Drühl-type delayed-choice quantum eraser, where the two recorders of the which-way information directly interact with the signal qubit and remain spatially separated. Experiments conducted on IBM Quantum and IonQ processors demonstrate that the recovery of interference patterns, to varying degrees, aligns closely with theoretical predictions, despite the presence of systematic errors. This quantum circuit-based approach, more manageable and versatile than traditional optical experiments, facilitates arbitrary adjustment of the erasure and enables a true random choice in a genuine delayed-choice manner. On the IBM Quantum platform, delay gates can be employed to further defer the random choice, thereby amplifying the retrocausal effect. Since gate operations are executed sequentially in time, the system does not have any involvement of random choice until after the signal qubit has been measured, therefore eliminating any potential philosophical loopholes regarding retrocausality that might exist in other experimental setups. Remarkably, quantum erasure is achieved with delay times up to ∼ 1 μ s without noticeable decoherence, a feat challenging to replicate in optical setups.
The Bootstrap Universe framework treats the electron as an extended geometric structure with a physical field reach of 83,733 lattice units ≈ 4.4 pm. A natural consequence is the one-wave hypothesis: entangled particles are not two systems mysteriously correlated but one wave structure with multiple detection possibilities. This paper derives five testable predictions from the one-wave hypothesis. (1) Delayed-choice experiments should show exact timing independence. (2) Partial quantum erasure should restore interference visibility exactly as V = √(1 − D²), with no threshold or hysteresis. (3) Entanglement swapping fidelity should depend on intermediate measurement quality, not spatial separation. (4) Multi-particle (GHZ) decoherence should scale with wave-environment interaction surface, not particle count. (5) Electron entanglement across the 200–500 keV transition should show a qualitative shift in correlation structure. All predictions are falsifiable. The paper also resolves the EPR argument, delayed-choice experiments, and quantum erasure without retrocausality.