Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:0807.3286

The Strong Free Will Theorem

John H. Conway, Simon Kochen

Published Jul 21, 2008• 77 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We strengthen "The Free Will Theorem" [1] in several ways, by replacing the axiom FIN by a weaker axiom MIN, and also by allowing the particles' responses to depend on past half-spaces rather than on on past light cones. This change allows us to directly apply our theorem to relativistic theories of the GRW type.
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.0807.3286

Related papers

The Free Will Theorem (Russian Version)

J. Conway, Simon Kochen

On the basis of three physical axioms, we prove that if the choice of a particular type of spin 1 experiment is not a function of the information accessible to the experimenters, then its outcome is equally not a function of the information accessible to the particles. We show that this result is robust, and deduce that neither hidden variable theories nor mechanisms of the GRW type for wave function collapse can be made relativistic. We also establish the consistency of our axioms and discuss the philosophical implications.

•Jul 1, 2018•0 citations

The Strong Free Will Theorem

John H. Conway, Simon Kochen

Introduction The two theories that revolutionized physics in the twentieth century, relativity and quantum mechanics, are full of predictions that defy common sense. Recently, we used three such paradoxical ideas to prove “The Free Will Theorem” (strengthened here), which is the culmination of a series of theorems about quantum mechanics that began in the 1960s. It asserts, roughly, that if indeed we humans have free will, then elementary particles already have their own small share of this valuable commodity. More precisely, if the experimenter can freely choose the directions in which to orient his apparatus in a certain measurement, then the particle's response (to be pedantic—the universe's response near the particle) is not determined by the entire previous history of the universe. Our argument combines the well-known consequence of relativity theory, that the time order of spacelike separated events is not absolute, with the EPR paradox discovered by Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen in 1935 and the Kochen–Specker Paradox of 1967 (see [5]). We follow Bohm in using a spin version of EPR and Peres in using his set of thirty-three directions, rather than the original configuration used by Kochen and Specker. More contentiously, the argument also involves the notion of free will, but we postpone further discussion of this to the last section of the chapter.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Apr 18, 2011•136 citations

The Free Will Theorem and the Flash Ontology implicitly assume the Before-Before Experiment and thereby imply free will. Comment on a note by Nicolas Gisin in arXiv:1002.1392v1

Antoine Suárez

It is argued that both the "Free Will Theorem" (FWT) and the "relativistic GRW model with Flash Ontology" (rGRWf) hiddenly assume the result of the before-before experiment, and for this reason both FWT and rGRWf imply free will in the world outside free experimenters.

arXiv:1002.2697•Feb 13, 2010•2 citations

On the Free Will Theorem

Simon Kochen

We strengthen the Free Will Theorem, which proved the spontaneity of particles, based on the free will of the experimenter. The new result is unconditional, and does not require the experimenter's free will to prove the particles' spontaneity.

arXiv:2207.06295•Jul 13, 2022•0 citations

Relativistic collapse model with tachyonic features

Philip Pearle

A finite relativistic model for free particles, which describes the collapse of the state vector, is presented. The interaction of particles with a classical fluctuating field $w(x)$ causes collapse, as in the (so far) physically satisfactory nonrelativistic continuous spontaneous localization (CSL) model. In previous relativistic models, where $w(x)$ has a white-noise spectrum, collapse is accompanied by spontaneous creation of particles with all energies out of the vacuum [amounting to infinite energy/(sec-volume)]. In this paper we explore one way of eliminating such vacuum excitation. We present a formalism which allows an arbitrary spectrum for $w(x).$ We point out, in lowest order of perturbation theory, that it is timelike components of this spectrum which are responsible for vacuum excitation but (appropriate, it seems, to a fundamentally nonlocal phenomenon) it is spacelike components which are responsible for collapse. We restrict the spectrum of $w(x)$ to that of a tachyon of mass $\ensuremath{\mu}=\ensuremath{\Elzxh}/ac\ensuremath{\approx}1 \mathrm{eV},$ where $a\ensuremath{\approx}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}5} \mathrm{cm}\mathrm{}$ is the Ghirardi-Rimini-Weber (GRW) collapse model scale parameter used in CSL. However, in higher orders than the first, there is still vacuum excitation due to the energy-momentum supplied by particle propagators. We opt to explore a simple means of eliminating this vacuum excitation: by removing the time-ordering operation from the state vector evolution so that particle propagators are on the mass shell. The result is a finite theory: there is no vacuum excitation (and no need for renormalization) as each vertex describes a finite physical process, the spontaneous emission or absorption of a real tachyon by a particle (pair creation or annihilation is not permitted by energy-momentum conservation). This process may be thought of as analogous to the GRW ``hitting'' description of collapse. The cost of no time ordering is that at each vertex a mass M particle's wave function can spread by as much as $\ensuremath{\approx}cT(\ensuremath{\mu}/M)$ in time T. This has the result that, beginning at perturbation order $2M/\ensuremath{\mu},$ there is a nonvanishing probability for the particle to be found outside its light cone: for electrons and nucleons, the probability of this spacelike transport is negligibly small. Apart from this effect, the density matrix of particles in one region evolves independently of particles in another spacelike separated region. We thus obtain a finite, reasonably sensible, relativistic collapse model for free particles.

arXiv:quant-ph/9902046•Physical Review A•Jan 1, 1999•90 citations

The Code-Theoretic Axiom: The Third Ontology

Klee Irwin

A logical physical ontology is code theory, wherein reality is neither deterministic nor random. In light of Conway and Kochen’s free will theorem [The free will theorem, Found. Phys. 36(10) (2006) 1441–1473] and strong free will theorem [The strong free will theorem, Not. Am. Math. Soc. 56(2) (2009) 226–232], we discuss the plausibility of a third axiomatic option — geometric language; the code-theoretic axiom. We suggest that freewill choices at the syntactically-free steps of a geometric language of spacetime form the code-theoretic substrate upon which particle and gravitational physics emerge.

Reports in Advances of Physical Sciences•Mar 1, 2019•12 citations
On the basis of three physical axioms, we prove that if the choice of a particular type of spin 1 experiment is not a function of the information accessible to the experimenters, then its outcome is equally not a function of the information accessible to the particles. We show that this result is robust, and deduce that neither hidden variable theories nor mechanisms of the GRW type for wave function collapse can be made relativistic. We also establish the consistency of our axioms and discuss the philosophical implications.
Introduction The two theories that revolutionized physics in the twentieth century, relativity and quantum mechanics, are full of predictions that defy common sense. Recently, we used three such paradoxical ideas to prove “The Free Will Theorem” (strengthened here), which is the culmination of a series of theorems about quantum mechanics that began in the 1960s. It asserts, roughly, that if indeed we humans have free will, then elementary particles already have their own small share of this valuable commodity. More precisely, if the experimenter can freely choose the directions in which to orient his apparatus in a certain measurement, then the particle's response (to be pedantic—the universe's response near the particle) is not determined by the entire previous history of the universe. Our argument combines the well-known consequence of relativity theory, that the time order of spacelike separated events is not absolute, with the EPR paradox discovered by Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen in 1935 and the Kochen–Specker Paradox of 1967 (see [5]). We follow Bohm in using a spin version of EPR and Peres in using his set of thirty-three directions, rather than the original configuration used by Kochen and Specker. More contentiously, the argument also involves the notion of free will, but we postpone further discussion of this to the last section of the chapter.
A finite relativistic model for free particles, which describes the collapse of the state vector, is presented. The interaction of particles with a classical fluctuating field w(x)w(x)w(x) causes collapse, as in the (so far) physically satisfactory nonrelativistic continuous spontaneous localization (CSL) model. In previous relativistic models, where w(x)w(x)w(x) has a white-noise spectrum, collapse is accompanied by spontaneous creation of particles with all energies out of the vacuum [amounting to infinite energy/(sec-volume)]. In this paper we explore one way of eliminating such vacuum excitation. We present a formalism which allows an arbitrary spectrum for w(x).w(x).w(x). We point out, in lowest order of perturbation theory, that it is timelike components of this spectrum which are responsible for vacuum excitation but (appropriate, it seems, to a fundamentally nonlocal phenomenon) it is spacelike components which are responsible for collapse. We restrict the spectrum of w(x)w(x)w(x) to that of a tachyon of mass $\ensuremath{\mu}=\ensuremath{\Elzxh}/ac\ensuremath{\approx}1 \mathrm{eV},$ where $a\ensuremath{\approx}{10}^{\ensuremath{-}5} \mathrm{cm}\mathrm{}$ is the Ghirardi-Rimini-Weber (GRW) collapse model scale parameter used in CSL. However, in higher orders than the first, there is still vacuum excitation due to the energy-momentum supplied by particle propagators. We opt to explore a simple means of eliminating this vacuum excitation: by removing the time-ordering operation from the state vector evolution so that particle propagators are on the mass shell. The result is a finite theory: there is no vacuum excitation (and no need for renormalization) as each vertex describes a finite physical process, the spontaneous emission or absorption of a real tachyon by a particle (pair creation or annihilation is not permitted by energy-momentum conservation). This process may be thought of as analogous to the GRW ``hitting'' description of collapse. The cost of no time ordering is that at each vertex a mass M particle's wave function can spread by as much as $\ensuremath{\approx}cT(\ensuremath{\mu}/M)$ in time T. This has the result that, beginning at perturbation order $2M/\ensuremath{\mu},$ there is a nonvanishing probability for the particle to be found outside its light cone: for electrons and nucleons, the probability of this spacelike transport is negligibly small. Apart from this effect, the density matrix of particles in one region evolves independently of particles in another spacelike separated region. We thus obtain a finite, reasonably sensible, relativistic collapse model for free particles.
A logical physical ontology is code theory, wherein reality is neither deterministic nor random. In light of Conway and Kochen’s free will theorem [The free will theorem, Found. Phys. 36(10) (2006) 1441–1473] and strong free will theorem [The strong free will theorem, Not. Am. Math. Soc. 56(2) (2009) 226–232], we discuss the plausibility of a third axiomatic option — geometric language; the code-theoretic axiom. We suggest that freewill choices at the syntactically-free steps of a geometric language of spacetime form the code-theoretic substrate upon which particle and gravitational physics emerge.