Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:0708.3909 · Physical Review A

No-signaling bound on quantum state discrimination

Sarah Croke, Erika Andersson, Stephen Mark Barnett

Published Jan 28, 2008• 27 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Quantum correlations do not allow signaling, and any operation which may be performed on one system of an entangled pair cannot be detected by measurement of the other system alone. This no-signaling condition limits allowed operations and, in the context of quantum communication, may be used to put bounds on quantum state discrimination. We find that the natural figure of merit to consider is the confidence in identifying a state, which is optimized by the maximum confidence strategy. We show that this strategy may be derived from the no-signaling condition, and demonstrate the relationship between maximum confidence measurements and entanglement concentration.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.77.012113

Related papers

Sequential Quantum Maximum Confidence Discrimination

Hanwool Lee, Kieran Flatt, Joonwoo Bae

Sequential quantum information processing may lie in the peaceful coexistence of no-go theorems on quantum operations, such as the no-cloning theorem, the monogamy of correlations, and the no-signalling principle. In this work, we investigate a sequential scenario of quantum state discrimination with maximum confidence, called maximum-confidence discrimination, which generalizes other strategies including minimum-error and unambiguous state discrimination. We show that sequential state discrimination with equally high confidence can be realized only when positive-operator-valued measure elements for a maximum-confidence measurement are linearly independent; otherwise, a party will have strictly less confidence in measurement outcomes than the previous one. We establish a tradeoff between the disturbance of states and information gain in sequential state discrimination, namely, that the less a party learn in state discrimination in terms of a guessing probability, the more parties can participate in the sequential scenario.

arXiv:2411.12550•Nov 19, 2024•0 citations

Sequential quantum maximum-confidence discrimination

Hanwool Lee, Kieran Flatt, Joonwoo Bae

Sequential quantum information processing may lie in the peaceful coexistence of no-go theorems on quantum operations, such as the no-cloning theorem, the monogamy of correlations, and the no-signalling principle. In this work, we investigate a sequential scenario of quantum state discrimination with maximum confidence, called maximum-confidence discrimination, which generalizes other strategies such as minimum-error and unambiguous discrimination. We show that sequential discrimination with equally high confidence can be realized if and only if positive-operator-valued measure elements for a maximum-confidence measurement can be unambiguously discriminated, i.e., linearly independent; otherwise, a party will have strictly less confidence in measurement outcomes than the previous one. We investigate the tradeoff between state disturbance and information gain in sequential state discrimination and show that the less guessing probability there is from conclusive outcomes for each party, the more parties can participate in the sequential scenario.

Physical Review A•Nov 6, 2025•5 citations

Entanglement witness and nonlocality in confidence of measurement from multipartite quantum state discrimination

Donghoon Ha, Jeong San Kim

We consider multipartite quantum state discrimination and provide a specific relation between the properties of entanglement witness and quantum nonlocality inherent in the confidence of measurement. We first provide the definition of the confidence of measurement as well as its useful properties for various types of multipartite measurement. We show that globally-maximum confidence that cannot be achieved by local operations and classical communication strongly depends on the existence of a certain type of entanglement witness. We also provide conditions for an upper bound on maximum of locally-achievable confidence. Finally, we establish a method in terms of entanglement witness to construct quantum state ensembles with nonlocal maximum confidence.

arXiv:2405.20586•Scientific Reports•Oct 11, 2024•2 citations

Contextual Advantages and Certification for Maximum-Confidence Discrimination

Kieran Flatt, Hanwool Lee, Carles Roch i Carceller +2 more

One of the most fundamental results in quantum information theory is that no measurement can perfectly discriminate between nonorthogonal quantum states.In this work, we investigate quantum advantages for discrimination tasks over noncontextual theories by considering a maximum-confidence measurement that unifies different strategies of quantum state discrimination, including minimum-error and unambiguous discrimination.We first show that maximum-confidence discrimination, as well as unambiguous discrimination, contains contextual advantages.We then consider a semi-device-independent scenario of certifying maximum-confidence measurement.The scenario naturally contains undetected events, making it a natural setting to explore maximum-confidence measurements.We show that the certified maximum confidence in quantum theory also contains contextual advantages.Our results establish how the advantages of quantum theory over a classical model may appear in a realistic scenario of a discrimination task.

arXiv:2112.09626•PRX Quantum•Sep 13, 2022•46 citations

Entanglement in quantum channel discrimination: sometimes less is more

Kristin Sundal Lien, Marco Túlio Quintino

Entanglement is known to be a powerful resource that improves performance in various quantum information and computational tasks. A standard example of such a phenomenon is the possibility of perfectly discriminating all four Pauli operations in a single shot via the superdense coding protocol. While entanglement is often a powerful resource for quantum channel discrimination, this is not necessarily the case. In this work, we identify scenarios in which the maximally entangled state is a bad choice of input state and, more generally, show that excessive entanglement can reduce channel discriminability dramatically. To do so, we present an explicit pair of unitary channels which are perfectly discriminable without entanglement, but for which any strategy with maximally entangled input states is $ε$-close to a blind uniform guessing strategy. To develop a systematic approach, we introduce the concepts of Maximal Entanglement Worst Case (MEWC) and Maximal Entanglement Best Case (MEBC) pairs of channels, and present conditions for a pair of channels to be MEWC or MEBC. With these conditions, we show that the optimal input states for discriminating MEWC pairs of channels are necessarily separable, and provide non-trivial examples of measurement channels for which entanglement necessarily reduces the maximum probability of discrimination.

quant-pharXiv:2605.31519•Jun 1, 2026•0 citations

Factorizability of optimal quantum sequence discrimination under maximum-confidence measurements

Donghoon Ha, Jeong San Kim

We consider the discrimination of quantum sequences under maximum-confidence measurements and show that the optimal discrimination of a quantum sequence ensemble can always be factorized into that of each individual ensemble. In other words, the optimal quantum sequence discrimination under maximum-confidence measurements can be achieved just by performing a maximum-confidence discrimination independently at each step of the quantum sequence. We also show that the maximum confidence of identifying a quantum sequence is to achieve the maximum confidence of identifying each state comprising the quantum sequence. We further provide a necessary and sufficient condition for the optimal quantum state discrimination under maximum-confidence measurements.

arXiv:2510.20311•Physical Review A•Feb 9, 2026•0 citations
Quantum correlations do not allow signaling, and any operation which may be performed on one system of an entangled pair cannot be detected by measurement of the other system alone. This no-signaling condition limits allowed operations and, in the context of quantum communication, may be used to put bounds on quantum state discrimination. We find that the natural figure of merit to consider is the confidence in identifying a state, which is optimized by the maximum confidence strategy. We show that this strategy may be derived from the no-signaling condition, and demonstrate the relationship between maximum confidence measurements and entanglement concentration.
Sequential quantum information processing may lie in the peaceful coexistence of no-go theorems on quantum operations, such as the no-cloning theorem, the monogamy of correlations, and the no-signalling principle. In this work, we investigate a sequential scenario of quantum state discrimination with maximum confidence, called maximum-confidence discrimination, which generalizes other strategies including minimum-error and unambiguous state discrimination. We show that sequential state discrimination with equally high confidence can be realized only when positive-operator-valued measure elements for a maximum-confidence measurement are linearly independent; otherwise, a party will have strictly less confidence in measurement outcomes than the previous one. We establish a tradeoff between the disturbance of states and information gain in sequential state discrimination, namely, that the less a party learn in state discrimination in terms of a guessing probability, the more parties can participate in the sequential scenario.
Sequential quantum information processing may lie in the peaceful coexistence of no-go theorems on quantum operations, such as the no-cloning theorem, the monogamy of correlations, and the no-signalling principle. In this work, we investigate a sequential scenario of quantum state discrimination with maximum confidence, called maximum-confidence discrimination, which generalizes other strategies such as minimum-error and unambiguous discrimination. We show that sequential discrimination with equally high confidence can be realized if and only if positive-operator-valued measure elements for a maximum-confidence measurement can be unambiguously discriminated, i.e., linearly independent; otherwise, a party will have strictly less confidence in measurement outcomes than the previous one. We investigate the tradeoff between state disturbance and information gain in sequential state discrimination and show that the less guessing probability there is from conclusive outcomes for each party, the more parties can participate in the sequential scenario.
We consider multipartite quantum state discrimination and provide a specific relation between the properties of entanglement witness and quantum nonlocality inherent in the confidence of measurement. We first provide the definition of the confidence of measurement as well as its useful properties for various types of multipartite measurement. We show that globally-maximum confidence that cannot be achieved by local operations and classical communication strongly depends on the existence of a certain type of entanglement witness. We also provide conditions for an upper bound on maximum of locally-achievable confidence. Finally, we establish a method in terms of entanglement witness to construct quantum state ensembles with nonlocal maximum confidence.
One of the most fundamental results in quantum information theory is that no measurement can perfectly discriminate between nonorthogonal quantum states.In this work, we investigate quantum advantages for discrimination tasks over noncontextual theories by considering a maximum-confidence measurement that unifies different strategies of quantum state discrimination, including minimum-error and unambiguous discrimination.We first show that maximum-confidence discrimination, as well as unambiguous discrimination, contains contextual advantages.We then consider a semi-device-independent scenario of certifying maximum-confidence measurement.The scenario naturally contains undetected events, making it a natural setting to explore maximum-confidence measurements.We show that the certified maximum confidence in quantum theory also contains contextual advantages.Our results establish how the advantages of quantum theory over a classical model may appear in a realistic scenario of a discrimination task.
Entanglement is known to be a powerful resource that improves performance in various quantum information and computational tasks. A standard example of such a phenomenon is the possibility of perfectly discriminating all four Pauli operations in a single shot via the superdense coding protocol. While entanglement is often a powerful resource for quantum channel discrimination, this is not necessarily the case. In this work, we identify scenarios in which the maximally entangled state is a bad choice of input state and, more generally, show that excessive entanglement can reduce channel discriminability dramatically. To do so, we present an explicit pair of unitary channels which are perfectly discriminable without entanglement, but for which any strategy with maximally entangled input states is εεε-close to a blind uniform guessing strategy. To develop a systematic approach, we introduce the concepts of Maximal Entanglement Worst Case (MEWC) and Maximal Entanglement Best Case (MEBC) pairs of channels, and present conditions for a pair of channels to be MEWC or MEBC. With these conditions, we show that the optimal input states for discriminating MEWC pairs of channels are necessarily separable, and provide non-trivial examples of measurement channels for which entanglement necessarily reduces the maximum probability of discrimination.
We consider the discrimination of quantum sequences under maximum-confidence measurements and show that the optimal discrimination of a quantum sequence ensemble can always be factorized into that of each individual ensemble. In other words, the optimal quantum sequence discrimination under maximum-confidence measurements can be achieved just by performing a maximum-confidence discrimination independently at each step of the quantum sequence. We also show that the maximum confidence of identifying a quantum sequence is to achieve the maximum confidence of identifying each state comprising the quantum sequence. We further provide a necessary and sufficient condition for the optimal quantum state discrimination under maximum-confidence measurements.