Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:2112.09626 · PRX Quantum

Contextual Advantages and Certification for Maximum-Confidence Discrimination

Kieran Flatt, Hanwool Lee, Carles Roch i Carceller, Jonatan Bohr Brask, Joonwoo Bae

Published Sep 13, 2022• 46 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

One of the most fundamental results in quantum information theory is that no measurement can perfectly discriminate between nonorthogonal quantum states.In this work, we investigate quantum advantages for discrimination tasks over noncontextual theories by considering a maximum-confidence measurement that unifies different strategies of quantum state discrimination, including minimum-error and unambiguous discrimination.We first show that maximum-confidence discrimination, as well as unambiguous discrimination, contains contextual advantages.We then consider a semi-device-independent scenario of certifying maximum-confidence measurement.The scenario naturally contains undetected events, making it a natural setting to explore maximum-confidence measurements.We show that the certified maximum confidence in quantum theory also contains contextual advantages.Our results establish how the advantages of quantum theory over a classical model may appear in a realistic scenario of a discrimination task.

DOI
10.1103/prxquantum.3.030337

Related papers

Contextual advantages across two-state discrimination strategies

Kieran Flatt, Joonwoo Bae

Quantum state discrimination, alongside its other applications, has recently found use as a tool for witnessing generalised contextuality. In this article, we derive noncontextuality inequalities for both conclusive and inconclusive outcomes across various guessing strategies. For minimum-error discrimination, the advantage is in terms of the confidences of individual outcomes, while for unambiguous state discrimination, it is in terms of the average guessing probability. For maximum-confidence discrimination, we show that contextual advantages occur not only for the confidence but also their average, the guessing probability, as well as the inconclusive outcome rate. Our results show that contextual advantages are observed across all two-state discrimination schemes and figures of merit. We envisage that various quantum information applications based on state discrimination may offer advantages over noncontextual theories.

quant-pharXiv:2511.04100•New Journal of Physics•Nov 7, 2025•2 citations

Experimental investigation of maximum-confidence measurements and their contextual advantages

Qin Fan, Yong-Nan Sun, Jie Yang +2 more

Nonorthogonal quantum states cannot be perfectly distinguished; seeking the optimal discrimination strategy is a critical task in quantum information processing. Maximum-confidence measurements provide the highest confidence that represents the conditional probability of the prepared state being correct given an observed outcome. In this work, we experimentally investigate maximum-confidence measurements by discrete-time quantum walks for geometrically uniform states and tetrahedron states, and our experimental results clearly show that the maximum-confidence measurements coincide with minimum-error discrimination in these cases. Meanwhile, we also provide experimental evidence for the contextual advantage of maximum-confidence measurements in quantum theory over classical theory, using two quantum pure states as an example. Our work provides a unified experimental approach to quantum state discrimination that highlights the practical value of maximum-confidence measurements in quantum information processing.

Optics Express•Apr 22, 2026•0 citations

Quantum vs Noncontextual Semi-Device-Independent Randomness Certification

Carles Roch i Carceller, Kieran Flatt, Hanwool Lee +2 more

We compare the power of quantum and classical physics in terms of randomness certification from devices which are only partially characterized. We study randomness certification based on state discrimination and take noncontextuality as the notion of classicality. A contextual advantage was recently shown to exist for state discrimination. Here, we develop quantum and noncontextual semi-device independent protocols for random-number generation based on maximum-confidence discrimination, which generalizes unambiguous and minimum-error state discrimination. We show that, for quantum eavesdroppers, quantum devices can certify more randomness than noncontextual ones whenever none of the input states are unambiguously identified. That is, a quantum-over-classical advantage exists.

•Jan 1, 2022•38 citations

Quantum vs Noncontextual Semi-Device-Independent Randomness Certification

Carles Roch i Carceller, Kieran Flatt, Hanwool Lee +2 more

We compare the power of quantum and classical physics in terms of randomness certification from devices which are only partially characterized. We study randomness certification based on state discrimination and take noncontextuality as the notion of classicality. A contextual advantage was recently shown to exist for state discrimination. Here, we develop quantum and noncontextual semi-device independent protocols for random-number generation based on maximum-confidence discrimination, which generalizes unambiguous and minimum-error state discrimination. We show that, for quantum eavesdroppers, quantum devices can certify more randomness than noncontextual ones whenever none of the input states are unambiguously identified. That is, a quantum-over-classical advantage exists.

arXiv:2112.09678•Physical Review Letters•Jul 25, 2022•0 citations

Discriminating three mirror-symmetric states with a restricted contextual advantage

Sumit Mukherjee, Shivam Naonit, A. K. Pan

The generalized notion of noncontextuality provides an avenue to explore the fundamental departure of quantum theory from a classical explanation. Recently, extracting different forms of quantum advantages in various information processing tasks has received an upsurge of attention. In a recent work [Schmid and Spekkens, Phys. Rev. X 8, 011015 (2018)] it has been demonstrated that minimum error discrimination of two nonorthogonal pure quantum states entails contextual advantage when the states are supplied with equal prior probabilities. We generalize their work for arbitrary prior probabilities and extend the investigation for three arbitrary mirror-symmetric states. We show that the contextual advantage can be obtained for any value of prior probability when only two quantum states are present in the task. But surprisingly, for the case of three mirror-symmetric states, the contextual advantage can be revealed only for a restrictive range of prior probabilities with which the states are supplied. Further, we extend our study to examine the contextual advantage for maximum confidence state discrimination. We demonstrate that the prior probabilities of state preparation play a similar role in exploiting the quantum advantage in maximum confidence discrimination.

arXiv:2112.15452•Physical Review A•Jul 21, 2022•20 citations

Sequential quantum maximum-confidence discrimination

Hanwool Lee, Kieran Flatt, Joonwoo Bae

Sequential quantum information processing may lie in the peaceful coexistence of no-go theorems on quantum operations, such as the no-cloning theorem, the monogamy of correlations, and the no-signalling principle. In this work, we investigate a sequential scenario of quantum state discrimination with maximum confidence, called maximum-confidence discrimination, which generalizes other strategies such as minimum-error and unambiguous discrimination. We show that sequential discrimination with equally high confidence can be realized if and only if positive-operator-valued measure elements for a maximum-confidence measurement can be unambiguously discriminated, i.e., linearly independent; otherwise, a party will have strictly less confidence in measurement outcomes than the previous one. We investigate the tradeoff between state disturbance and information gain in sequential state discrimination and show that the less guessing probability there is from conclusive outcomes for each party, the more parties can participate in the sequential scenario.

Physical Review A•Nov 6, 2025•5 citations
One of the most fundamental results in quantum information theory is that no measurement can perfectly discriminate between nonorthogonal quantum states.In this work, we investigate quantum advantages for discrimination tasks over noncontextual theories by considering a maximum-confidence measurement that unifies different strategies of quantum state discrimination, including minimum-error and unambiguous discrimination.We first show that maximum-confidence discrimination, as well as unambiguous discrimination, contains contextual advantages.We then consider a semi-device-independent scenario of certifying maximum-confidence measurement.The scenario naturally contains undetected events, making it a natural setting to explore maximum-confidence measurements.We show that the certified maximum confidence in quantum theory also contains contextual advantages.Our results establish how the advantages of quantum theory over a classical model may appear in a realistic scenario of a discrimination task.
Quantum state discrimination, alongside its other applications, has recently found use as a tool for witnessing generalised contextuality. In this article, we derive noncontextuality inequalities for both conclusive and inconclusive outcomes across various guessing strategies. For minimum-error discrimination, the advantage is in terms of the confidences of individual outcomes, while for unambiguous state discrimination, it is in terms of the average guessing probability. For maximum-confidence discrimination, we show that contextual advantages occur not only for the confidence but also their average, the guessing probability, as well as the inconclusive outcome rate. Our results show that contextual advantages are observed across all two-state discrimination schemes and figures of merit. We envisage that various quantum information applications based on state discrimination may offer advantages over noncontextual theories.
Nonorthogonal quantum states cannot be perfectly distinguished; seeking the optimal discrimination strategy is a critical task in quantum information processing. Maximum-confidence measurements provide the highest confidence that represents the conditional probability of the prepared state being correct given an observed outcome. In this work, we experimentally investigate maximum-confidence measurements by discrete-time quantum walks for geometrically uniform states and tetrahedron states, and our experimental results clearly show that the maximum-confidence measurements coincide with minimum-error discrimination in these cases. Meanwhile, we also provide experimental evidence for the contextual advantage of maximum-confidence measurements in quantum theory over classical theory, using two quantum pure states as an example. Our work provides a unified experimental approach to quantum state discrimination that highlights the practical value of maximum-confidence measurements in quantum information processing.
We compare the power of quantum and classical physics in terms of randomness certification from devices which are only partially characterized. We study randomness certification based on state discrimination and take noncontextuality as the notion of classicality. A contextual advantage was recently shown to exist for state discrimination. Here, we develop quantum and noncontextual semi-device independent protocols for random-number generation based on maximum-confidence discrimination, which generalizes unambiguous and minimum-error state discrimination. We show that, for quantum eavesdroppers, quantum devices can certify more randomness than noncontextual ones whenever none of the input states are unambiguously identified. That is, a quantum-over-classical advantage exists.
We compare the power of quantum and classical physics in terms of randomness certification from devices which are only partially characterized. We study randomness certification based on state discrimination and take noncontextuality as the notion of classicality. A contextual advantage was recently shown to exist for state discrimination. Here, we develop quantum and noncontextual semi-device independent protocols for random-number generation based on maximum-confidence discrimination, which generalizes unambiguous and minimum-error state discrimination. We show that, for quantum eavesdroppers, quantum devices can certify more randomness than noncontextual ones whenever none of the input states are unambiguously identified. That is, a quantum-over-classical advantage exists.
The generalized notion of noncontextuality provides an avenue to explore the fundamental departure of quantum theory from a classical explanation. Recently, extracting different forms of quantum advantages in various information processing tasks has received an upsurge of attention. In a recent work [Schmid and Spekkens, Phys. Rev. X 8, 011015 (2018)] it has been demonstrated that minimum error discrimination of two nonorthogonal pure quantum states entails contextual advantage when the states are supplied with equal prior probabilities. We generalize their work for arbitrary prior probabilities and extend the investigation for three arbitrary mirror-symmetric states. We show that the contextual advantage can be obtained for any value of prior probability when only two quantum states are present in the task. But surprisingly, for the case of three mirror-symmetric states, the contextual advantage can be revealed only for a restrictive range of prior probabilities with which the states are supplied. Further, we extend our study to examine the contextual advantage for maximum confidence state discrimination. We demonstrate that the prior probabilities of state preparation play a similar role in exploiting the quantum advantage in maximum confidence discrimination.
Sequential quantum information processing may lie in the peaceful coexistence of no-go theorems on quantum operations, such as the no-cloning theorem, the monogamy of correlations, and the no-signalling principle. In this work, we investigate a sequential scenario of quantum state discrimination with maximum confidence, called maximum-confidence discrimination, which generalizes other strategies such as minimum-error and unambiguous discrimination. We show that sequential discrimination with equally high confidence can be realized if and only if positive-operator-valued measure elements for a maximum-confidence measurement can be unambiguously discriminated, i.e., linearly independent; otherwise, a party will have strictly less confidence in measurement outcomes than the previous one. We investigate the tradeoff between state disturbance and information gain in sequential state discrimination and show that the less guessing probability there is from conclusive outcomes for each party, the more parties can participate in the sequential scenario.