Entanglement is known to be a powerful resource that improves performance in various quantum information and computational tasks. A standard example of such a phenomenon is the possibility of perfectly discriminating all four Pauli operations in a single shot via the superdense coding protocol. While entanglement is often a powerful resource for quantum channel discrimination, this is not necessarily the case. In this work, we identify scenarios in which the maximally entangled state is a bad choice of input state and, more generally, show that excessive entanglement can reduce channel discriminability dramatically. To do so, we present an explicit pair of unitary channels which are perfectly discriminable without entanglement, but for which any strategy with maximally entangled input states is $ε$-close to a blind uniform guessing strategy. To develop a systematic approach, we introduce the concepts of Maximal Entanglement Worst Case (MEWC) and Maximal Entanglement Best Case (MEBC) pairs of channels, and present conditions for a pair of channels to be MEWC or MEBC. With these conditions, we show that the optimal input states for discriminating MEWC pairs of channels are necessarily separable, and provide non-trivial examples of measurement channels for which entanglement necessarily reduces the maximum probability of discrimination.
Entanglement is known to be a powerful resource that improves performance in various quantum information and computational tasks. A standard example of such a phenomenon is the possibility of perfectly discriminating all four Pauli operations in a single shot via the superdense coding protocol. While entanglement is often a powerful resource for quantum channel discrimination, this is not necessarily the case. In this work, we identify scenarios in which the maximally entangled state is a bad choice of input state and, more generally, show that excessive entanglement can reduce channel discriminability dramatically. To do so, we present an explicit pair of unitary channels which are perfectly discriminable without entanglement, but for which any strategy with maximally entangled input states is ε-close to a blind uniform guessing strategy. To develop a systematic approach, we introduce the concepts of Maximal Entanglement Worst Case (MEWC) and Maximal Entanglement Best Case (MEBC) pairs of channels, and present conditions for a pair of channels to be MEWC or MEBC. With these conditions, we show that the optimal input states for discriminating MEWC pairs of channels are necessarily separable, and provide non-trivial examples of measurement channels for which entanglement necessarily reduces the maximum probability of discrimination.
Among the intriguing features of quantum theory, the problem of distinguishing quantum channels is of fundamental interest. In this paper, we focus on the single-shot discrimination of two noisy quantum channels using two distinct classes of probes: single-system (product) probes and entangled probes. Our aim is to identify optimal probing state for specific discrimination tasks and to analyze the necessity and role of entanglement in enhancing channel distinguishability. We show that maximally entangled probes are optimal for discriminating two qubit depolarizing channels, with any nonzero entanglement providing an advantage over single-system probes. In contrast, for dephasing channels in arbitrary dimensions, we prove that single-system probe can be optimal and that entanglement offers no improvement, even when the dephasing unitary is generalized. For qubit amplitude-damping channels, we identify distinct noise-dependent regimes in which either single-system probe outperforms maximally entangled probes and vice-versa. Moreover, we demonstrate that non-maximally entangled probes can act as the optimum probe if the noise parameters restricted to certain values in this task. We also present examples of noisy unitary channels for which discrimination is possible using non-maximally entangled probe, while both single-systems and maximally entangled probes fail. We introduce another class of noisy unitary channels for which perfect discrimination is achievable with a single system, while maximally entangled probes are insufficient. Finally, we show that two erasure channels can be optimally discriminated using any pure single-system probe, with no advantage gained from entanglement.
Quantum channel discrimination is a fundamental task in quantum information processing. In the one-shot regime, discrimination between two candidate channels is characterized by the diamond norm. Beyond this basic setting, however, many scenarios in distributed quantum information processing remain unresolved, motivating notions of distinguishability that capture the power of the available resources. In this work, we formulate a theory of testers for bipartite channel discrimination, leading to the concept of the entanglement cost of bipartite channel discrimination: the minimum Schmidt rank k of a shared maximally entangled state required for local protocols to achieve the globally optimal success probability. We introduce k-injectable testers as a tester-based description of entanglement-assisted local discrimination and, in particular, study the class of k-injectable positive-partial-transpose (PPT) testers, which constitutes a numerically tractable relaxation of the practically relevant class of LOCC testers.
For every k, we derive a semidefinite program (SDP) for the optimal success probability, which in turn yields an efficiently computable one-shot PPT entanglement cost. To render these optimization problems numerically feasible, we prove a symmetry-reduction principle for covariant channel pairs, thereby reducing the effective dimension of the associated SDPs. Finally, by dualizing the SDP, we derive bounds on the composite channel-discrimination problem and illustrate our framework with proof-of-principle examples based on the depolarizing channel, the depolarized SWAP channel, and the Werner--Holevo channels.
There have been many instances where the maximally entangled state as a probe acts better than the product and the nonmaximally entangled states in the task of distinguishing quantum channels. We provide a proof that for the single-shot discrimination of two unitary channels, entangled and product states are operationally equivalent. However, we identify pairs of unitaries that are perfectly distinguishable using a nonmaximally entangled state, but not with a maximally entangled one. This contrast becomes more pronounced when the number of unitaries exceeds two. In every $\text{dimension}\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}\ensuremath{\geqslant}3$, we show that there exists a class of unitaries that is indistinguishable under maximally entangled probes, yet perfectly distinguishable using product or nonmaximally entangled inputs. Another interesting set of unitaries in every $\text{dimension}\phantom{\rule{0.16em}{0ex}}\ensuremath{\geqslant}3$ has been presented where only a nonmaximally entangled state acts as a successful probe, while product states and maximally entangled states cannot.
Quantum channel discrimination is a primitive task for identifying, verifying, and benchmarking quantum dynamics. Previous studies have primarily considered either the best-case tester-input setting or the worst-case jammer-input setting. Here, we introduce a game-theoretic framework in which both the tester and jammer control separate inputs. Combining three input structures, characterized by whether the tester and jammer use entangled inputs or IID inputs across channel uses, with four information patterns, determined by the visibility of the jammer's strategy and its knowledge of the true hypothesis, yields twelve game models. We provide exact finite blocklength hypothesis testing characterizations of all twelve models in terms of nine minimax hypothesis testing divergences and derive their asymptotic Stein exponents. Notably, for entangled jammers, neither the visibility of the jammer's strategy nor its knowledge of the true hypothesis affects the asymptotic Stein exponent, whereas the information pattern remains consequential for IID jammers. As an example, we study the discrimination of a general channel from a replacer channel and show that all asymptotic Stein exponents coincide with the same additive, single letter quantity. We further develop a general argument that upgrades achievability results to strong converse results, thereby establishing strong converse properties for several game models, resolving an open problem in composite hypothesis testing posed by Berta et al. [Commun. Math. Phys. 385, 55 (2021)], and strengthening several recent results of Lami [arXiv:2510.06340]. The framework and techniques developed here may support future studies of quantum information tasks involving competing roles.
I study the problem of optimally discriminating between two open quantum dynamical processes in a single-shot scenario, with the aim of minimizing the error probability of identification. This task requires jointly optimising the input state—potentially entangled with an ancillary system isolated from the dynamics—and the time at which the resulting time-dependent quantum channels, generated by the two dynamical maps, are most distinguishable. As an illustrative case, I focus on Pauli dynamical maps and their associated families of time-dependent Pauli channels. I identify a regime in which separable strategies require waiting indefinitely until the dynamics reaches the stationary state, whereas entangled input states enable optimal discrimination at a finite time, with a strict reduction in error probability. These results highlight the crucial interplay between entanglement and timing in enhancing the distinguishability of quantum dynamical processes.
Quantum hypothesis testing is a central task in the entire field of quantum information theory. Understanding its ultimate limits will give insight into a wide range of quantum protocols and applications, from sensing to communication. Although the limits of hypothesis testing between quantum states have been completely clarified by the pioneering works of Helstrom in the 1970s, the more difficult problem of hypothesis testing with quantum channels, i.e., channel discrimination, is less understood. This is mainly due to the complications coming from the use of input entanglement and the possibility of employing adaptive strategies. In this Letter, we establish a lower limit for the ultimate error probability affecting the discrimination of an arbitrary number of quantum channels. We also show that this lower bound is achievable when the channels have certain symmetries. As an example, we apply our results to the problem of channel position finding, where the goal is to identify the location of a target channel among multiple background channels. In this general setting, we find that the use of entanglement offers a great advantage over strategies without entanglement, with nontrivial implications for data readout, target detection, and quantum spectroscopy.