Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/9912076

Asymptotic entanglement manipulations can be genuinely irreversible

Michał Horodecki, Paweł Horodecki, Ryszard Horodecki

Published Dec 15, 1999• 7 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

It is commonly believed that distillation of entanglement can be, in general,irreversible. Perhaps the strongest evidence is constituted by existence of thebound entangled states. However, even a single example of state exhibiting thisirreversibility has not been found so far. We show that for a family of statesthe process of distillation of entanglement is {\\it truly irreversible}. Thesestates have nonzero amount of bound entanglement and, at most, a very smallamount of free entanglement.

Related papers

Asymptotic Manipulations of Entanglement Can Exhibit Genuine Irreversibility

Michał Horodecki, Paweł Horodecki, Ryszard Horodecki

It is commonly believed that distillation of entanglement can be, in general, irreversible. Perhaps the strongest evidence is constituted by the existence of the bound entangled states. However, even a single example of state exhibiting this irreversibility has not been found so far. We show that for a family of states the process of distillation of entanglement is truly irreversible. These states have a nonzero amount of bound entanglement and, at most, a very small amount of free entanglement.

Physical Review Letters•May 8, 2000•40 citations

Irreversibility in asymptotic manipulations of a distillable entangled state

Guifré Vidal, J. I. Cirac

We provide an example of a distillable bipartite mixed state such that, even in the asymptotic limit, more pure-state entanglement is required to create it than can be distilled from it. Thus, we show that the irreversibility in the processes of formation and distillation of bipartite states, recently proved in [G. Vidal and J. I. Cirac, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5803 (2001)], is not limited to bound-entangled states.

arXiv:quant-ph/0107051•Physical Review A•Dec 14, 2001•18 citations

Very Strong Irreversibility of Quantum Entanglement

Tulja Varun Kondra, Raphael Brinster, Hermann Kampermann +2 more

The manipulation of quantum entanglement is fundamentally irreversible: some mixed entangled states require pure entanglement for their preparation, although no pure entanglement can be recovered from them by local operations and classical communication. This irreversibility is known to persist even under the maximal class of operations that do not generate entanglement, revealing a fundamental distinction between entanglement theory and thermodynamics. We construct cases for which any attempt to restore reversibility necessarily incurs an error that increases exponentially with the number of copies. Technically, we demonstrate a strict separation between the exponential strong-converse distillable entanglement and the exponential strong-converse entanglement cost. Our result resolves a conjecture posed by Lami and Regula (Nat. Phys. 19, 184-189 (2023)) and strengthens it by showing that the irreversibility of entanglement persists even at the level of polynomially (in the number of copies) growing error. We further derive a semidefinite-programming lower bound on the exponential strong-converse cost under non-entangling operations. Finally, for the class of completely PPT-preserving operations, we construct analytically solvable families of antisymmetric states exhibiting the exponential strong-converse irreversibility. Remarkably, to our knowledge, no analogous separation between exponential strong converse cost and the analogous distillable entanglement is currently known even under the more restrictive class of LOCC operations.

quant-pharXiv:2607.27195•Jul 30, 2026•0 citations

Irreversibility in Asymptotic Manipulations of Entanglement

Guifré Vidal, J. I. Cirac

We show that the process of entanglement distillation is irreversible by showing that the entanglement cost of a bound entangled state is finite. Such irreversibility remains even if extra pure entanglement is loaned to assist the distillation process.

arXiv:quant-ph/0102036•Physical Review Letters•Jun 18, 2001•110 citations

Superactivation of Bound Entanglement

Peter W. Shor, John A. Smolin, Ashish V. Thapliyal

We show that, in a multiparty setting, two nondistillable (bound-entangled) states tensored together can make a distillable state. This is an example of true superadditivity of distillable entanglement. We also show that unlockable bound-entangled states cannot be asymptotically unentangled, providing the first proof that some states are truly bound-entangled in the sense of being both nondistillable and nonseparable asymptotically.

arXiv:quant-ph/0005117•Physical Review Letters•Mar 10, 2003•111 citations

Bipartite Bound Information Exists

Jef Pauwels, Nicolas Gisin, Renato Renner

There exist bipartite quantum states that cost entanglement to create, yet from which no singlet can be distilled. This extreme irreversibility is known as bound entanglement. A quarter-century ago, Gisin and Wolf asked whether classical information theory admits the same phenomenon. Are there correlations, shared by two parties and an eavesdropper, that cost secret bits to create, yet from which none can be distilled? This question is part of a broader program exploring the relation between quantum and classical information theory. We answer it in the affirmative, providing a simple example, a distribution of two bits and a trit. Bound entanglement thus has a classical counterpart, bound information. An even more direct correspondence was originally conjectured, namely that measuring purifications of bound-entangled states yields distributions with bound information. The very states that motivated the conjecture, however, yield no bound information when measured in the standard basis, whereas suitable measurements of purifications of separable states do. The analogy between bound entanglement and bound information thus lies in the accounting of resources, not in a correspondence between individual quantum states and the classical probability distributions induced by measuring them.

quant-pharXiv:2607.25838•Jul 29, 2026•0 citations
It is commonly believed that distillation of entanglement can be, in general,irreversible. Perhaps the strongest evidence is constituted by existence of thebound entangled states. However, even a single example of state exhibiting thisirreversibility has not been found so far. We show that for a family of statesthe process of distillation of entanglement is {\it truly irreversible}. Thesestates have nonzero amount of bound entanglement and, at most, a very smallamount of free entanglement.
The manipulation of quantum entanglement is fundamentally irreversible: some mixed entangled states require pure entanglement for their preparation, although no pure entanglement can be recovered from them by local operations and classical communication. This irreversibility is known to persist even under the maximal class of operations that do not generate entanglement, revealing a fundamental distinction between entanglement theory and thermodynamics. We construct cases for which any attempt to restore reversibility necessarily incurs an error that increases exponentially with the number of copies. Technically, we demonstrate a strict separation between the exponential strong-converse distillable entanglement and the exponential strong-converse entanglement cost. Our result resolves a conjecture posed by Lami and Regula (Nat. Phys. 19, 184-189 (2023)) and strengthens it by showing that the irreversibility of entanglement persists even at the level of polynomially (in the number of copies) growing error. We further derive a semidefinite-programming lower bound on the exponential strong-converse cost under non-entangling operations. Finally, for the class of completely PPT-preserving operations, we construct analytically solvable families of antisymmetric states exhibiting the exponential strong-converse irreversibility. Remarkably, to our knowledge, no analogous separation between exponential strong converse cost and the analogous distillable entanglement is currently known even under the more restrictive class of LOCC operations.
There exist bipartite quantum states that cost entanglement to create, yet from which no singlet can be distilled. This extreme irreversibility is known as bound entanglement. A quarter-century ago, Gisin and Wolf asked whether classical information theory admits the same phenomenon. Are there correlations, shared by two parties and an eavesdropper, that cost secret bits to create, yet from which none can be distilled? This question is part of a broader program exploring the relation between quantum and classical information theory. We answer it in the affirmative, providing a simple example, a distribution of two bits and a trit. Bound entanglement thus has a classical counterpart, bound information. An even more direct correspondence was originally conjectured, namely that measuring purifications of bound-entangled states yields distributions with bound information. The very states that motivated the conjecture, however, yield no bound information when measured in the standard basis, whereas suitable measurements of purifications of separable states do. The analogy between bound entanglement and bound information thus lies in the accounting of resources, not in a correspondence between individual quantum states and the classical probability distributions induced by measuring them.