Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/9903076 · Physical Review A

Path-integral approach to the Schrödinger current

Avi Marchewka, Z. Schuss

Published Apr 10, 2000• 31 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Discontinuous initial wave functions, or wave functions with a discontinuous derivative and a bounded support, arise in a natural way in various situations in physics, in particular in measurement theory. The propagation of such initial wave functions is not well described by the Schr\"odinger current which vanishes on the boundary of the support of the wave function. This propagation gives rise to a unidirectional current at the boundary of the support. We use path integrals to define current and unidirectional current, and to provide a direct derivation of the expression for current from the path-integral formulation for both diffusion and quantum mechanics. Furthermore, we give an explicit asymptotic expression for the short-time propagation of an initial wave function with compact support for cases of both a discontinuous derivative and a discontinuous wave function. We show that in the former case the probability propagated across the boundary of the support in time $\ensuremath{\Delta}t$ is $O(\ensuremath{\Delta}{t}^{3/2}),$ and the initial unidirectional current is $O(\ensuremath{\Delta}{t}^{1/2}).$ This recovers the Zeno effect for continuous detection of a particle in a given domain. For the latter case the probability propagated across the boundary of the support in time $\ensuremath{\Delta}t$ is $O(\ensuremath{\Delta}{t}^{1/2}),$ and the initial unidirectional current is $O(\ensuremath{\Delta}{t}^{\ensuremath{-}1/2}).$ This is an anti-Zeno effect. However, the probability propagated across a point located at a finite distance from the boundary of the support is $O(\ensuremath{\Delta}t).$ This gives a decay law.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.61.052107

Related papers

A subluminous Schroedinger equation

Philip Rosenau, Z. Schuss

The standard derivation of Schroedinger's equation from a Lorentz-invariant Feynman path integral consists in taking first the limit of infinite speed of light and then the limit of short time slice. In this order of limits the light cone of the path integral disappears, giving rise to an instantaneous spread of the wave function to the entire space. We ascribe the failure of Schroedinger's equation to retain the light cone of the path integral to the very nature of the limiting process: it is a regular expansion of a singular approximation problem, because the boundary conditions of the path integral on the light cone are lost in this limit. We propose a distinguished limit, which produces an intermediate model between non-relativistic and relativistic quantum mechanics: it produces Schroedinger's equation and preserves the zero boundary conditions on and outside the original light cone of the path integral. These boundary conditions relieve the Schroedinger equation of several annoying, seemingly unrelated unphysical artifacts, including non-analytic wave functions, spontaneous appearance of discontinuities, non-existence of moments when the initial wave function has a jump discontinuity (e.g., a collapsed wave function after a measurement), the EPR paradox, and so on. The practical implications of the present formulation are yet to be seen.

arXiv:1007.1780•Jul 11, 2010•0 citations

Path integration with non-positive distributions and applications to the Schrödinger equation

Ekaterina S. Nathanson

In 1948, Richard Feynman published the first paper on his new approach to non-relativistic quantum mechanics. Before Feynman's work there were two mathematical formulations of quantum mechanics. Schrödinger's formulation was based on PDE (the Schrödinger equation) and states representation by wave functions, so it was in the framework of analysis and differential equations. The other formulation was Heisenberg's matrix algebra. Initially, they were thought to be competing. The proponents of one claimed that the other was “ wrong. ” Within a couple of years, John von Neumann had proved that they are equivalent.\nAlthough Feynman's theory was not fundamentally new, it nonetheless offered an entirely fresh and different perspective: via a precise formulation of Bohr's correspondence principle, it made quantum mechanics similar to classical mechanics in a precise sense. In addition, Feynman's approach made it possible to explain physical experiments, and, via diagrams, link them directly to computations. What resulted was a very powerful device for computing energies and scattering amplitudes - the famous Feynman's diagrams.\nIn his formulation, Feynman aimed at representing the solution to the non-relativistic Schrödinger equation in the form of an “ average ” over histories or paths of a particle. This solution is commonly known as the Feynman path integral. It plays an important role in the theory but appears as a postulate based on intuition coming from physics rather than a justified mathematical object. This is why Feynman's vision has caught the attention of many mathematicians as well as physicists.\nThe papers of Gelfand, Cameron, and Nelson are among the first, and more substantial, attempts to supply Feynman's theory with a rigorous mathematical foundation. These attempts were followed by many others, but unfortunately all of them were not quite satisfactory. The difficulty comes from a need to define a measure on an infinite-dimensional space of continuous functions that represent all possible paths of a particle. This Feynman's measure has to produce an integral with the properties requested by Feynman. In particular, the expression for the Feynman measure has to involve the non-absolutely integrable Fresnel integrands. The non-absolute integrability of the Fresnel integrands makes the measure fail to be positive and to have the countably additive property. Thus, a well-defined measure in the case of the Feynman path integral does not exist.\nExtensive research has been done on the methods of relating the Feynman path integral to the integral with respect to the Wiener measure. The method of analytic continuation in mass defines the Feynman path integral as a certain limit of the Wiener integrals. Unfortunately, this method can be used as definition for only almost all values of the mass parameter in the Schrödinger equation. For physicists, this is not a satisfactory result and needs to be improved.\nIn this work we examine those questions which originally led to the Feynman path integral. By now we know that Feynman's “ dream ” cannot be realized as a positive and countably additive measure on the path-space. Here, we offer a new way out by modifying Feynman's question, and thereby achieving a solution to the Schrödinger equation via a different kind of averages in the path-space.\nWe give our version of the question that Feynman “ should have asked ” in order to realize the elusive path integral. In our formulation, we get a Feynman path integral as a limit of linear functionals, as opposed to the more familiar inductive limits of positive measures, traditionally used for constructing the Wiener measure, and related Gaussian families. We adapt here an approach pioneered by Patrick Muldowney. In it, Muldowney suggested a Henstock integration technique in order to deal with the non-absolute integrability of the kind of Fresnel integrals which we need in our solution to Feynman's question. By applying Henstock's theory to Fresnel integrals, we construct a complex-valued “ probability distribution functions ” on the path-space. Then we use this “ probability ” distribution function to define the Feynman path integral as an inductive limit. This establishes a mathematically rigorous Feynman limit, and at the same time, preserves Feynman's intuitive idea in resulting functional. In addition, our definition, and our solution, do not place any restrictions on any of the parameters in the Schrödinger equation, and have a potential to offer useful computational experiments, and other theoretical insights.

•Jul 1, 2014•5 citations

Feynman Integral Approach to Absorption in Quantum Mechanics

Avi Marchewka, Z. Schuss

We propose a formulation of an absorbing boundary for a quantum particle. The formulation is based on a Feynman-type integral over trajectories that are confined by the absorbing boundary. Trajectories that reach the absorbing wall are instantaneously terminated and their probability is discounted from the population of the surviving trajectories. This gives rise to a unidirectional absorption current at the boundary. We calculate the survival probability as a function of time. Several modes of absorption are derived from our formalism: total absorption, absorption that depends on energy levels, and absorption of non-interacting particles. Several applications are given: the slit experiment with an absorbing screen and with absorbing lateral walls, and one dimensional particle between two absorbing walls. The survival probability of a particle between absorbing walls exhibits decay with beats.

arXiv:quant-ph/9906003•Jun 1, 1999•2 citations

From Born Back to Schrödinger: Reconstructing the Physical Meaning of the Wave Function

Kaisheng Li, Longji Li

The Schrödinger equation and the Born rule constitute two of the most successful structures in quantum mechanics. The former governs the continuous evolution of the wave function, while the latter connects its squared amplitude to the statistical distribution of experimental outcomes. Yet these two structures operate at different descriptive levels: the Schrödinger state is continuous, spatially extended, and phase-sensitive, whereas individual experiments terminate in localized physical events. This paper develops a theoretical framework for reconstructing the physical relation between these two levels. Rather than proceeding only in the conventional direction from Schrödinger dynamics to Born probabilities, we introduce an inverse explanatory strategy: from Born back to Schrödinger. Born statistics are treated as an empirical constraint from which the physical role of the wave function is reconsidered. We propose that, for the single-particle regime examined here, the wave function may be interpreted functionally as a dynamical propagation structure rather than as the localized particle itself. Its amplitude, phase, conserved current, gauge-covariant propagation momentum, and associated velocity field jointly define a structured family of possible motions. This interpretation leads to three separations: propagation from localization, propagation from physical population, and arrival from detector registration. A physical preparation generates a source measure (\mu_0^{\rm phys}); Schrödinger dynamics generates a propagation map (\Phi_\Psi); and microscopic detector dynamics is represented by a response map (\mathcal R_D). The Born problem can then be formulated as the closure condition \[ \boxed{\mathcal R_D\!\left[(\Phi_\Psi)_*\mu_0^{\rm phys}\right] \overset{?}{=} \mu_{\rm Born,D}.} \] This relation is not claimed here as a derived law, but as the central dynamical problem that a physical reconstruction of quantum probability must solve without inserting the Born measure at either boundary. The paper synthesizes six preceding studies on wave-packet localization, Born's scattering interpretation, the emergence of probability, the physical meaning of the wave function, source-to-detector transport, and unified propagation dynamics. It places the resulting framework in dialogue with Madelung and Hamilton–Jacobi formulations, Bohmian mechanics, decoherence, Quantum Darwinism, structural and symmetry-based derivations of the Born rule, Everettian approaches, objective-collapse theories, and detector models. The resulting proposal is best understood as a propagation-first theoretical reconstruction program: Schrödinger dynamics organizes possible propagation, while Born statistics constrain how that propagation becomes physically realized. Keywords: Schrödinger equation; Born rule; wave function; quantum foundations; propagation structure; quantum probability; quantum trajectories; source-to-detector transport; detector response; wave–particle duality; Bohmian mechanics; quantum measurement

•Oct 4, 2026•0 citations

Short time propagation of a singular wave function: Some surprising results

Avi Marchewka, Er’el Granot, Z. Schuss

The Schrödinger evolution of an initially singular wave function was investigated. First it was shown that a wide range of physical problems can be described by initially singular wave function. Then it was demonstrated that outside the support of the initial wave function the time evolution is governed to leading order by the values of the wave function and its derivatives at the singular points. Short-time universality appears where it depends only on a single parameter—the value at the singular point (not even on its derivatives). It was also demonstrated that the short-time evolution in the presence of an absorptive potential is different than in the presence of a nonabsorptive one. Therefore, this dynamics can be harnessed to the determination whether a potential is absorptive or not simply by measuring only the transmitted particles density.

Optics and Spectroscopy•Aug 1, 2007•10 citations

Path integrals and quantum mechanics

In this thesis we are investigating a different formalism of non-relativistic quantum mechanics called the path integral formalism.It is a generalization of the classical least action principle.The introduction to this subject begins with the construction of the path integral in terms of the idea of probability amplitudes whose absolute square gives the probability of finding a system in a particular state.Then we show that if the Lagrangian is a quadratic form one needs only to calculate the classical action besides from a time-dependent normalization constant to find the explicit expression of the path integral.We look in to the subject of two kinds of slit-experiments: The square slit, the single-and the double-Gaussian slit.Also, the propagator for constrained paths is calculated and applied to the Aharonov-Bohm effect, which shows that the vector potential defined in classical electrodynamics have a physical meaning in quantum mechanics.It is also shown that the path integral formulation is equivalent to the Schrödinger description of quantum mechanics, by deriving the Schrödinger equation from the path integral.Further applications of the path integral are discussed.

World Scientific lecture notes in physics•Feb 18, 2019•0 citations
Discontinuous initial wave functions, or wave functions with a discontinuous derivative and a bounded support, arise in a natural way in various situations in physics, in particular in measurement theory. The propagation of such initial wave functions is not well described by the Schr"odinger current which vanishes on the boundary of the support of the wave function. This propagation gives rise to a unidirectional current at the boundary of the support. We use path integrals to define current and unidirectional current, and to provide a direct derivation of the expression for current from the path-integral formulation for both diffusion and quantum mechanics. Furthermore, we give an explicit asymptotic expression for the short-time propagation of an initial wave function with compact support for cases of both a discontinuous derivative and a discontinuous wave function. We show that in the former case the probability propagated across the boundary of the support in time \ensuremathΔt\ensuremath{\Delta}t\ensuremathΔt is O(\ensuremathΔt3/2),O(\ensuremath{\Delta}{t}^{3/2}),O(\ensuremathΔt3/2), and the initial unidirectional current is O(\ensuremathΔt1/2).O(\ensuremath{\Delta}{t}^{1/2}).O(\ensuremathΔt1/2). This recovers the Zeno effect for continuous detection of a particle in a given domain. For the latter case the probability propagated across the boundary of the support in time \ensuremathΔt\ensuremath{\Delta}t\ensuremathΔt is O(\ensuremathΔt1/2),O(\ensuremath{\Delta}{t}^{1/2}),O(\ensuremathΔt1/2), and the initial unidirectional current is O(\ensuremathΔt\ensuremath−1/2).O(\ensuremath{\Delta}{t}^{\ensuremath{-}1/2}).O(\ensuremathΔt\ensuremath−1/2). This is an anti-Zeno effect. However, the probability propagated across a point located at a finite distance from the boundary of the support is O(\ensuremathΔt).O(\ensuremath{\Delta}t).O(\ensuremathΔt). This gives a decay law.
The standard derivation of Schroedinger's equation from a Lorentz-invariant Feynman path integral consists in taking first the limit of infinite speed of light and then the limit of short time slice. In this order of limits the light cone of the path integral disappears, giving rise to an instantaneous spread of the wave function to the entire space. We ascribe the failure of Schroedinger's equation to retain the light cone of the path integral to the very nature of the limiting process: it is a regular expansion of a singular approximation problem, because the boundary conditions of the path integral on the light cone are lost in this limit. We propose a distinguished limit, which produces an intermediate model between non-relativistic and relativistic quantum mechanics: it produces Schroedinger's equation and preserves the zero boundary conditions on and outside the original light cone of the path integral. These boundary conditions relieve the Schroedinger equation of several annoying, seemingly unrelated unphysical artifacts, including non-analytic wave functions, spontaneous appearance of discontinuities, non-existence of moments when the initial wave function has a jump discontinuity (e.g., a collapsed wave function after a measurement), the EPR paradox, and so on. The practical implications of the present formulation are yet to be seen.
In 1948, Richard Feynman published the first paper on his new approach to non-relativistic quantum mechanics. Before Feynman's work there were two mathematical formulations of quantum mechanics. Schrödinger's formulation was based on PDE (the Schrödinger equation) and states representation by wave functions, so it was in the framework of analysis and differential equations. The other formulation was Heisenberg's matrix algebra. Initially, they were thought to be competing. The proponents of one claimed that the other was “ wrong. ” Within a couple of years, John von Neumann had proved that they are equivalent.\nAlthough Feynman's theory was not fundamentally new, it nonetheless offered an entirely fresh and different perspective: via a precise formulation of Bohr's correspondence principle, it made quantum mechanics similar to classical mechanics in a precise sense. In addition, Feynman's approach made it possible to explain physical experiments, and, via diagrams, link them directly to computations. What resulted was a very powerful device for computing energies and scattering amplitudes - the famous Feynman's diagrams.\nIn his formulation, Feynman aimed at representing the solution to the non-relativistic Schrödinger equation in the form of an “ average ” over histories or paths of a particle. This solution is commonly known as the Feynman path integral. It plays an important role in the theory but appears as a postulate based on intuition coming from physics rather than a justified mathematical object. This is why Feynman's vision has caught the attention of many mathematicians as well as physicists.\nThe papers of Gelfand, Cameron, and Nelson are among the first, and more substantial, attempts to supply Feynman's theory with a rigorous mathematical foundation. These attempts were followed by many others, but unfortunately all of them were not quite satisfactory. The difficulty comes from a need to define a measure on an infinite-dimensional space of continuous functions that represent all possible paths of a particle. This Feynman's measure has to produce an integral with the properties requested by Feynman. In particular, the expression for the Feynman measure has to involve the non-absolutely integrable Fresnel integrands. The non-absolute integrability of the Fresnel integrands makes the measure fail to be positive and to have the countably additive property. Thus, a well-defined measure in the case of the Feynman path integral does not exist.\nExtensive research has been done on the methods of relating the Feynman path integral to the integral with respect to the Wiener measure. The method of analytic continuation in mass defines the Feynman path integral as a certain limit of the Wiener integrals. Unfortunately, this method can be used as definition for only almost all values of the mass parameter in the Schrödinger equation. For physicists, this is not a satisfactory result and needs to be improved.\nIn this work we examine those questions which originally led to the Feynman path integral. By now we know that Feynman's “ dream ” cannot be realized as a positive and countably additive measure on the path-space. Here, we offer a new way out by modifying Feynman's question, and thereby achieving a solution to the Schrödinger equation via a different kind of averages in the path-space.\nWe give our version of the question that Feynman “ should have asked ” in order to realize the elusive path integral. In our formulation, we get a Feynman path integral as a limit of linear functionals, as opposed to the more familiar inductive limits of positive measures, traditionally used for constructing the Wiener measure, and related Gaussian families. We adapt here an approach pioneered by Patrick Muldowney. In it, Muldowney suggested a Henstock integration technique in order to deal with the non-absolute integrability of the kind of Fresnel integrals which we need in our solution to Feynman's question. By applying Henstock's theory to Fresnel integrals, we construct a complex-valued “ probability distribution functions ” on the path-space. Then we use this “ probability ” distribution function to define the Feynman path integral as an inductive limit. This establishes a mathematically rigorous Feynman limit, and at the same time, preserves Feynman's intuitive idea in resulting functional. In addition, our definition, and our solution, do not place any restrictions on any of the parameters in the Schrödinger equation, and have a potential to offer useful computational experiments, and other theoretical insights.
We propose a formulation of an absorbing boundary for a quantum particle. The formulation is based on a Feynman-type integral over trajectories that are confined by the absorbing boundary. Trajectories that reach the absorbing wall are instantaneously terminated and their probability is discounted from the population of the surviving trajectories. This gives rise to a unidirectional absorption current at the boundary. We calculate the survival probability as a function of time. Several modes of absorption are derived from our formalism: total absorption, absorption that depends on energy levels, and absorption of non-interacting particles. Several applications are given: the slit experiment with an absorbing screen and with absorbing lateral walls, and one dimensional particle between two absorbing walls. The survival probability of a particle between absorbing walls exhibits decay with beats.
The Schrödinger equation and the Born rule constitute two of the most successful structures in quantum mechanics. The former governs the continuous evolution of the wave function, while the latter connects its squared amplitude to the statistical distribution of experimental outcomes. Yet these two structures operate at different descriptive levels: the Schrödinger state is continuous, spatially extended, and phase-sensitive, whereas individual experiments terminate in localized physical events. This paper develops a theoretical framework for reconstructing the physical relation between these two levels. Rather than proceeding only in the conventional direction from Schrödinger dynamics to Born probabilities, we introduce an inverse explanatory strategy: from Born back to Schrödinger. Born statistics are treated as an empirical constraint from which the physical role of the wave function is reconsidered. We propose that, for the single-particle regime examined here, the wave function may be interpreted functionally as a dynamical propagation structure rather than as the localized particle itself. Its amplitude, phase, conserved current, gauge-covariant propagation momentum, and associated velocity field jointly define a structured family of possible motions. This interpretation leads to three separations: propagation from localization, propagation from physical population, and arrival from detector registration. A physical preparation generates a source measure (\mu_0^{\rm phys}); Schrödinger dynamics generates a propagation map (\Phi_\Psi); and microscopic detector dynamics is represented by a response map (\mathcal R_D). The Born problem can then be formulated as the closure condition RD ⁣[(ΦΨ)∗μ0phys]=?μBorn,D. \boxed{\mathcal R_D\!\left[(\Phi_\Psi)_*\mu_0^{\rm phys}\right] \overset{?}{=} \mu_{\rm Born,D}.} RD​[(ΦΨ​)∗​μ0phys​]=?μBorn,D​.​ This relation is not claimed here as a derived law, but as the central dynamical problem that a physical reconstruction of quantum probability must solve without inserting the Born measure at either boundary. The paper synthesizes six preceding studies on wave-packet localization, Born's scattering interpretation, the emergence of probability, the physical meaning of the wave function, source-to-detector transport, and unified propagation dynamics. It places the resulting framework in dialogue with Madelung and Hamilton–Jacobi formulations, Bohmian mechanics, decoherence, Quantum Darwinism, structural and symmetry-based derivations of the Born rule, Everettian approaches, objective-collapse theories, and detector models. The resulting proposal is best understood as a propagation-first theoretical reconstruction program: Schrödinger dynamics organizes possible propagation, while Born statistics constrain how that propagation becomes physically realized. Keywords: Schrödinger equation; Born rule; wave function; quantum foundations; propagation structure; quantum probability; quantum trajectories; source-to-detector transport; detector response; wave–particle duality; Bohmian mechanics; quantum measurement
The Schrödinger evolution of an initially singular wave function was investigated. First it was shown that a wide range of physical problems can be described by initially singular wave function. Then it was demonstrated that outside the support of the initial wave function the time evolution is governed to leading order by the values of the wave function and its derivatives at the singular points. Short-time universality appears where it depends only on a single parameter—the value at the singular point (not even on its derivatives). It was also demonstrated that the short-time evolution in the presence of an absorptive potential is different than in the presence of a nonabsorptive one. Therefore, this dynamics can be harnessed to the determination whether a potential is absorptive or not simply by measuring only the transmitted particles density.
In this thesis we are investigating a different formalism of non-relativistic quantum mechanics called the path integral formalism.It is a generalization of the classical least action principle.The introduction to this subject begins with the construction of the path integral in terms of the idea of probability amplitudes whose absolute square gives the probability of finding a system in a particular state.Then we show that if the Lagrangian is a quadratic form one needs only to calculate the classical action besides from a time-dependent normalization constant to find the explicit expression of the path integral.We look in to the subject of two kinds of slit-experiments: The square slit, the single-and the double-Gaussian slit.Also, the propagator for constrained paths is calculated and applied to the Aharonov-Bohm effect, which shows that the vector potential defined in classical electrodynamics have a physical meaning in quantum mechanics.It is also shown that the path integral formulation is equivalent to the Schrödinger description of quantum mechanics, by deriving the Schrödinger equation from the path integral.Further applications of the path integral are discussed.