Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1007.1780

A subluminous Schroedinger equation

Philip Rosenau, Z. Schuss

Published Jul 11, 2010• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The standard derivation of Schroedinger's equation from a Lorentz-invariant Feynman path integral consists in taking first the limit of infinite speed of light and then the limit of short time slice. In this order of limits the light cone of the path integral disappears, giving rise to an instantaneous spread of the wave function to the entire space. We ascribe the failure of Schroedinger's equation to retain the light cone of the path integral to the very nature of the limiting process: it is a regular expansion of a singular approximation problem, because the boundary conditions of the path integral on the light cone are lost in this limit. We propose a distinguished limit, which produces an intermediate model between non-relativistic and relativistic quantum mechanics: it produces Schroedinger's equation and preserves the zero boundary conditions on and outside the original light cone of the path integral. These boundary conditions relieve the Schroedinger equation of several annoying, seemingly unrelated unphysical artifacts, including non-analytic wave functions, spontaneous appearance of discontinuities, non-existence of moments when the initial wave function has a jump discontinuity (e.g., a collapsed wave function after a measurement), the EPR paradox, and so on. The practical implications of the present formulation are yet to be seen.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1007.1780

Related papers

A SUBLUMINOUS SCHR ¨ ODINGER EQUATION

Philip Rosenau, Z. Schuss

AbstractThe standard derivation of Schro¨dinger’s equation from a Lorentz-invariant Feynman path integral consists in taking first the limit ofinfinite speed of light and then the limit of short time slice. In this or-der of limits the light cone of the path integral disappears, giving riseto an instantaneous spread of the wave function to the entire space.We ascribe the failure of Schro¨dinger’s equation to retain the lightcone of the path integral to the very nature of the limiting process: itis a regular expansion of a singular approximation problem, becausethe boundary conditions of the path integral on the light cone are lostin this limit. We propose a distinguished limit, which produces anintermediate model between non-relativistic and relativistic quantummechanics: it produces Schro¨dinger’s equation and preserves the zeroboundary conditions on and outside the original light cone of the pathintegral. These boundary conditions relieve the Schro¨dinger equationof several annoying, seemingly unrelated unphysical artifacts, includ-ing non-analytic wave functions, spontaneous appearance of disconti-nuities, non-existence of moments when the initial wave function hasa jump discontinuity (e.g., a collapsed wave function after a measure-ment), the EPR paradox, and so on. The practical implications of thepresent formulation are yet to be seen.

•Jul 11, 2010•0 citations

The Classical Limit of Quantum Mechanics

Velton Wade Hefley

The Feynman path integral formulation of quantum mechanics is a path integral representation for a propagator or probability amplitude in going between two points in space-time. The wave function is expressed in terms of an integral equation from which the Schrodinger equation can be derived. On taking the limit h — 0, the method of stationary phase can be applied and Newton's second law of motion is obtained. Also, the condition the phase vanishes leads to the Hamilton - Jacobi equation. The secondary objective of this paper is to study ways of relating quantum mechanics and classical mechanics. The Ehrenfest theorem is applied to a particle in an electromagnetic field. Expressions are found which are the hermitian Lorentz force operator, the hermitian torque operator, and the hermitian power operator.

•Dec 1, 1977•1 citation

To the nonlinear quantum mechanics

Miroslav Pardy

The Schroedinger equation with the nonlinear term is derived by the natural generalization of the hydrodynamical model of quantum mechanics. The nonlinear term appears to be logically necessary because it enables explanation of the classical limit of the wave function, the collaps of the wave function and solves the Schroedinger cat paradox.

arXiv:quant-ph/0111105•Nov 20, 2001•10 citations

The pursuit of locality in quantum mechanics

Malcolm Hodkin

The rampant success of quantum theory is the result of applications of the 'new' quantum \nmechanics of Schrödinger and Heisenberg (1926-7), the Feynman-Schwinger-Tomonaga Quantum \nElectrodynamics (1946-51), the electro-weak theory of Salaam, Weinberg, and Glashow (1967-9), \nand Quantum Chromodynamics (1973-); in fact, this success of `the' quantum theory has depended \non a continuous stream of brilliant and quite disparate mathematical formulations. In this carefully \nconcealed ferment there lie plenty of unresolved difficulties, simply because in churning out fabulously \naccurate calculational tools there has been no sensible explanation of all that is going on. It is even \nargued that such an understanding is nothing to do with physics. A long-standing and famous \nillustration of this is the paradoxical thought-experiment of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (1935). \nFundamental to all quantum theories, and also their paradoxes, is the location of sub-microscopic \nobjects; or, rather, that the specification of such a location is fraught with mathematical inconsistency. \nThis project encompasses a detailed, critical survey of the tangled history of Position \nwithin quantum theories. The first step is to show that, contrary to appearances, canonical quantum \nmechanics has only a vague notion of locality. After analysing a number of previous attempts at a \n`relativistic quantum mechanics', two lines of thought are considered in detail. The first is the work \nof Wan and students, which is shown to be no real improvement on the usual `nonrelativistic' theory. \nThe second is based on an idea of Dirac's - using backwards-in-time light-cones as the hypersurface \nin space-time. There remain considerable difficulties in the way of producing a consistent scheme here. \nTo keep things nicely stirred up, the author then proposes his own approach - an adaptation \nof Feynman's QED propagators. \nThis new approach is distinguished from Feynman's since the propagator or Green's function \nis not obtained by Feynman's rule. The type of equation solved is also different: instead of an \ninitial-value problem, a solution that obeys a time-symmetric causality criterion is found for an \ninhomogeneous partial differential equation with homogeneous boundary conditions. \nTo make the consideration of locality more precise, some results of Fourier transform theory are \npresented in a form that is directly applicable. \nSomewhat away from the main thrust of the thesis, there is also an attempt to explain the \nmanner in which quantum effects disappear as the number of particles increases in such things as \nexperimental realisations of the EPR and de Broglie thought experiments.

•Jan 1, 1990•0 citations

Modified Schrödinger equation, its analysis and experimental verification

Isaac Shnaid

According to classical non-relativistic Schrödinger equation, any local perturbation of wave function instantaneously affects all infinite region, because this equation is of parabolic type, and its solutions demonstrate infinite speed of perturbations propagation. From physical point of view, this feature of Schrödinger equation solutions is questionable. According to relativistic quantum mechanics, the perturbations propagate with speed of light. However when appropriate mathematical procedures are applied to Dirac relativistic quantum equation with finite speed of the wave function perturbations propagation, only classical Schrödinger equation predicting infinite speed of the wave function perturbations propagation is obtained. Thus, in non-relativistic quantum mechanics the problem persists. In my work modified non-relativistic Schrödinger equation is formulated. It is also of parabolic type, but its solutions predict finite speed of the wave function perturbations propagation. Properties of modified Schrödinger equation solutions are studied. I show that results of classical Davisson-Germer experiments with electron waves diffraction support developed theoretical concept of modified Schrödinger equation, and predict that speed of the wave function perturbations propagation has order of magnitude of speed of light.

arXiv:1202.1321•Feb 7, 2012•1 citation

Case of an Electron

Lukong Cornelius Fai

It is not possible to use the Schrödinger equation to describe the motion of a particle with relativistic effects since it is not invariant relative to the Lorentz transformation. However, the attempt to generalize quantum mechanics in the relativistic domain on the basis of the one particle theory is somehow difficult. So we find the appropriate equations on the basis of the relativistic invariance. To obtain the non-relativistic equations, we take the limit as the speed of light tends to infinity. This obviously recovers the Schrödinger equation. Under this heading, we extend the non-relativistic Schrödinger equation in the description of particles with speeds comparable with that of light. This extension should be consistent with the Lorentz transformation [ 12 ]. The characteristic feature of the relativistic wave equations is the spin which provides a useful gauge in the applicability of particular equations that describe particular kinds of particles. We have two types of relativistic equations, i.e., the equation with spin-zero due to Schrödinger and spin-half due to Dirac that describes the electron.

CRC Press eBooks•Apr 19, 2022•0 citations
The standard derivation of Schroedinger's equation from a Lorentz-invariant Feynman path integral consists in taking first the limit of infinite speed of light and then the limit of short time slice. In this order of limits the light cone of the path integral disappears, giving rise to an instantaneous spread of the wave function to the entire space. We ascribe the failure of Schroedinger's equation to retain the light cone of the path integral to the very nature of the limiting process: it is a regular expansion of a singular approximation problem, because the boundary conditions of the path integral on the light cone are lost in this limit. We propose a distinguished limit, which produces an intermediate model between non-relativistic and relativistic quantum mechanics: it produces Schroedinger's equation and preserves the zero boundary conditions on and outside the original light cone of the path integral. These boundary conditions relieve the Schroedinger equation of several annoying, seemingly unrelated unphysical artifacts, including non-analytic wave functions, spontaneous appearance of discontinuities, non-existence of moments when the initial wave function has a jump discontinuity (e.g., a collapsed wave function after a measurement), the EPR paradox, and so on. The practical implications of the present formulation are yet to be seen.
AbstractThe standard derivation of Schro¨dinger’s equation from a Lorentz-invariant Feynman path integral consists in taking first the limit ofinfinite speed of light and then the limit of short time slice. In this or-der of limits the light cone of the path integral disappears, giving riseto an instantaneous spread of the wave function to the entire space.We ascribe the failure of Schro¨dinger’s equation to retain the lightcone of the path integral to the very nature of the limiting process: itis a regular expansion of a singular approximation problem, becausethe boundary conditions of the path integral on the light cone are lostin this limit. We propose a distinguished limit, which produces anintermediate model between non-relativistic and relativistic quantummechanics: it produces Schro¨dinger’s equation and preserves the zeroboundary conditions on and outside the original light cone of the pathintegral. These boundary conditions relieve the Schro¨dinger equationof several annoying, seemingly unrelated unphysical artifacts, includ-ing non-analytic wave functions, spontaneous appearance of disconti-nuities, non-existence of moments when the initial wave function hasa jump discontinuity (e.g., a collapsed wave function after a measure-ment), the EPR paradox, and so on. The practical implications of thepresent formulation are yet to be seen.
The Feynman path integral formulation of quantum mechanics is a path integral representation for a propagator or probability amplitude in going between two points in space-time. The wave function is expressed in terms of an integral equation from which the Schrodinger equation can be derived. On taking the limit h — 0, the method of stationary phase can be applied and Newton's second law of motion is obtained. Also, the condition the phase vanishes leads to the Hamilton - Jacobi equation. The secondary objective of this paper is to study ways of relating quantum mechanics and classical mechanics. The Ehrenfest theorem is applied to a particle in an electromagnetic field. Expressions are found which are the hermitian Lorentz force operator, the hermitian torque operator, and the hermitian power operator.
The rampant success of quantum theory is the result of applications of the 'new' quantum \nmechanics of Schrödinger and Heisenberg (1926-7), the Feynman-Schwinger-Tomonaga Quantum \nElectrodynamics (1946-51), the electro-weak theory of Salaam, Weinberg, and Glashow (1967-9), \nand Quantum Chromodynamics (1973-); in fact, this success of `the' quantum theory has depended \non a continuous stream of brilliant and quite disparate mathematical formulations. In this carefully \nconcealed ferment there lie plenty of unresolved difficulties, simply because in churning out fabulously \naccurate calculational tools there has been no sensible explanation of all that is going on. It is even \nargued that such an understanding is nothing to do with physics. A long-standing and famous \nillustration of this is the paradoxical thought-experiment of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (1935). \nFundamental to all quantum theories, and also their paradoxes, is the location of sub-microscopic \nobjects; or, rather, that the specification of such a location is fraught with mathematical inconsistency. \nThis project encompasses a detailed, critical survey of the tangled history of Position \nwithin quantum theories. The first step is to show that, contrary to appearances, canonical quantum \nmechanics has only a vague notion of locality. After analysing a number of previous attempts at a \n`relativistic quantum mechanics', two lines of thought are considered in detail. The first is the work \nof Wan and students, which is shown to be no real improvement on the usual `nonrelativistic' theory. \nThe second is based on an idea of Dirac's - using backwards-in-time light-cones as the hypersurface \nin space-time. There remain considerable difficulties in the way of producing a consistent scheme here. \nTo keep things nicely stirred up, the author then proposes his own approach - an adaptation \nof Feynman's QED propagators. \nThis new approach is distinguished from Feynman's since the propagator or Green's function \nis not obtained by Feynman's rule. The type of equation solved is also different: instead of an \ninitial-value problem, a solution that obeys a time-symmetric causality criterion is found for an \ninhomogeneous partial differential equation with homogeneous boundary conditions. \nTo make the consideration of locality more precise, some results of Fourier transform theory are \npresented in a form that is directly applicable. \nSomewhat away from the main thrust of the thesis, there is also an attempt to explain the \nmanner in which quantum effects disappear as the number of particles increases in such things as \nexperimental realisations of the EPR and de Broglie thought experiments.
According to classical non-relativistic Schrödinger equation, any local perturbation of wave function instantaneously affects all infinite region, because this equation is of parabolic type, and its solutions demonstrate infinite speed of perturbations propagation. From physical point of view, this feature of Schrödinger equation solutions is questionable. According to relativistic quantum mechanics, the perturbations propagate with speed of light. However when appropriate mathematical procedures are applied to Dirac relativistic quantum equation with finite speed of the wave function perturbations propagation, only classical Schrödinger equation predicting infinite speed of the wave function perturbations propagation is obtained. Thus, in non-relativistic quantum mechanics the problem persists. In my work modified non-relativistic Schrödinger equation is formulated. It is also of parabolic type, but its solutions predict finite speed of the wave function perturbations propagation. Properties of modified Schrödinger equation solutions are studied. I show that results of classical Davisson-Germer experiments with electron waves diffraction support developed theoretical concept of modified Schrödinger equation, and predict that speed of the wave function perturbations propagation has order of magnitude of speed of light.
It is not possible to use the Schrödinger equation to describe the motion of a particle with relativistic effects since it is not invariant relative to the Lorentz transformation. However, the attempt to generalize quantum mechanics in the relativistic domain on the basis of the one particle theory is somehow difficult. So we find the appropriate equations on the basis of the relativistic invariance. To obtain the non-relativistic equations, we take the limit as the speed of light tends to infinity. This obviously recovers the Schrödinger equation. Under this heading, we extend the non-relativistic Schrödinger equation in the description of particles with speeds comparable with that of light. This extension should be consistent with the Lorentz transformation [ 12 ]. The characteristic feature of the relativistic wave equations is the spin which provides a useful gauge in the applicability of particular equations that describe particular kinds of particles. We have two types of relativistic equations, i.e., the equation with spin-zero due to Schrödinger and spin-half due to Dirac that describes the electron.