Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/9803052 · Springer eBooks

Decoherence: Concepts and examples

Claus Kiefer, Erich Joos

Published Apr 7, 2008• 9 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/bfb0105342

Related papers

The Program of Decoherence: Ideas and Concepts

H. D. Zeh

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 1996•15 citations

8 Decoherence: Concepts and Examples

Claus Kiefer, Joos, E

We give a pedagogical introduction to the process of decoherence - the irreversible emergence of classical properties through interaction with the environment. After discussing the general concepts, we present the following examples: Localisation of objects, quantum Zeno effect, classicality of fields and charges in QED, and decoherence in gravity theory. We finally emphasise the important interpretational features of decoherence.

•Mar 20, 1998•30 citations

Coherence and Decoherence

Sushanta Dattagupta, Sanjay Puri

Springer series in materials science•Jan 1, 2004•0 citations

Decoherence and beyond

Robin Blume-Kohout

•Jan 1, 2005•2 citations

What classicality? Decoherence and Bohr’s classical concepts

Maximilian Schlosshauer, Kristian Camilleri

Niels Bohr famously insisted on the indispensability of what he termed "classical concepts." In the context of the decoherence program, on the other hand, it has become fashionable to talk about the "dynamical emergence of classicality" from the quantum formalism alone. Does this mean that decoherence challenges Bohr's dictum -- for example, that classical concepts do not need to be assumed but can be derived? In this paper, we'll try to shed some light down the murky waters where formalism and philosophy mingle. To begin, we'll clarify the notion of classicality in the decoherence description. We'll then discuss Bohr's and Heisenberg's takes on the quantum-classical problem and reflect on the different meanings of the terms "classicality" and "classical concepts" in the writings of Bohr and his followers. This analysis will allow us to put forward some tentative suggestions for how we may better understand the relation between decoherence-induced classicality and Bohr's classical concepts.

arXiv:1009.4072•AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2011•14 citations

Decoherence: A Closed-System Approach

Sebastian Fortin, Olimpia Lombardi, Mario Castagnino

arXiv:1402.3525•Brazilian Journal of Physics•Aug 19, 2013•29 citations
Niels Bohr famously insisted on the indispensability of what he termed "classical concepts." In the context of the decoherence program, on the other hand, it has become fashionable to talk about the "dynamical emergence of classicality" from the quantum formalism alone. Does this mean that decoherence challenges Bohr's dictum -- for example, that classical concepts do not need to be assumed but can be derived? In this paper, we'll try to shed some light down the murky waters where formalism and philosophy mingle. To begin, we'll clarify the notion of classicality in the decoherence description. We'll then discuss Bohr's and Heisenberg's takes on the quantum-classical problem and reflect on the different meanings of the terms "classicality" and "classical concepts" in the writings of Bohr and his followers. This analysis will allow us to put forward some tentative suggestions for how we may better understand the relation between decoherence-induced classicality and Bohr's classical concepts.