Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/9803030

No-cloning and superluminal signaling

S. J. van Enk

Published Mar 13, 1998• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The argument given by M.D. Westmoreland and B. Schumacher in quant-ph/9801014 leading to the purported conclusion that superluminal signaling violates the no-cloning theorem is shown to be incorrect.
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/9803030

Related papers

No-cloning and superluminal signaling

S. J. van Enk

The argument given by M.D. Westmoreland and B. Schumacher in quant-ph/9801014 leading to the purported conclusion that superluminal signaling violates the no-cloning theorem is shown to be incorrect.

•Mar 13, 1998•3 citations

Another Comment on ``Quantum Entanglement and Nonexistence of Superluminal Signals''

Vladimir S. Mashkevich

We argue that the claim given in quant-ph/9801014 remains untenable in the revised version. The fallacy in the proof is a misinterpretation of the no-cloning and teleportation theorems, which do not involve time and reference frames.

arXiv:quant-ph/9803027•Mar 12, 1998•0 citations

Comment on ``Quantum Entanglement and the Nonexistence of Superluminal Signals''

Vladimir S. Mashkevich

We argue that the claim given in quant-ph/9801014 is untenable. The fallacy in the proof is a misinterpretation of the no-cloning theorem, which does not allow quantum jumps, specifically measurements.

arXiv:quant-ph/9801062•Jan 27, 1998•1 citation

Cloning and superluminal signaling

Sibasish Ghosh A

Pramana•Feb 1, 2001•0 citations

Superluminal Signaling Seems Unphysical

Remi Cornwall

The author muses on precursor ideas on a mechanism for superluminal signaling via entanglement correlation and comes to the conclusion that, whatever it is, it would be highly unusual, if superluminal signaling is to be believed. (Date of publication Sept/Oct 2011).

•Apr 1, 2015•0 citations

Comment on "How the No-Cloning Theorem Got its Name"

Alexander Yu. Vlasov

A review by A. Peres [quant-ph/0205076] appears recently. It is difficult to add something to such kind of fundamental themes, but here is briefly presented some ideas about challenges of the no-cloning theorem and imaginary modifications of quantum mechanics, that could make precise cloning possible.

arXiv:quant-ph/0205195•May 31, 2002•0 citations