Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/9710020

Phase of the quantum oscillator

H. S. Sharatchandra

Published Oct 6, 1997• 6 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Requirements of a conjugate operator are emphasized, especially in its role in uncertainty relations.It is argued that in many contexts it is necessary to extend the Hilbert space in order to define a conjugate operator as in gauge theories. Example of a particle in a box is analysed. This is closely related to the quantum oscillator through cosine states of Susskind and Glogower.It is used to justify London's phase wave functions albeit as part of a larger Hilbert space. A new definition phase uncertainty neccessiated by periodicity is proposed.It is close to the usual r.m.s. definition.Corresponding number- phase uncertainty relation is obtained and its implications are discussed. Hilbert space of an oscillator is identified with the Hilbert space of a planar rotor with a $Z_2$ gauge invariance.This is used to construct states analogous to the cosine and sine states and to illustrate unitary equivalence of Hilbert spaces.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/9710020

Related papers

Phase and Angle Variables in Quantum Mechanics

Peter Carruthers, Michael Martin Nieto

The quantum-mechanical description of phase and angle variables is reviewed, with emphasis on the proper mathematical description of these coordinates. The relations among the operators and state vectors under consideration are clarified in the context of the Heisenberg uncertainty relations. The familiar case of the azimuthal angle variable $\ensuremath{\phi}$ and its "conjugate" angular momentum ${L}_{z}$ is discussed. Various pitfalls associated with the periodicity problem are avoided by employing periodic variables ($sin\ensuremath{\phi}$ and $cos\ensuremath{\phi}$ to describe the phase variable. Well-defined uncertainty relations are derived and discussed. A detailed analysis of the three-dimensional harmonic oscillator excited in coherent states is given. A detailed analysis of the simple harmonic oscillator is given. The usual assumption that a (Hermitian) phase operator $\ensuremath{\varphi}$ (conjugate to the number operator $N$) exists is shown to be erroneous. However, cosine and sine operators $C$ and $S$ exist and are the appr\'opriate phase variables. A Poisson bracket argument using action-angle (rather $J$, $cos\ensuremath{\varphi}$, $sin\ensuremath{\varphi}$) variables is used to deduce $C$ and $S$. The spectra and eigenfunctions of these operators are investigated, along with the important "phase-difference" periodic variables. The properties of the oscillator variables in the various types of states are analyzed with special attention to the uncertainty relations and the transition to the classical limit. The utility of coherent states as a basis for the description of the evolution of the density matrix is emphasized. In this basis it is easy to identify the classical Liouville equation in action-angle variables along with quantum-mechanical "corrections." Mention is made of possible physical applications to superfluid systems.

Reviews of Modern Physics•Apr 1, 1968•1,108 citations

Wigner Quasiprobability of Coherent Phase States

Alfred Wünsche

The Wigner quasiprobability, along with some of its essentialproperties, is introduced and discussed in two versions, first covering real canonical variables such as W(q,p) and second a pair of complex conjugate coordinates such as W(α,α*). The reconstruction of the density operator ϱ of states is also given. Building upon the Susskind–Glogower concept of quantum phase operators, further aspects of phase operator algebras in the quantum optics of a harmonic oscillator are discussed in relation to the realization of the su(1,1) Lie algebra. Coherent phase states |ε⟩ are introduced in analogy to the common coherent states |α⟩ in two ways, as both eigenstates of certain operators and as states generated from a ground state |0⟩ by operators of the Lie group SU(1,1). The limiting transition to the non-normalizable Fritz London phase states |eiφ⟩ on the unit circle and an (over)-completeness relation for the coherent phase states are derived. The Wigner quasiprobability W(q,p) for the coherent phase states is calculated and graphically represented. From the Wigner quasiprobability, a phase distribution W(φ) is calculated by integrating over the radius, and its uncertainty is defined and presented. The Hilbert–Schmidt distance is discussed as a measure of the non-classicality of states, where most of our with Viktor Dodonov work was carried out.

Physics•Apr 8, 2026•1 citation

The quantum absolute phase observable

Gilad Gour

Defining the observable ${\bf ϕ}$ canonically conjugate to the number observable ${\bf N}$ has long been an open problem in quantum theory. Here we show how to define the absolute phase observable ${\bf Φ}\equiv |{\bfϕ}|$ by suitably restricting the Hilbert space of $x$ and $p$ like variables. This ${\bf Φ}$ is actually the absolute value of the phase and has the correct classical limit. A correction to the ``cosine'' ${\bf C}$ and ``sine'' ${\bf S}$ operators of Carruthers and Nieto is obtained.

arXiv:quant-ph/0102092•Feb 19, 2001•0 citations

Inverse operator representations of quantum phase

G. M. Saxena

We define quantum phase in terms of inverses of annihilation and creation operators. We show that like Susskind - Glogower phase operators, the measured phase operators and the unitary phase operators can be defined in terms of the inverse operators. However, for the unitary phase operator the Hilbert space includes the negative energy states. The quantum phase in inverse operator representation may find the applications in the field of quantum optics particularly in the squeezed states.

arXiv:0803.2094•Mar 14, 2008•0 citations

Resolution to the quantum phase problem

Gilad Gour

Defining the observable φ canonically conjugate to the number observable N has long been an open problem in quantum theory. The problem stems from the fact that N is bounded from below. Here we show how to define the absolute phase observable Φ ≡ |φ | by suitably restricting the Hilbert space of x and p like variables. This Φ is actually the absolute value of the phase and has the correct classical limit. A correction to the “cosine ” C and “sine ” S operators of Carruthers and Nieto is obtained.

Physical Review Letters•Feb 19, 2001•0 citations

Covariant phase-space representation for harmonic oscillators

Y. S. Kim, Eugene Paul Wigner

It is shown that, in the phase-space representation of quantum mechanics, the uncertainty relation can be stated in terms of the integral invariant of Poincar\'e. The uncertainty relation for spreading free wave packets is discussed as an illustrative example. This phase-space approach can be extended to the relativistic regime. It is shown that Lorentz boosts are area-preserving canonical transformations in the phase space of the light-cone variables. The harmonic oscillator is discussed in detail as an illustrative example for the covariant realization of the uncertainty principle.

Physical Review A•Aug 1, 1988•38 citations
Requirements of a conjugate operator are emphasized, especially in its role in uncertainty relations.It is argued that in many contexts it is necessary to extend the Hilbert space in order to define a conjugate operator as in gauge theories. Example of a particle in a box is analysed. This is closely related to the quantum oscillator through cosine states of Susskind and Glogower.It is used to justify London's phase wave functions albeit as part of a larger Hilbert space. A new definition phase uncertainty neccessiated by periodicity is proposed.It is close to the usual r.m.s. definition.Corresponding number- phase uncertainty relation is obtained and its implications are discussed. Hilbert space of an oscillator is identified with the Hilbert space of a planar rotor with a Z2Z_2Z2​ gauge invariance.This is used to construct states analogous to the cosine and sine states and to illustrate unitary equivalence of Hilbert spaces.
The quantum-mechanical description of phase and angle variables is reviewed, with emphasis on the proper mathematical description of these coordinates. The relations among the operators and state vectors under consideration are clarified in the context of the Heisenberg uncertainty relations. The familiar case of the azimuthal angle variable $\ensuremath{\phi}$ and its "conjugate" angular momentum Lz{L}_{z}Lz​ is discussed. Various pitfalls associated with the periodicity problem are avoided by employing periodic variables ($sin\ensuremath{\phi}$ and $cos\ensuremath{\phi}$ to describe the phase variable. Well-defined uncertainty relations are derived and discussed. A detailed analysis of the three-dimensional harmonic oscillator excited in coherent states is given. A detailed analysis of the simple harmonic oscillator is given. The usual assumption that a (Hermitian) phase operator $\ensuremath{\varphi}$ (conjugate to the number operator NNN) exists is shown to be erroneous. However, cosine and sine operators CCC and SSS exist and are the appr\'opriate phase variables. A Poisson bracket argument using action-angle (rather JJJ, $cos\ensuremath{\varphi}$, $sin\ensuremath{\varphi}$) variables is used to deduce CCC and SSS. The spectra and eigenfunctions of these operators are investigated, along with the important "phase-difference" periodic variables. The properties of the oscillator variables in the various types of states are analyzed with special attention to the uncertainty relations and the transition to the classical limit. The utility of coherent states as a basis for the description of the evolution of the density matrix is emphasized. In this basis it is easy to identify the classical Liouville equation in action-angle variables along with quantum-mechanical "corrections." Mention is made of possible physical applications to superfluid systems.
The Wigner quasiprobability, along with some of its essentialproperties, is introduced and discussed in two versions, first covering real canonical variables such as W(q,p) and second a pair of complex conjugate coordinates such as W(α,α*). The reconstruction of the density operator ϱ of states is also given. Building upon the Susskind–Glogower concept of quantum phase operators, further aspects of phase operator algebras in the quantum optics of a harmonic oscillator are discussed in relation to the realization of the su(1,1) Lie algebra. Coherent phase states |ε⟩ are introduced in analogy to the common coherent states |α⟩ in two ways, as both eigenstates of certain operators and as states generated from a ground state |0⟩ by operators of the Lie group SU(1,1). The limiting transition to the non-normalizable Fritz London phase states |eiφ⟩ on the unit circle and an (over)-completeness relation for the coherent phase states are derived. The Wigner quasiprobability W(q,p) for the coherent phase states is calculated and graphically represented. From the Wigner quasiprobability, a phase distribution W(φ) is calculated by integrating over the radius, and its uncertainty is defined and presented. The Hilbert–Schmidt distance is discussed as a measure of the non-classicality of states, where most of our with Viktor Dodonov work was carried out.
Defining the observable ϕ{\bf ϕ}ϕ canonically conjugate to the number observable N{\bf N}N has long been an open problem in quantum theory. Here we show how to define the absolute phase observable Φ≡∣ϕ∣{\bf Φ}\equiv |{\bfϕ}|Φ≡∣ϕ∣ by suitably restricting the Hilbert space of xxx and ppp like variables. This Φ{\bf Φ}Φ is actually the absolute value of the phase and has the correct classical limit. A correction to the ``cosine'' C{\bf C}C and ``sine'' S{\bf S}S operators of Carruthers and Nieto is obtained.
Defining the observable φ canonically conjugate to the number observable N has long been an open problem in quantum theory. The problem stems from the fact that N is bounded from below. Here we show how to define the absolute phase observable Φ ≡ |φ | by suitably restricting the Hilbert space of x and p like variables. This Φ is actually the absolute value of the phase and has the correct classical limit. A correction to the “cosine ” C and “sine ” S operators of Carruthers and Nieto is obtained.
It is shown that, in the phase-space representation of quantum mechanics, the uncertainty relation can be stated in terms of the integral invariant of Poincar\'e. The uncertainty relation for spreading free wave packets is discussed as an illustrative example. This phase-space approach can be extended to the relativistic regime. It is shown that Lorentz boosts are area-preserving canonical transformations in the phase space of the light-cone variables. The harmonic oscillator is discussed in detail as an illustrative example for the covariant realization of the uncertainty principle.