Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/9606013

Algebraic Formulation of the Operatorial Perturbation Theory. Part 2. Aplications

Ary W. Espinosa Müller, Adelio Matamala-V�squez

Published Jun 13, 1996• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The algebraic approach to operator perturbation method has been applied to two quantum--mechanical systems ``The Stark Effect in the Harmonic Oscillator'' and ``The Generalized Zeeman Effect''. To that end, two realizations of the superoperators involved in the formalism have been carried out. The first of them has been based on the Heisenberg--Dirac algebra of $\hat{a}^\dagger$, $\hat{a}$, $\hat{1}$ operators, the second one has been based in the angular momemtum algebra of $\hat{L}_+$, $\hat{L}_-$ and $\hat{L}_0$ operators. The successful results achieved in predicting the discrete spectra of both systems have put in evidence the reliability and accuracy of the theory.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/9606013

Related papers

Algebraic Formulation of the Operatorial Perturbation Theory. Part I

Ary W. Espinosa Müller, Adelio Matamala-V�squez

A new totally algebraic formalism based on general, abstract ladder operators has been proposed. This approach heavily grounds in the superoperator formalism of Primas. However it is necessary to introduce many improvements in his formalism. In this regard, it has been introduced a new set of superoperators featured by their algebraic structure. Also, two lemmas and one theorem have been developed in order to algebraically reformulate the theory on more rigorous grounds. Finally, we have been able to build a coherent and self-contained formalism independent on any matricial representation , removing in this way the degeneracy problem .

arXiv:quant-ph/9606011•Jun 12, 1996•0 citations

Perturbation theory

Giampiero V. M. Esposito, Giuseppe Marmo, George Sudarshan

The subject of perturbation theory in non-relativistic quantum mechanics is introduced. First, perturbation theory for stationary states in the absence of degeneracy is studied. The case of nearby levels, perturbations of a one-dimensional harmonic oscillator, the occurrence of degeneracy, Stark and Zeeman effects are then described in detail. After a brief outline of the variational method, the Dyson series for time-dependent perturbation theory is derived, with application to harmonic perturbations. The Fermi golden rule is also presented. The chapter ends with an assessment of four branches of the subject: regular perturbation theory, asymptotic perturbation theory, and summability methods, spectral concentration and singular perturbations. Approximate methods for stationary states It is frequently the case, in physical problems, that the full Hamiltonian operator H consists of an operator H 0 whose eigenvalues and eigenfunctions are known exactly, and a second term V resulting from a variety of sources (e.g. the interaction with an electric field, or a magnetic field, or the relativistic corrections to the kinetic energy, or the effects of spin). The problems and aims of perturbation theory for stationary states can be therefore summarized as follows. (i) Once the domain of (essential) self-adjointness of the ‘unperturbed’ Hamiltonian H 0 is determined, find on which domain the ‘sum’ H = H 0 + V represents an (essentially) self-adjoint operator (the reader should remember from appendix 4. A that in general, once some operators A and B are given, the intersection of their domains, on which their sum is defined, might be the empty set). […]

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Mar 11, 2004•0 citations

Perturbation theory in quantum mechanics—II

Alan Herries Wilson

Abstract In a previous paper the theory of perturbations was discussed for system which possess only discrete spectra. The theory is now extended to systems with both discrete and continuous spectra, and in addition a slightly more general method of perturbation is considered. The Hamiltonian H of the perturbed systems is split up into three parts H0, H1, H2 (t), two of which can be chosen arbitrarily. The solutions of the perturbed problem can then be worked out in terms of the characteristic functions corresponding to the Hamiltonian H0 + H2 (T), where T is any arbitrary fixed time. In general, however, the series of perturbations does not converge, and different modes of splitting up the Hamiltonian will lead to different formal results. The perturbation theory does usually give the correct physical results, and it is therefore necessary to give some explanation of how this happens. In (I) the asymptotic nature of certain solutions was emphasised, but this does not extend to the more general systems treated here. It is suggested that the usual boundary conditions do not give an adequate description of any but the simplest atomic problems, and that more detailed restrictions, determined by the experimental conditions, ought to be substituted. As this is impossible in practice, an alternative method is to regard the motion as a perturbation on that Hamiltonian H0 + H2 (T) which most nearly corresponds to the experimental conditions. (For example, we may regard an electron as free or bound according as the experiment determines the number of free or bound electrons respectively, whereas in the usual theory the initial Hamiltonian is taken as fundamental.) This criterion, together with the initial conditions, suffices to fix the division of H into the three parts H0, H1, H2 (t) which at first were chosen arbitrarily. The formal solution can be worked out on this basis, and it is then assumed that this solution is asymptotic to the one which would be obtained if the full boundary conditions were used. This suggestion is in accordance with the fact that a hydrogen atom in an electric field gives rise not only to the usual Stark effect, but also to an ionisation effect. In § 2 the perturbation equation are derived in a slightly more general form than has previously been given. The theories of Born,* Dirac and Oppenheimer are particular cases of that given here, and are obtained by particular choices of H0, H1, H2 (t). To obtain Born’s theory we take H1 = 0, and for Oppenheimer’s we take H2 (t) = H2 (T) and T = 0. In Dirac’s theory we have H1 = 0, H2 (0) = 0 and T = 0. Each of these theories is appropriate for the solution of special problems, but the more general method of this paper is required for the full discussion of the perturbation theory.

Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character•May 2, 1929•5 citations

The eigenvalue spectrum in quantum mechanics and the nonlinearization procedure

Alexander V. Turbiner

A new approach to the eigenvalue problem in quantum mechanics is proposed. This approach is based on three propositions: 1) a perturbation theory which does not require knowledge of the entire eigenvalue spectrum of the unperturbed problem and which uses a nonlinearization procedure (leaving some latitude in the choice of a zeroth order approximation); 2) a relationship between the perturbation theory and a variational principle, namely that any variational calculation is none other than the first two terms of some nontrivial perturbation theory which, when developed further, can reveal the accuracy of the variational calculations and can refine them by an iterative procedure; 3) Dyson's argument, which serves as a criterion for the reasonableness of the choice of a zeroth order approximation (the unperturbed problem). The realization of this perturbation theory in a k-dimensional space is equivalent to the solution of a k-dimensional electrostatic problem with a variable dielectric permittivity. In the one-dimensional case and in cases which reduce to the one-dimensional case, all the corrections are written in quadratures. It is shown that the construction of an ordinary perturbation theory (in which the zeroth order approximation is an exactly solvable problem) within the framework of this perturbation theory is a purely algebraic procedure, which reduces to the solution of some simple recurrence relations. An approximation analogous to the leading logarithmic approximation of quantum field theory is constructed. Some standard problems of quantum mechanics—the anharmonic oscillator, the Zeeman effect, and the Stark effect—are treated as examples. It is shown that this new approach makes it possible to develop systematically a theory for strong coupling and large perturbations.

Soviet Physics Uspekhi•Sep 30, 1984•70 citations

The Zeeman effect and spherical harmonics

C. G. DARWIN

Abstract 1. The chief object of the present paper is to present a simple system of equations which are competent to determine the frequencies and intensities of the lines in the standard Zeeman effect. By the standard Zeeman effect is meant the type where the terms are given by Landé’s "g"and “γ” formulæ, and where the multiplicity of the two sets of terms is the same. It will probably be held that the theory of such multiplets has been fairly completely understood for the last two years owing to the works of Sommerfeld, Heisenberg, Landé and Pauli, and the main new contribution of the present work is that, whereas these writers gave formulæ valid only either in weak or strong field (except for doublets, where Heisenberg and Jordan give the value for any strength), here we have complete formulæ from which the intensity of any component in any strength of field can be obtained merely from the solution of rather simple algebraic equations. The proper attack on this problem would undoubtedly be by way of the recent work of Heisenberg on the helium spectrum, and his still more recent work on complex spectra; but this theory is still in the making, so that it has not been practicable to apply it here, and to this extent our results are unverified. Their validity rests firstly on a complete verification of all known facts connected with both weak and strong fields (and intermediate fields for doublets), and also on a conformity with the general features of wave mechanics. The work of Heisenberg and Jordan could readily have been adapted to give all the results of the present paper; but it would have been harder to follow because the matrix methods are not so easy for most readers as are spherical harmonics.

Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character•Jun 1, 1927•45 citations

Supersymmetric Aspects of One Dimensional Quantum Mechanics

Edilson Ferreira Batista, Ronaldo Thibes

We review SUSY in non-relativistic quantum mechanics as a powerful tool for studying one dimensional potentials and discuss some applications. The Dirac operatorial factorization method for the harmonic oscillator in QM is generalized to a broader scope. A Schr¨odinger second order operator can be factorized into two first-order ones by solving a Riccati equation and determining the corresponding superpotential. We apply the technique to square well, P¨oschl-Teller and finite barrier potentials, analyzing the resulting energy spectra and the transmission and reflection coefficients. Both discrete and continuous energy spectrum cases are discussed.

Exatas Online•Jun 30, 2013•0 citations
The algebraic approach to operator perturbation method has been applied to two quantum--mechanical systems The Stark Effect in the Harmonic Oscillator'' and The Generalized Zeeman Effect''. To that end, two realizations of the superoperators involved in the formalism have been carried out. The first of them has been based on the Heisenberg--Dirac algebra of a^†\hat{a}^\daggera^†, a^\hat{a}a^, 1^\hat{1}1^ operators, the second one has been based in the angular momemtum algebra of L^+\hat{L}_+L^+​, L^−\hat{L}_-L^−​ and L^0\hat{L}_0L^0​ operators. The successful results achieved in predicting the discrete spectra of both systems have put in evidence the reliability and accuracy of the theory.
A new totally algebraic formalism based on general, abstract ladder operators has been proposed. This approach heavily grounds in the superoperator formalism of Primas. However it is necessary to introduce many improvements in his formalism. In this regard, it has been introduced a new set of superoperators featured by their algebraic structure. Also, two lemmas and one theorem have been developed in order to algebraically reformulate the theory on more rigorous grounds. Finally, we have been able to build a coherent and self-contained formalism independent on any matricial representation , removing in this way the degeneracy problem .
The subject of perturbation theory in non-relativistic quantum mechanics is introduced. First, perturbation theory for stationary states in the absence of degeneracy is studied. The case of nearby levels, perturbations of a one-dimensional harmonic oscillator, the occurrence of degeneracy, Stark and Zeeman effects are then described in detail. After a brief outline of the variational method, the Dyson series for time-dependent perturbation theory is derived, with application to harmonic perturbations. The Fermi golden rule is also presented. The chapter ends with an assessment of four branches of the subject: regular perturbation theory, asymptotic perturbation theory, and summability methods, spectral concentration and singular perturbations. Approximate methods for stationary states It is frequently the case, in physical problems, that the full Hamiltonian operator H consists of an operator H 0 whose eigenvalues and eigenfunctions are known exactly, and a second term V resulting from a variety of sources (e.g. the interaction with an electric field, or a magnetic field, or the relativistic corrections to the kinetic energy, or the effects of spin). The problems and aims of perturbation theory for stationary states can be therefore summarized as follows. (i) Once the domain of (essential) self-adjointness of the ‘unperturbed’ Hamiltonian H 0 is determined, find on which domain the ‘sum’ H = H 0 + V represents an (essentially) self-adjoint operator (the reader should remember from appendix 4. A that in general, once some operators A and B are given, the intersection of their domains, on which their sum is defined, might be the empty set). […]
Abstract In a previous paper the theory of perturbations was discussed for system which possess only discrete spectra. The theory is now extended to systems with both discrete and continuous spectra, and in addition a slightly more general method of perturbation is considered. The Hamiltonian H of the perturbed systems is split up into three parts H0, H1, H2 (t), two of which can be chosen arbitrarily. The solutions of the perturbed problem can then be worked out in terms of the characteristic functions corresponding to the Hamiltonian H0 + H2 (T), where T is any arbitrary fixed time. In general, however, the series of perturbations does not converge, and different modes of splitting up the Hamiltonian will lead to different formal results. The perturbation theory does usually give the correct physical results, and it is therefore necessary to give some explanation of how this happens. In (I) the asymptotic nature of certain solutions was emphasised, but this does not extend to the more general systems treated here. It is suggested that the usual boundary conditions do not give an adequate description of any but the simplest atomic problems, and that more detailed restrictions, determined by the experimental conditions, ought to be substituted. As this is impossible in practice, an alternative method is to regard the motion as a perturbation on that Hamiltonian H0 + H2 (T) which most nearly corresponds to the experimental conditions. (For example, we may regard an electron as free or bound according as the experiment determines the number of free or bound electrons respectively, whereas in the usual theory the initial Hamiltonian is taken as fundamental.) This criterion, together with the initial conditions, suffices to fix the division of H into the three parts H0, H1, H2 (t) which at first were chosen arbitrarily. The formal solution can be worked out on this basis, and it is then assumed that this solution is asymptotic to the one which would be obtained if the full boundary conditions were used. This suggestion is in accordance with the fact that a hydrogen atom in an electric field gives rise not only to the usual Stark effect, but also to an ionisation effect. In § 2 the perturbation equation are derived in a slightly more general form than has previously been given. The theories of Born,* Dirac and Oppenheimer are particular cases of that given here, and are obtained by particular choices of H0, H1, H2 (t). To obtain Born’s theory we take H1 = 0, and for Oppenheimer’s we take H2 (t) = H2 (T) and T = 0. In Dirac’s theory we have H1 = 0, H2 (0) = 0 and T = 0. Each of these theories is appropriate for the solution of special problems, but the more general method of this paper is required for the full discussion of the perturbation theory.
A new approach to the eigenvalue problem in quantum mechanics is proposed. This approach is based on three propositions: 1) a perturbation theory which does not require knowledge of the entire eigenvalue spectrum of the unperturbed problem and which uses a nonlinearization procedure (leaving some latitude in the choice of a zeroth order approximation); 2) a relationship between the perturbation theory and a variational principle, namely that any variational calculation is none other than the first two terms of some nontrivial perturbation theory which, when developed further, can reveal the accuracy of the variational calculations and can refine them by an iterative procedure; 3) Dyson's argument, which serves as a criterion for the reasonableness of the choice of a zeroth order approximation (the unperturbed problem). The realization of this perturbation theory in a k-dimensional space is equivalent to the solution of a k-dimensional electrostatic problem with a variable dielectric permittivity. In the one-dimensional case and in cases which reduce to the one-dimensional case, all the corrections are written in quadratures. It is shown that the construction of an ordinary perturbation theory (in which the zeroth order approximation is an exactly solvable problem) within the framework of this perturbation theory is a purely algebraic procedure, which reduces to the solution of some simple recurrence relations. An approximation analogous to the leading logarithmic approximation of quantum field theory is constructed. Some standard problems of quantum mechanics—the anharmonic oscillator, the Zeeman effect, and the Stark effect—are treated as examples. It is shown that this new approach makes it possible to develop systematically a theory for strong coupling and large perturbations.
Abstract 1. The chief object of the present paper is to present a simple system of equations which are competent to determine the frequencies and intensities of the lines in the standard Zeeman effect. By the standard Zeeman effect is meant the type where the terms are given by Landé’s "g"and “γ” formulæ, and where the multiplicity of the two sets of terms is the same. It will probably be held that the theory of such multiplets has been fairly completely understood for the last two years owing to the works of Sommerfeld, Heisenberg, Landé and Pauli, and the main new contribution of the present work is that, whereas these writers gave formulæ valid only either in weak or strong field (except for doublets, where Heisenberg and Jordan give the value for any strength), here we have complete formulæ from which the intensity of any component in any strength of field can be obtained merely from the solution of rather simple algebraic equations. The proper attack on this problem would undoubtedly be by way of the recent work of Heisenberg on the helium spectrum, and his still more recent work on complex spectra; but this theory is still in the making, so that it has not been practicable to apply it here, and to this extent our results are unverified. Their validity rests firstly on a complete verification of all known facts connected with both weak and strong fields (and intermediate fields for doublets), and also on a conformity with the general features of wave mechanics. The work of Heisenberg and Jordan could readily have been adapted to give all the results of the present paper; but it would have been harder to follow because the matrix methods are not so easy for most readers as are spherical harmonics.
We review SUSY in non-relativistic quantum mechanics as a powerful tool for studying one dimensional potentials and discuss some applications. The Dirac operatorial factorization method for the harmonic oscillator in QM is generalized to a broader scope. A Schr¨odinger second order operator can be factorized into two first-order ones by solving a Riccati equation and determining the corresponding superpotential. We apply the technique to square well, P¨oschl-Teller and finite barrier potentials, analyzing the resulting energy spectra and the transmission and reflection coefficients. Both discrete and continuous energy spectrum cases are discussed.