Abstract 1. The chief object of the present paper is to present a simple system of equations which are competent to determine the frequencies and intensities of the lines in the standard Zeeman effect. By the standard Zeeman effect is meant the type where the terms are given by Landé’s "g"and “γ” formulæ, and where the multiplicity of the two sets of terms is the same. It will probably be held that the theory of such multiplets has been fairly completely understood for the last two years owing to the works of Sommerfeld, Heisenberg, Landé and Pauli, and the main new contribution of the present work is that, whereas these writers gave formulæ valid only either in weak or strong field (except for doublets, where Heisenberg and Jordan give the value for any strength), here we have complete formulæ from which the intensity of any component in any strength of field can be obtained merely from the solution of rather simple algebraic equations. The proper attack on this problem would undoubtedly be by way of the recent work of Heisenberg on the helium spectrum, and his still more recent work on complex spectra; but this theory is still in the making, so that it has not been practicable to apply it here, and to this extent our results are unverified. Their validity rests firstly on a complete verification of all known facts connected with both weak and strong fields (and intermediate fields for doublets), and also on a conformity with the general features of wave mechanics. The work of Heisenberg and Jordan could readily have been adapted to give all the results of the present paper; but it would have been harder to follow because the matrix methods are not so easy for most readers as are spherical harmonics.
Abstract 1. The chief object of the present paper is to present a simple system of equations which are competent to determine the frequencies and intensities of the lines in the standard Zeeman effect. By the standard Zeeman effect is meant the type where the terms are given by Landé’s "g"and “γ” formulæ, and where the multiplicity of the two sets of terms is the same. It will probably be held that the theory of such multiplets has been fairly completely understood for the last two years owing to the works of Sommerfeld, Heisenberg, Landé and Pauli, and the main new contribution of the present work is that, whereas these writers gave formulæ valid only either in weak or strong field (except for doublets, where Heisenberg and Jordan give the value for any strength), here we have complete formulæ from which the intensity of any component in any strength of field can be obtained merely from the solution of rather simple algebraic equations. The proper attack on this problem would undoubtedly be by way of the recent work of Heisenberg on the helium spectrum, and his still more recent work on complex spectra; but this theory is still in the making, so that it has not been practicable to apply it here, and to this extent our results are unverified. Their validity rests firstly on a complete verification of all known facts connected with both weak and strong fields (and intermediate fields for doublets), and also on a conformity with the general features of wave mechanics. The work of Heisenberg and Jordan could readily have been adapted to give all the results of the present paper; but it would have been harder to follow because the matrix methods are not so easy for most readers as are spherical harmonics.
Abstract 1. In a recent paper Dirac* has brilliantly removed the defects before existing in the mechanics of the electron, and has shown how the phenomena usually called the “ spinning electron ” fit into place in the complete theory. He applies to he problem the method of q-numbers and, using non-commutative algebra, exhibits the properties of a free electron, and of an electron in a central field of electric force. In a second paper † he also discusses the rules of combination and the Zeeman effect. There are probably readers who will share the present writer’s feeling that the methods of non-commutative algebra are harder to follow, and certainly much more difficult to invent, than are operations of types long familiar to analysis. Wherever it is possible to do so, it is surely better to present the theory in a mathematical form that dates from the time of Laplace and Legendre, if only because the details of the calculus have been so much more thoroughly explored. So the object of the present work is to take Dirac’s system and treat it by the ordinary methods of wave calculus. The chief point of interest is perhaps the solution of the problem of the central field, which can be carried out exactly and leads to Sommerfeld’s original formula for the hydrogen levels. But it is also of some interest to exhibit the relationship of the new theory to the previous equations which were derived empirically by the present writer.* It appears that those equations were an approximation to the new ones, derived by an approximate elimination of two of Dirac’s four wave functions. We shall also review a few other points connected with the free electron, the emission of radiation from an atom and its magnetic moment, and shall outline a discussion of the Zeeman effect.
Abstract It will probably be agreed that among all the recent developments of the quantum theory, one of the least satisfactory is the theory of radiation. The present paper is intended as a preliminary to a new line of attack on the subject. It was begun some time ago, but owing to lack of success in carrying it to a conclusion, its publication has been much delayed. In the meantime other papers have appeared, which in some respects follow the same train of thought. The authors of these works have carried their methods further in some directions than I have attempted, but there is still perhaps room for the discussion of a number of questions from the rather different point of view adopted here. 1. The main principle of the present work is the idea that, since matter and light both possess the dual characters of particle and wave, a similar mathematical treatment ought to be applied to both, and that this has not yet bee done as fully as should be possible. Whereas we have a fairly complete calculus for dealing with the behaviour of any number of electrons or atoms, for photons the existing processes are much less satisfactory. The central difficulty, which makes it hard to apply the ordinary methods of wave mechanics to light, is the fact that (at least according to our present ideas) photons can be created and annihilated, and to represent this in a wave system we have to be able to think of a medium suddenly coming into existence and then going out again, when the light that it was carrying is absorbed. Such behaviour is a grave difficulty in the way of allowing us to think of the photon as a wave, and tends to make us think with more favour of its particle aspect, until we recall that after all it is quite unlike any known particle to come into existence and later to disappear without trace. The theories at present current, such as that of Heisenberg and Pauli, avoid these difficulties because they are mainly formal generalisations of the classical theory; this frees them from the above difficulties, but they pay for it in being highly abstract, and, as it has turned out, rather unsuccessful.
Abstract 1. The procedure usually adopted in the Quantum Theory for the estimation of the intensities of a spectrum line includes two stages : (1) the electric moment, p, of the distribution responsible for the spectrum line is calculated by means of Schrodinger’s integrals or some equivalent method ; (2) the rate of loss of energy due to radiation is calculated by the classical formula due to H. Hertz, viz., 2p2/3c3, just as if the distribution were concentrated in a dipole of precisely the same moment p. The first stage involves no difficulties beyond those met with in the evaluation of the integrals or matrices with which we are concerned, the only principles needed being those of the particular quantum theory adopted. But the second stage is open to grave objections and can only be justified on the ground of necessity owing to the absence of any completely satisfactory quantum theory of the electromagnetic field. Sometimes an appeal is made to Bohr’s Correspondence Principle, but this itself involves a somewhat hazardous extrapolation from infinitely large down to small quantum numbers and cannot take the place of a rigorous calculation. A logically consistent method is possible, based on Maxwell’s theory as represented by his electromagnetic equations and their solutions in terms of the classical retarded potential integrals. It may be objected that we do not know how far Maxwell’s equations can be applied to the interiors of atoms, in particular to distributions like those of Schrodinger, but precisely the same objection applies to the customary use of the classical expression for the radiation from an oscillating dipole. Moreover, the attempts made by Heisenberg and Pauli, Dirac and others to formulate a quantum theory of the electromagnetic field have all been based on the assumption that such a theory must be consistent with Maxwell’s equations. The direct application of the methods of classical electromagnetic theory to Schrodinger’s distributions can be justified at least as a rigorous attempt to determine their electromagnetic field and the radiation from them, and the validity of the procedure will have to be judged by the agreement, or otherwise, of the results obtained with experience. In this way we avoid the assumption that a spatially extended distribution can be treated as if its electric moment were concentrated in a point; in fact, the results obtained in this paper for the more important spectrum line series show definitely that the assumption is false, because it leads to results in many cases quite inconsistent with a rigorous application of Maxwell’s theory.
Abstract Bohr’s theory of the atom did a fine job of explaining the absorption and em1ss10n spectra of one-electron atoms in terms of the quantum rules. Schrodinger’s wave mechanics did better in the sense that the rules of quantization were given a firm mathematical basis. However, problems still abounded. Experimental spectra revealed quite a number of problems for which wave mechanics (and matrix mechanics) appeared to have no solutions. In particular, some atomic emission lines predicted by the theory were seen to be split in the presence of a magnetic field into several quite distinct lines (a phenomenon known as the Zeeman effect). Neither wave mechanics nor matrix mechanics could explain this phenomenon without some further, largely ad hoc, assumptions. Worse still, when the spectra of atoms with two or more electrons were studied, certain predicted lines were found to be missing.
Abstract A theory of the helium atom was developed by Heisenberg, following his famous principle of “resonance.” His work is based upon Schrodinger’s equation, and in order to allow for the spin of the electrons he introduces extra energy terms, expressing the classical energy of two appropriate magnets. It is the perturbation by this spin energy which produces the triplet separations. Heisenberg’s calculation of these separations is open to three criticisms: (1) He assumes that certain simple forms are correct first approximations to the wave-functions; whereas, owing to degeneracy, it is necessary to take linear combinations of these forms. (2) He estimates the mean values of the spin energy by means of a model built up of precessing vectors. (3) He neglects the radius of the inner orbit in comparison with that of the outer orbit, even when the principal quantum number of the latter is only 2; this is the least satisfactory of several necessary simplifications. Schrödinger’s equation is likely to be supplanted as the foundation of wave-mechanics by the equation recently put forward by Dirae. This fits the spin of the electron neatly into the theory of relativity, and produces the doublets of the hydrogen-like atom in a beautiful manner. Dirac’s q-number theory has been translated into wave-mechanics by Darwin. Apart altogether from the above criticisms of Heisenberg, it seemed expedient to proceed to the theory of an atom with two electrons on the basis of the new equation. Calculations which are independent of the spin, such as the approximate energylevels, and the separation between ortho- and para-terms, are the same on either theory, and are not the concern of this paper. We deal here with spin effects, such as the fine structure of the triplets and intercombinations between ortho- and para-states.
Abstract In an article in ‘Nature’ last February I put forward a suggestion, of necessity in so concise a form as to be not very easily intelligible, that when the magnetic properties of the atom are regarded from the point of view of the wave mechanics, they suggest that the electron is to be taken as a wave of two components, like light, not of one like sound. The theory and its mathematical development were only outlined in ‘Nature,’ and the object of the present work is to give them in fuller detail. Recently Pauli has published a paper on the same subject, and arrived at the same mathematical results, but owing to the fact that he is more disposed to regard the wave theory as a mathematical convenience and less as a physical reality, he stops short of the point which was the guiding principle to me, and refuses to interpret the two functions that we both obtain as formed from a vector. I shall therefore here develop somewhat fully the arguments and analogies which seem to me to show that the vector is the right form in which to regard it. The chief part of the paper is concerned with developing the results given in ‘Nature’; owing to other work I have not carried the matter much farther yet. The main new points are general formulæ for the intensities of spectral lines, and for the magnetic moment, and the form the theory must take for several electrons—in which my first suggestion was wrong, and which Pauli has developed from his point of view. In a future paper I hope to discuss the motion of a free electron in a magnetic field, together with other problems. Since writing the account of the theory in ‘Nature’ I have had the immense benefit of a visit to Prof. Bohr’s Institute in Copenhagen, and have thus enjoyed the advantage of discussing the subject with him, Dr. Klein and the other members in detail. I may take the opportunity here to express my thanks to them for their interest in the matter and for many helpful criticisms.