Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/9510002 · Foundations of Physics

Branching space-time analysis of the GHZ theorem

Nuel Belnap, László E. Szabó

Published Aug 1, 1996• 45 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/bf02061400

Related papers

GHZ Theorems in the Framework of Outcomes in Branching Space-time

Tomasz Kowalski, Tomasz Placek

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Mar 1, 2000•1 citation

Branching space-time

Nuel Belnap

Synthese•Sep 1, 1992•226 citations

A branching space-times view on quantum error correction

Thomas Müller

Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics•Jul 6, 2007•1 citation

Comparative Similarity in Branching Space-Times

Tomasz Placek

International Journal of Theoretical Physics•Apr 9, 2009•3 citations

Branching space-time analysis of the GHZ theorem

Nuel Belnap, László E. Szabó

Greenberger, Horne, Shimony and Zeilinger gave a new version of the Bell theorem without using inequalities (probabilities). Mermin summarized it concisely; but Bohm and Hiley criticized Mermin’s proof from contextualists ’ point of view. Using the Branching Space-time language, in this paper a proof will be given that is free of these difficulties. At the same time we will also clarify the limits of the validity of the theorem when it is taken as a proof that quantum mechanics is not compatible with a deterministic world nor with a world that permits correlated space-related events without a common cause.

•Jan 1, 1996•52 citations

Locality, Bell's inequality and the GHZ theorem

A. Fahmi

Physics Letters A•Oct 1, 2002•8 citations
Greenberger, Horne, Shimony and Zeilinger gave a new version of the Bell theorem without using inequalities (probabilities). Mermin summarized it concisely; but Bohm and Hiley criticized Mermin’s proof from contextualists ’ point of view. Using the Branching Space-time language, in this paper a proof will be given that is free of these difficulties. At the same time we will also clarify the limits of the validity of the theorem when it is taken as a proof that quantum mechanics is not compatible with a deterministic world nor with a world that permits correlated space-related events without a common cause.