arXiv:quant-ph/0701035

Comments on quant-ph/0609176

Wu, XiaoDi

Published Jan 8, 2007• 0 citations

Abstract

In this note, we show the mistake which has been made in quant-ph/0609176. Further more, we provide a sketch of proof to show the impossibility of the effort of such kind toward improving the efficiency of Grover's Algorithm.

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0701035

Related papers

A New Formulation of Grover's Algorithm

Michael Stay

Withdrawn; replaced by longer, more detailed paper quant-ph/0010065.

arXiv:quant-ph/0010028Oct 6, 20000 citations

Comment on the "Comment by Schwab, Blencowe, Roukes, Cleland, Girvin, Milburn, and Ekinci: quant-ph/0503018"

A. Gaidarzhy, Guiti Zolfagharkhani, Robert L. Badzey +1 more

We show that arguments in the comment by Schwab et al. quant-ph/0503018 on our recent work are invalid.

arXiv:cond-mat/0503502Mar 19, 20050 citations

Comment on "Maximum likelihood reconstruction of CP maps", quant-ph/0009104

Jaromı́r Fiurášek, Z. Hradil

The treatment proposed by Sacchi quant-ph/0009104 does not represent correct solution, since the necessary conditions on CP maps are not guaranteed.

arXiv:quant-ph/0101048Jan 12, 20011 citation

Reply to the comment "quant-ph/9710002"

Luming Duan, Guang‐Can Guo

In the comment, Zanardi and Rasetti argue that several claims in our recent letter (Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1953, 1997) are questionable. The reply shows these claims remain true.

arXiv:quant-ph/9710014Oct 3, 19971 citation

Reply to Comment

Ping‐Xing Chen, Lin-Mei Liang, Cheng-Zu Li +1 more

In the comment(quant-ph/0103003) Eggeling,Vollbrecht and Wolf suspect our method in quant-ph/0102133 is not practical. Here we explain our result and method and show that our example can tell one how to judge a separable state, and so our method is practical, at least for many mixed states.

Mar 17, 20010 citations

Reply to Comment

Ping‐Xing Chen, Lin-Mei Liang, Cheng-Zu Li +1 more

arXiv:quant-ph/0103104Mar 17, 20010 citations