Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0103104

Reply to Comment

Ping‐Xing Chen, Lin-Mei Liang, Cheng-Zu Li, Ming-Qiu Huang

Published Mar 17, 2001• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In the comment(quant-ph/0103003) Eggeling,Vollbrecht and Wolf suspect our method in quant-ph/0102133 is not practical. Here we explain our result and method and show that our example can tell one how to judge a separable state, and so our method is practical, at least for many mixed states.
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0103104

Related papers

Reply to Comment

Ping‐Xing Chen, Lin-Mei Liang, Cheng-Zu Li +1 more

In the comment(quant-ph/0103003) Eggeling,Vollbrecht and Wolf suspect our method in quant-ph/0102133 is not practical. Here we explain our result and method and show that our example can tell one how to judge a separable state, and so our method is practical, at least for many mixed states.

•Mar 17, 2001•0 citations

Reply to the comment "quant-ph/9710002"

Luming Duan, Guang‐Can Guo

In the comment, Zanardi and Rasetti argue that several claims in our recent letter (Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1953, 1997) are questionable. The reply shows these claims remain true.

arXiv:quant-ph/9710014•Oct 3, 1997•1 citation

Comment on the "Comment by Schwab, Blencowe, Roukes, Cleland, Girvin, Milburn, and Ekinci: quant-ph/0503018"

A. Gaidarzhy, Guiti Zolfagharkhani, Robert L. Badzey +1 more

We show that arguments in the comment by Schwab et al. quant-ph/0503018 on our recent work are invalid.

arXiv:cond-mat/0503502•Mar 19, 2005•0 citations

Comments on quant-ph/0609176

Wu, XiaoDi

In this note, we show the mistake which has been made in quant-ph/0609176. Further more, we provide a sketch of proof to show the impossibility of the effort of such kind toward improving the efficiency of Grover's Algorithm.

arXiv:quant-ph/0701035•Jan 8, 2007•0 citations

Comment on: Necessary and sufficient condition of separability of any system

Tilo Eggeling, K. G. H. Vollbrecht, Michael M. Wolf

In a recent paper (quant-ph/0102133) Chen, Liang, Li and Huang suggest a necessary and sufficient separability criterion, which is supposedly practical in judging the separability of any mixed state. In this note we briefly recapitulate their main result and show that it is a reformulation of the problem rather than a practical criterion.

arXiv:quant-ph/0103003•Mar 1, 2001•1 citation

Reply to "Comment on 'Separability of quantum states and the violation of Bell-type inequalities'"

Elena R. Loubenets

It is stated by C. Simon, quant-ph/0410032, that the definition of "classicality" used in quant-ph/0310116 is "much narrower than Bell's concept of local hidden variables" and that, in the separable quantum case, the validity of the perfect correlation form of the original Bell inequality is necessarily linked with "the assumption of perfect correlations if the same (quantum) observable is measured on both sides". Here, I prove that these and other statements in quant-ph/0410032 are misleading.

arXiv:quant-ph/0502084•Feb 14, 2005•1 citation
It is stated by C. Simon, quant-ph/0410032, that the definition of "classicality" used in quant-ph/0310116 is "much narrower than Bell's concept of local hidden variables" and that, in the separable quantum case, the validity of the perfect correlation form of the original Bell inequality is necessarily linked with "the assumption of perfect correlations if the same (quantum) observable is measured on both sides". Here, I prove that these and other statements in quant-ph/0410032 are misleading.