arXiv:quant-ph/0701027 · Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE

Violation of the principle of complementarity, and its implications

Shahriar S. Afshar

Published Aug 1, 2005• 45 citations

Abstract

Bohr's principle of complementarity predicts that in a welcher weg ("which-way") experiment, obtaining fully visible interference pattern should lead to the destruction of the path knowledge. Here I report a failure for this prediction in an optical interferometry experiment. Coherent laser light is passed through a dual pinhole and allowed to go through a converging lens, which forms well-resolved images of the respective pinholes, providing complete path knowledge. A series of thin wires are then placed at previously measured positions corresponding to the dark fringes of the interference pattern upstream of the lens. No reduction in the resolution and total radiant flux of either image is found in direct disagreement with the predictions of the principle of complementarity. In this paper, a critique of the current measurement theory is offered, and a novel nonperturbative technique for ensemble properties is introduced. Also, another version of this experiment without an imaging lens is suggested, and some of the implications of the violation of complementarity for another suggested experiment to investigate the nature of the photon and its "empty wave" is briefly discussed.

DOI: 10.1117/12.638774

Related papers

Violation of Bohr’s Complementarity: One Slit or Both?

Shahriar S. Afshar

We have implemented a novel double‐slit “which‐way” experiment which raises interesting questions of interpretation. Coherent laser light is passed through a converging lens and then through a dual pinhole producing two beams crossing over at the focal point of the lens, and fully separating further downstream providing which‐way information. A thin wire is then placed at a minimum of the interference pattern formed at the cross‐over region. No significant reduction in the total flux or resolution of the separated beams is found, providing evidence for coexistence of perfect interference and which‐way information in the same experiment, contrary to the common readings of Bohr’s principle of complementarity. This result further supports the conclusions of the original experiment by the author in which an imaging lens was employed to obtain which‐way information. Finally, a short discussion of the novel nonperturbative measurement technique for ensemble properties is offered.

arXiv:quant-ph/0701039AIP conference proceedingsJan 1, 200613 citations

Wave Particle Duality and the Afshar Experiment

Aurélien Drezet

In an interesting series of articles published few years ago Afshar and coworkers [1,2] reported an optical experiment in which they claimed to refute the well known N. Bohr principle of complementarity [3, 4]. Obviously this result, if justified, would constitute a serious attack against the orthodox interpretation of quantum mechanics (known as the Copenhagen interpretation). This work stirred much debate in different journals (see for examples references [5–12]). We think however that there are still some important misunderstandings concerning the interpretation of this experiment. In a preprint written originally in 2004 [5] (and following some early discussions with Afshar) we claimed already that the interpretation by Afshar et al. can be easily stated if we stay as close as possible from the texts written by Bohr. The aim of the present article (which was initially written in 2005 to precise a bit the thought developed in [5]) is to comment the interpretation discussed in [1]. We will in the following analyze the meaning of Bohr principle and show that far from disproving its content the experiment [1] is actually a complete confirmation of its general validity. The difficulties associated with the understanding of this principle are not new and actually complementarity created troubles even in Einstein mind [3] so that we are here in good company. To summarize a bit emphatically Bohr’s complementarity we here remind that this principle states that if one of a pair of non commuting observables of a quantum object is known for sure, then information about the second (complementary) is lost [3, 4, 15, 16]. This can be equivalently expressed as a kind of duality between different descriptions of the quantum system associated with different experimental arrangements which mutually exclude each other (read in particular [3,4]). Later in the discussion we will try to precise this definition but for the moment it is enough to illustrate the concepts by examples Consider for instance the well known Young double-pinholes interference experiment made with photons. The discrete nature of light precludes the simultaneous observation of a same photon in the aperture plane and in the interference pattern: the photon cannot be absorbed twice. This is already a trivial manifestation of the principle of Bohr. Here it implies that the two statistical patterns associated with the wave in the aperture plane and its Fourier (i. e., momentum) transform require necessarily different photons for their recording. It is in that sense that each experiment excludes and completes reciprocally the other. In the case considered before the photon is absorbed during the first detection (this clearly precludes any other detection). However even a non-destructive solution for detection implying entanglement with other quantum systems has a radical effect of the same nature: the complementarity principle is still valid. For example, during their debate Bohr and Einstein [3] discussed an ideal which-way experiment in which the recoil of the slits is correlated to the motion of the photon. Momentum conservation added to arguments based on the uncertainty relations are sufficient to explain how such entanglement photon-slits can erase fringes [15–19]. It is also important for the present discussion to remind that the principle of complementarity has a perfidious consequence on the experimental meaning of trajectory and path followed by a particle. Indeed the unavoidable interactions existing between photons and detectors imply that a trajectory existing independently of any measurement process cannot be unambiguously defined. This sounds even like a tragedy when we consider once again the two-holes experiment. Indeed for Bohr this kind of experiments shows definitely the essential element of ambiguity which is involved in ascribing conventional physical attributes to quantum systems. Intuitively (i. e., from the point of view of classical particle dynamic) one would expect that a photon detected in the focal plane of the lens must have crossed only one of the hole 1 or 2 before to reach its final destination. However, if this is true, one can not intuitively understand how the presence of the second hole (through which the photon evidently did not go) forces the photon to participate to an interference pattern (which obviously needs an influence coming from both holes). Explanations to solve this paradox have been proposed by de Broglie, Bohm, and others using concepts such as empty waves or quantum potentials [20, 21]. However all these explanations are in agreement with Bohr principle (since they fully reproduce quantum predictions) and can not be experimentally distinguished. Bohr and Heisenberg proposed for all needed purposes a much more pragmatic and simpler answer: don’t bother, the complementarity principle precludes the simultaneous observation of a photon trajectory and of an interference pattern. For Bohr [3]: This point is of great logical consequence, since it is only the circumstance that we are presented with a choice of either tracing the path

Jan 1, 20115 citations

Incompleteness of Wave Theories of Light --- Non-Interference Patterns and Interference Patterns Emerging Simultaneously on Screen

hui peng

Young’s double slit experiments revived the wave theory of light. The standard interpretation is that the light behaves as waves before and after passing through the double slit. Feynman called the double slit experiment the only mystery in quantum mechanics. By placing a convex lens at different positions, we have shown: (1) Near the diaphragm, light behaves as photons and produces a non-interference pattern; near the screen, the photons produce an interference pattern; (2) The non-interference pattern evolves to the orthogonal interference pattern gradually in the same experiment; (3) The convex lens stops the further evolution. It is heuristic for study the nature of light by showing all of three different kinds of patterns on the screen simultaneously. For this purpose, in this article, we setup three paths. The light is divided into three portions, each portion propagates along one path. Then inserting three lenses to different Zones of different paths. Experiments show that two non-interference patterns and interference pattern simultaneously emerge on the same screen. The experiments: (1) challenge the wave theories of light; (2) violate Bohr’s complementarity principle; (3) provide profound phenomena for further development of optics and for study of the nature of light; (4) suggest that a complete theory should be able to simultaneously interpret the non-interference pattern, the interference pattern, and the evolution from the non-interference to the interference pattern in the same experiment.

Feb 5, 20230 citations

Incompleteness of Wave Theories of Light --- Non-Interference Patterns and Interference Patterns Emerging Simultaneously on Screen

Hui Hua Peng

Feb 5, 20230 citations

Afshar's experiment revisited: a demonstration of Bohr's complementary principle

Ngoc Diep Lai, V. Jacques, A. Dréau +5 more

A recent experiment performed by Afshar et al. has been interpreted as a violation of Bohr's complementarity principle between interference visibility and which-path information a two-path interferometer. The authors have reproduced the same experiment, using true single-photon pulses emitted by a single nitrogen-vacancy (NV) color center in a diamond crystal and propagating in a two-path wavefront-splitting interferometer realized with a Fresnels' biprism, followed by a grating with transmitting slits of adjustable width. The experimental setup is illustrated. The results go far beyond the reported results in the previous works of Afshar et al. and the subtle flaws in their analysis are then pointed out. The measured values of the interference visibility V and the which-path information, characterized by the distinguishability parameter D, are found, with values close to the ideal-case upper bound. This result demonstrates that the experiment can be perfectly explained by the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, without any violation of Bohr's complementarity principle.

Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics Europe & European Quantum Electronics Conference (CLEO/Europe-EQEC)Jun 1, 20090 citations

Quantum Optical Discussion of Uncertainty and Complementarity in a Mach-Zehnder Interferometer

Doron ludwin, Y. Ben-Aryeh, A. Mann

We discuss complementarity and uncertainty in a gedanken Which-Way (Welcher-Weg) experiment in a Mach-Zehnder interferometer. Although a Welcher-Weg measurement can be performed with only a negligible amount of momentum change in the detector itself, the change in the interference pattern must correspond to a change in the momentum distribution of the particle. Entanglement between the Mach-Zehnder interferometer and the Welcher-Weg measurement introduces orthogonality that disables the interference of the particle, but simultaneously, it also generates a momentum transfer between the particle and other parts of the whole entangled system (including macroscopic parts). This analysis can be related to the Delayed Choice interpretation. We show where the momentum change takes place and we conclude that entanglement is the key to understand how complementarity (i.e. Which Way versus interference) and the position-momentum uncertainty relation are interwoven.

arXiv:quant-ph/0008096Aug 23, 20000 citations