Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0607082 · Physical Review A

Unconditional security of the Bennett 1992 quantum-key-distribution scheme with a strong reference pulse

Kiyoshi Tamaki, Norbert Lütkenhaus, Masato Koashi, Jamie Batuwantudawe

Published Sep 1, 2009• 56 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We prove the unconditional security of the original Bennett 1992 protocol with strong reference pulse. We show that we may place a projection onto suitably defined qubit spaces before the receiver, which makes the analysis as simple as qubit-based protocols. Unlike the single-photon-based qubits, the qubits identified in this scheme are almost surely detected by the receiver even after a lossy channel. This leads to the key generation rate that is proportional to the channel transmission rate for proper choices of experimental parameters.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.80.032302

Related papers

Unconditional security of phase-coded quantum key distribution with strong reference pulse

Masato Koashi

We discuss the unconditional security of a quantum key distribution protocol in which bit values are encoded in the phase of a weak coherent-state pulse relative to a strong reference pulse, which is essentially the one proposed by Bennett in 1992 (the B92 scheme). In the BB84 protocol with a perfect single photon source, the key rate decreases linearly with the transmission T of the channel. If we simply replace this source with a weak coherent-state pulse, the key rate drops more rapidly (as O(η2)) since the presence of multiple photons favors the eavesdropper, Eve. The B92 protocol, if modified to be encoded on the polarization of a single photon, also shows O(η2) dependence. This comes from Eve's option of sending the vacuum state, which is always registered as an inconclusive result and never causes bit errors. In the original B92 scheme with phase coding, Eve has no such option--replacing the weak pulse by the vacuum cannot avoid errors completely, thanks to the strong reference pulse. This should make the scheme stronger against the loss in the channel even coherent-state pulses from conventional lasers are used. We have obtained an unconditional security proof allowing the presence of small bit errors, and confirmed the above observation in a rigorous way. The key rate is found to drop linearly with the transmission η, and it is lower than the BB84 with a perfect single-photon source only by a constant.

Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE•Jan 11, 2005•0 citations

Unconditional Security of Coherent-State Quantum Key Distribution with a Strong Phase-Reference Pulse

Masato Koashi

We prove the unconditional security of a quantum key distribution protocol in which bit values are encoded in the phase of a weak coherent-state pulse relative to a strong reference pulse. In contrast with implementations in which a weak pulse is used as a substitute for a single-photon source, the achievable key rate is found to decrease only linearly with the transmission of the channel.

arXiv:quant-ph/0403131•Physical Review Letters•Sep 15, 2004•138 citations

SECURITY OF QUANTUM KEY DISTRIBUTION WITH STRONG PHASE-REFERENCE PULSE

Masato Koashi

In the BB84 protocol with a perfect single photon source, the key rate decreases linearly with the transmission η of the channel. If we simply replace this source with a weak coherent-state pulse, the key rate drops more rapidly (as O(η2)) since the presence of multiple photons favors the eavesdropper. Here we discuss the unconditional security of a quantum key distribution protocol in which bit values are encoded in the phase of a weak coherent-state pulse relative to a strong reference pulse, which is essentially the one proposed by Bennett in 1992 (the B92 scheme). We show that in the limit of high loss in the transmission channel, we can construct a secret key with a rate proportional to the transmission η of the channel.

International Journal of Quantum Information•Nov 1, 2005•0 citations

Unconditional security of phase-coded quantum key distribution with strong reference pulse [5631-1]

Masato Koashia

We discuss the unconditional security of a quantum key distribution protocol in which bit values are encoded in the phase of a weak coherent-state pulse relative to a strong reference pulse, which is essentially the one proposed by Bennett in 1992 (the B92 scheme). In the BB84 protocol with a perfect single photon source, the key rate decreases linearly with the transmission η of the channel. If we simply replace this source with a weak coherent-state pulse, the key rate drops more rapidly (as O(η)) since the presence of multiple photons favors the eavesdropper, Eve. The B92 protocol, if modified to be encoded on the polarization of a single photon, also shows O(η) dependence. This comes from Eve’s option of sending the vacuum state, which is always registered as an inconclusive result and never causes bit errors. In the original B92 scheme with phase coding, Eve has no such option replacing the weak pulse by the vacuum cannot avoid errors completely, thanks to the strong reference pulse. This should make the scheme stronger against the loss in the channel even coherent-state pulses from conventional lasers are used. We have obtained an unconditional security proof allowing the presence of small bit errors, and confirmed the above observation in a rigorous way. The key rate is found to drop linearly with the transmission η, and it is lower than the BB84 with a perfect single-photon source only by a constant.

•Jan 1, 2005•0 citations

Unconditionally secure quantum key distribution with relatively strong signal pulse

Kiyoshi Tamaki

We propose an unconditionally secure quantum key distribution protocol, which uses a relatively strong signal pulse. While our protocol shares similar security bases as the Bennett 1992 protocol with a strong reference pulse, our scheme uses a smaller number of detectors and it is robust against Rayleigh scattering in an optical fiber. We derive a lower bound of secret key generation rate of our protocol and show that our protocol can cover relatively long distances, assuming precise phase modulations and stable interferometers.

arXiv:0711.3526•Physical Review A•Mar 26, 2008•12 citations

Unconditional security in quantum cryptography

Dominic Mayers

Basic techniques to prove the unconditional security of quantum crypto graphy are described. They are applied to a quantum key distribution protocol proposed by Bennett and Brassard [1984]. The proof considers a practical variation on the protocol in which the channel is noisy and photos may be lost during the transmission. Each individual signal sent into the channel must contain a single photon or any two-dimensional system in the exact state described in the protocol. No restriction is imposed on the detector used at the receiving side of the channel, except that whether or not the received system is detected must be independent of the basis used to measure this system.

arXiv:quant-ph/9802025•Journal of the ACM•May 1, 2001•1,036 citations
We prove the unconditional security of the original Bennett 1992 protocol with strong reference pulse. We show that we may place a projection onto suitably defined qubit spaces before the receiver, which makes the analysis as simple as qubit-based protocols. Unlike the single-photon-based qubits, the qubits identified in this scheme are almost surely detected by the receiver even after a lossy channel. This leads to the key generation rate that is proportional to the channel transmission rate for proper choices of experimental parameters.
We discuss the unconditional security of a quantum key distribution protocol in which bit values are encoded in the phase of a weak coherent-state pulse relative to a strong reference pulse, which is essentially the one proposed by Bennett in 1992 (the B92 scheme). In the BB84 protocol with a perfect single photon source, the key rate decreases linearly with the transmission T of the channel. If we simply replace this source with a weak coherent-state pulse, the key rate drops more rapidly (as O(η2)) since the presence of multiple photons favors the eavesdropper, Eve. The B92 protocol, if modified to be encoded on the polarization of a single photon, also shows O(η2) dependence. This comes from Eve's option of sending the vacuum state, which is always registered as an inconclusive result and never causes bit errors. In the original B92 scheme with phase coding, Eve has no such option--replacing the weak pulse by the vacuum cannot avoid errors completely, thanks to the strong reference pulse. This should make the scheme stronger against the loss in the channel even coherent-state pulses from conventional lasers are used. We have obtained an unconditional security proof allowing the presence of small bit errors, and confirmed the above observation in a rigorous way. The key rate is found to drop linearly with the transmission η, and it is lower than the BB84 with a perfect single-photon source only by a constant.
In the BB84 protocol with a perfect single photon source, the key rate decreases linearly with the transmission η of the channel. If we simply replace this source with a weak coherent-state pulse, the key rate drops more rapidly (as O(η2)) since the presence of multiple photons favors the eavesdropper. Here we discuss the unconditional security of a quantum key distribution protocol in which bit values are encoded in the phase of a weak coherent-state pulse relative to a strong reference pulse, which is essentially the one proposed by Bennett in 1992 (the B92 scheme). We show that in the limit of high loss in the transmission channel, we can construct a secret key with a rate proportional to the transmission η of the channel.
We discuss the unconditional security of a quantum key distribution protocol in which bit values are encoded in the phase of a weak coherent-state pulse relative to a strong reference pulse, which is essentially the one proposed by Bennett in 1992 (the B92 scheme). In the BB84 protocol with a perfect single photon source, the key rate decreases linearly with the transmission η of the channel. If we simply replace this source with a weak coherent-state pulse, the key rate drops more rapidly (as O(η)) since the presence of multiple photons favors the eavesdropper, Eve. The B92 protocol, if modified to be encoded on the polarization of a single photon, also shows O(η) dependence. This comes from Eve’s option of sending the vacuum state, which is always registered as an inconclusive result and never causes bit errors. In the original B92 scheme with phase coding, Eve has no such option replacing the weak pulse by the vacuum cannot avoid errors completely, thanks to the strong reference pulse. This should make the scheme stronger against the loss in the channel even coherent-state pulses from conventional lasers are used. We have obtained an unconditional security proof allowing the presence of small bit errors, and confirmed the above observation in a rigorous way. The key rate is found to drop linearly with the transmission η, and it is lower than the BB84 with a perfect single-photon source only by a constant.
We propose an unconditionally secure quantum key distribution protocol, which uses a relatively strong signal pulse. While our protocol shares similar security bases as the Bennett 1992 protocol with a strong reference pulse, our scheme uses a smaller number of detectors and it is robust against Rayleigh scattering in an optical fiber. We derive a lower bound of secret key generation rate of our protocol and show that our protocol can cover relatively long distances, assuming precise phase modulations and stable interferometers.
Basic techniques to prove the unconditional security of quantum crypto graphy are described. They are applied to a quantum key distribution protocol proposed by Bennett and Brassard [1984]. The proof considers a practical variation on the protocol in which the channel is noisy and photos may be lost during the transmission. Each individual signal sent into the channel must contain a single photon or any two-dimensional system in the exact state described in the protocol. No restriction is imposed on the detector used at the receiving side of the channel, except that whether or not the received system is detected must be independent of the basis used to measure this system.