Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0602057 · Physical Review A

Information-disturbance theorem for mutually unbiased observables

Takayuki Miyadera, Hideki Imai

Published Apr 20, 2006• 14 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We derive a version of information-disturbance theorems for mutually unbiased observables. We show that the information gain by Eve inevitably makes the outcomes by Bob in the conjugate basis not only erroneous but random.
DOI
10.1103/physreva.73.042317

Related papers

Information vs. Disturbance in Dimension D

P. Oscar Boykin, Vwani Roychowdhury

We show that for Eve to get information in one basis about a state, she must cause errors in all bases that are mutually unbiased to that basis. Our result holds in any dimension. We also show that this result holds for all functions of messages that are encrypted with a key.

arXiv:quant-ph/0412028•Dec 3, 2004•1 citation

Information-disturbance theorem for mutually unbiased observables (4 pages)

Takayuki Miyadera

Physical Review A•Jan 1, 2006•0 citations

Information-Disturbance theorem and Uncertainty Relation

Takayuki Miyadera, Hideki Imai

It has been shown that Information-Disturbance theorem can play an important role in security proof of quantum cryptography. The theorem is by itself interesting since it can be regarded as an information theoretic version of uncertainty principle. It, however, has been able to treat restricted situations. In this paper, the restriction on the source is abandoned, and a general information-disturbance theorem is obtained. The theorem relates information gain by Eve with information gain by Bob.

arXiv:0707.4559•Jul 31, 2007•4 citations

Information vs. disturbance in dimension D

P. Oscar Boykin, Vwani Roychowdhury

We show that for Eve to get information in one basis about a state, she must cause errors in \emph{all} bases that are mutually unbiased to that basis. Our result holds in any dimension. We also show that this result holds for \emph{all functions of messages} that are encrypted with a key.

Quantum Information and Computation•Jul 1, 2005•10 citations

Adversarial Information Gain in Non-ideal Quantum Measurements

Andrés Muñoz-Moller, Leevi Leppäjärvi, Teiko Heinosaari

Performing a quantum measurement yields two different results: a classical outcome drawn from a probability distribution, according to Born's rule, and a quantum outcome corresponding to the post-measurement state. Quantum devices that provide both outcomes can be described through quantum instruments. In a realistic scenario, one can expect that the observer's obtained classical and quantum outcomes are non-ideal: this can be due to experimental limitations, but could also be explained by adversarial interference, that is, a second party that disturbs the device through a concealed measurement to obtain information. The second scenario can be interpreted through quantum compatibility, as it implies that both the observer's instrument and the adversary's measurement can be performed simultaneously. In this work, we show how the noise of the observer's device relates to the amount of information that the adversary can obtain. We study scenarios in which the adversary aims to acquire information on the same basis as the observer's measurement, or on a mutually unbiased basis with respect to the observer's basis. In both cases, we derive necessary and sufficient conditions for the compatibility of a single qubit non-ideal quantum instrument and a noisy meter, from which we obtain the maximum amount of information that the adversary can extract in terms of the noise parameters of the observer's instrument. Finally, we provide the device implementation from the adversary's point of view for the same basis scenario.

quant-pharXiv:2602.20941•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Feb 25, 2026•0 citations

An operator-based bound on information and disturbance in quantum measurements

Williams, Hollis, Holger Friedrich Hofmann

Quantum measurements can be described by operators that assign conditional probabilities to different outcomes while also describing unavoidable physical changes to the system. Here, we point out that operators describing information gain at minimal disturbance can be expanded into a set of unitary operators representing experimentally distinguishable patterns of disturbance. The observable statistics of disturbance defines a tight upper bound on the information gain of the measurement.

arXiv:2510.00064•Sep 29, 2025•0 citations
Performing a quantum measurement yields two different results: a classical outcome drawn from a probability distribution, according to Born's rule, and a quantum outcome corresponding to the post-measurement state. Quantum devices that provide both outcomes can be described through quantum instruments. In a realistic scenario, one can expect that the observer's obtained classical and quantum outcomes are non-ideal: this can be due to experimental limitations, but could also be explained by adversarial interference, that is, a second party that disturbs the device through a concealed measurement to obtain information. The second scenario can be interpreted through quantum compatibility, as it implies that both the observer's instrument and the adversary's measurement can be performed simultaneously. In this work, we show how the noise of the observer's device relates to the amount of information that the adversary can obtain. We study scenarios in which the adversary aims to acquire information on the same basis as the observer's measurement, or on a mutually unbiased basis with respect to the observer's basis. In both cases, we derive necessary and sufficient conditions for the compatibility of a single qubit non-ideal quantum instrument and a noisy meter, from which we obtain the maximum amount of information that the adversary can extract in terms of the noise parameters of the observer's instrument. Finally, we provide the device implementation from the adversary's point of view for the same basis scenario.