Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0511270

Photon Position Operator and Localization of Photons inside a Waveguide

Zhiyong Wang, Cai-Dong Xiong, Ole Keller

Published Nov 30, 2005• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In this article, we show that in the level of quantum mechanics, a photon position operator with commuting components can be obtained in a more natural way; in the level of quantum field theory, the photon position operator corresponds to the center of the photon number. It is most interesting for us to show that, a photon inside a waveguide can be localized in the same sense that a massive particle can be localized in free space, and just as that it is impossible to localize a massive particle with a greater precision than its Compton wavelength, one can also arrival at a similar conclusion: it is impossible to localize a photon inside a waveguide with a greater precision than its equivalent Compton wavelength, which owing to evanescent-wave or photon-tunneling phenomena.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0511270

Related papers

V Photon Wave Function

Iwo Białynicki‐Birula

This chapter describes the photon wave function, and explains the basic properties of a well-defined mathematical object—a six-component function of space-time variables—that describes the quantum state of the photon. The most essential property that does not hold for the photon wave function is that the argument of the wave function cannot be directly associated with the position operator of the photon. The position operator for the photon simply does not exist. However, one should remember that for massive particles also, the true position operator exists only in the nonrelativistic approximation. The concept of localization associated with the Newton-Wigner position operator is not relativistically invariant. The photon wave function is not restricted to the wave mechanics of photons. The same wave functions also appear as mode functions in the expansion of the electromagnetic field operators.

Progress in optics•Jan 1, 1996•240 citations

Aspects of particle localisation in quantum mechanics

G.F. Melloy

The concept of position is a basic one in our construction of a model of thenphysical world: yet the theory of localisation in quantum mechanics is fraughtnwith difficulties, especially in the relativistic case. A strictly localised state forna nonrelativistic particle cannot be described by an ordinary function. In thenrelativistic case the problems are manifold. For a free electron, using the Diracnposition operator x, we cannot construct positive-energy states which localisenthe particle within a compact region. Furthermore it has been suggested that anconsistent one-particle description of localisation on a scale small compared tonthe Compton wavelength of the particle is ruled out because pair-productionnwould take place. These matters are dicussed at greater length in Chaptern1, where several proposed localisation schemes (that is, sets of definitions ofnlocalised states and position operators) are reviewed: none of these is deemednwholly satisfactory. Introductory remarks are also made in this chapter aboutnthe remarkable phenomenon of 'probability backflow', which is discussed further below, and which is relevant to our discussion of localisation.In Chapter 2 we show that while strict localisation of the free Dirac particle is not describable within the usual mathematical formalism, in terms of Dirac's position operator x it is possible to describe sequences of positive-energy states whose spread Dx = ((x -- x0)2) about a point X0 approaches zero.In Chapter 3 the component states of these sequences are used as the basis of a full causally well-behaved solution to the localisation problem for the free electron, with natural space-time transformation properties. It is shown that although x is not an observable in the usual sense, the four-vector density (p(x, t), j(x, t)/c) is observable, and can be localised arbitrarily precisely about any point in space, at any instant of time, using only positive-energy states. A suitable spin operator can be diagonalised at the same time.n n

•Jan 1, 2001•0 citations

Photon position eigenvectors lead to complete photon wave mechanics

Margaret Hawton

We have recently constructed a photon position operator with commuting components. This was long thought to be impossible, but our position eigenvectors have a vortex structure like twisted light. Thus they are not spherically symmetric and the position operator does not transform as a vector, so that previous non-existence arguments do not apply. We find two classes of position eigenvectors and obtain photon wave functions by projection onto the bases of position eigenkets that they define, following the usual rules of quantum mechanics. The hermitian position operator, r⁁(0), leads to a Landau-Peierls wave function, while field-like eigenvectors of the nonhermitian position operator and its adjoint lead to a biorthonormal basis. These two bases are equivalent in the sense that they are related by a similarity transformation. The eigenvectors of the nonhermitian operators r⁁(±½) lead to a field-potential wave function pair. These field-like positive frequency wave functions satisfy Maxwell's equations, and thus justify the supposition that MEs describe single photon wave mechanics. The expectation value of the number operator is photon density with undetected photons integrated over, consistent with Feynman's conclusion that the density of non-interacting particles can be interpreted as probability density.

arXiv:0711.0112•Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE•Aug 26, 2007•7 citations

Imaging Inside a Wavelength

J. Swain, Y. Musienko, S. Reucroft +2 more

Classical physics assigns sharp positions x,y,z to objects, but it is well-known in quantum mechanics that this description must give way to a blurrier picture with x,y,z promoted to operators in some Hilbert space. The photon poses a subtler problem as Newton and Wigner pointed out many years ago, and in fact there is no suitable position operator with all of the qualities one would expect-something new must arise. That new ingredient is that the various components xcirc,ycirc,zcirc of a position operator of rcirc no longer commute. The commutation relations are reminiscent of those of the x,y,z components of spin, and in fact the picture that emerges is one where the photon can have a well defined z, for example, representing the front of a light wave, while the and y components of its position become blurry in a wavelength-dependent fashion. We review these results and discuss possible experimental setups and expected results that may occur for the position of a photon inside its wavelength. Quantum theory predicts that a noncommutative effective geometry to emerge-a new prediction which present-day technology should just make it feasible to test

IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC)•Mar 21, 2006•0 citations

Quantum mechanics of a photon

Hassan Babaei, Ali Mostafazadeh

A first-quantized free photon is a complex massless vector field A=(Aμ) whose field strength satisfies Maxwell’s equations in vacuum. We construct the Hilbert space H of the photon by endowing the vector space of the fields A in the temporal-Coulomb gauge with a positive-definite and relativistically invariant inner product. We give an explicit expression for this inner product, identify the Hamiltonian for the photon with the generator of time translations in H, determine the operators representing the momentum and the helicity of the photon, and introduce a chirality operator whose eigenfunctions correspond to fields having a definite sign of energy. We also construct a position operator for the photon whose components commute with each other and with the chirality and helicity operators. This allows for the construction of the localized states of the photon with a definite sign of energy and helicity. We derive an explicit formula for the latter and compute the corresponding electric and magnetic fields. These turn out to diverge not just at the point where the photon is localized but on a plane containing this point. We identify the axis normal to this plane with an associated symmetry axis and show that each choice of this axis specifies a particular position operator, a corresponding position basis, and a position representation of the quantum mechanics of a photon. In particular, we examine the position wave functions determined by such a position basis, elucidate their relationship with the Riemann-Silberstein and Landau-Peierls wave functions, and give an explicit formula for the probability density of the spatial localization of the photon.

arXiv:1608.06479•Journal of Mathematical Physics•Aug 1, 2017•25 citations

Photon position operator with commuting components

Margaret Hawton

A photon position operator with commuting components is constructed, and it is proved that it equals the Pryce operator plus a term that compensates for the adiabatic phase. Its eigenkets are transverse and longitudinal vectors, and thus states can be selected that have definite polarization or helicity. For angular momentum and boost operators defined in the usual way, all of the commutation relations of the Poincar\'e group are satisfied. This new position operator is unitarily equivalent to the Newton-Wigner-Pryce position operator for massive particles.

Physical Review A•Feb 1, 1999•63 citations
In this article, we show that in the level of quantum mechanics, a photon position operator with commuting components can be obtained in a more natural way; in the level of quantum field theory, the photon position operator corresponds to the center of the photon number. It is most interesting for us to show that, a photon inside a waveguide can be localized in the same sense that a massive particle can be localized in free space, and just as that it is impossible to localize a massive particle with a greater precision than its Compton wavelength, one can also arrival at a similar conclusion: it is impossible to localize a photon inside a waveguide with a greater precision than its equivalent Compton wavelength, which owing to evanescent-wave or photon-tunneling phenomena.
This chapter describes the photon wave function, and explains the basic properties of a well-defined mathematical object—a six-component function of space-time variables—that describes the quantum state of the photon. The most essential property that does not hold for the photon wave function is that the argument of the wave function cannot be directly associated with the position operator of the photon. The position operator for the photon simply does not exist. However, one should remember that for massive particles also, the true position operator exists only in the nonrelativistic approximation. The concept of localization associated with the Newton-Wigner position operator is not relativistically invariant. The photon wave function is not restricted to the wave mechanics of photons. The same wave functions also appear as mode functions in the expansion of the electromagnetic field operators.
The concept of position is a basic one in our construction of a model of thenphysical world: yet the theory of localisation in quantum mechanics is fraughtnwith difficulties, especially in the relativistic case. A strictly localised state forna nonrelativistic particle cannot be described by an ordinary function. In thenrelativistic case the problems are manifold. For a free electron, using the Diracnposition operator x, we cannot construct positive-energy states which localisenthe particle within a compact region. Furthermore it has been suggested that anconsistent one-particle description of localisation on a scale small compared tonthe Compton wavelength of the particle is ruled out because pair-productionnwould take place. These matters are dicussed at greater length in Chaptern1, where several proposed localisation schemes (that is, sets of definitions ofnlocalised states and position operators) are reviewed: none of these is deemednwholly satisfactory. Introductory remarks are also made in this chapter aboutnthe remarkable phenomenon of 'probability backflow', which is discussed further below, and which is relevant to our discussion of localisation.In Chapter 2 we show that while strict localisation of the free Dirac particle is not describable within the usual mathematical formalism, in terms of Dirac's position operator x it is possible to describe sequences of positive-energy states whose spread Dx = ((x -- x0)2) about a point X0 approaches zero.In Chapter 3 the component states of these sequences are used as the basis of a full causally well-behaved solution to the localisation problem for the free electron, with natural space-time transformation properties. It is shown that although x is not an observable in the usual sense, the four-vector density (p(x, t), j(x, t)/c) is observable, and can be localised arbitrarily precisely about any point in space, at any instant of time, using only positive-energy states. A suitable spin operator can be diagonalised at the same time.n n
We have recently constructed a photon position operator with commuting components. This was long thought to be impossible, but our position eigenvectors have a vortex structure like twisted light. Thus they are not spherically symmetric and the position operator does not transform as a vector, so that previous non-existence arguments do not apply. We find two classes of position eigenvectors and obtain photon wave functions by projection onto the bases of position eigenkets that they define, following the usual rules of quantum mechanics. The hermitian position operator, r⁁(0), leads to a Landau-Peierls wave function, while field-like eigenvectors of the nonhermitian position operator and its adjoint lead to a biorthonormal basis. These two bases are equivalent in the sense that they are related by a similarity transformation. The eigenvectors of the nonhermitian operators r⁁(±½) lead to a field-potential wave function pair. These field-like positive frequency wave functions satisfy Maxwell's equations, and thus justify the supposition that MEs describe single photon wave mechanics. The expectation value of the number operator is photon density with undetected photons integrated over, consistent with Feynman's conclusion that the density of non-interacting particles can be interpreted as probability density.
Classical physics assigns sharp positions x,y,z to objects, but it is well-known in quantum mechanics that this description must give way to a blurrier picture with x,y,z promoted to operators in some Hilbert space. The photon poses a subtler problem as Newton and Wigner pointed out many years ago, and in fact there is no suitable position operator with all of the qualities one would expect-something new must arise. That new ingredient is that the various components xcirc,ycirc,zcirc of a position operator of rcirc no longer commute. The commutation relations are reminiscent of those of the x,y,z components of spin, and in fact the picture that emerges is one where the photon can have a well defined z, for example, representing the front of a light wave, while the and y components of its position become blurry in a wavelength-dependent fashion. We review these results and discuss possible experimental setups and expected results that may occur for the position of a photon inside its wavelength. Quantum theory predicts that a noncommutative effective geometry to emerge-a new prediction which present-day technology should just make it feasible to test
A first-quantized free photon is a complex massless vector field A=(Aμ) whose field strength satisfies Maxwell’s equations in vacuum. We construct the Hilbert space H of the photon by endowing the vector space of the fields A in the temporal-Coulomb gauge with a positive-definite and relativistically invariant inner product. We give an explicit expression for this inner product, identify the Hamiltonian for the photon with the generator of time translations in H, determine the operators representing the momentum and the helicity of the photon, and introduce a chirality operator whose eigenfunctions correspond to fields having a definite sign of energy. We also construct a position operator for the photon whose components commute with each other and with the chirality and helicity operators. This allows for the construction of the localized states of the photon with a definite sign of energy and helicity. We derive an explicit formula for the latter and compute the corresponding electric and magnetic fields. These turn out to diverge not just at the point where the photon is localized but on a plane containing this point. We identify the axis normal to this plane with an associated symmetry axis and show that each choice of this axis specifies a particular position operator, a corresponding position basis, and a position representation of the quantum mechanics of a photon. In particular, we examine the position wave functions determined by such a position basis, elucidate their relationship with the Riemann-Silberstein and Landau-Peierls wave functions, and give an explicit formula for the probability density of the spatial localization of the photon.
A photon position operator with commuting components is constructed, and it is proved that it equals the Pryce operator plus a term that compensates for the adiabatic phase. Its eigenkets are transverse and longitudinal vectors, and thus states can be selected that have definite polarization or helicity. For angular momentum and boost operators defined in the usual way, all of the commutation relations of the Poincar\'e group are satisfied. This new position operator is unitarily equivalent to the Newton-Wigner-Pryce position operator for massive particles.