This chapter describes the photon wave function, and explains the basic properties of a well-defined mathematical object—a six-component function of space-time variables—that describes the quantum state of the photon. The most essential property that does not hold for the photon wave function is that the argument of the wave function cannot be directly associated with the position operator of the photon. The position operator for the photon simply does not exist. However, one should remember that for massive particles also, the true position operator exists only in the nonrelativistic approximation. The concept of localization associated with the Newton-Wigner position operator is not relativistically invariant. The photon wave function is not restricted to the wave mechanics of photons. The same wave functions also appear as mode functions in the expansion of the electromagnetic field operators.
This chapter describes the photon wave function, and explains the basic properties of a well-defined mathematical object—a six-component function of space-time variables—that describes the quantum state of the photon. The most essential property that does not hold for the photon wave function is that the argument of the wave function cannot be directly associated with the position operator of the photon. The position operator for the photon simply does not exist. However, one should remember that for massive particles also, the true position operator exists only in the nonrelativistic approximation. The concept of localization associated with the Newton-Wigner position operator is not relativistically invariant. The photon wave function is not restricted to the wave mechanics of photons. The same wave functions also appear as mode functions in the expansion of the electromagnetic field operators.
The properties of a wave equation for a six-component wave function of a photon are re-analyzed. It is shown that the wave equation presents all the properties required by quantum mechanics, except for the ones that are linked with the definition of the position operator. The situation is contrasted with the three-component formulation based on the Riemann-Silberstein wave function. The inconsistency of the latter with the principles of quantum mechanics is shown to arise from the usual interpretation of the wave function. Finally, the Lorentz invariance of the six-component wave equation is demonstrated explicitly for Lorentz boosts and space inversion.
Whilst quantum electrodynamics (QED) underwent an impressive development and reached its maturity in the middle of the last century, one of its basic concepts—the photon wave function in free space—was deprived of such fortune. Although the photon wave function in coordinate representation was introduced already in 1930 by Landau and Peierls, the concept was found to suffer from inherent difficulties that were not overcome during the century —see review (Bialynicki-Birula, 1996). The common explanation presented in textbooks, e.g., (Akhiezer & Berestetskii, 1965; Mandel & Wolf, 1995), may be summed up as follows: (i) no position operator exists for the photon, (ii) while the position wave function may be localized near a space-time point, the measurable quantities like the electromagnetic field vectors, energy, and the photodetection probability remain spread out due to their non-local relation with the position wave function.
The wave function Before beginning to describe the quantum theory of measurement, we shall discuss briefly the main concepts of quantum mechanics. Readers familiar with quantum mechanics may skip this section and go on to section 2.2. Consider, as a pedagogical aid, a classical particle that can move only along the x direction. For example, it might be a bead on an infinite needle. If we know at any moment of time the values of two numbers, the particle's position and momentum, then we can compute from them all other features of the particle's motion: the forces acting on it, its resulting acceleration, etc. In other words, this pair of numbers, the position and momentum, completely define the state of the classical particle at the chosen moment of time. Similarly, for three-dimensional motion the state is defined by six numbers: the three spatial coordinates x, y, z and the three corresponding components of the momentum p x , p y , p z . A quantum object, with its dual particle-like and wave-like properties, is much more complex than a classical particle. Interferometric experiments (chapter I) show that the object can be spread out over some region of space, or for the bead on a needle, over an interval of x .
Abstract Through the classic work of Planck, Einstein, and others the particle nature of the photon has been established. In the previous chapter we considered the wave field of the photon. In this chapter we will emphasize more its particle nature and discuss the extent to which a wave function with a probabilistic interpretation is an appropriate description. Once we have the concept of a particle it is natural to ask how localized the state can be. The degree of localizability of photons is of concern in the interpretation of experiments in quantum optics involving weak light sources and non-linear electromagnetic media. If a photon is not to have the structure of a composite particle its quantum states should be describable by translations, rotations, and Lorentz boosts of a particular state and possibly super positions of such states. This is equivalent to a photon being associated with an irreducible representation of the Poincaré group. A brief overview of the general theory of group representations is given in Appendix 3. We will be able to give a complete discussion of the representations of the Poincaré group pertinent to the photon. Our discussion of localizability will be quite rigorous but we will gloss over measure-theoretic niceties. For more mathematical discussions the reader can refer to the works of Mackey (1978) and Wightman (1962). We will finish the chapter by examining the implication of Poincaré invariance for the metric on the space of quantum states of the photon.
Non-classical light sources are now being developed in more and more laboratories. Their noise reduction properties are potentially important for technology. Examples are squeezed and antibunched light sources. It is tempting to picture in some of these processes single photons flying through space. In non-relativistic quantum mechanics it is easy to discuss the properties of particle localisation in a general context without recourse to a particular experimental configuration. A position operator exists and the localised states are just the eigenstates of this operator. The situation in relativistic quantum mechanics (or field theory) is not as straightforward. The photon is relativistic and it has the addi-tional property of being massless. It has no position operator associated with it. Yet, nevertheless, it is possible to pose the question of finding a generic construction for a wave packet for the photon which is localised as far as possible in some (imaginary) box in space. The difficulty of the construction follows from the fact that in an electromagnetic wave the polarisation is perpendicular to the direction of propagation. Thus we need to construct a vector field which is localised and has this transverse property related to the masslessness of the photon.
A brief account of the connection between the photon little group and gauge in- variance is given, considering the four-potential as the wave function of the photon. In most textbooks single photons are associated to the quanta of monochromatic plane-wave components of the electromagnetic field. However, polychromatic superposition of such states may also represent single photons. Having established the framework for polychromatic single-photon states in Hilbert space, and upon a discussion of the mean value and variance of the photon Hamilton operator for polychromatic states, we turn our attention to- wards the single-photon description in direct space. A photon wave function in direct space is obtained via the inner product of the photon mean position state (introduced in Chapter 3 ) and the Hilbert space polychromatic single-photon state. Noting that the photon is a relativistic object a rigorous polychromatic photon wave function is, in the continuum superposition of monochromatic plane-wave components, obtained noting the form of the relativistically invari- ant volume element in wave-vector space. We establish a wave-packet basis for single-photon states in Hilbert space, and the related photon wave functions. Thereafter, multi-photon wave packets are discussed, and the equal-time com- mutator relations between the wave packets are discussed, and the equal-time commutator relations between the wave-packet annihilation and creation oper- ators set up. As an example, we focus on two-photon wave packet states. We finish the chapter by a discussion of the two-photon concept and two-photon wave mechanics, analysing in particular the physical difference between two photons and bi-photons (an entangled state of two photons).