Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0509054 · IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC)

Further results on the observability of quantum systems under general measurement

Domenico D’Alessandro, R. Romano

Published Oct 4, 2006• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In this paper, we present a collection of results on the observability of quantum mechanical systems, in the case the output is the result of a discrete nonselective measurement. nt. By defining an effective observable, we extend previous results, on the Lie algebraic characterization of observable systems, to general measurements. Further results include the characterization of a `best probe' (i.e. a minimally disturbing probe) in indirect measurement and a study of the relation between disturbance and observability in this case. We also discuss how the observability properties of a quantum system relate to the problem of state reconstruction. Extensions of the formalism to the case of selective measurements are also given.

DOI
10.1109/cdc.2005.1582419

Related papers

On the observability and state determination of quantum mechanical systems

Deanna M. D’Alessandro

We consider the problem of determining the state of a quantum system via a series of controlled evolutions and nonselective measurements of a given observable. Generalizing previous results to the case of possibly degenerate observables, we give a bound on the maximum number of parameters of the state that can be determined. We give a general algorithm for the determination of the maximum number of parameters. We also discuss how indirect measurement, when the system and probe are jointly controllable, allows one to determine all the parameters of the quantum state

IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC)•Jan 1, 2004•2 citations

Indirect controllability and indirect observability of quantum mechanical systems

Domenico D’Alessandro, Raffaele Romano

In many experiments, a target quantum mechanical system is controlled and-or measured indirectly using an auxiliary quantum system. In the case of control, this means that the control action only affects the auxiliary system while the evolution of the target system is affected indirectly through the interaction with the auxiliary system. In the case of measurement, only the state of the auxiliary system can be measured, providing information on the initial state of the target system. Indirect controllability is the property of the target system of being driven between two arbitrary states while indirect observability refers to the possibility of extracting all the information on the state of the target system by measuring the auxiliary system. This paper has three main goals. First, we summarize recent notions and results introduced by us on the study of indirect controllability. Then, we present some new technical results on indirect controllability. In particular, we present a counterexample to the converse of a criterion for indirect controllability, which shows that the Lie algebraic condition introduced in this criterion is necessary but not sufficient for indirect controllability. This gives an open problem which is how to strengthen this condition to obtain a necessary and sufficient condition for indirect controllability. Lastly, we present a parallel treatment of indirect observability, give the relevant notions and definitions and relate the properties of indirect controllability and observability. Our final result says that strong notions of indirect controllability and observability are equivalent properties to complete controllability of the system. We discuss examples of physical systems which are controlled and-or measured indirectly. The research is motivated by experimental schemes of current interest

IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC)•Dec 1, 2012•0 citations

Uncertainty characteristics of generalized quantum measurements

Holger Friedrich Hofmann

The effects of any quantum measurement can be described by a collection of measurement operators ${{M}_{m}}$ acting on the quantum state of the measured system. However, the Hilbert space formalism tends to obscure the relationship between the measurement results and the physical properties of the measured system. In this paper, a characterization of measurement operators in terms of measurement resolution and disturbance is developed. It is then possible to formulate uncertainty relations for the measurement process that are valid for arbitrary input states. The motivation of these concepts is explained from a quantum communication viewpoint. It is shown that the intuitive interpretation of uncertainty as a relation between measurement resolution and disturbance provides a valid description of measurement back action. Possible applications to quantum cryptography, quantum cloning, and teleportation are discussed.

arXiv:quant-ph/0209162•Physical Review A•Feb 13, 2003•18 citations

Measures of disturbance and incompatibility for quantum measurements

Prabha Mandayam, M. D. Srinivas

We propose a class of incompatibility measures for quantum observables based on quantifying the effect of a measurement of one observable on the statistics of the outcomes of another. Specifically, for a pair of observables $A$ and $B$ with purely discrete spectra, we compare the following two probability distributions: one resulting from a measurement of $A$ followed by a measurement of $B$ on a given state and the other obtained from a measurement of $B$ alone on the same state. We show that maximizing the distance between these two distributions over all states yields a valid measure of the incompatibility of observables $A$ and $B$, which is zero if and only if they commute and is strictly greater than zero (and less than or equal to one) otherwise. For finite-dimensional systems, we obtain a tight upper bound on the incompatibility of any pair of observables and show that the bound is attained when the observables are totally nondegenerate and associated with mutually unbiased bases. In the process, we also establish an important relation between the incompatibility of a pair of observables and the maximal disturbances due to their measurements. Finally, we indicate how these measures of incompatibility and disturbance can be extended to the more general class of nonprojective measurements. In particular, we obtain a nontrivial upper bound on the incompatibility of one L\"uders instrument with another.

arXiv:1402.0810•Physical Review A•Jun 17, 2014•9 citations

Nondisturbing quantum measurements

Teiko Heinosaari, Michael M. Wolf

We consider pairs of discrete quantum observables (POVMs) and analyze the relation between the notions of nondisturbance, joint measurability, and commutativity. We specify conditions under which these properties coincide or differ—depending, for instance, on the interplay between the number of outcomes and the Hilbert space dimension or on algebraic properties of the effect operators. We also show that (non-)disturbance is, in general, not a symmetric relation and that it can be decided and quantified by means of a semidefinite program.

arXiv:1005.5659•Journal of Mathematical Physics•Sep 1, 2010•83 citations

Measurement in Quantum Field Theory

Christopher J. Fewster, Rainer Verch

The topic of measurement in relativistic quantum field theory is addressed in this article. Some of the long standing problems of this subject are highlighted, including the incompatibility of an instantaneous ``collapse of the wavefunction'' with relativity of simultaneity, and the difficulty of maintaining causality in the rules for measurement highlighted by ``impossible measurement'' scenarios. Thereafter, the issue is considered from the perspective of mathematical physics. To this end, quantum field theory is described in a model-independent, operator algebraic setting, on generic Lorentzian spacetime manifolds. The process of measurement is modelled by a localized dynamical coupling between a quantum field called the ``system'', and another quantum field, called the ``probe''. The result of the dynamical coupling is a scattering map, whereby measurements carried out on the probe can be interpreted as measurements of induced observables on the system. The localization of the dynamical coupling allows it to derive causal relations for the induced observables. It will be discussed how this approach leads to the concept of selective or non-selective system state updates conditioned on the result of probe measurements, which in turn allows it to obtain conditional probabilities for consecutive probe measurements consistent with relativistic causality and general covariance, without the need for a physical collapse of the wavefunction. In particular, the problem of impossible measurements is resolved. Finally, there is a brief discussion of accelerated detectors and other related work.

arXiv:2304.13356•Apr 26, 2023•2 citations
In this paper, we present a collection of results on the observability of quantum mechanical systems, in the case the output is the result of a discrete nonselective measurement. nt. By defining an effective observable, we extend previous results, on the Lie algebraic characterization of observable systems, to general measurements. Further results include the characterization of a `best probe' (i.e. a minimally disturbing probe) in indirect measurement and a study of the relation between disturbance and observability in this case. We also discuss how the observability properties of a quantum system relate to the problem of state reconstruction. Extensions of the formalism to the case of selective measurements are also given.
We consider the problem of determining the state of a quantum system via a series of controlled evolutions and nonselective measurements of a given observable. Generalizing previous results to the case of possibly degenerate observables, we give a bound on the maximum number of parameters of the state that can be determined. We give a general algorithm for the determination of the maximum number of parameters. We also discuss how indirect measurement, when the system and probe are jointly controllable, allows one to determine all the parameters of the quantum state
In many experiments, a target quantum mechanical system is controlled and-or measured indirectly using an auxiliary quantum system. In the case of control, this means that the control action only affects the auxiliary system while the evolution of the target system is affected indirectly through the interaction with the auxiliary system. In the case of measurement, only the state of the auxiliary system can be measured, providing information on the initial state of the target system. Indirect controllability is the property of the target system of being driven between two arbitrary states while indirect observability refers to the possibility of extracting all the information on the state of the target system by measuring the auxiliary system. This paper has three main goals. First, we summarize recent notions and results introduced by us on the study of indirect controllability. Then, we present some new technical results on indirect controllability. In particular, we present a counterexample to the converse of a criterion for indirect controllability, which shows that the Lie algebraic condition introduced in this criterion is necessary but not sufficient for indirect controllability. This gives an open problem which is how to strengthen this condition to obtain a necessary and sufficient condition for indirect controllability. Lastly, we present a parallel treatment of indirect observability, give the relevant notions and definitions and relate the properties of indirect controllability and observability. Our final result says that strong notions of indirect controllability and observability are equivalent properties to complete controllability of the system. We discuss examples of physical systems which are controlled and-or measured indirectly. The research is motivated by experimental schemes of current interest
The effects of any quantum measurement can be described by a collection of measurement operators Mm{{M}_{m}}Mm​ acting on the quantum state of the measured system. However, the Hilbert space formalism tends to obscure the relationship between the measurement results and the physical properties of the measured system. In this paper, a characterization of measurement operators in terms of measurement resolution and disturbance is developed. It is then possible to formulate uncertainty relations for the measurement process that are valid for arbitrary input states. The motivation of these concepts is explained from a quantum communication viewpoint. It is shown that the intuitive interpretation of uncertainty as a relation between measurement resolution and disturbance provides a valid description of measurement back action. Possible applications to quantum cryptography, quantum cloning, and teleportation are discussed.
We propose a class of incompatibility measures for quantum observables based on quantifying the effect of a measurement of one observable on the statistics of the outcomes of another. Specifically, for a pair of observables AAA and BBB with purely discrete spectra, we compare the following two probability distributions: one resulting from a measurement of AAA followed by a measurement of BBB on a given state and the other obtained from a measurement of BBB alone on the same state. We show that maximizing the distance between these two distributions over all states yields a valid measure of the incompatibility of observables AAA and BBB, which is zero if and only if they commute and is strictly greater than zero (and less than or equal to one) otherwise. For finite-dimensional systems, we obtain a tight upper bound on the incompatibility of any pair of observables and show that the bound is attained when the observables are totally nondegenerate and associated with mutually unbiased bases. In the process, we also establish an important relation between the incompatibility of a pair of observables and the maximal disturbances due to their measurements. Finally, we indicate how these measures of incompatibility and disturbance can be extended to the more general class of nonprojective measurements. In particular, we obtain a nontrivial upper bound on the incompatibility of one L\"uders instrument with another.
We consider pairs of discrete quantum observables (POVMs) and analyze the relation between the notions of nondisturbance, joint measurability, and commutativity. We specify conditions under which these properties coincide or differ—depending, for instance, on the interplay between the number of outcomes and the Hilbert space dimension or on algebraic properties of the effect operators. We also show that (non-)disturbance is, in general, not a symmetric relation and that it can be decided and quantified by means of a semidefinite program.
The topic of measurement in relativistic quantum field theory is addressed in this article. Some of the long standing problems of this subject are highlighted, including the incompatibility of an instantaneous ``collapse of the wavefunction'' with relativity of simultaneity, and the difficulty of maintaining causality in the rules for measurement highlighted by ``impossible measurement'' scenarios. Thereafter, the issue is considered from the perspective of mathematical physics. To this end, quantum field theory is described in a model-independent, operator algebraic setting, on generic Lorentzian spacetime manifolds. The process of measurement is modelled by a localized dynamical coupling between a quantum field called the ``system'', and another quantum field, called the ``probe''. The result of the dynamical coupling is a scattering map, whereby measurements carried out on the probe can be interpreted as measurements of induced observables on the system. The localization of the dynamical coupling allows it to derive causal relations for the induced observables. It will be discussed how this approach leads to the concept of selective or non-selective system state updates conditioned on the result of probe measurements, which in turn allows it to obtain conditional probabilities for consecutive probe measurements consistent with relativistic causality and general covariance, without the need for a physical collapse of the wavefunction. In particular, the problem of impossible measurements is resolved. Finally, there is a brief discussion of accelerated detectors and other related work.