Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1402.0810 · Physical Review A

Measures of disturbance and incompatibility for quantum measurements

Prabha Mandayam, M. D. Srinivas

Published Jun 17, 2014• 9 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We propose a class of incompatibility measures for quantum observables based on quantifying the effect of a measurement of one observable on the statistics of the outcomes of another. Specifically, for a pair of observables $A$ and $B$ with purely discrete spectra, we compare the following two probability distributions: one resulting from a measurement of $A$ followed by a measurement of $B$ on a given state and the other obtained from a measurement of $B$ alone on the same state. We show that maximizing the distance between these two distributions over all states yields a valid measure of the incompatibility of observables $A$ and $B$, which is zero if and only if they commute and is strictly greater than zero (and less than or equal to one) otherwise. For finite-dimensional systems, we obtain a tight upper bound on the incompatibility of any pair of observables and show that the bound is attained when the observables are totally nondegenerate and associated with mutually unbiased bases. In the process, we also establish an important relation between the incompatibility of a pair of observables and the maximal disturbances due to their measurements. Finally, we indicate how these measures of incompatibility and disturbance can be extended to the more general class of nonprojective measurements. In particular, we obtain a nontrivial upper bound on the incompatibility of one L\"uders instrument with another.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.89.062112

Related papers

A Class of Distance-Based Incompatibility Measures for Quantum Measurements

Prabha Mandayam, M. D. Srinivas

We discuss a recently proposed class of incompatibility measures for quantum measurements, which is based on quantifying the effect of measurements of one observable on the statistics of the outcome of another. We summarize the properties of this class of measures, and present a tight upper bound for the incompatibility of any set of projective measurements in finite dimensions. We also discuss non-projective measurements, and give a non-trivial upper bound on the mutual incompatibility of a pair of Luders instruments. Using the example of incompatible observables that commute on a subspace, we elucidate how this class of measures goes beyond uncertainty relations in quantifying the mutual incompatibility of quantum measurements.

Current Science•Dec 1, 2015•0 citations

Operational measure of incompatibility of noncommuting observables

Somshubhro Bandyopadhyay, Prabha Mandayam

Uncertainty relations are often considered to be a measure of incompatibility of noncommuting observables. However, such a consideration is not valid in general, motivating the need for an alternate measure that applies to any set of noncommuting observables. We present an operational approach to quantifying incompatibility without invoking uncertainty relations. Our measure aims to capture the incompatibility of noncommuting observables as manifest in the nonorthogonality of their eigenstates. We prove that this measure has all the desired properties: It is zero when the observables commute, strictly greater than zero when they do not, and is maximum when they are mutually unbiased. We also obtain tight upper bounds on this measure for any $N$ noncommuting observables and compute it exactly when the observables are mutually unbiased.

arXiv:1301.4762•Physical Review A•Apr 29, 2013•5 citations

Incompatibility robustness of quantum measurements: a unified framework

Sébastien Designolle, Máté Farkas, Jędrzej Kaniewski

Abstract In quantum mechanics performing a measurement is an invasive process which generally disturbs the system. Due to this phenomenon, there exist incompatible quantum measurements, i.e. measurements that cannot be simultaneously performed on a single copy of the system. It is then natural to ask what the most incompatible quantum measurements are. To answer this question, several measures have been proposed to quantify how incompatible a set of measurements is, however their properties are not well-understood. In this work, we develop a general framework that encompasses all the commonly used measures of incompatibility based on robustness to noise. Moreover, we propose several conditions that a measure of incompatibility should satisfy, and investigate whether the existing measures comply with them. We find that some of the widely used measures do not fulfil these basic requirements. We also show that when looking for the most incompatible pairs of measurements, we obtain different answers depending on the exact measure. For one of the measures, we analytically prove that projective measurements onto two mutually unbiased bases are among the most incompatible pairs in every dimension. However, for some of the remaining measures we find that some peculiar measurements turn out to be even more incompatible.

arXiv:1906.00448•New Journal of Physics•Oct 22, 2019•79 citations

Quantifying measurement incompatibility via measurement disturbance

Yi Rong Guo, Shunlong Luo

The incompatibility between quantum measurements (as mathematically represented by positive operator-valued measures, i.e., POVMs) is a key feature of quantum mechanics and is intrinsically related to the noncommutativity of operators. For both theoretical and practical considerations, it is desirable to quantify the degree of incompatibility between quantum measurements, and considerable effort has been devoted to this issue. In this paper, we provide a novel approach to measurement incompatibility by exploiting the Lüders channels derived from POVMs and employing the measurement disturbance to quantify incompatibility. This is achieved by constructing an approximately joint measurement for a pair of POVMs, which is an enlarged POVM with the correct marginal property for one of the two POVMs but not necessarily for the other. The degree of failure of the marginal property for the other POVM is a kind of measurement disturbance and can be naturally interpreted as a quantifier of the incompatibility between the two POVMs. We reveal basic properties of this quantifier of measurement incompatibility, identify its maximal value in some cases, compare it with several popular measures in the literature, and illustrate it with some typical examples. Some related open issues are also discussed.

Theoretical and Mathematical Physics•May 1, 2025•2 citations

Incompatibility of quantum instruments

Leevi Leppäjärvi, Michal Sedlák

Quantum instruments describe outcome probability as well as state change induced by measurement of a quantum system. Incompatibility of two instruments, i. e. the impossibility to realize them simultaneously on a given quantum system, generalizes incompatibility of channels and incompatibility of positive operator-valued measures (POVMs). We derive implications of instrument compatibility for the induced POVMs and channels. We also study relation of instrument compatibility to the concept of non-disturbance. Finally, we prove equivalence between instrument compatibility and postprocessing of certain instruments, which we term complementary instruments. We illustrate our findings on examples of various classes of instruments.

arXiv:2212.11225•Quantum•Feb 12, 2024•8 citations

Quantifying Measurement Incompatibility of Mutually Unbiased Bases

Sébastien Designolle, Paul Skrzypczyk, Florian Fröwis +1 more

Quantum measurements based on mutually unbiased bases are commonly used in quantum information processing, as they are generally viewed as being maximally incompatible and complementary. Here we quantify precisely the degree of incompatibility of mutually unbiased bases (MUB) using the notion of noise robustness. Specifically, for sets of k MUB in dimension d, we provide upper and lower bounds on this quantity. Notably, we get a tight bound in several cases, in particular for complete sets of k=d+1 MUB (using the standard construction for d being a prime power). On the way, we also derive a general upper bound on the noise robustness for an arbitrary set of quantum measurements. Moreover, we prove the existence of sets of k MUB that are operationally inequivalent, as they feature different noise robustness, and we provide a lower bound on the number of such inequivalent sets up to dimension 32. Finally, we discuss applications of our results for Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering.

arXiv:1805.09609•Physical Review Letters•Feb 6, 2019•77 citations
We propose a class of incompatibility measures for quantum observables based on quantifying the effect of a measurement of one observable on the statistics of the outcomes of another. Specifically, for a pair of observables AAA and BBB with purely discrete spectra, we compare the following two probability distributions: one resulting from a measurement of AAA followed by a measurement of BBB on a given state and the other obtained from a measurement of BBB alone on the same state. We show that maximizing the distance between these two distributions over all states yields a valid measure of the incompatibility of observables AAA and BBB, which is zero if and only if they commute and is strictly greater than zero (and less than or equal to one) otherwise. For finite-dimensional systems, we obtain a tight upper bound on the incompatibility of any pair of observables and show that the bound is attained when the observables are totally nondegenerate and associated with mutually unbiased bases. In the process, we also establish an important relation between the incompatibility of a pair of observables and the maximal disturbances due to their measurements. Finally, we indicate how these measures of incompatibility and disturbance can be extended to the more general class of nonprojective measurements. In particular, we obtain a nontrivial upper bound on the incompatibility of one L"uders instrument with another.
We discuss a recently proposed class of incompatibility measures for quantum measurements, which is based on quantifying the effect of measurements of one observable on the statistics of the outcome of another. We summarize the properties of this class of measures, and present a tight upper bound for the incompatibility of any set of projective measurements in finite dimensions. We also discuss non-projective measurements, and give a non-trivial upper bound on the mutual incompatibility of a pair of Luders instruments. Using the example of incompatible observables that commute on a subspace, we elucidate how this class of measures goes beyond uncertainty relations in quantifying the mutual incompatibility of quantum measurements.
Uncertainty relations are often considered to be a measure of incompatibility of noncommuting observables. However, such a consideration is not valid in general, motivating the need for an alternate measure that applies to any set of noncommuting observables. We present an operational approach to quantifying incompatibility without invoking uncertainty relations. Our measure aims to capture the incompatibility of noncommuting observables as manifest in the nonorthogonality of their eigenstates. We prove that this measure has all the desired properties: It is zero when the observables commute, strictly greater than zero when they do not, and is maximum when they are mutually unbiased. We also obtain tight upper bounds on this measure for any NNN noncommuting observables and compute it exactly when the observables are mutually unbiased.
Abstract In quantum mechanics performing a measurement is an invasive process which generally disturbs the system. Due to this phenomenon, there exist incompatible quantum measurements, i.e. measurements that cannot be simultaneously performed on a single copy of the system. It is then natural to ask what the most incompatible quantum measurements are. To answer this question, several measures have been proposed to quantify how incompatible a set of measurements is, however their properties are not well-understood. In this work, we develop a general framework that encompasses all the commonly used measures of incompatibility based on robustness to noise. Moreover, we propose several conditions that a measure of incompatibility should satisfy, and investigate whether the existing measures comply with them. We find that some of the widely used measures do not fulfil these basic requirements. We also show that when looking for the most incompatible pairs of measurements, we obtain different answers depending on the exact measure. For one of the measures, we analytically prove that projective measurements onto two mutually unbiased bases are among the most incompatible pairs in every dimension. However, for some of the remaining measures we find that some peculiar measurements turn out to be even more incompatible.
The incompatibility between quantum measurements (as mathematically represented by positive operator-valued measures, i.e., POVMs) is a key feature of quantum mechanics and is intrinsically related to the noncommutativity of operators. For both theoretical and practical considerations, it is desirable to quantify the degree of incompatibility between quantum measurements, and considerable effort has been devoted to this issue. In this paper, we provide a novel approach to measurement incompatibility by exploiting the Lüders channels derived from POVMs and employing the measurement disturbance to quantify incompatibility. This is achieved by constructing an approximately joint measurement for a pair of POVMs, which is an enlarged POVM with the correct marginal property for one of the two POVMs but not necessarily for the other. The degree of failure of the marginal property for the other POVM is a kind of measurement disturbance and can be naturally interpreted as a quantifier of the incompatibility between the two POVMs. We reveal basic properties of this quantifier of measurement incompatibility, identify its maximal value in some cases, compare it with several popular measures in the literature, and illustrate it with some typical examples. Some related open issues are also discussed.
Quantum instruments describe outcome probability as well as state change induced by measurement of a quantum system. Incompatibility of two instruments, i. e. the impossibility to realize them simultaneously on a given quantum system, generalizes incompatibility of channels and incompatibility of positive operator-valued measures (POVMs). We derive implications of instrument compatibility for the induced POVMs and channels. We also study relation of instrument compatibility to the concept of non-disturbance. Finally, we prove equivalence between instrument compatibility and postprocessing of certain instruments, which we term complementary instruments. We illustrate our findings on examples of various classes of instruments.
Quantum measurements based on mutually unbiased bases are commonly used in quantum information processing, as they are generally viewed as being maximally incompatible and complementary. Here we quantify precisely the degree of incompatibility of mutually unbiased bases (MUB) using the notion of noise robustness. Specifically, for sets of k MUB in dimension d, we provide upper and lower bounds on this quantity. Notably, we get a tight bound in several cases, in particular for complete sets of k=d+1 MUB (using the standard construction for d being a prime power). On the way, we also derive a general upper bound on the noise robustness for an arbitrary set of quantum measurements. Moreover, we prove the existence of sets of k MUB that are operationally inequivalent, as they feature different noise robustness, and we provide a lower bound on the number of such inequivalent sets up to dimension 32. Finally, we discuss applications of our results for Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen steering.