Theoretical and Mathematical Physics

Quantifying measurement incompatibility via measurement disturbance

Yi Rong Guo, Shunlong Luo

Published May 1, 2025• 2 citations

Abstract

The incompatibility between quantum measurements (as mathematically represented by positive operator-valued measures, i.e., POVMs) is a key feature of quantum mechanics and is intrinsically related to the noncommutativity of operators. For both theoretical and practical considerations, it is desirable to quantify the degree of incompatibility between quantum measurements, and considerable effort has been devoted to this issue. In this paper, we provide a novel approach to measurement incompatibility by exploiting the Lüders channels derived from POVMs and employing the measurement disturbance to quantify incompatibility. This is achieved by constructing an approximately joint measurement for a pair of POVMs, which is an enlarged POVM with the correct marginal property for one of the two POVMs but not necessarily for the other. The degree of failure of the marginal property for the other POVM is a kind of measurement disturbance and can be naturally interpreted as a quantifier of the incompatibility between the two POVMs. We reveal basic properties of this quantifier of measurement incompatibility, identify its maximal value in some cases, compare it with several popular measures in the literature, and illustrate it with some typical examples. Some related open issues are also discussed.

DOI: 10.1134/s0040577925050071

Related papers

Quantifying incompatibility between positive operator-valued measures via negativity of the Jordan product

Yi Rong Guo, Shunlong Luo

A fundamental feature of quantum mechanics is the incompatibility between quantum measurements, which leads to the Heisenberg uncertainty relations and is intrinsically related to detection of many other quantum features such as nonlocality and steering. Given the significance and ubiquity of incompatibility, it is desirable to quantify the degree of incompatibility between two quantum measurements which are mathematically described by positive operator valued measures. The commutator (Lie product) between operators has widely been used in quantifying incompatibility (noncommutativity) and plays a crucial role in quantum mechanics. In contrast, the anticommutator (Jordan product) between operators has been relatively less employed in the study of quantum mechanics. In this work, we explore the role of the Jordan product in characterizing measurement incompatibility. The key observation lies in that while the product of two non-negative classical observables is automatically non-negative, this is not the case for quantum observables. Indeed the Jordan product of two non-negative observables is not necessarily non-negative. This negativity of the Jordan product is a purely quantum phenomenon and is here exploited to quantify a kind of measurement incompatibility, which interpolates between noncommutativity and joint measurability. We reveal basic features of this approach, make some comparisons with existing quantifiers of incompatibility and suggest the issue of investigating its applications and implications in quantum information tasks.

Physical Review ADec 5, 20249 citations

The statistical disturbance bound of quantum measurements

Ties-A. Ohst, Sebastian Schlösser, Roope Uola

Quantifying the disturbance caused by a quantum measurement typically requires detailed knowledge of the underlying measurement channel. In this work, we introduce a statistical disturbance bound, which connects the statistical properties of a quantum measurement to the state disturbance induced by any compatible measurement channel. Specifically, we show that the average fidelity between input and output with respect to an arbitrary ensemble of pure input states is fundamentally bounded in terms of the measurement, described as a positive operator-valued measure (POVM). We further develop the weighted state exclusion technique, which enables an experimental determination of the statistical disturbance bound without requiring explicit knowledge of the measurement effects. To see the advantages of our approach over existing information-disturbance relations, we show that our bound distinguishes between measurements with equivalent informativeness. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the weighted state exclusion technique can detect and quantify measurement-induced disturbance using state preparations that are insufficient for tomographic reconstruction of the measurement operators. Finally, we illustrate how disturbance bounds defined with respect to specific input ensembles can be used to bound an eavesdropper's guessing probability in a simple protocol for quantum randomness generation.

quant-pharXiv:2607.15874Jul 20, 20260 citations

Incompatibility of quantum instruments

Leevi Leppäjärvi, Michal Sedlák

Quantum instruments describe outcome probability as well as state change induced by measurement of a quantum system. Incompatibility of two instruments, i. e. the impossibility to realize them simultaneously on a given quantum system, generalizes incompatibility of channels and incompatibility of positive operator-valued measures (POVMs). We derive implications of instrument compatibility for the induced POVMs and channels. We also study relation of instrument compatibility to the concept of non-disturbance. Finally, we prove equivalence between instrument compatibility and postprocessing of certain instruments, which we term complementary instruments. We illustrate our findings on examples of various classes of instruments.

arXiv:2212.11225QuantumFeb 12, 20248 citations

Robustness-based bounds for approximate joint realizations of incompatible quantum channels

Shintaro Minagawa, Ryo Takakura, Kensei Torii

Several quantum channels may fail to admit an exact joint realization, a property known as incompatibility. Channel incompatibility unifies various quantum limitations, such as measurement uncertainty, the no-information-without-disturbance principle, and the no-cloning and no-broadcasting theorems. We address how accurately incompatible channels can be approximated by the marginals of a single joint channel, quantified by the minimum total diamond-norm error over all joint realizations. We establish two-sided bounds relating it to the generalized robustness of incompatibility (RoI), a noise-based resource quantifier of incompatibility. For identity channels, we determine both the RoI and the minimum total error exactly. The upper bound is attained by the optimal symmetric universal cloner, while the prefactor in the lower bound is asymptotically optimal as the dimension tends to infinity. Applying this result to measurement channels provides a unified, model-independent framework encompassing error-error and information-error-disturbance tradeoffs. Furthermore, our robustness-based evaluation of disturbance outperforms an algebraic bound for every non-trivial POVM in dimensions up to six.

quant-pharXiv:2605.11924May 13, 20260 citations

Measurement uncertainty relations: characterising optimal error bounds for qubits

Tom Bullock, Paul Busch

Abstract In standard formulations of the uncertainty principle, two fundamental features are typically cast as impossibility statements: two noncommuting observables cannot in general both be sharply defined (for the same state), nor can they be measured jointly. The pioneers of quantum mechanics were acutely aware and puzzled by this fact, and it motivated Heisenberg to seek a mitigation, which he formulated in his seminal paper of 1927. He provided intuitive arguments to show that the values of, say, the position and momentum of a particle can at least be unsharply defined, and they can be measured together provided some approximation errors are allowed. Only now, nine decades later, a working theory of approximate joint measurements is taking shape, leading to rigorous and experimentally testable formulations of associated error tradeoff relations. Here we briefly review this new development, explaining the concepts and steps taken in the construction of optimal joint approximations of pairs of incompatible observables. As a case study, we deduce measurement uncertainty relations for qubit observables using two distinct error measures. We provide an operational interpretation of the error bounds and discuss some of the first experimental tests of such relations.

arXiv:1512.00104Journal of Physics A Mathematical and TheoreticalMay 23, 201813 citations

Quantification of Jordan incompatibility for triple positive operator-valued measures

Yuan-Yuan Duan, Li-Guang Wang, Zheng-Li Chen

Abstract We investigate the compatibility of three positive operator-valued measures via the triple Jordan product. First, we establish the necessary and sufficient conditions for Jordan compatibility of three unbiased qubit measurements. Then, based on the negativity of the triple Jordan product, we propose a measure to quantify the incompatibility of three POVMs and elaborate on several key properties. Subsequently, we study the scenario of maximal incompatibility for three unbiased qubit measurements and prove that this maximum is attained when three POVMs are constructed from three mutually unbiased bases. Finally, we illustrate our quantification with two concrete examples.

Chinese Physics BApr 8, 20260 citations