Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0507108 · Bulletin of the American Physical Society

Influence-free states on compound quantum systems

Howard Barnum, Christopher A. Fuchs, Joseph M. Renes, Alexander Wilce

Published Jul 12, 2005• 20 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Let Alice and Bob be able to make local quantum measurements and communicate classically. The set of mathematically consistent joint probability assignments (``states'') for such measurements is properly larger than the set of quantum-mechanical mixed states for the Alice-Bob system. It is canonically isomorphic to the set of positive (not necessarily completely positive) linear maps Phi from the bounded linear operators on Alice's space to those on Bob's, for which Tr Phi(I)=1. We review the fact that allowing classical communication is equivalent to enforcing ``no-instantaneous-signalling'' (``no--influence'') in the direction opposite the communication. We establish that in the subclass of ``decomposable'' states, i.e. convex combinations of positive states with "PTP" ones whose partial transpose is positive, the extremal states are just the extremal positive and extremal PTP states. We show that two such states, shared by the same pair of parties, cannot necessarily be combined as independent states (their tensor product) if the full set of quantum operations is allowed locally to each party. We use a framework of ``test spaces'' and states on these, suited for exhibiting the analogies and deviations of empirical probabilistic theories from classical probability theory. This leads to a deeper understanding of analogies between quantum mechanics and Bayesian probability theory. The existence of a ``most Bayesian'' quantum rule for updating states after measurement, and its association with the situation when information on one system is gained by measuring another, is a case of a general proposition holding for test spaces combined subject to the no-signalling requirement.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0507108

Related papers

Limits on Quantum Probability Rule by no-Signaling Principle

Yeong Deok Han, Taeseung Choi

We have studied the possibility of post-quantum theories more nonlocal than the (standard) quantum theory using the modification of the quantum probability rule under the no-signaling condition. For this purpose we have considered the situation that two spacelike separate parties Alice and Bob share an entangled two qubit system. We have modified the quantum probability rule as small as possible such that the first local measurements are governed by the usual Born rule and the second measurement by the modified quantum probability rule. We have shown that only the maximally entangled states can have higher nonlocality than the quantum upper bound while satisfying the no-signaling condition. This fact could be a partial explanation for why the nonlocality of the quantum theory is limited. As a by-product we have found the systematic way to obtain a variety of nonlocal boxes.

arXiv:1208.2814•Aug 14, 2012•0 citations

Local Quantum Measurement and No-Signaling Imply Quantum Correlations

Howard Barnum, Salman Beigi, Sergio Boixo +2 more

We show that, assuming that quantum mechanics holds locally, the finite speed of information is the principle that limits all possible correlations between distant parties to be quantum mechanical as well. Local quantum mechanics means that a Hilbert space is assigned to each party, and then all local positive-operator-valued measurements are (in principle) available; however, the joint system is not necessarily described by a Hilbert space. In particular, we do not assume the tensor product formalism between the joint systems. Our result shows that if any experiment would give nonlocal correlations beyond quantum mechanics, quantum theory would be invalidated even locally.

arXiv:0910.3952•Physical Review Letters•Apr 6, 2010•147 citations

Consequences of a dynamical no-signaling condition for classical-quantum interactions

S. Camalet

Hybrid classical-quantum approaches are instrumental in numerous fields, from condensed matter physics to quantum information science. We recently proposed to describe hybrid systems starting from a set of natural axioms for measurement probabilities without adding any underlying mathematical structure. The so defined probability measures fulfill a no-signaling condition that ensures that instantaneous communication is impossible. We formulate here a dynamical generalization of this condition. It means that, for two independent systems, the outcome probabilities of a measurement made on one of them are not affected by a measurement performed earlier on the other. Analogous requirements are satisfied for usual classical and quantum bipartite systems and violating them would make faster-than-light signaling possible. The dynamical no-signaling condition has important consequences for classical-quantum interactions that depend on the hybrid approach used. For no-signaling hybrid dynamics with classical trajectories, the classical degrees of freedom can influence the quantum ones but the latter cannot react on the former. If pure states of quantum systems remain pure then the dynamical no-signaling condition implies the absence of classical reaction. When all hybrid states are allowed, there are no genuine classical-quantum interactions for no-signaling hybrid dynamics that do not generate correlations between the classical and the quantum degrees of freedom. In all these cases, the proposed condition is equivalent to the convex-linearity of the probability measure transformations describing finite-time evolutions.

quant-pharXiv:2608.07245•Aug 10, 2026•0 citations

Towards a formulation of quantum theory as a causally neutral theory of Bayesian inference

Matthew Leifer, Robert W. Spekkens

Quantum theory can be viewed as a generalization of classical probability theory, but the analogy as it has been developed so far is not complete. Whereas the manner in which inferences are made in classical probability theory is independent of the causal relation that holds between the conditioned variable and the conditioning variable, in the conventional quantum formalism, there is a significant difference between how one treats experiments involving two systems at a single time and those involving a single system at two times. In this article, we develop the formalism of quantum conditional states, which provides a unified description of these two sorts of experiment. In addition, concepts that are distinct in the conventional formalism become unified: Channels, sets of states, and positive operator valued measures are all seen to be instances of conditional states; the action of a channel on a state, ensemble averaging, the Born rule, the composition of channels, and nonselective state-update rules are all seen to be instances of belief propagation. Using a quantum generalization of Bayes' theorem and the associated notion of Bayesian conditioning, we also show that the remote steering of quantum states can be described within our formalism as a mere updating of beliefs about one system given new information about another, and retrodictive inferences can be expressed using the same belief propagation rule as is used for predictive inferences. Finally, we show that previous arguments for interpreting the projection postulate as a quantum generalization of Bayesian conditioning are based on a misleading analogy and that it is best understood as a combination of belief propagation (corresponding to the nonselective state-update map) and conditioning on the measurement outcome.

arXiv:1107.5849•Physical Review A•Nov 27, 2013•287 citations

Certifying entangled measurements in known Hilbert spaces

Tamás Vértesi, Miguel Navascués

We study under which conditions it is possible to assert that a joint measurement cannot be simulated by local operations and classical communication. More concretely, we consider a scenario where two parties, Alice and Bob, send each a state selected from a labeled set of unknown states to a third party, Charlie, who in turn interacts with the states in some undisclosed way and then announces an outcome. We show that, under the assumption that Alice and Bob know the dimensionality of their systems, there exist situations where the statistics of the outcomes reveals the nature of Charlie's measurement.

arXiv:1101.5361•Physical Review A•Jun 17, 2011•27 citations

Nonlocality, entanglement witnesses, and supra-correlations

Paul M. Alsing, Jonathan McDonald

While entanglement is believed to underlie the power of quantum computation and communication, it is not generally well understood for multipartite systems. Recently, it has been appreciated that there exists proper no-signaling probability distributions derivable from operators that do not represent valid quantum states. Such systems exhibit supra-correlations that are stronger than allowed by quantum mechanics, but less than the algebraically allowed maximum in Bell-inequalities (in the bipartite case). Some of these probability distributions are derivable from an entanglement witness W, which is a non-positive Hermitian operator constructed such that its expectation value with a separable quantum state (positive density matrix) ρsep is non-negative (so that Tr[W ρ]< 0 indicates entanglement in quantum state ρ). In the bipartite case, it is known that by a modification of the local no-signaling measurements by spacelike separated parties A and B, the supra-correlations exhibited by any W can be modeled as derivable from a physically realizable quantum state ρ. However, this result does not generalize to the n-partite case for n>2. Supracorrelations can also be exhibited in 2- and 3-qubit systems by explicitly constructing "states" Ο (not necessarily positive quantum states) that exhibit PR correlations for a fixed, but arbitrary number, of measurements available to each party. In this paper we examine the structure of "states" that exhibit supra-correlations. In addition, we examine the affect upon the distribution of the correlations amongst the parties involved when constraints of positivity and purity are imposed. We investigate circumstances in which such "states" do and do not represent valid quantum states.

Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE•May 1, 2012•0 citations
Let Alice and Bob be able to make local quantum measurements and communicate classically. The set of mathematically consistent joint probability assignments (states'') for such measurements is properly larger than the set of quantum-mechanical mixed states for the Alice-Bob system. It is canonically isomorphic to the set of positive (not necessarily completely positive) linear maps Phi from the bounded linear operators on Alice's space to those on Bob's, for which Tr Phi(I)=1. We review the fact that allowing classical communication is equivalent to enforcing no-instantaneous-signalling'' (no--influence'') in the direction opposite the communication. We establish that in the subclass of decomposable'' states, i.e. convex combinations of positive states with "PTP" ones whose partial transpose is positive, the extremal states are just the extremal positive and extremal PTP states. We show that two such states, shared by the same pair of parties, cannot necessarily be combined as independent states (their tensor product) if the full set of quantum operations is allowed locally to each party. We use a framework of test spaces'' and states on these, suited for exhibiting the analogies and deviations of empirical probabilistic theories from classical probability theory. This leads to a deeper understanding of analogies between quantum mechanics and Bayesian probability theory. The existence of a most Bayesian'' quantum rule for updating states after measurement, and its association with the situation when information on one system is gained by measuring another, is a case of a general proposition holding for test spaces combined subject to the no-signalling requirement.
We have studied the possibility of post-quantum theories more nonlocal than the (standard) quantum theory using the modification of the quantum probability rule under the no-signaling condition. For this purpose we have considered the situation that two spacelike separate parties Alice and Bob share an entangled two qubit system. We have modified the quantum probability rule as small as possible such that the first local measurements are governed by the usual Born rule and the second measurement by the modified quantum probability rule. We have shown that only the maximally entangled states can have higher nonlocality than the quantum upper bound while satisfying the no-signaling condition. This fact could be a partial explanation for why the nonlocality of the quantum theory is limited. As a by-product we have found the systematic way to obtain a variety of nonlocal boxes.
We show that, assuming that quantum mechanics holds locally, the finite speed of information is the principle that limits all possible correlations between distant parties to be quantum mechanical as well. Local quantum mechanics means that a Hilbert space is assigned to each party, and then all local positive-operator-valued measurements are (in principle) available; however, the joint system is not necessarily described by a Hilbert space. In particular, we do not assume the tensor product formalism between the joint systems. Our result shows that if any experiment would give nonlocal correlations beyond quantum mechanics, quantum theory would be invalidated even locally.
Hybrid classical-quantum approaches are instrumental in numerous fields, from condensed matter physics to quantum information science. We recently proposed to describe hybrid systems starting from a set of natural axioms for measurement probabilities without adding any underlying mathematical structure. The so defined probability measures fulfill a no-signaling condition that ensures that instantaneous communication is impossible. We formulate here a dynamical generalization of this condition. It means that, for two independent systems, the outcome probabilities of a measurement made on one of them are not affected by a measurement performed earlier on the other. Analogous requirements are satisfied for usual classical and quantum bipartite systems and violating them would make faster-than-light signaling possible. The dynamical no-signaling condition has important consequences for classical-quantum interactions that depend on the hybrid approach used. For no-signaling hybrid dynamics with classical trajectories, the classical degrees of freedom can influence the quantum ones but the latter cannot react on the former. If pure states of quantum systems remain pure then the dynamical no-signaling condition implies the absence of classical reaction. When all hybrid states are allowed, there are no genuine classical-quantum interactions for no-signaling hybrid dynamics that do not generate correlations between the classical and the quantum degrees of freedom. In all these cases, the proposed condition is equivalent to the convex-linearity of the probability measure transformations describing finite-time evolutions.
Quantum theory can be viewed as a generalization of classical probability theory, but the analogy as it has been developed so far is not complete. Whereas the manner in which inferences are made in classical probability theory is independent of the causal relation that holds between the conditioned variable and the conditioning variable, in the conventional quantum formalism, there is a significant difference between how one treats experiments involving two systems at a single time and those involving a single system at two times. In this article, we develop the formalism of quantum conditional states, which provides a unified description of these two sorts of experiment. In addition, concepts that are distinct in the conventional formalism become unified: Channels, sets of states, and positive operator valued measures are all seen to be instances of conditional states; the action of a channel on a state, ensemble averaging, the Born rule, the composition of channels, and nonselective state-update rules are all seen to be instances of belief propagation. Using a quantum generalization of Bayes' theorem and the associated notion of Bayesian conditioning, we also show that the remote steering of quantum states can be described within our formalism as a mere updating of beliefs about one system given new information about another, and retrodictive inferences can be expressed using the same belief propagation rule as is used for predictive inferences. Finally, we show that previous arguments for interpreting the projection postulate as a quantum generalization of Bayesian conditioning are based on a misleading analogy and that it is best understood as a combination of belief propagation (corresponding to the nonselective state-update map) and conditioning on the measurement outcome.
We study under which conditions it is possible to assert that a joint measurement cannot be simulated by local operations and classical communication. More concretely, we consider a scenario where two parties, Alice and Bob, send each a state selected from a labeled set of unknown states to a third party, Charlie, who in turn interacts with the states in some undisclosed way and then announces an outcome. We show that, under the assumption that Alice and Bob know the dimensionality of their systems, there exist situations where the statistics of the outcomes reveals the nature of Charlie's measurement.
While entanglement is believed to underlie the power of quantum computation and communication, it is not generally well understood for multipartite systems. Recently, it has been appreciated that there exists proper no-signaling probability distributions derivable from operators that do not represent valid quantum states. Such systems exhibit supra-correlations that are stronger than allowed by quantum mechanics, but less than the algebraically allowed maximum in Bell-inequalities (in the bipartite case). Some of these probability distributions are derivable from an entanglement witness W, which is a non-positive Hermitian operator constructed such that its expectation value with a separable quantum state (positive density matrix) ρsep is non-negative (so that Tr[W ρ]< 0 indicates entanglement in quantum state ρ). In the bipartite case, it is known that by a modification of the local no-signaling measurements by spacelike separated parties A and B, the supra-correlations exhibited by any W can be modeled as derivable from a physically realizable quantum state ρ. However, this result does not generalize to the n-partite case for n>2. Supracorrelations can also be exhibited in 2- and 3-qubit systems by explicitly constructing "states" Ο (not necessarily positive quantum states) that exhibit PR correlations for a fixed, but arbitrary number, of measurements available to each party. In this paper we examine the structure of "states" that exhibit supra-correlations. In addition, we examine the affect upon the distribution of the correlations amongst the parties involved when constraints of positivity and purity are imposed. We investigate circumstances in which such "states" do and do not represent valid quantum states.