Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0504226 · Physical Review A

Distance-based degrees of polarization for a quantum field

A. B. Klimov, Luis Lorenzo Sánchez-Soto, E. C. Yustas, Jonas Söderholm, Gunnar G. Bjork

Published Sep 16, 2005• 58 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

It is well established that unpolarized light is invariant with respect to any SU(2) polarization transformation. This requirement fully characterizes the set of density matrices representing unpolarized states. We introduce the degree of polarization of a quantum state as its distance to the set of unpolarized states. We use two different candidates of distance, namely the Hilbert-Schmidt and the Bures metric, showing that they induce fundamentally different degrees of polarization. We apply these notions to relevant field states and we demonstrate that they avoid some of the problems arising with the classical definition.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.72.033813

Related papers

Degrees of polarization for a quantum field

Luis Lorenzo Sánchez-Soto, Jonas Söderholm, E. C. Yustas +2 more

Unpolarized light is invariant with respect to any SU(2) polarization transformation. Since this fully characterizes the set of density matrices representing unpolarized states, we introduce the degree of polarization of a quantum state as its distance to the set of unpolarized states. We discuss different candidates of distance, and show that they induce fundamentally different degrees of polarization.

Journal of Physics Conference Series•Apr 1, 2006•12 citations

Degree of polarization in quantum optics

Alfredo Luis

Quantum optics entails polarization properties that cannot be fully described by the classical Stokes parameters. In this work, we characterize the polarization of classical as well as quantum fields by means of a probability distribution on the Poincar\'e sphere. This serves to define the degree of polarization of a field state as the distance between the corresponding polarization distribution and the uniform distribution representing unpolarized light. We apply this definition to relevant quantum field states such as SU(2) coherent, squeezed, number, and phase states.

Physical Review A•Jul 15, 2002•122 citations

Probing light polarization with the quantum Chernoff bound

Iulia Ghiu, Gunnar G. Bjork, Paulina Marian +1 more

We recall the framework of a consistent quantum description of polarization of light. Accordingly, the degree of polarization of a two-mode state $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\rho}\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}$ of the quantum radiation field can be defined as a distance of a related state ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\rho}\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}}_{b}$ to the convex set of all SU(2)-invariant two-mode states. We explore a distance-type polarization measure in terms of the quantum Chernoff bound and derive its explicit expression. A comparison between the Chernoff and Bures degrees of polarization leads to interesting conclusions for some particular states chosen as illustrative examples.

arXiv:1008.3858•Physical Review A•Aug 6, 2010•17 citations

Maximally polarized states for quantum light fields

Luis Lorenzo Sánchez-Soto, E. C. Yustas, Gunnar G. Bjork +1 more

The degree of polarization of a quantum field can be defined as its distance to an appropriate set of states. When we take unpolarized states as this reference set, the states optimizing this degree for a fixed average number of photons $\overline{N}$ present a fairly symmetric, parabolic photon statistic, with a variance scaling as ${\overline{N}}^{2}$. Although no standard optical process yields such a statistic, we show that, to an excellent approximation, a highly squeezed vacuum can be taken as maximally polarized. We also consider the distance of a field to the set of its SU(2) transformed, finding that certain linear superpositions of SU(2) coherent states make this degree to be unity.

arXiv:quant-ph/0610032•Physical Review A•Oct 15, 2007•11 citations

Unpolarized light: Classical and quantum states

J. Lehner, Ulf Leonhardt, Henryk Paul

We give a general definition of unpolarized light that rests on invariance properties rather than specific values of second-order field correlations or, equivalently, the Stokes parameters. It turns out that to require invariance with respect to rotation around the propagation axis and symmetry with respect to left- and right-handed circular polarization is not sufficient to fully characterize completely unpolarized light, such as natural light. Actually, a third requirement demanding invariance with respect to phase retardation is needed. Depending on whether it is satisfied or not, we speak of type I or type II unpolarized light, and we specify the general form of both classical distribution functions and density operators consistent with the respective conditions. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.

Physical Review A•Apr 1, 1996•81 citations

Modification of polarization through de-Gaussification

Iulia Ghiu, Paulina Marian, Tudor A. Marian

We analyze the polarization of a quantum radiation field under a de-Gaussification process. Specifically, we consider the addition of photons to a two-mode thermal state to get mixed non-Gaussian and nonclassical states which are still diagonal in the Fock basis. Stokes-operator-based degrees of polarization and two distance-type measures defined with Hilbert-Schmidt and Bures metrics are investigated. For a better insight we here introduce a polarization degree based on the relative entropy. Polarization of the thermal states is fully investigated and simple closed expressions are found for all the defined degrees. The evaluated degrees for photon-added states are then compared to the corresponding ones for the two-mode thermal states they originate from. We present interesting findings which tell us that some popular degrees of polarization are not fully consistent. However, the most solidly defined degrees, which are based on the Bures metric and relative entropy, clearly indicate an enhancement of polarization through de-Gaussification. This conclusion is supported by the behavior of the degrees of polarization of the Fock states, which are finally discussed as a limit case.

arXiv:1809.10547•Physical Review A•Sep 26, 2018•5 citations
It is well established that unpolarized light is invariant with respect to any SU(2) polarization transformation. This requirement fully characterizes the set of density matrices representing unpolarized states. We introduce the degree of polarization of a quantum state as its distance to the set of unpolarized states. We use two different candidates of distance, namely the Hilbert-Schmidt and the Bures metric, showing that they induce fundamentally different degrees of polarization. We apply these notions to relevant field states and we demonstrate that they avoid some of the problems arising with the classical definition.
Quantum optics entails polarization properties that cannot be fully described by the classical Stokes parameters. In this work, we characterize the polarization of classical as well as quantum fields by means of a probability distribution on the Poincar\'e sphere. This serves to define the degree of polarization of a field state as the distance between the corresponding polarization distribution and the uniform distribution representing unpolarized light. We apply this definition to relevant quantum field states such as SU(2) coherent, squeezed, number, and phase states.
We recall the framework of a consistent quantum description of polarization of light. Accordingly, the degree of polarization of a two-mode state $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\rho}\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}$ of the quantum radiation field can be defined as a distance of a related state ${\mathrm{\ensuremath{\rho}\ifmmode \hat{}\else \^{}\fi{}}}_{b}$ to the convex set of all SU(2)-invariant two-mode states. We explore a distance-type polarization measure in terms of the quantum Chernoff bound and derive its explicit expression. A comparison between the Chernoff and Bures degrees of polarization leads to interesting conclusions for some particular states chosen as illustrative examples.
The degree of polarization of a quantum field can be defined as its distance to an appropriate set of states. When we take unpolarized states as this reference set, the states optimizing this degree for a fixed average number of photons N‾\overline{N}N present a fairly symmetric, parabolic photon statistic, with a variance scaling as N‾2{\overline{N}}^{2}N2. Although no standard optical process yields such a statistic, we show that, to an excellent approximation, a highly squeezed vacuum can be taken as maximally polarized. We also consider the distance of a field to the set of its SU(2) transformed, finding that certain linear superpositions of SU(2) coherent states make this degree to be unity.
We give a general definition of unpolarized light that rests on invariance properties rather than specific values of second-order field correlations or, equivalently, the Stokes parameters. It turns out that to require invariance with respect to rotation around the propagation axis and symmetry with respect to left- and right-handed circular polarization is not sufficient to fully characterize completely unpolarized light, such as natural light. Actually, a third requirement demanding invariance with respect to phase retardation is needed. Depending on whether it is satisfied or not, we speak of type I or type II unpolarized light, and we specify the general form of both classical distribution functions and density operators consistent with the respective conditions. \textcopyright{} 1996 The American Physical Society.
We analyze the polarization of a quantum radiation field under a de-Gaussification process. Specifically, we consider the addition of photons to a two-mode thermal state to get mixed non-Gaussian and nonclassical states which are still diagonal in the Fock basis. Stokes-operator-based degrees of polarization and two distance-type measures defined with Hilbert-Schmidt and Bures metrics are investigated. For a better insight we here introduce a polarization degree based on the relative entropy. Polarization of the thermal states is fully investigated and simple closed expressions are found for all the defined degrees. The evaluated degrees for photon-added states are then compared to the corresponding ones for the two-mode thermal states they originate from. We present interesting findings which tell us that some popular degrees of polarization are not fully consistent. However, the most solidly defined degrees, which are based on the Bures metric and relative entropy, clearly indicate an enhancement of polarization through de-Gaussification. This conclusion is supported by the behavior of the degrees of polarization of the Fock states, which are finally discussed as a limit case.