Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0503124

Notes on Polarization Measurements

Andrea Aiello, J. P. Woerdman

Published Mar 14, 2005• 2 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We review a few useful concepts about polarization measurements in the quantum domain. Using a perfectly general formalism, we show how to build the quantum counterpart of some classical quantities like Stokes parameters and Mueller matrices, which are well known in classical polarization-measurement theory.
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0503124

Related papers

Quantum theory of polarimetry: From quantum operations to Mueller matrices

Aaron Z. Goldberg

This article provides a description of the quantum mechanical processes underlying polarimetry; for example, classical depolarization is represented by a quantum circuit diagram corresponding to SU(3) operations in an enlarged Hilbert space. The quantum theory of polarimetry can be used to place constraints on classical polarization transformations, find quantum-enhanced polarization measurements, and investigate the quantum structure underlying classical polarization.

arXiv:1912.01614•Physical Review Research•Apr 14, 2020•24 citations

The Theory of Polarization Phenomena

J. Byrne

B A Robson London: Oxford University Press 1975 pp viii + 119 price £5.50 Some decades back Jones and Mueller developed their distinctive matrix calculi for treating polarization effects in classical optics, building on techniques reaching back to Stokes more than a century ago. In this little book the author describes the extension of these methods to the study of polarization phenomena, for spin ½ and spin 1 particles in particular, but with appropriate generalization to systems of arbitrary spin.

Physics Bulletin•Jun 1, 1975•0 citations

Disquisitions on quantum-enhanced polarimetry

Aaron Z. Goldberg

It takes some convincing to realize that light has a polarization degree of freedom, as our eyes are usually ignorant of light's polarization. Since overcoming this hurdle of intuition, polarization has become a fantastic resource that can be easily manipulated both physically and mathematically, opening the door to a wide variety of applications. We have only recently begun to appreciate how many more doors are opened by the quantum mechanical degrees of freedom inherent to optical polarization. One use of optical polarization is for polarimetry: measuring the changes in light's polarization after it interacts with a material is an excellent procedure for nondestructively probing the characteristics and composition of the intervening material. More sensitive measurements require brighter probe light; however, sufficiently intense light will begin to destroy the sample being probed. In this thesis, we seek to provide more sensitive polarimetry without resorting to bright beams of light. Tailoring the quantum properties of various states of light has been shown to increase their usefulness for other estimation protocols and we show how to extend this paradigm to quantum enhancements in polarimetry. We begin by finding the quantum states underlying classical polarization. Each particular set of classical polarization properties corresponds to a large variety of quantum states. Next, we establish quantum descriptions of classical polarization transformations corresponding to arbitrary Jones and Mueller matrices, including quantum mechanical insights into the distinction between processes that can and cannot be described by Jones matrices. We propose candidates for the most likely quantum states underlying classical decompositions into polarized and unpolarized fractions, carefully inspecting how these quantum states behave under polarization transformations. This language allows us to inspect quantum-enhanced sensing in the multiparameter context of polarimetry. We show the dramatic possibilities for quantum enhancements in any metrological scenario that is mathematically equivalent to a rotation, of which polarization rotations are a primary example; in contrast, we also show most attenuating and depolarizing polarization transformations to forbid such dramatic enhancements. Finally, we discuss polarization and its generalizations in the context of generating quantum entanglement via linear optics. These applications serve as mere examples of the usefulness promised by light’s quantum polarization degrees of freedom.

•Jun 1, 2021•0 citations

Polarized light and geometric phase in qg units: Stokes parameters, Mueller matrices and Stokes' theorem

Vicente Humberto Monteverde

⟨ ⟩ The qang project describes qubits by measurement—level quantities, the qg values qgP = P [1]. This short note states two classical results in those units, implemented and checked in the qang library (pip install qang, version 0.6.0). First, a polarization state of light is a qubit: the normalized Stokes parameters are exactly the qg values, the degree of polarization P is the length of the qg vector, and a lossless Mueller matrix is the qg gate rule qg′ = qgU†PU . Malus's law becomes I = I0(1 + qgZ cos 2θ + qgX sin 2θ)/2 for any input state. Second, the — geometric phase of a closed loop on the Bloch (Poincaré) sphere is minus half the enclosed solid angle, which is Stokes' theorem for the Berry curvature. For a loop at constant qgZ the phase is (qgZ 1)/2 of a turn: it is fixed by qgZ alone. Nothing here is new physics. The contribution is the translation into qang's units and a set of 26 numerical checks, with the phase computed three independent ways.

•Oct 5, 2026•0 citations

Quantum resolution of geometric rotations of polarization

L. Tsegaye, Jonas Söderholm, Mete Atatüre +5 more

Summary form only given. In quantum optics the usual way of treating polarization has been to use the Stokes parameters. Here we present a different approach starting from the quantum description of geometric rotation of polarization.

Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics•Aug 29, 2005•0 citations

Polarization quantum states of light in nonlinear distributed feedback systems; quantum nondemolition measurements of the Stokes parameters of light and atomic angular momentum

A. P. Alodjants, Sergei M Arakelyan, A. S. Chirkin

Applied Physics B•Jan 1, 1998•31 citations
B A Robson London: Oxford University Press 1975 pp viii + 119 price £5.50 Some decades back Jones and Mueller developed their distinctive matrix calculi for treating polarization effects in classical optics, building on techniques reaching back to Stokes more than a century ago. In this little book the author describes the extension of these methods to the study of polarization phenomena, for spin ½ and spin 1 particles in particular, but with appropriate generalization to systems of arbitrary spin.
It takes some convincing to realize that light has a polarization degree of freedom, as our eyes are usually ignorant of light's polarization. Since overcoming this hurdle of intuition, polarization has become a fantastic resource that can be easily manipulated both physically and mathematically, opening the door to a wide variety of applications. We have only recently begun to appreciate how many more doors are opened by the quantum mechanical degrees of freedom inherent to optical polarization. One use of optical polarization is for polarimetry: measuring the changes in light's polarization after it interacts with a material is an excellent procedure for nondestructively probing the characteristics and composition of the intervening material. More sensitive measurements require brighter probe light; however, sufficiently intense light will begin to destroy the sample being probed. In this thesis, we seek to provide more sensitive polarimetry without resorting to bright beams of light. Tailoring the quantum properties of various states of light has been shown to increase their usefulness for other estimation protocols and we show how to extend this paradigm to quantum enhancements in polarimetry. We begin by finding the quantum states underlying classical polarization. Each particular set of classical polarization properties corresponds to a large variety of quantum states. Next, we establish quantum descriptions of classical polarization transformations corresponding to arbitrary Jones and Mueller matrices, including quantum mechanical insights into the distinction between processes that can and cannot be described by Jones matrices. We propose candidates for the most likely quantum states underlying classical decompositions into polarized and unpolarized fractions, carefully inspecting how these quantum states behave under polarization transformations. This language allows us to inspect quantum-enhanced sensing in the multiparameter context of polarimetry. We show the dramatic possibilities for quantum enhancements in any metrological scenario that is mathematically equivalent to a rotation, of which polarization rotations are a primary example; in contrast, we also show most attenuating and depolarizing polarization transformations to forbid such dramatic enhancements. Finally, we discuss polarization and its generalizations in the context of generating quantum entanglement via linear optics. These applications serve as mere examples of the usefulness promised by light’s quantum polarization degrees of freedom.
⟨ ⟩ The qang project describes qubits by measurement—level quantities, the qg values qgP = P [1]. This short note states two classical results in those units, implemented and checked in the qang library (pip install qang, version 0.6.0). First, a polarization state of light is a qubit: the normalized Stokes parameters are exactly the qg values, the degree of polarization P is the length of the qg vector, and a lossless Mueller matrix is the qg gate rule qg′ = qgU†PU . Malus's law becomes I = I0(1 + qgZ cos 2θ + qgX sin 2θ)/2 for any input state. Second, the — geometric phase of a closed loop on the Bloch (Poincaré) sphere is minus half the enclosed solid angle, which is Stokes' theorem for the Berry curvature. For a loop at constant qgZ the phase is (qgZ 1)/2 of a turn: it is fixed by qgZ alone. Nothing here is new physics. The contribution is the translation into qang's units and a set of 26 numerical checks, with the phase computed three independent ways.