On the occasion of the 100th anniversary of the beginning of the revolutionary contributions to physics by Einstein, I am happy to respond to a problem posed by him in 1905. He said: In this paper it will be shown that according to the molecular-kinetic theory of heat, bodies of microscopically-visible size suspended in a liquid will perform movements of such magnitude that they can be easily observed in a microscope, on account of the molecular motions of heat....that is, Brownian molecular motion. In this article I provide incontrovertible evidence against molecular-kinetic conception of heat, and a regularization of the Brownian movement that differs from all the statistical procedures and/or analyses that exist in the archival literature to date. The regularization is based on either of two distinct but intimately interrelated revolutionary conceptions of thermodynamics, one is purely thermodynamic and the other is quantum mechanical.
On the occasion of the 100th anniversary of the beginning of the revolutionary contributions to physics by Einstein, I am happy to respond to a problem posed by him in 1905. He said: In this paper it will be shown that according to the molecular-kinetic theory of heat, bodies of microscopically-visible size suspended in a liquid will perform movements of such magnitude that they can be easily observed in a microscope, on account of the molecular motions of heat....that is, Brownian molecular motion. In this article I provide incontrovertible evidence against molecular-kinetic conception of heat, and a regularization of the Brownian movement that differs from all the statistical procedures and/or analyses that exist in the archival literature to date. The regularization is based on either of two distinct but intimately interrelated revolutionary conceptions of thermodynamics, one is purely thermodynamic and the other is quantum mechanical.
In 2005 we celebrate the hundredth anniversary of the publication of five seminal papers by Albert Einstein establishing the basis of three fundamental fields of physics: the theory of relativity, quantum theory and the theory of Brownian motion. This happened at a time when the reality of atoms and molecules was still far from certain. The microscopic view Einstein took of molecular motion led to the calculation of Avogadro's number and the size of molecules by studying the motion of small particles in liquids. Combining kinetic theory and classical thermodynamics finally led Einstein to the conclusion that the displacement of a microparticle under Brownian motion varies as the square root of time. The experimental demonstration of this law three years later was considered as the striking proof that atoms and molecules are physically real. Today single atoms are probed directly in experiments, and we are able to observe the individual paths of colliding or dissociating particles. These new techniques are described in some of the papers of this issue in a very impressive way. An even more exciting development was initiated with the demonstration of Bose–Einstein condensation of dilute gases of ultracold atoms, a phenomenon first predicted by Einstein in papers published between 1916 and 1924. The first paper of Einstein's famous series of 1905, 'On an heuristic point of view about the creation and conversion of light', was an explanation of the photoelectric effect, demonstrated in several experiments over the previous few years. The explanation was based on the quantum hypothesis introduced by Max Planck five years earlier, and was considered as an additional and important proof of Planck's hypothesis. Today quantum theory and photons are the basis for much of modern science and technology. We have learned to experiment with single photons, and we have demonstrated the advantages of information transfer by single photons. Photons permit new and incredibly precise time and frequency standards. These are not only technically important, but may also lead to even more stringent tests of relativity and other fundamental laws and concepts of physics. Examples of these applications and many other uses of modern optics are discussed in this issue. Special relativity, the third of Einstein's 1905 topics, has always been closely connected with atomic, molecular and optical physics. Today atomic physics provides some of the most stringent tests of special relativity. Furthermore, fast electron beams are used in advanced light sources such as synchrotron radiation generators and free electron lasers. Those aspects and related applications are also discussed here. We hope that this special issue will be of great interest to the reader by highlighting recent advances in atomic, molecular and optical physics. This field continues to provide one of the most fertile areas for research one hundred years after it first emerged from the work of Einstein published in 1905, his 'miraculous year'.
A general quantum theory encompassing Mechanics, Thermodynamics and irreversible dynamics is presented in two parts. The first part is concerned exclusively with the description of the states of any individual physical system. It is based on a new nonlinear quantum equation of motion, which reduces to the Schroedinger equation of motion of motion of conventional quantum dynamics only under special conditions. It accounts for the implications of the laws of Thermodynamics as well as for irreversible phenomena, such as the natural tendency of an isolated system to transit from any non-equilibrium state to an equilibrium state of higher entropy. Conversely, the laws of Thermodynamics and irreversibility emerge as manifestations of the fundamental quantum dynamical behaviour of the elementary constituents of any material system. We call this part Quantum Thermodynamics. The second part of the theory, which contains the first as a special case, is concerned with the description of stochastic distributions of states in an ensemble of identical physical systems each of which individually obeys the laws of Quantum Thermodynamics. It is based on a new measure-theoretic description of ensembles. It accounts unambiguously for the essential distinction between two types of uncertainties that are generally present in an ensemble, namely, quantal uncertainties due to the inherent quantal nature of the states of each individual member system and nonquantal uncertainties due to the stochastic distribution of states. We call this part Quantum Statistical Thermodynamics.
What is the physical significance of entropy? What is the physical origin of irreversibility? Do entropy and irreversibility exist only for complex and macroscopic systems? The bulk of the physics community accepts and teaches that all these fundamental questions are rationalized within statistical mechanics. Indeed, for everyday laboratory physics, the mathematical formalism of statistical mechanics (canonical and grandcanonica1, Boltzmann, Bose-Einstein and Fermi-Dirac distributions) allows a successful description of the thermodynamic equilibrium properties of matter, including entropy values. But an ever growing handful of physicists (Schrodinger among the first) have realized that, even in its explanation of the meaning of entropy, statistical mechanics is impaired by ambiguities and logical inconsistencies. They have started to search for a better theory to eliminate these stumbling blocks while maintaining the mathematical formalism that has been so successful in so many applications. This handful of upstreamers must not be confused with the many schools of physicists that have thrived on the more renowned incompleteness of statistical mechanics, namely, the lack of a quantitative (and the weakness of the qualitative) explanation of the origin of irreversibility. In these studies the thrust is provided by the discovery that the macroscopic dynamics of certain complex systems may be modeled using a few-degrees-of-freedom nonlinear Hamiltonian with singularities that give rise to bifurcations and chaotic behavior. These results have generated successful ways to describe irreversible behavior, but their link to the origin of irreversibility is still only heuristic (what is the connection between the nonlinear model Hamiltonian and the true full Hamiitonian?) and does not provide yet a rigorous resolution of the century-old paradox of the conflict between the irreversibiiity of macroscopic behavior, and the reversibility of the laws of mechanics. To resolve both the problem of the meaning of entropy and that of the origin of irreversibility we have built entropy and irreversibility into the laws of mechanics. The result is a theory that we call quantum thermodynamics that has all the necessary properties to combine mechanics and thermodynamics uniting all the successful results of both theories, eliminating the logical inconsistencies of statistical mechanics and the paradox on irreversibiiity, and providing an entirely new perspective on the microscopic origin of irreversibility, nonlinearity and therefore chaotic behavior. The mathematical formalism of quantum thermodynamics differs from that of statistical mechanics mainly in the equation of motion which is nonlinear but has solutions identical to those of the Schrodinger equation for all the states for which statistical mechanics reduces to quantum mechanics. The physical meaning of the formalism of quantum thermodynamics differs more drastically from that of statistical mechanics. The significance of the state operator of quantum thermodynamics is entirely different from that of the density operator of statistical mechanics, even though the two are mathematically equivalent. Indeed they obey different equations of motion. In particular, quantum thermodynamics is concerned only with those systems for which quantum mechanics would describe the states with vectors in Hilbert space or, equivalently, projection operators. Using a well known jargon, we can say that quantum thermodynamics like quantum mechanics is concerned only with pure quantum states. However, it postulates that the set of pure quantum states of a system is much broader than contemplated by quantum mechanics. Pure quantum states must be described by operators defined by all the features of projection operators except the condition of idempotence. As a result, an operator that within statistical mechanics would describe a mixed quantum state (that is, the average state of a statistical mixture of identical systems in different pure quantum states) in quantum thermodynamics describes a pure quantum state, a state that neither quantum mechanics non statistical mechanics would contemplate. Conceptually, the increased richness of pure quantum states is a new revolutionary postulate of quantum physics. But from the point of view of the statistical mechanics practitioners the new theory is not as traumatic as it seems. Whenever one uses a nonidempotent density operator to describe a thermodynamic equilibrium state one simply has to reinterpret it as one of the new pure quantum states. One even saves the usual ad hoc arguments on thermal baths and reservoirs that are usually required in statistical mechanics to justify the use of a nonidempotent density operator to describe the state of a system. In this paper we discuss the background and formalism of quantum thermodynamics including its nonlinear equation of motion and the main general results. Our objective is to show in a not-too-technical manner that this theory provides indeed a complete and coherent resolution of the century-old dilemma on the meaning of entropy and the origin of irreversibility. As a byproduct, we discuss a long set of criteria that a theory should meet in order to afford the same claim.
This problem in lieu of thesis is a discussion of two topics: Brownian movement and quantum computers. Brownian movement is a physical phenomenon in which the particle velocity is constantly undergoing random fluctuations. Chapters 2, 3 and 4, describe Brownian motion from three different perspectives. The next four chapters are devoted to the subject of quantum computers, which are the signal of a new era of technology and science combined together. In the first chapter I present to a reader the two topics of my problem in lieu of thesis. In the second chapter I explain the idea of Brownian motion, its interpretation as a stochastic process and I find its distribution function. The next chapter illustrates the probabilistic picture of Brownian motion, where the statistical averages over trajectories are related to the probability distribution function. Chapter 4 shows how to derive the Langevin equation, introduced in chapter 1, using a Hamiltonian picture of a bath with infinite number of harmonic oscillators. The chapter 5 explains how the idea of quantum computers was developed and how step-by-step all the puzzles for the field of quantum computers were created. The next chapter, chapter 6, discus the basic quantum unit of information namely, the so called qubit and its properties. Chapter 7 is devoted to quantum logic gates, which are important for conducting logic operation in quantum computers. This chapter explains how they were developed and how they are different from classical ones. Chapter 8 is about the quantum algorithm, Shor's algorithm. Quantum algorithm in quantum computers enables one to solve problems that are hard to solve on digital computers. The last chapter contains conclusions on Brownian movement and the field of quantum computers.
For pt.I see ibid., vol.2, p.203 (1981). In a thermodynamic system the following quantities are intimately related: 'thermodynamic probability' W, entropy S(U) as a function of internal energy U, U itself, and the variance sigma E 2 of the energy. A further close relation with the energy spectrum (E n ) of the system is pointed out here. Once the purely mathematical relations between these concepts are understood, it is shown how only one general case needs to be considered in order to follow Planck's and Einstein's arguments concerning quantisation. A choice of the entropy function S(U), for example, determines (E n ). The results clarify the interrelationships of the assumptions.
A persistent conceptual puzzle in statistical mechanics is that the entropy S of a classical ideal gas depends on quantum mechanical quantities such as Planck's constant h and the factor 1/N!, which is commonly attributed to the indistinguishability of quantum particles. We resolve this puzzle by distinguishing entropy differences ΔS computed within the gas phase from those computed across a phase transition. For thermodynamic transformations within the gas phase, ΔS depends exclusively on classical macroscopic variables. In such processes, both h and 1/N! contribute only additive constants that cancel in ΔS, rendering them irrelevant for classical measurements. However, computing the latent heat released during a phase transition requires the entropy difference between two distinct phases with fundamentally different microscopic structures. Since the additive contributions do not cancel across phase transitions, a microscopic theory that correctly counts the states of each phase becomes essential, and quantum mechanics is required.