Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0502128 · Physical Review A

Geometry of an adiabatic passage at a level crossing

Mateusz Cholascinski

Published Jun 28, 2005• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We discuss adiabatic quantum phenomena at a level crossing. Given a path in the parameter space which passes through a degeneracy point, we find a criterion which determines whether the adiabaticity condition can be satisfied. For paths that can be traversed adiabatically we also derive a differential equation which specifies the time dependence of the system parameters, for which transitions between distinct energy levels can be neglected. We also generalize the well-known geometric connections to the case of adiabatic paths containing arbitrarily many level-crossing points and degenerate levels.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.71.063409

Related papers

Intrinsic geometry of quantum adiabatic evolution and quantum phase transitions

A. T. Rezakhani, Damian F. Abasto, Daniel A. Lidar +1 more

We elucidate the geometry of quantum adiabatic evolution. By minimizing the deviation from adiabaticity, we find a Riemannian metric tensor underlying adiabatic evolution. Equipped with this tensor, we identify a unified geometric description of quantum adiabatic evolution and quantum phase transitions that generalizes previous treatments to allow for degeneracy. The same structure is relevant for applications in quantum information processing, including adiabatic and holonomic quantum computing, where geodesics over the manifold of control parameters correspond to paths which minimize errors. We illustrate this geometric structure with examples, for which we explicitly find adiabatic geodesics. By solving the geodesic equations in the vicinity of a quantum critical point, we identify universal characteristics of optimal adiabatic passage through a quantum phase transition. In particular, we show that in the vicinity of a critical point describing a second-order quantum phase transition, the geodesic exhibits power-law scaling with an exponent given by twice the inverse of the product of the spatial and scaling dimensions.

arXiv:1004.0509•Physical Review A•Jul 20, 2010•83 citations

Non-Abelian geometric effect in quantum adiabatic transitions

Alain Joye, Charles E. Pfister

We establish a formula for the probability of a quantum adiabatic transition between two permanently degenerate energy levels which do not cross. This formula corresponds to the non-Abelian generalization of the Landau-Dykhne formula that is valid for the nondegenerate case. It applies in particular in cases of symmetry-induced degeneracy, a typical example being the Kramer degeneracy.

Physical Review A•Oct 1, 1993•7 citations

Time-dependent Quantum Systems

Jaakko Lehto

This thesis discusses different aspects of time-dependent two-level quantum systems and their coherent dynamics. In the introductory chapters, we present some basic models used to study them and some basic results related to the level-crossing problems generally. As these systems are only rarely analytically solvable, some emphasis is put on the existing approximative theories. In particular, the generalization of the method of Dykhne, Davis and Pechukas (DDP), originally developed for problems in near-adiabatic region, is studied further. In the DDP theory, the final populations of different states are determined by the complex zero points of the eigenenergies. Superparabolic level-crossing models are introduced in this thesis and they prove to be simple but versatile test models for these studies. It is shown that, by considering all of the zero points, one can obtain accurate approximations also for highly non-adiabatic regions. In Chapter 4, a general differential geometric framework for time-dependent level-crossing models is developed and its basic character is discussed. A natural way of associating a plane curve to a time-dependent two-level model is introduced. This association allows one to use all of the mathematical results concerning plane curves to study these models. As an example, we use the Four-vertex theorem to discuss the adiabatic limit of certain type of systems. We also consider the prospect of enhancing the population transfer by transforming the time-dependent coupling pulse into a zero-area coupling. This is done either smoothly or by an abrupt jump in the phase of the coupling. It has been shown earlier, that one can obtain a complete population inversion (CPI) in a robust way with strong, non-resonant zero-area pulses. We study this in the more general time-dependent setting in Chapter 5, where also the energy levels are driven in a time-dependent fashion. This allows to transport the CPI phenomenon from the strong coupling region towards more moderate couplings. As an example of the smooth case, we consider the SechTanh-model, and show that even the nearest-zero DDP approximation can be used, despite the highly non-adiabatic origin of the phenomenon. We develop an approximative scheme also for the phase-jump case, using the parabolic model as an example. As a limiting case, we derive an approximative formula for the transition probability, which has some universal character and which proves to be useful in the most interesting case where the robust CPI is obtained. It is shown that even the highly suppressed transitions in tunnelling cases can be strongly enhanced in the phase-jump scenario.

•Jun 2, 2017•8 citations

Bounds on adiabatic path geometry from the width class of the gap profile

Mancheon Han, Sangkook Choi

In an adiabatic evolution, the wave function follows the path of ground states $|Φ_0(s)\rangle$ of a Hamiltonian $H(s)$ as $s$ is tuned from $0$ to $1$. The geometry of this adiabatic path is described by quantities such as its length $L=\int_0^1 \|\partial_s |Φ_0(s)\rangle\|\,ds$ and its total curvature $K$. This geometry affects the evolution time $T$. For instance, $T$ is at least of order $L/Δ_*$, where $Δ_*$ is the minimum energy gap over $s\in[0,1]$. The traditional approach gives $L=O(Δ_*^{-1/2})$ and $K=O(Δ_*^{-1})$, which are loose in many cases. We improve these bounds by using $μ_<(γ)$, the width of the region in $s$ on which the gap is below $γ$. The gap profile is in width class $p$ when $μ_<(γ)$ falls at least as fast as $γ^{1/p}$. A typical avoided crossing is in width class $p=1$, which gives $L=O(\sqrt{\log Δ_*^{-1}})$ and $K=O(\log Δ_*^{-1})$. A profile in width class $p>1$ gives power laws with exponents $(p-1)/(2p)$ for $L$ and $(p-1)/p$ for $K$. The width class also bounds the evolution time. At $p=1$ we have $T=O(Δ_*^{-2})$ with a schedule that advances $s$ at a constant rate, and $T=O(Δ_*^{-1})$ up to a polylogarithmic correction with a schedule that traverses the path at a constant geometric speed. The bounds on $L$ hold for any twice continuously differentiable $H(s)$, and the bounds on $K$ for affine $H(s)$. We also prove the tightness of scaling of $L$ in $Δ_*$ for every integer $p\ge1$, and the scaling of $K$ at $p=1$. We demonstrate the bounds on the adiabatic Grover search, the XXZ spin chain, and molecular electronic Hamiltonians.

quant-pharXiv:2609.39286•Oct 1, 2026•0 citations

Probability of violation of the Ehrenfest principle in fast passage

Gregory H. Wannier

ADIABATIC passage through an almost degenerate intermediate state is a common experimental technique.It is ba sed on the Ehrenfest principle which states that if the external conditions for a system are changed slowly enough, the change of the system can be predicted by computing qu asi statically the modification of its initial quantum state.The Ehrenfest principle is not a law of na ture beca use the system has an alternate path it can follow, which might appropriately be termed 'inertial*.This path is favored by a rapid change of the external variables.Among the two paths, the adiabatic one has a privileged position.Thus, it has been shown re cently that if the external change is measured by a "slowness parameter" inversely proportional to the time ta ken to effect the change then the Ehrenfest principle is valid to all orders in th is para meter [l].The following lines are to derive a rigorous formula for the probability that the adiabatic path is not followed in the simple case of the near crossing of two quantum levels.

Physics Physique Fizika•May 1, 1965•35 citations

Adiabatic evolution amidst dephasing

Peter A. Ivanov, Nikolay V. Vitanov

An analytic description of adiabatic evolution of a two-state system in the presence of dephasing processes is presented. The adiabatic solution of the Bloch equation is derived in the most general case of a mixed initial state. Examples of the general analytic solution are given in the particular cases of energy-level crossing, no crossing, and half crossing.

Physical Review A•Jun 21, 2005•17 citations
We discuss adiabatic quantum phenomena at a level crossing. Given a path in the parameter space which passes through a degeneracy point, we find a criterion which determines whether the adiabaticity condition can be satisfied. For paths that can be traversed adiabatically we also derive a differential equation which specifies the time dependence of the system parameters, for which transitions between distinct energy levels can be neglected. We also generalize the well-known geometric connections to the case of adiabatic paths containing arbitrarily many level-crossing points and degenerate levels.
We elucidate the geometry of quantum adiabatic evolution. By minimizing the deviation from adiabaticity, we find a Riemannian metric tensor underlying adiabatic evolution. Equipped with this tensor, we identify a unified geometric description of quantum adiabatic evolution and quantum phase transitions that generalizes previous treatments to allow for degeneracy. The same structure is relevant for applications in quantum information processing, including adiabatic and holonomic quantum computing, where geodesics over the manifold of control parameters correspond to paths which minimize errors. We illustrate this geometric structure with examples, for which we explicitly find adiabatic geodesics. By solving the geodesic equations in the vicinity of a quantum critical point, we identify universal characteristics of optimal adiabatic passage through a quantum phase transition. In particular, we show that in the vicinity of a critical point describing a second-order quantum phase transition, the geodesic exhibits power-law scaling with an exponent given by twice the inverse of the product of the spatial and scaling dimensions.
This thesis discusses different aspects of time-dependent two-level quantum systems and their coherent dynamics. In the introductory chapters, we present some basic models used to study them and some basic results related to the level-crossing problems generally. As these systems are only rarely analytically solvable, some emphasis is put on the existing approximative theories. In particular, the generalization of the method of Dykhne, Davis and Pechukas (DDP), originally developed for problems in near-adiabatic region, is studied further. In the DDP theory, the final populations of different states are determined by the complex zero points of the eigenenergies. Superparabolic level-crossing models are introduced in this thesis and they prove to be simple but versatile test models for these studies. It is shown that, by considering all of the zero points, one can obtain accurate approximations also for highly non-adiabatic regions. In Chapter 4, a general differential geometric framework for time-dependent level-crossing models is developed and its basic character is discussed. A natural way of associating a plane curve to a time-dependent two-level model is introduced. This association allows one to use all of the mathematical results concerning plane curves to study these models. As an example, we use the Four-vertex theorem to discuss the adiabatic limit of certain type of systems. We also consider the prospect of enhancing the population transfer by transforming the time-dependent coupling pulse into a zero-area coupling. This is done either smoothly or by an abrupt jump in the phase of the coupling. It has been shown earlier, that one can obtain a complete population inversion (CPI) in a robust way with strong, non-resonant zero-area pulses. We study this in the more general time-dependent setting in Chapter 5, where also the energy levels are driven in a time-dependent fashion. This allows to transport the CPI phenomenon from the strong coupling region towards more moderate couplings. As an example of the smooth case, we consider the SechTanh-model, and show that even the nearest-zero DDP approximation can be used, despite the highly non-adiabatic origin of the phenomenon. We develop an approximative scheme also for the phase-jump case, using the parabolic model as an example. As a limiting case, we derive an approximative formula for the transition probability, which has some universal character and which proves to be useful in the most interesting case where the robust CPI is obtained. It is shown that even the highly suppressed transitions in tunnelling cases can be strongly enhanced in the phase-jump scenario.
In an adiabatic evolution, the wave function follows the path of ground states ∣Φ0(s)⟩|Φ_0(s)\rangle∣Φ0​(s)⟩ of a Hamiltonian H(s)H(s)H(s) as sss is tuned from 000 to 111. The geometry of this adiabatic path is described by quantities such as its length L=∫01∥∂s∣Φ0(s)⟩∥ dsL=\int_0^1 \|\partial_s |Φ_0(s)\rangle\|\,dsL=∫01​∥∂s​∣Φ0​(s)⟩∥ds and its total curvature KKK. This geometry affects the evolution time TTT. For instance, TTT is at least of order L/Δ∗L/Δ_*L/Δ∗​, where Δ∗Δ_*Δ∗​ is the minimum energy gap over s∈[0,1]s\in[0,1]s∈[0,1]. The traditional approach gives L=O(Δ∗−1/2)L=O(Δ_*^{-1/2})L=O(Δ∗−1/2​) and K=O(Δ∗−1)K=O(Δ_*^{-1})K=O(Δ∗−1​), which are loose in many cases. We improve these bounds by using μ<(γ)μ_<(γ)μ<​(γ), the width of the region in sss on which the gap is below γγγ. The gap profile is in width class ppp when μ<(γ)μ_<(γ)μ<​(γ) falls at least as fast as γ1/pγ^{1/p}γ1/p. A typical avoided crossing is in width class p=1p=1p=1, which gives L=O(log⁡Δ∗−1)L=O(\sqrt{\log Δ_*^{-1}})L=O(logΔ∗−1​​) and K=O(log⁡Δ∗−1)K=O(\log Δ_*^{-1})K=O(logΔ∗−1​). A profile in width class p>1p>1p>1 gives power laws with exponents (p−1)/(2p)(p-1)/(2p)(p−1)/(2p) for LLL and (p−1)/p(p-1)/p(p−1)/p for KKK. The width class also bounds the evolution time. At p=1p=1p=1 we have T=O(Δ∗−2)T=O(Δ_*^{-2})T=O(Δ∗−2​) with a schedule that advances sss at a constant rate, and T=O(Δ∗−1)T=O(Δ_*^{-1})T=O(Δ∗−1​) up to a polylogarithmic correction with a schedule that traverses the path at a constant geometric speed. The bounds on LLL hold for any twice continuously differentiable H(s)H(s)H(s), and the bounds on KKK for affine H(s)H(s)H(s). We also prove the tightness of scaling of LLL in Δ∗Δ_*Δ∗​ for every integer p≥1p\ge1p≥1, and the scaling of KKK at p=1p=1p=1. We demonstrate the bounds on the adiabatic Grover search, the XXZ spin chain, and molecular electronic Hamiltonians.
ADIABATIC passage through an almost degenerate intermediate state is a common experimental technique.It is ba sed on the Ehrenfest principle which states that if the external conditions for a system are changed slowly enough, the change of the system can be predicted by computing qu asi statically the modification of its initial quantum state.The Ehrenfest principle is not a law of na ture beca use the system has an alternate path it can follow, which might appropriately be termed 'inertial*.This path is favored by a rapid change of the external variables.Among the two paths, the adiabatic one has a privileged position.Thus, it has been shown re cently that if the external change is measured by a "slowness parameter" inversely proportional to the time ta ken to effect the change then the Ehrenfest principle is valid to all orders in th is para meter [l].The following lines are to derive a rigorous formula for the probability that the adiabatic path is not followed in the simple case of the near crossing of two quantum levels.