Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0502095 · Optics Communications

Comment on “A simple experiment to test Bell’s inequality”, J.-M. Vigoureux

Aurélien Drezet

Published Feb 25, 2005• 4 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1016/j.optcom.2005.02.045

Related papers

A simple experiment to test Bell’s inequality

Jean Marie Vigoureux

Optics Communications•Feb 1, 2003•3 citations

Comment on “Testing Bell’s inequality with one party weak measurements”

George Moreno

Quantum Information Processing•Jan 25, 2017•0 citations

Comment on “Consequences of the single-pair measurement of the Bell parameter”

Marian Kupczyński

Genovese and Piacentini [] claim that, in a recent experiment [S. Virzì , ], the Bell parameter was measured on a single pair of photons, thus challenging several conclusions and discussions on the meaning of Bell inequalities as well as certain quantum mechanical interpretations. We explain that the parameter measured in the experiment of Virzì is not the Bell parameter S , which has been discussed and estimated in many loophole-free tests. Therefore, this experiment neither challenges our understanding of Bell tests nor allows having doubts about Bohr complementarity and contextuality.

arXiv:2502.11261•Physical Review A•Oct 30, 2025•1 citation

Interpretation of the Experiments on Bell's Inequality

Mario Iannuzzi, Vittorio Merlo

Foundations of Physics Letters•Aug 1, 2001•2 citations

Comment on “Consequences of the single-pair measurement of the Bell parameter”

Justo Pastor Lambare

In a recent article [], Genovese and Piacentini analyzed recent experiments measuring what they call “the entire Bell-Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (Bell-CHSH) parameter.” They claimed those experiments may have implications for interpreting loophole-free tests of the Bell-CHSH inequality. We explain that the Bell-CHSH inequality is not based on the entire Bell parameter, so these experiments are unrelated to their empirical tests and cannot close any eventual loopholes that might still persist. We point out that the physical meaning of these new experiments measuring the entire Bell parameter could be interpreted differently.

arXiv:2504.10341•Physical Review A•Oct 30, 2025•1 citation

On the Applicability of Bell's Inequality

Pierre A. Millette

Progress in physics•Jul 1, 2016•0 citations
Genovese and Piacentini [] claim that, in a recent experiment [S. Virzì , ], the Bell parameter was measured on a single pair of photons, thus challenging several conclusions and discussions on the meaning of Bell inequalities as well as certain quantum mechanical interpretations. We explain that the parameter measured in the experiment of Virzì is not the Bell parameter S , which has been discussed and estimated in many loophole-free tests. Therefore, this experiment neither challenges our understanding of Bell tests nor allows having doubts about Bohr complementarity and contextuality.
In a recent article [], Genovese and Piacentini analyzed recent experiments measuring what they call “the entire Bell-Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (Bell-CHSH) parameter.” They claimed those experiments may have implications for interpreting loophole-free tests of the Bell-CHSH inequality. We explain that the Bell-CHSH inequality is not based on the entire Bell parameter, so these experiments are unrelated to their empirical tests and cannot close any eventual loopholes that might still persist. We point out that the physical meaning of these new experiments measuring the entire Bell parameter could be interpreted differently.