Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0501116 · Physical Review A

Identifying an experimental two-state Hamiltonian to arbitrary accuracy

Jared H. Cole, Sonia G. Schirmer, Andrew D. Greentree, Cameron J. Wellard, Daniel K. L. Oi, Lloyd C. L. Hollenberg

Published Jun 14, 2005• 84 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Precision control of a quantum system requires accurate determination of the effective system Hamiltonian. We develop a method for estimating the Hamiltonian parameters for some unknown two-state system and providing uncertainty bounds on these parameters. This method requires only one measurement basis and the ability to initialize the system in some arbitrary state which is not an eigenstate of the Hamiltonian in question. The scaling of the uncertainty is studied for large numbers of measurements and found to be proportional to the reciprocal of the square root of the number of measurements.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.71.062312

Related papers

Measuring energy, estimating Hamiltonians, and the time-energy uncertainty relation

Yakir Aharonov, Serge Massar, Sandu Popescu

Suppose that the Hamiltonian acting on a quantum system is unknown and one wants to determine which is the Hamiltonian. We show that, in general, this requires a time $\ensuremath{\Delta}t$ that obeys the uncertainty relation $\ensuremath{\Delta}t\ensuremath{\Delta}H\ensuremath{\gtrsim}1,$ where $\ensuremath{\Delta}H$ is a measure of how accurately the unknown Hamiltonian must be estimated. We apply this result to the problem of measuring the energy of an unknown quantum state. It has been previously shown that if the Hamiltonian is known, then the energy can, in principle, be measured with arbitrarily large precision in an arbitrarily short time. On the other hand, we show that if the Hamiltonian is not known then an energy measurement necessarily takes a minimum time $\ensuremath{\Delta}t$ which obeys the uncertainty relation $\ensuremath{\Delta}t\ensuremath{\Delta}E\ensuremath{\gtrsim}1,$ where $\ensuremath{\Delta}E$ is the precision of the energy measurement. Several examples are studied to address the question of whether it is possible to saturate these uncertainty relations. Their interpretation is discussed in detail.

arXiv:quant-ph/0110004•Physical Review A•Nov 22, 2002•58 citations

Scalable Bayesian Hamiltonian learning

T. J. Evans, Robin Harper, Steven T. Flammia

As the size of quantum devices continues to grow, the development of scalable methods to characterise and diagnose noise is becoming an increasingly important problem. Recent methods have shown how to efficiently estimate Hamiltonians in principle, but they are poorly conditioned and can only characterize the system up to a scalar factor, making them difficult to use in practice. In this work we present a Bayesian methodology, called Bayesian Hamiltonian Learning (BHL), that addresses both of these issues by making use of any or all, of the following: well-characterised experimental control of Hamiltonian couplings, the preparation of multiple states, and the availability of any prior information for the Hamiltonian. Importantly, BHL can be used online as an adaptive measurement protocol, updating estimates and their corresponding uncertainties as experimental data become available. In addition, we show that multiple input states and control fields enable BHL to reconstruct Hamiltonians that are neither generic nor spatially local. We demonstrate the scalability and accuracy of our method with numerical simulations on up to 100 qubits. These practical results are complemented by several theoretical contributions. We prove that a $k$-body Hamiltonian $H$ whose correlation matrix has a spectral gap $Δ$ can be estimated to precision $\varepsilon$ with only $\tilde{O}\bigl(n^{3k}/(\varepsilon Δ)^{3/2}\bigr)$ measurements. We use two subroutines that may be of independent interest: First, an algorithm to approximate a steady state of $H$ starting from an arbitrary input that converges factorially in the number of samples; and second, an algorithm to estimate the expectation values of $m$ Pauli operators with weight $\le k$ to precision $ε$ using only $O(ε^{-2} 3^k \log m)$ measurements, which quadratically improves a recent result by Cotler and Wilczek.

arXiv:1912.07636•Dec 16, 2019•33 citations

Estimation of Hamiltonian Parameters from Thermal States

Luis Pedro García-Pintos, Kishor Bharti, Jacob Bringewatt +4 more

We upper bound and lower bound the optimal precision with which one can estimate an unknown Hamiltonian parameter via measurements of Gibbs thermal states with a known temperature. The bounds depend on the uncertainty in the Hamiltonian term that contains the parameter and on the term's degree of noncommutativity with the full Hamiltonian: higher uncertainty and commuting operators lead to better precision. We apply the bounds to show that there exist entangled thermal states such that the parameter can be estimated with an error that decreases faster than 1/sqrt[n], beating the standard quantum limit. This result governs Hamiltonians where an unknown scalar parameter (e.g., a component of a magnetic field) is coupled locally and identically to n qubit sensors. In the high-temperature regime, our bounds allow for pinpointing the optimal estimation error, up to a constant prefactor. Our bounds generalize to joint estimations of multiple parameters. In this setting, we recover the high-temperature sample scaling derived previously via techniques based on quantum state discrimination and coding theory. In an application, we show that noncommuting conserved quantities hinder the estimation of chemical potentials.

arXiv:2401.10343•Physical Review Letters•Jul 26, 2024•15 citations

Identifying a two-state Hamiltonian in the presence of decoherence

Jared H. Cole, Andrew D. Greentree, Daniel K. L. Oi +3 more

Mapping the system evolution of a two-state system allows the determination of the effective system Hamiltonian directly. We show how this can be achieved even if the system is decohering appreciably over the observation time. A method to include various decoherence models is given and the limits of this technique are explored. This technique is applicable both to the problem of calibrating a control Hamiltonian for quantum computing applications and for precision experiments in two-state quantum systems. The accuracy of the results obtained with this technique are ultimately limited by the validity of the decoherence model used.

arXiv:quant-ph/0509157•Physical Review A•Jun 27, 2006•40 citations

Heisenberg scaling in Gaussian quantum metrology

Nicolai Friis, Michalis Skotiniotis, Ivette Fuentes +1 more

We address the issue of precisely estimating small parameters encoded in a general linear transformation of the modes of a bosonic quantum field. Such Bogoliubov transformations frequently appear in the context of quantum optics. We provide a set of instructions for computing the quantum Fisher information for arbitrary pure initial states. We show that the maximally achievable precision of estimation is inversely proportional to the squared average particle number and that such Heisenberg scaling requires nonclassical but not necessarily entangled states. Our method further allows us to quantify losses in precision arising from being able to monitor only finitely many modes, for which we identify a lower bound.

arXiv:1502.07654•Physical Review A•Aug 7, 2015•70 citations

Quantum system identification: Hamiltonian estimation using spectral and Bayesian analysis

Sophie G Schirmer, Frank C Langbein

Identifying the Hamiltonian of a quantum system from experimental data is considered. General limits on the identifiability of model parameters with limited experimental resources are investigated, and a specific Bayesian estimation procedure is proposed and evaluated for a model system where a-priori information about the Hamiltonian's structure is available.

arXiv:0911.5429•International Symposium on Communications, Control and Signal Processing•Mar 1, 2010•6 citations
Precision control of a quantum system requires accurate determination of the effective system Hamiltonian. We develop a method for estimating the Hamiltonian parameters for some unknown two-state system and providing uncertainty bounds on these parameters. This method requires only one measurement basis and the ability to initialize the system in some arbitrary state which is not an eigenstate of the Hamiltonian in question. The scaling of the uncertainty is studied for large numbers of measurements and found to be proportional to the reciprocal of the square root of the number of measurements.
Suppose that the Hamiltonian acting on a quantum system is unknown and one wants to determine which is the Hamiltonian. We show that, in general, this requires a time $\ensuremath{\Delta}t$ that obeys the uncertainty relation $\ensuremath{\Delta}t\ensuremath{\Delta}H\ensuremath{\gtrsim}1,$ where $\ensuremath{\Delta}H$ is a measure of how accurately the unknown Hamiltonian must be estimated. We apply this result to the problem of measuring the energy of an unknown quantum state. It has been previously shown that if the Hamiltonian is known, then the energy can, in principle, be measured with arbitrarily large precision in an arbitrarily short time. On the other hand, we show that if the Hamiltonian is not known then an energy measurement necessarily takes a minimum time $\ensuremath{\Delta}t$ which obeys the uncertainty relation $\ensuremath{\Delta}t\ensuremath{\Delta}E\ensuremath{\gtrsim}1,$ where $\ensuremath{\Delta}E$ is the precision of the energy measurement. Several examples are studied to address the question of whether it is possible to saturate these uncertainty relations. Their interpretation is discussed in detail.
As the size of quantum devices continues to grow, the development of scalable methods to characterise and diagnose noise is becoming an increasingly important problem. Recent methods have shown how to efficiently estimate Hamiltonians in principle, but they are poorly conditioned and can only characterize the system up to a scalar factor, making them difficult to use in practice. In this work we present a Bayesian methodology, called Bayesian Hamiltonian Learning (BHL), that addresses both of these issues by making use of any or all, of the following: well-characterised experimental control of Hamiltonian couplings, the preparation of multiple states, and the availability of any prior information for the Hamiltonian. Importantly, BHL can be used online as an adaptive measurement protocol, updating estimates and their corresponding uncertainties as experimental data become available. In addition, we show that multiple input states and control fields enable BHL to reconstruct Hamiltonians that are neither generic nor spatially local. We demonstrate the scalability and accuracy of our method with numerical simulations on up to 100 qubits. These practical results are complemented by several theoretical contributions. We prove that a kkk-body Hamiltonian HHH whose correlation matrix has a spectral gap ΔΔΔ can be estimated to precision ε\varepsilonε with only O~(n3k/(εΔ)3/2)\tilde{O}\bigl(n^{3k}/(\varepsilon Δ)^{3/2}\bigr)O~(n3k/(εΔ)3/2) measurements. We use two subroutines that may be of independent interest: First, an algorithm to approximate a steady state of HHH starting from an arbitrary input that converges factorially in the number of samples; and second, an algorithm to estimate the expectation values of mmm Pauli operators with weight ≤k\le k≤k to precision εεε using only O(ε−23klog⁡m)O(ε^{-2} 3^k \log m)O(ε−23klogm) measurements, which quadratically improves a recent result by Cotler and Wilczek.
We upper bound and lower bound the optimal precision with which one can estimate an unknown Hamiltonian parameter via measurements of Gibbs thermal states with a known temperature. The bounds depend on the uncertainty in the Hamiltonian term that contains the parameter and on the term's degree of noncommutativity with the full Hamiltonian: higher uncertainty and commuting operators lead to better precision. We apply the bounds to show that there exist entangled thermal states such that the parameter can be estimated with an error that decreases faster than 1/sqrt[n], beating the standard quantum limit. This result governs Hamiltonians where an unknown scalar parameter (e.g., a component of a magnetic field) is coupled locally and identically to n qubit sensors. In the high-temperature regime, our bounds allow for pinpointing the optimal estimation error, up to a constant prefactor. Our bounds generalize to joint estimations of multiple parameters. In this setting, we recover the high-temperature sample scaling derived previously via techniques based on quantum state discrimination and coding theory. In an application, we show that noncommuting conserved quantities hinder the estimation of chemical potentials.
Mapping the system evolution of a two-state system allows the determination of the effective system Hamiltonian directly. We show how this can be achieved even if the system is decohering appreciably over the observation time. A method to include various decoherence models is given and the limits of this technique are explored. This technique is applicable both to the problem of calibrating a control Hamiltonian for quantum computing applications and for precision experiments in two-state quantum systems. The accuracy of the results obtained with this technique are ultimately limited by the validity of the decoherence model used.
We address the issue of precisely estimating small parameters encoded in a general linear transformation of the modes of a bosonic quantum field. Such Bogoliubov transformations frequently appear in the context of quantum optics. We provide a set of instructions for computing the quantum Fisher information for arbitrary pure initial states. We show that the maximally achievable precision of estimation is inversely proportional to the squared average particle number and that such Heisenberg scaling requires nonclassical but not necessarily entangled states. Our method further allows us to quantify losses in precision arising from being able to monitor only finitely many modes, for which we identify a lower bound.