Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0403152 · Springer eBooks

Quantum Gates and Decoherence

Stefan Scheel, Jiannis K. Pachos, E. A. Hinds, P. L. Knight

Published Mar 10, 2006• 16 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/11398448_2

Related papers

Decoherence of the quantum gate in Milburn’s model of decoherence

Kyoungtae Kimm, Hwang-h. Kwon

We study the decoherence properties of a two-qubit quantum swap gate in Milburn's model of decoherence where the gate is realized by the quantum-dot system. We examine how the so-called intrinsic decoherence may degrade the gate purity and gate fidelity of the quantum swap gate and also present a potential source for the occurrence of Milburn's equation in the system of concern.

Physical Review A•Jan 11, 2002•22 citations

Quantum gates and entanglement

Schmidt-Kaler, Haffiier, Riebe +7 more

Conference on Lasers and Electro-Optics•Jan 1, 2004•0 citations

Single-loop realization of universal nonadiabatic holonomic gates in decoherence-free subspaces

Chang Wang, Zhenping Guo

Control errors and decoherence are two main obstacles for realization of quantum computation. Nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation in decoherence-free subspaces can protect quantum gates from both control errors and decoherence, and, therefore, it has received increasing attention. The original protocol of nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation in decoherence-free subspaces needs two loops in the Grassmann manifold to generate an arbitrary nonadiabatic holonomic one-qubit gate. In this paper, we proposed a protocol of nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation in decoherence-free subspaces, where an arbitrary one-qubit gate is generated by only a single loop in the Grassmann manifold and an entangling two-qubit gate assisted by two single-qubit gates can be used to construct a two-qubit controlled unitary gate. In addition, the encoding of our protocol for nonadiabatic holonomic gates requires a lower number of physical qubits compared with previous schemes. Our scheme not only maintains the merits of the original protocol but it also avoids the extra work of combining two gates to realize an arbitrary one-qubit gate.

Europhysics Letters (EPL)•Dec 10, 2018•10 citations

Decoherence and Quantum Computing

The frontiers collection•Jul 27, 2007•1 citation

Single-shot realization of nonadiabatic holonomic quantum gates in decoherence-free subspaces

P. Z. Zhao, Guofu Xu, Qi-Ming Ding +2 more

Nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation in decoherence-free subspaces has attracted increasing attention recently, as it allows for high-speed implementation and combines both the robustness of holonomic gates and the coherence stabilization of decoherence-free subspaces. Since the first protocol of nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation in decoherence-free subspaces, a number of schemes for its physical implementation have been put forward. However, all previous schemes require two noncommuting gates to realize an arbitrary one-qubit gate, which doubles the exposure time of gates to error sources as well as the resource expenditure. In this paper, we propose an alternative protocol for nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation in decoherence-free subspaces, in which an arbitrary one-qubit gate in decoherence-free subspaces is realized by a single-shot implementation. The present protocol not only maintains the merits of the original protocol but also avoids the extra work of combining two gates to implement an arbitrary one-qubit gate and thereby reduces the exposure time to various error sources.

arXiv:1706.02967•Physical Review A•Jun 6, 2017•70 citations

Decoherence and quantum computing

Pablo Paz Juan

•Sep 12, 2006•0 citations
Control errors and decoherence are two main obstacles for realization of quantum computation. Nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation in decoherence-free subspaces can protect quantum gates from both control errors and decoherence, and, therefore, it has received increasing attention. The original protocol of nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation in decoherence-free subspaces needs two loops in the Grassmann manifold to generate an arbitrary nonadiabatic holonomic one-qubit gate. In this paper, we proposed a protocol of nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation in decoherence-free subspaces, where an arbitrary one-qubit gate is generated by only a single loop in the Grassmann manifold and an entangling two-qubit gate assisted by two single-qubit gates can be used to construct a two-qubit controlled unitary gate. In addition, the encoding of our protocol for nonadiabatic holonomic gates requires a lower number of physical qubits compared with previous schemes. Our scheme not only maintains the merits of the original protocol but it also avoids the extra work of combining two gates to realize an arbitrary one-qubit gate.
Nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation in decoherence-free subspaces has attracted increasing attention recently, as it allows for high-speed implementation and combines both the robustness of holonomic gates and the coherence stabilization of decoherence-free subspaces. Since the first protocol of nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation in decoherence-free subspaces, a number of schemes for its physical implementation have been put forward. However, all previous schemes require two noncommuting gates to realize an arbitrary one-qubit gate, which doubles the exposure time of gates to error sources as well as the resource expenditure. In this paper, we propose an alternative protocol for nonadiabatic holonomic quantum computation in decoherence-free subspaces, in which an arbitrary one-qubit gate in decoherence-free subspaces is realized by a single-shot implementation. The present protocol not only maintains the merits of the original protocol but also avoids the extra work of combining two gates to implement an arbitrary one-qubit gate and thereby reduces the exposure time to various error sources.