Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0402118

Reply to "Non-relativistic proofs of the spin-statistics connection," by Shaji and Sudarshan

Murray Peshkin

Published Feb 17, 2004• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

I earlier proved under stated assumptions of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics, that identical spin-zero particles with no internal degrees of freedom must be bosons. Shaji and Sudarshan have criticized that proof, asserting that it is "based on single-valuedness under rotation of the wave functions of systems of identical particles." No such assumption was used. Here, to remove all doubt, I exclude the fermion possibility through a proof in which even the existence of rotation is not used. Following that, I assume that the Hilbert space is invariant under rotation to exclude other symmetries which correspond neither to bosons nor to fermions. In that proof no issue of single-valuedness can arise.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0402118

Related papers

Reply to "No spin-statistics connection in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics"

Murray Peshkin

In a previous paper [quant-ph/0207017] I gave an elementary proof, starting from stated assumptions of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics, that identical spin-zero particles must be bosons. Since then it has been suggested that my proof assumed its conclusion, and that it is based on a theory "quite different from standard physics." [quant-ph/0304088] I show here that those two statements are incorrect.

arXiv:quant-ph/0306189•Jun 27, 2003•3 citations

Non-relativistic proofs of the spin-statistics connection

Anil Shaji, E. C. G. Sudarshan

A recent paper by Peshkin [1] has drawn attention again to the problem of understanding the spin statistics connection in non-relativistic quantum mechanics. Allen and Mondragon [2] has pointed out correctly some of the flaws in Peshkin's arguments which are based on the single valuedness under rotation of the wave functions of systems of identical particles. We examine carefully the claim that is made in the title of [2] that there can be ``no spin-statistics connection in non-relativistic quantum mechanics''. We show that we can derive the spin statistics connection for non-relativistic quantum field theories which have equations of motion of the Hamiltonian type based on SU(2) invariance of the Lagrangian. The formalism and machinary of non-relativistic quantum field theory as opposed to usual quantum mechanics is necessary for constructing our proof.

arXiv:quant-ph/0306033•Jun 4, 2003•7 citations

Note on Possibility of obtaining a non-relativistic proof of the spin-statistics theorem in the Galilean frame

Gabriel D. Puccini, H. Vucetich

We replay to the critique by Sudarshan and Shaji of our argument of impossibility to obtain a non-relativistic proof of the spin-statistics theorem in the Galilean frame.

arXiv:quant-ph/0502048•Feb 8, 2005•0 citations

Sudarshan's non-relativistic approach to the spin-statistics connection

Anil Shaji

George Sudarshan was quite a bit ahead of the times when he sketched out a non-relativistic proof of the spin-statistics connection forty years back. A recent revival of interest in the role of relativistic arguments in proving the spin-statistics connection prompted us to revisit Sudarshan's original arguments and present them in simpler fashion. The proof is designed to work in three space dimensions. Sudarshan's observation was that if we impose SU (2) invariance, along with a few other restrictions, on the kinematic part of the Lagrangian of a field theory which is derivable from a Weiss-Schwinger type of the Principle of Least Action, then the spin-statistics connection automatically follows. The assumptions and simplifications that go into constructing the proof will be carefully laid out so as to identify the limitations of this approach.

Journal of Physics Conference Series•Nov 1, 2009•0 citations

Proof of Spin-Statistics Theorem in Quantum Mechanics of Identical Particles

Takafumi Kita

A nonrelativistic proof of the spin-statistics theorem is given in terms of the field operators satisfying commutation and anticommutation relations, which are introduced here in the coordinate space as a means to build the permutation symmetry into the brackets of identical particles. An eigenvalue problem of a $π$-rotation for a product of two annihilation operators is combined with an analysis on its rotational property to prove the connection that the field operators for integral-spin and half-integral-spin particles obey the commutation and anticommutation relations, respectively.

quant-pharXiv:2512.12071•Dec 16, 2025•0 citations

Reply to “Comment on ‘Spin and statistics in nonrelativistic quantum mechanics: The spin-zero case’ ”

Murray Peshkin

The preceding Comment states that I have assumed the conclusion in my proof from nonrelativistic quantum mechanics that spin-zero particles must be bosons, and that the theory presented is different from standard quantum mechanics. I show here that neither of those statements is true.

Physical Review A•Oct 14, 2003•14 citations
I earlier proved under stated assumptions of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics, that identical spin-zero particles with no internal degrees of freedom must be bosons. Shaji and Sudarshan have criticized that proof, asserting that it is "based on single-valuedness under rotation of the wave functions of systems of identical particles." No such assumption was used. Here, to remove all doubt, I exclude the fermion possibility through a proof in which even the existence of rotation is not used. Following that, I assume that the Hilbert space is invariant under rotation to exclude other symmetries which correspond neither to bosons nor to fermions. In that proof no issue of single-valuedness can arise.
A recent paper by Peshkin [1] has drawn attention again to the problem of understanding the spin statistics connection in non-relativistic quantum mechanics. Allen and Mondragon [2] has pointed out correctly some of the flaws in Peshkin's arguments which are based on the single valuedness under rotation of the wave functions of systems of identical particles. We examine carefully the claim that is made in the title of [2] that there can be ``no spin-statistics connection in non-relativistic quantum mechanics''. We show that we can derive the spin statistics connection for non-relativistic quantum field theories which have equations of motion of the Hamiltonian type based on SU(2) invariance of the Lagrangian. The formalism and machinary of non-relativistic quantum field theory as opposed to usual quantum mechanics is necessary for constructing our proof.
George Sudarshan was quite a bit ahead of the times when he sketched out a non-relativistic proof of the spin-statistics connection forty years back. A recent revival of interest in the role of relativistic arguments in proving the spin-statistics connection prompted us to revisit Sudarshan's original arguments and present them in simpler fashion. The proof is designed to work in three space dimensions. Sudarshan's observation was that if we impose SU (2) invariance, along with a few other restrictions, on the kinematic part of the Lagrangian of a field theory which is derivable from a Weiss-Schwinger type of the Principle of Least Action, then the spin-statistics connection automatically follows. The assumptions and simplifications that go into constructing the proof will be carefully laid out so as to identify the limitations of this approach.
A nonrelativistic proof of the spin-statistics theorem is given in terms of the field operators satisfying commutation and anticommutation relations, which are introduced here in the coordinate space as a means to build the permutation symmetry into the brackets of identical particles. An eigenvalue problem of a πππ-rotation for a product of two annihilation operators is combined with an analysis on its rotational property to prove the connection that the field operators for integral-spin and half-integral-spin particles obey the commutation and anticommutation relations, respectively.