arXiv:quant-ph/0306033

Non-relativistic proofs of the spin-statistics connection

Anil Shaji, E. C. G. Sudarshan

Published Jun 4, 2003• 7 citations

Abstract

A recent paper by Peshkin [1] has drawn attention again to the problem of understanding the spin statistics connection in non-relativistic quantum mechanics. Allen and Mondragon [2] has pointed out correctly some of the flaws in Peshkin's arguments which are based on the single valuedness under rotation of the wave functions of systems of identical particles. We examine carefully the claim that is made in the title of [2] that there can be ``no spin-statistics connection in non-relativistic quantum mechanics''. We show that we can derive the spin statistics connection for non-relativistic quantum field theories which have equations of motion of the Hamiltonian type based on SU(2) invariance of the Lagrangian. The formalism and machinary of non-relativistic quantum field theory as opposed to usual quantum mechanics is necessary for constructing our proof.

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0306033

Related papers

Sudarshan's non-relativistic approach to the spin-statistics connection

Anil Shaji

George Sudarshan was quite a bit ahead of the times when he sketched out a non-relativistic proof of the spin-statistics connection forty years back. A recent revival of interest in the role of relativistic arguments in proving the spin-statistics connection prompted us to revisit Sudarshan's original arguments and present them in simpler fashion. The proof is designed to work in three space dimensions. Sudarshan's observation was that if we impose SU (2) invariance, along with a few other restrictions, on the kinematic part of the Lagrangian of a field theory which is derivable from a Weiss-Schwinger type of the Principle of Least Action, then the spin-statistics connection automatically follows. The assumptions and simplifications that go into constructing the proof will be carefully laid out so as to identify the limitations of this approach.

Journal of Physics Conference SeriesNov 1, 20090 citations

Reply to "Non-relativistic proofs of the spin-statistics connection," by Shaji and Sudarshan

Murray Peshkin

I earlier proved under stated assumptions of nonrelativistic quantum mechanics, that identical spin-zero particles with no internal degrees of freedom must be bosons. Shaji and Sudarshan have criticized that proof, asserting that it is "based on single-valuedness under rotation of the wave functions of systems of identical particles." No such assumption was used. Here, to remove all doubt, I exclude the fermion possibility through a proof in which even the existence of rotation is not used. Following that, I assume that the Hilbert space is invariant under rotation to exclude other symmetries which correspond neither to bosons nor to fermions. In that proof no issue of single-valuedness can arise.

arXiv:quant-ph/0402118Feb 17, 20041 citation

Note on Non-relativistic proof of the spin-statistics connection in the Galilean frame

E. C. G. Sudarshan, Anil Shaji

We reply to the critique by Pucchini and Vucetich of our construction of a non-relativistic proof of the spin-statistics connection using SU(2) invariance and a Weiss-Schwinger action principle.

arXiv:quant-ph/0409205Sep 28, 20042 citations

Connecting Spin and Statistics in Quantum Mechanics

Arthur Jabs, Paul Ehrenfest

Abstract. The spin-statistics connection is derived in a simple manner under the postulates that the original and the exchange wave functions are simply added, and that the azimuthal phase angle, which defines the orientation of the spin part of each single-particle spin-component eigenfunction in the plane normal to the spinquantization axis, is exchanged along with the other parameters. The spin factor (−1) 2s belongs to the exchange wave function when this function is constructed so as to get the spinor ambiguity under control. This is achieved by effecting the exchange of the azimuthal angle by means of rotations and admitting only rotations in one sense. The procedure works in Galilean as well as in Lorentz-invariant quantum mechanics. Relativistic quantum field theory is not required.

Nov 20, 201237 citations

Obtaining the non-relativistic quantum mechanics from quantum field theory: issues, folklores and facts

Τ. Padmanabhan

Given the classical dynamics of a non-relativistic particle in terms of a Hamiltonian or an action, it is relatively straightforward to obtain the non-relativistic quantum mechanics (NRQM) of the system. These standard procedures, based on either the Hamiltonian or the path integral, however, do not work in the case of a relativistic particle. As a result we do not have a single-particle description of relativistic quantum mechanics (RQM). Instead, the correct approach requires a transmutation of dynamical variables from the position and momentum of a single particle to a field and its canonical momentum. Particles, along with antiparticles , reappear in a very nontrivial manner as the excitations of the field. The fact that one needs to adopt completely different languages to describe a relativistic and non-relativistic free particle implies that obtaining the NRQM limit of QFT is conceptually nontrivial. I examine this limit in several approaches (like, for e.g., Hamiltonian dynamics, Lagrangian and Hamiltonian path integrals, field theoretic description etc.) and identify the precise issues which arise when one attempts to obtain the NRQM from QFT in each of these approaches. The dichotomy of NRQM and QFT does not originate just from the square root in the Hamiltonian or from the demand of Lorentz invariance, as is sometimes claimed. The real difficulty has its origin in the necessary existence of antiparticles to ensure a particular notion of relativistic causality. Because of these conceptual issues, it turns out that one cannot , in fact, obtain some of the popular descriptions of NRQM by any sensible limiting procedure applied to QFT. To obtain NRQM from QFT in a seamless manner, it is necessary to work with NRQM expressed in a language closer to that of QFT. This fact has several implications, especially for the operational notion of space coordinates in quantum theory. A close examination of these issues, which arise when quantum theory is combined with special relativity, could offer insights in the context of attempts to combine quantum theory with general relativity.

arXiv:1712.06605The European Physical Journal CJul 1, 201823 citations

Weyl-gauge invariant proof of the Spin-Statistics Theorem

Enrico Santamato, F. De Martini

The traditional standard theory of quantum mechanics is unable to solve the spin-statistics problem, i.e. to justify the utterly important \qo{Pauli Exclusion Principle} but by the adoption of the complex standard relativistic quantum field theory. In a recent paper (Ref. [1]) we presented a proof of the spin-statistics problem in the nonrelativistic approximation on the basis of the \qo{Conformal Quantum Geometrodynamics}. In the present paper, by the same theory the proof of the Spin-Statistics Theorem is extended to the relativistic domain in the general scenario of curved spacetime. The relativistic approach allows to formulate a manifestly step-by-step Weyl gauge invariant theory and to emphasize some fundamental aspects of group theory in the demonstration. No relativistic quantum field operators are used and the particle exchange properties are drawn from the conservation of the intrinsic helicity of elementary particles. It is therefore this property, not considered in the Standard Quantum Mechanics, which determines the correct spin-statistics connection observed in Nature [1]. The present proof of the Spin-Statistics Theorem is simpler than the one presented in Ref. [1], because it is based on symmetry group considerations only, without having recourse to frames attached to the particles.

arXiv:1604.06253Apr 21, 20161 citation