Effective classicality of a property of a quantum system can be defined using redundancy of its record in the environment. This allows quantum physics to approximate the situation encountered in the classical world: The information about a classical system can exist independently from its state. In quantum theory this is no longer possible: In an isolated quantum system the state and the information about it are inextricably linked, and any measurement may -- and usually will -- reset that state. However, when the information about the state of a quantum system is spread throughout the environment, it can be treated (almost) as in classical physics.
Effective classicality of a property of a quantum system can be defined using redundancy of its record in the environment. This allows quantum physics to approximate the situation encountered in the classical world: The information about a classical system can exist independently from its state. In quantum theory this is no longer possible: In an isolated quantum system the state and the information about it are inextricably linked, and any measurement may -- and usually will -- reset that state. However, when the information about the state of a quantum system is spread throughout the environment, it can be treated (almost) as in classical physics.
Core quantum postulates including the superposition principle and the unitarity of evolutions are natural and strikingly simple. I show that—when supplemented with a limited version of predictability (captured in the textbook accounts by the repeatability postulate)—these core postulates can account for all the symptoms of classicality. In particular, both objective classical reality and elusive information about reality arise, via quantum Darwinism, from the quantum substrate. This approach shares with the Relative State Interpretation of Everett the view that collapse of the wavepacket reflects perception of the state of the rest of the Universe relative to the state of observer’s records. However, our “let quantum be quantum” approach poses questions absent in Bohr’s Copenhagen Interpretation that relied on the preexisting classical domain. Thus, one is now forced to seek preferred, predictable, hence effectively classical but ultimately quantum states that allow observers keep reliable records. Without such (i) preferred basis relative states are simply “too relative”, and the ensuing basis ambiguity makes it difficult to identify events (e.g., measurement outcomes). Moreover, universal validity of quantum theory raises the issue of (ii) the origin of Born’s rule, pk=|ψk|2, relating probabilities and amplitudes (that is simply postulated in textbooks). Last not least, even preferred pointer states (defined by einselection—environment—induced superselection)—are still quantum. Therefore, unlike classical states that exist objectively, quantum states of an individual system cannot be found out by an initially ignorant observer through direct measurement without being disrupted. So, to complete the ‘quantum theory of the classical’ one must identify (iii) quantum origin of objective existence and explain how the information about objectively existing states can appear to be essentially inconsequential for them (as it does for states in Newtonian physics) and yet matter in other settings (e.g., thermodynamics). I show how the mathematical structure of quantum theory supplemented by the only uncontroversial measurement postulate (that demands immediate repeatability—hence, predictability) leads to preferred states. These (i) pointer states correspond to measurement outcomes. Their stability is a prerequisite for objective existence of effectively classical states and for events such as quantum jumps. Events at hand, one can now enquire about their probability—the probability of a pointer state (or of a measurement record). I show that the symmetry of entangled states—(ii) entanglement—assisted invariance or envariance—implies Born’s rule. Envariance also accounts for the loss of phase coherence between pointer states. Thus, decoherence can be traced to symmetries of entanglement and understood without its usual tool—reduced density matrices. A simple and manifestly noncircular derivation of pk=|ψk|2 follows. Monitoring of the system by its environment in course of decoherence typically leaves behind multiple copies of its pointer states in the environment. Only pointer states can survive decoherence and can spawn such plentiful information-theoretic progeny. This (iii) quantum Darwinism allows observers to use environment as a witness—to find out pointer states indirectly, leaving systems of interest untouched. Quantum Darwinism shows how epistemic and ontic (coexisting in epiontic quantum state) separate into robust objective existence of pointer states and detached information about them, giving rise to extantons—composite objects with system of interest in the core and multiple records of its pointer states in the halo comprising of environment subsystems (e.g., photons) which disseminates that information throughout the Universe.
The emergence of the classical world from the quantum substrate of our Universe is a long-standing conundrum. In this paper, I describe three insights into the transition from quantum to classical that are based on the recognition of the role of the environment. I begin with the derivation of preferred sets of states that help to define what exists—our everyday classical reality. They emerge as a result of the breaking of the unitary symmetry of the Hilbert space which happens when the unitarity of quantum evolutions encounters nonlinearities inherent in the process of amplification—of replicating information. This derivation is accomplished without the usual tools of decoherence, and accounts for the appearance of quantum jumps and the emergence of preferred pointer states consistent with those obtained via environment-induced superselection, or einselection . The pointer states obtained in this way determine what can happen—define events—without appealing to Born’s Rule for probabilities. Therefore, p k =| ψ k | 2 can now be deduced from the entanglement-assisted invariance, or envariance —a symmetry of entangled quantum states. With probabilities at hand, one also gains new insights into the foundations of quantum statistical physics. Moreover, one can now analyse the information flows responsible for decoherence. These information flows explain how the perception of objective classical reality arises from the quantum substrate: the effective amplification that they represent accounts for the objective existence of the einselected states of macroscopic quantum systems through the redundancy of pointer state records in their environment—through quantum Darwinism . This article is part of a discussion meeting issue ‘Foundations of quantum mechanics and their impact on contemporary society’.
Quantum Darwinism is a leading framework for explaining how classical reality emerges from a quantum universe—the environment redundantly encodes the pointer state information of quantum systems, enabling multiple independent observers to reach consensus about reality. However, a fundamental question has remained unanswered: Why does the environment possess this capacity for redundant recording? This paper proposes, within the information-potential conversion framework, that the redundant recording mechanism of quantum Darwinism is the physical realization of the information-potential conversion consensus protocol—the environment, acting as the physical medium for information-potential conversion, redundantly encodes system information, providing consistent conversion records for independent information processing units, from which classical reality emerges. Based on this interpretation, three testable quantitative predictions are proposed: (1) In superconducting quantum circuits, when system complexity exceeds a critical threshold, the efficiency of redundant recording should exhibit an abrupt transition—a signal of the information-potential conversion phase transition of the consensus protocol from “quantum critical” to “classically locked”; (2) There should exist a precise linear relationship between functional information and information-potential conversion energy consumption: each additional bit of functional information doubles the minimum heat dissipation required for record stabilization; (3) Consensus strength—the stability of classical reality—should be positively correlated with the number of information processing units participating in the consensus protocol, and a critical number exists at which the consensus phase transition occurs. quantum Darwinism, information-potential conversion, consensus protocol, classical emergence, redundant recording, functional information
A fact of the classical world is public property: many agents can learn it without erasing or revising it. Quantum mechanics offers no such notion, since unknown states cannot be copied and measurement disturbs. This review develops quantum Darwinism’s resolution, which locates classicality in the environment as a broadcast medium carrying independent records of an observable. The framework is assembled in information-theoretic terms: quantum mutual information between system and environment fragments, redundancy at an information deficit, the Holevo quantity separating accessible from total correlation, spectrum broadcast structure as the record-bearing state, and the quantum Chernoff information fixing the rate of accumulation. A proposition proving that spectrum broadcast structure forces the classical plateau fragment by fragment is given. Three media — spin registers, oscillator baths, and scattered photons — are examined, followed by account of a record’s life cycle: formation, degradation under intra-environmental scrambling and information backflow, and counterexamples where decoherence proceeds while no record is deposited. The relation between redundancy and consensus, consistent histories, laboratory evidence, and unresolved problems are treated in closing.
In our daily life experiences we face localized objects which are "here or there" not "here and there". The state of a cat could be "dead and alive" at the same time from a quantum mechanical point of view, which is not in agreement with our classical life observations. If we assume that quantum theory can explain the large scale events, how is it possible that quantumness disappears in the classical world? The answer lies in the interaction between the environment and the system of interest. Quantum Darwinism describes the proliferation of the quantum information of each system in the environment. We will show how entanglement plays a key role in coding and decoding the information of each system in its surrounding environment.