In our daily life experiences we face localized objects which are "here or there" not "here and there". The state of a cat could be "dead and alive" at the same time from a quantum mechanical point of view, which is not in agreement with our classical life observations. If we assume that quantum theory can explain the large scale events, how is it possible that quantumness disappears in the classical world? The answer lies in the interaction between the environment and the system of interest. Quantum Darwinism describes the proliferation of the quantum information of each system in the environment. We will show how entanglement plays a key role in coding and decoding the information of each system in its surrounding environment.
In our daily life experiences we face localized objects which are "here or there" not "here and there". The state of a cat could be "dead and alive" at the same time from a quantum mechanical point of view, which is not in agreement with our classical life observations. If we assume that quantum theory can explain the large scale events, how is it possible that quantumness disappears in the classical world? The answer lies in the interaction between the environment and the system of interest. Quantum Darwinism describes the proliferation of the quantum information of each system in the environment. We will show how entanglement plays a key role in coding and decoding the information of each system in its surrounding environment.
In this article I aim to provide an intuitive and non-technical introduction to decoherence and quantum Darwinism. Together these theories explain how our classical reality emerges from an underlying quantum mechanical description. Here I focus on two aspects of this and explain, firstly, how decoherence can tell us why we never see macroscopic superpositions, such as dead-and-alive cats, in our classical surroundings; and secondly I describe and then provide a resolution to the so-called preferred basis problem. I then introduce recent results demonstrating that certain aspects of classicality are generic phenomena that emerge from the basic mathematical structure of quantum mechanics. This is in stark contrast to previous work in this field that focused on specific models that cannot realistically be scaled up to explicitly answer questions about the macroscopic world. Finally, I demonstrate how decoherence and quantum Darwinism can shed significant light on the measurement problem, and I discuss the implications for how we should interpret quantum mechanics.
An explanation for the quantum-to-classical transition has long been sought after since the haydays of the field. Decoherence theory and open quantum system dynamics have paved the way, showing how a system can become correlated with, and so lose information into the environment. Quantum Darwinism, and its more stringent cousins Strong Quantum Darwinism and Spectrum Broadcast Structures, seek to explain how this information loss is achieved in such a way as to be objective, classical and redundant. However there remains questions as to how the structure of the environment, states and types of interactions can give rise to this redundant encoding. In this thesis, we collect the work of 3 of our papers, exploring these questions. First, we show how information from one environment can spread to another. Then we show how commutativity can play a role in the emergence of objectivity. Lastly, we move beyond a single, pure system to a more realistic bipartite one, with both classical and quantum correlations between the subsystems. We shall show how interactions between only these subsystems can mediate the redundancy of others, and how these can lower bound and upper bound other forms of interactions between said subsystems and the environment.
Amplification was regarded, since the early days of quantum theory, as a mysterious ingredient that endows quantum microstates with macroscopic consequences, key to the "collapse of the wave packet," and a way to avoid embarrassing problems exemplified by Schrödinger's cat. Such a bridge between the quantum microworld and the classical world of our experience was postulated ad hoc in the Copenhagen interpretation. Quantum Darwinism views amplification as replication, in many copies, of the information about quantum states. We show that such amplification is a natural consequence of a broad class of models of decoherence, including the photon environment we use to obtain most of our information. This leads to objective reality via the presence of robust and widely accessible records of selected quantum states. The resulting redundancy (the number of copies deposited in the environment) follows from the quantum Chernoff information that quantifies the information transmitted by a typical elementary subsystem of the environment.
In quantum theory, a particle is allowed to be in a state of coherent superposition among a set of orthogonal states. A vivid picture of this concept is the “Schrödinger cat”: a cat is alive and dead simultaneously. This would be no surprise if one means a large number of an ensemble of cats with 50% alive and 50% dead. But, “Schrödinger cat” is a cat. People are talking about a cat being alive and dead simultaneously. In mathematics, the best word to characterize the relationship between states “alive” and “dead” is perhaps “orthogonal”. In quantum mechanics, the superposition of orthogonal states is used to describe the state of a quantum object, or a particle. The superposition principle is indeed a mystery compared to our everyday classical life experience. Beyond the superposition of orthogonal single-particle states, the superposition of orthogonal multi-particle states represents an even more troubling concept in classical theory.
The framework of Quantum Darwinism strives at characterizing the quantum-to-classical transition by introducing the concept of redundancy of information-as measured by Mutual Information-that a set of observers would acquire on the state of a physical system of interest. Further development on this concept, in the form of Strong Quantum Darwinism and Spectrum Broadcast Structures, has recently led to a more fine-grained identification of the nature of such information, which should not involve any quantum correlations between observing and observed systems, while the assessment of information proliferation from individual systems has attracted most of the attention so far, the way such mechanism takes place in more complex states is open to exploration. To this end, we shall consider a two-qubit state, sharing initial quantum correlations in the form of Quantum Discord, and different dephasing-like interactions between them and an observing environment. We will focus on the amount of information regarding the subsystem not involved in the interaction that is proliferated to the environment. We shall refer to this as mediated redundancy. We will show that, in some cases, the channel capacity of the subsystems, given these interactions, can exceed that of the fragments.