Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0212140

Entanglement and Relativity

Christopher G. Timpson, Harvey R. Brown

Published Dec 24, 2002• 22 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In this paper we survey, in an elementary fashion, some of the questions that arise when one considers how entanglement and relativity are related via the notion of non-locality. We begin by reviewing the role of entangled states in Bell inequality violation and question whether the associated notions of non-locality lead to problems with relativity. The use of entanglement and wavefunction collapse in Einstein's famous incompleteness argument is then considered, before we go on to see how the issue of non-locality is transformed if one considers quantum mechanics without collapse to be a complete theory, as in the Everett interpretation. The opportunity is taken to consider whether teleportation and dense coding might constitute a source of non-locality within the Everett interpretation.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0212140

Related papers

Quantum Entanglement: Foundations, Implications, and Future Directions

PAULO SÉRGIO DE ANDRADE

Quantum entanglement represents one of the most profound and counterintuitive phenomena in modern physics, fundamentally challenging classical notions of locality, causality, and separability. This comprehensive review examines the theoretical foundations of quantum entanglement, tracing its conceptual development from Einstein's critique of quantum mechanics through Bell's theorem to contemporary experimental verification. The paper synthesizes current understanding of entanglement's mathematical formalism, its role in violating Bell inequalities, and the resolution of the EPR paradox. Extensive discussion is devoted to landmark experiments that have conclusively demonstrated non-local correlations, including photon polarization studies, satellite-based quantum communication, and loophole-free Bell tests. The work further explores emerging technological applications in quantum cryptography, quantum computing, and quantum teleportation, while addressing fundamental questions regarding the nature of reality, information, and the relationship between quantum mechanics and general relativity. Finally, the paper examines open questions and speculative frameworks suggesting that entanglement may represent a foundational principle underlying spacetime geometry itself. Video documentation of this analysis is available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDGKuXYRPpI.

•Dec 25, 2025•0 citations

Holism and non-separability applied to quantum mechanics

Catherine E Nisson

Einstein was never satisfied with quantum mechanics. He argued that quantum mechanics was incomplete for two main reasons; it violated the locality principle and the separability principle. The violation of separability is an unavoidable consequence of quantum interactions. Non-separability can be seen in quantum entanglement. Non-locality, however, is more controversial. Einstein and his associates published the EPR paper in order to argue for the incompleteness of quantum mechanics. Years later, John Bell formulated what became known as the Bell Inequalities in response to the EPR paper. The Bell Inequalities are seen as a major obstacle for quantum locality. I will argue that non-locality is not a necessary implication of the Bell Inequalities. The Bell Inequalities were developed using Bell’s locality requirement as a major premise. Bell’s locality requirement can be described in terms of two conditions, parameter independence and outcome independence. A violation of either condition will lead to a violation of the Bell inequalities. Parameter independence is not violated by the results of experimental quantum physics. So, it can be argued that violations of the Bell inequalities are caused by the violation of outcome independence. Such a violation of outcome independence does not imply non-locality if we accept some form of holism or non-separability. Thus, by including some form of holism or non-separability into our picture of the quantum realm we can develop a theory that does not conflict with locality. This paper will discuss different types of holism and non-separability and how they can be used to help understand quantum phenomena.

•Jan 1, 2011•0 citations

Entanglement and Quantum Teleportation

Moamer Hasanovic

This chapter investigates quantum entanglement and teleportation, challenging local realism by demonstrating quantum mechanics' inconsistency with locality and realism. It begins with Einstein's skepticism towards entanglement and introduces Bell's theorem as a framework to test local realism, showing how quantum systems violate Bell's inequality. The chapter details experiments with entangled photon pairs, highlighting their non-local correlations and probabilistic nature, and contrasts these with classical correlations. It explains quantum teleportation, its process, and applications in quantum networks, concluding with the operational principles of an entanglement generator and its role in secure quantum communication.

SPIE eBooks•Aug 31, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Entanglement: A Fundamental Concept Finding its Applications

Anton Zeilinger

Entanglement, according to the Austrian physicist Erwin Schrödinger the Essence of Quantum Mechanics, has been known for a long time now to be the source of a number of paradoxical and counterintuitive phenomena. Of those the most remarkable one is usually called non-locality and it is at the heart of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox and of the fact that Quantum Mechanics violates Bell’s inequalities. Recent years saw an emergence of novel ideas in entanglement of three or more particles. Most recently it turned out that entanglement is an important concept in the development of quantum communication, quantum cryptography and quantum computation. First explicit experimental realizations with two or more photons include quantum dense coding and quantum teleportation.

Physica Scripta•Jan 1, 1998•47 citations

Bell’s Inequality and Quantum Gravity: On the Incompleteness of Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity

WU Xin-zhong

This paper examines the history of Bell’s inequality from EPR argument to Bell’s papers, and the influence of Bell’s inequality on the frontier exploration of quantum mechanics. It is found that Bell’s inequality has some hidden assumptions that are different from EPR argument. Along Schrodinger’s idea that the measurement process of the EPR experiment requires time, Karl Hess and his follows treat time as a time order parameter, by extending the method of space-time geometry analysis of relativity to the localized geometry analysis of quantum states, it is believed that the reasoning of Bell’s inequality does not meet the requirements of the completeness of EPR argument. Analyzing the non locality of gravitational energy in general relativity makes it necessary for us to seek a more localized expression of relativistic gravitational theory. Based on local realism, exploring new interpretations and expressions of quantum mechanics may open up new avenues for studying quantum gravity. We found that Lorentz almost discovered the incompleteness of general relativity but erroneously insisted on the concepts of ether and absolute space, just as Einstein correctly discovered the flaws in the non local representation of quantum mechanics based on outdated determinism.

Journal of High Energy Physics Gravitation and Cosmology•Jan 1, 2025•0 citations

Quantum Nonlocality: Myth and Reality

Robert B. Griffiths

It is shown that when properly analyzed using principles consistent with the use of a Hilbert space to describe microscopic properties, quantum mechanics is a local theory: one system cannot influence another system with which it does not interact. Claims to the contrary based on quantum violations of Bell inequalities are shown to be incorrect. A specific example traces a violation of the CHSH Bell inequality in the case of a spin-3/2 particle to the noncommutation of certain quantum operators in a situation where (non)locality is not an issue. A consistent histories analysis of what quantum measurements measure, in terms of quantum properties, is used to identify the basic problem with derivations of Bell inequalities: the use of classical concepts (hidden variables) rather than a probabilistic structure appropriate to the quantum domain. A difficulty with the original Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) argument for the incompleteness of quantum mechanics is the use of a counterfactual argument which is not valid if one assumes that Hilbert-space quantum mechanics is complete; locality is not an issue. The quantum correlations that violate Bell inequalities can be understood using local quantum common causes. Wavefunction collapse and Schr\odinger steering are calculational procedures, not physical processes. A general Principle of Einstein Locality rules out nonlocal influences between noninteracting quantum systems. Some suggestions are made for changes in terminology that could clarify discussions of quantum foundations and be less confusing to students.

•Jan 21, 2019•11 citations
In this paper we survey, in an elementary fashion, some of the questions that arise when one considers how entanglement and relativity are related via the notion of non-locality. We begin by reviewing the role of entangled states in Bell inequality violation and question whether the associated notions of non-locality lead to problems with relativity. The use of entanglement and wavefunction collapse in Einstein's famous incompleteness argument is then considered, before we go on to see how the issue of non-locality is transformed if one considers quantum mechanics without collapse to be a complete theory, as in the Everett interpretation. The opportunity is taken to consider whether teleportation and dense coding might constitute a source of non-locality within the Everett interpretation.
Quantum entanglement represents one of the most profound and counterintuitive phenomena in modern physics, fundamentally challenging classical notions of locality, causality, and separability. This comprehensive review examines the theoretical foundations of quantum entanglement, tracing its conceptual development from Einstein's critique of quantum mechanics through Bell's theorem to contemporary experimental verification. The paper synthesizes current understanding of entanglement's mathematical formalism, its role in violating Bell inequalities, and the resolution of the EPR paradox. Extensive discussion is devoted to landmark experiments that have conclusively demonstrated non-local correlations, including photon polarization studies, satellite-based quantum communication, and loophole-free Bell tests. The work further explores emerging technological applications in quantum cryptography, quantum computing, and quantum teleportation, while addressing fundamental questions regarding the nature of reality, information, and the relationship between quantum mechanics and general relativity. Finally, the paper examines open questions and speculative frameworks suggesting that entanglement may represent a foundational principle underlying spacetime geometry itself. Video documentation of this analysis is available at: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDGKuXYRPpI.
Einstein was never satisfied with quantum mechanics. He argued that quantum mechanics was incomplete for two main reasons; it violated the locality principle and the separability principle. The violation of separability is an unavoidable consequence of quantum interactions. Non-separability can be seen in quantum entanglement. Non-locality, however, is more controversial. Einstein and his associates published the EPR paper in order to argue for the incompleteness of quantum mechanics. Years later, John Bell formulated what became known as the Bell Inequalities in response to the EPR paper. The Bell Inequalities are seen as a major obstacle for quantum locality. I will argue that non-locality is not a necessary implication of the Bell Inequalities. The Bell Inequalities were developed using Bell’s locality requirement as a major premise. Bell’s locality requirement can be described in terms of two conditions, parameter independence and outcome independence. A violation of either condition will lead to a violation of the Bell inequalities. Parameter independence is not violated by the results of experimental quantum physics. So, it can be argued that violations of the Bell inequalities are caused by the violation of outcome independence. Such a violation of outcome independence does not imply non-locality if we accept some form of holism or non-separability. Thus, by including some form of holism or non-separability into our picture of the quantum realm we can develop a theory that does not conflict with locality. This paper will discuss different types of holism and non-separability and how they can be used to help understand quantum phenomena.
This chapter investigates quantum entanglement and teleportation, challenging local realism by demonstrating quantum mechanics' inconsistency with locality and realism. It begins with Einstein's skepticism towards entanglement and introduces Bell's theorem as a framework to test local realism, showing how quantum systems violate Bell's inequality. The chapter details experiments with entangled photon pairs, highlighting their non-local correlations and probabilistic nature, and contrasts these with classical correlations. It explains quantum teleportation, its process, and applications in quantum networks, concluding with the operational principles of an entanglement generator and its role in secure quantum communication.
Entanglement, according to the Austrian physicist Erwin Schrödinger the Essence of Quantum Mechanics, has been known for a long time now to be the source of a number of paradoxical and counterintuitive phenomena. Of those the most remarkable one is usually called non-locality and it is at the heart of the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox and of the fact that Quantum Mechanics violates Bell’s inequalities. Recent years saw an emergence of novel ideas in entanglement of three or more particles. Most recently it turned out that entanglement is an important concept in the development of quantum communication, quantum cryptography and quantum computation. First explicit experimental realizations with two or more photons include quantum dense coding and quantum teleportation.
This paper examines the history of Bell’s inequality from EPR argument to Bell’s papers, and the influence of Bell’s inequality on the frontier exploration of quantum mechanics. It is found that Bell’s inequality has some hidden assumptions that are different from EPR argument. Along Schrodinger’s idea that the measurement process of the EPR experiment requires time, Karl Hess and his follows treat time as a time order parameter, by extending the method of space-time geometry analysis of relativity to the localized geometry analysis of quantum states, it is believed that the reasoning of Bell’s inequality does not meet the requirements of the completeness of EPR argument. Analyzing the non locality of gravitational energy in general relativity makes it necessary for us to seek a more localized expression of relativistic gravitational theory. Based on local realism, exploring new interpretations and expressions of quantum mechanics may open up new avenues for studying quantum gravity. We found that Lorentz almost discovered the incompleteness of general relativity but erroneously insisted on the concepts of ether and absolute space, just as Einstein correctly discovered the flaws in the non local representation of quantum mechanics based on outdated determinism.
It is shown that when properly analyzed using principles consistent with the use of a Hilbert space to describe microscopic properties, quantum mechanics is a local theory: one system cannot influence another system with which it does not interact. Claims to the contrary based on quantum violations of Bell inequalities are shown to be incorrect. A specific example traces a violation of the CHSH Bell inequality in the case of a spin-3/2 particle to the noncommutation of certain quantum operators in a situation where (non)locality is not an issue. A consistent histories analysis of what quantum measurements measure, in terms of quantum properties, is used to identify the basic problem with derivations of Bell inequalities: the use of classical concepts (hidden variables) rather than a probabilistic structure appropriate to the quantum domain. A difficulty with the original Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) argument for the incompleteness of quantum mechanics is the use of a counterfactual argument which is not valid if one assumes that Hilbert-space quantum mechanics is complete; locality is not an issue. The quantum correlations that violate Bell inequalities can be understood using local quantum common causes. Wavefunction collapse and Schr\odinger steering are calculational procedures, not physical processes. A general Principle of Einstein Locality rules out nonlocal influences between noninteracting quantum systems. Some suggestions are made for changes in terminology that could clarify discussions of quantum foundations and be less confusing to students.