Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0211022 · Physical Review Letters

Kuhn, Hennrich, and Rempe Reply:

Axel Kuhn, Markus Hennrich, Gerhard Rempe

Published Jun 17, 2003• 7 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Reply to the comment of H. J. Kimble [quant-ph/0210032] on the experiment realizing a "deterministic single-photon source for distributed quantum networking" by Kuhn, Hennrich, and Rempe [Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 067901 (2002), quant-ph/0204147].
DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.90.249802

Related papers

Comment on “Deterministic Single-Photon Source for Distributed Quantum Networking”

Harry J. Kimble

A Comment on the Letter by Axel Kuhn, Markus Hennrich, and Gerhard Rempe, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89, 067901 (2002). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.

arXiv:quant-ph/0210032•Physical Review Letters•Jun 17, 2003•17 citations

Kuhn, Hennrich, and Rempe Reply to Comment on "Deterministic single-photon source for distributed quantum networking"

Axel Kuhn, Markus Hennrich, Gerhard Rempe

Physical Review Letters•Jun 20, 2003•0 citations

Vacchini Replies:

Bassano Vacchini

This is the reply to a Comment by R. F. O'Connell (Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 028901) on a paper written by the author (B. Vacchini, ``Completely positive quantum dissipation'', Phys.Rev.Lett. 84 (2000) 1374, arXiv:quant-ph/0002094).

arXiv:quant-ph/0107046•Physical Review Letters•Jun 20, 2001•16 citations

Reply to Comment on "Deterministic six states protocol for quantum communication" [arXiv:1107.4435v1 [quant-ph] / Phys. Lett. A 374 (2010) 1097]

Jesni Shamsul Shaari, Marco Lucamarini, Asmaʼ Ahmad Bahari

We reply to the Comment made in arXiv:1107.4435v1 [quant-ph] (Phys. Lett. A \textbf{374} (2010) 1097) by noting some erroneous considerations therein resulting in a misleading view of the quantum key distribution protocol in question. We then correct the rates provided for the Intercept-and-Resend attack and we complete the analysis of Eve's attack based on a double CNOT gate.

arXiv:1110.1170•Oct 6, 2011•0 citations

Reply to Comment: Quantum Cryptography Based on Orthogonal States?

Lior Goldenberg, Lev Vaidman A

This is our Reply to Peres' Comment [quant-ph/9509003] to "Quantum Cryptography Based on Orthogonal States" [Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 1239 (1995)].

arXiv:quant-ph/9604029•Apr 25, 1996•3 citations

Reply to Comment on "State-independent experimental test of quantum contextuality in an indivisible system"

Chong Zu, Y. X. Wang, Deng, D. -L. +5 more

This is a reply to the comment from E. Amselem et al. on our paper (Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 150401 (2012), arXiv:1207.0059).

arXiv:1302.0619•Feb 4, 2013•0 citations