Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0107046 · Physical Review Letters

Vacchini Replies:

Bassano Vacchini

Published Jun 20, 2001• 16 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

This is the reply to a Comment by R. F. O'Connell (Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 028901) on a paper written by the author (B. Vacchini, ``Completely positive quantum dissipation'', Phys.Rev.Lett. 84 (2000) 1374, arXiv:quant-ph/0002094).
DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.87.028902

Related papers

Comment on “Completely Positive Quantum Dissipation”

Robert F. O’Connell

A Comment on the Letter by Bassano Vacchini, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 1374 (2000). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply. © 2001 The American Physical Society.

Physical Review Letters•Jun 20, 2001•19 citations

Reply to the comment "quant-ph/9710002"

Luming Duan, Guang‐Can Guo

In the comment, Zanardi and Rasetti argue that several claims in our recent letter (Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1953, 1997) are questionable. The reply shows these claims remain true.

arXiv:quant-ph/9710014•Oct 3, 1997•1 citation

Reply to Comment on "Deterministic six states protocol for quantum communication" [arXiv:1107.4435v1 [quant-ph] / Phys. Lett. A 374 (2010) 1097]

Jesni Shamsul Shaari, Marco Lucamarini, Asmaʼ Ahmad Bahari

We reply to the Comment made in arXiv:1107.4435v1 [quant-ph] (Phys. Lett. A \textbf{374} (2010) 1097) by noting some erroneous considerations therein resulting in a misleading view of the quantum key distribution protocol in question. We then correct the rates provided for the Intercept-and-Resend attack and we complete the analysis of Eve's attack based on a double CNOT gate.

arXiv:1110.1170•Oct 6, 2011•0 citations

Comment on: “Quantum exam” [Phys. Lett. A 350 (2006) 174]

Fei Gao, Qiaoyan Wen, Fu-Chen Zhu

arXiv:quant-ph/0606034•Physics Letters A•Aug 18, 2006•139 citations

Comment on: “Quantum exam” [Phys. Lett. A 350 (2006) 174]

Jie Song, Shou Zhang

Physics Letters A•Aug 18, 2006•11 citations

Reply to Comment on

Jesni Shamsul Shaari, Marco Lucamarini, Asmaʼ Ahmad Bahari

We reply to the Comment made in arXiv:1107.4435v1 [quant-ph] (Phys. Lett. A \textbf{374} (2010) 1097) by noting some erroneous considerations therein resulting in a misleading view of the quantum key distribution protocol in question. We then correct the rates provided for the Intercept-and-Resend attack and we complete the analysis of Eve's attack based on a double CNOT gate.

•Oct 6, 2011•0 citations