Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0209003 · Physics Letters A

Analysing a complementarity experiment on the quantum–classical boundary

M.O. Terra Cunha, M.C. Nemes

Published Dec 1, 2002• 2 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1016/s0375-9601(02)01507-4

Related papers

A complementarity experiment with an interferometer at the quantum–classical boundary

Patrice Bertet, S. Osnaghi, Arno Rauschenbeutel +5 more

Nature•May 1, 2001•210 citations

Strangeness and power of the quantum

S. Haroche, J. M. Raimond

This chapter describes the non-classical aspects of the quantum theory. The strangeness of the quantum can be traced back to the superposition principle rooted in the linearity of quantum theory. Section 2.1 recalls how this principle conditions the properties of the wave function of a quantum particle. Section 2.2 discusses the ubiquitous quantum interference phenomenon and its relations with complementarity. Section 2.3 is about the subtleties of the superposition principle when applied to a system of identical particles. Section 2.4 shows that entanglement is a direct consequence of the superposition principle applied to composite systems. It analyses the non-local nature of quantum correlations in an entangled bipartite system and relates entanglement to complementarity. Section 2.5 discusses the quantum-classical boundary and analyses the decoherence phenomenon. Finally, Section 2.6 shows how simple quantum systems can be used as elementary qubits for information processing.

Oxford University Press eBooks•Aug 10, 2006•2 citations

The complementarity of quantum observables: Theory and experiments

Paul Busch, PEKKA J. LAHTI

arXiv:quant-ph/0406132•Rivista Del Nuovo Cimento•Apr 1, 1995•28 citations

Complementarity, entanglement and quantum erasing in continuous-variable quantum nondemolition experiments

Radim Filip

We analyse the entanglement nature of quantum complementarity in individual and simultaneous continuous-variable (CV) quantum nondemolition measurements of coordinate and momentum. The complementarity expressed by the uncertainty relations is compared with an information-theoretical analysis of the quantum correlations. To demonstrate the entanglement nature, new CV quantum erasing experiments are suggested, employing only Gaussian states and feasible quantum optical devices, as parametrical processes, beamsplitters and homodyne detections.

Journal of Optics B Quantum and Semiclassical Optics•Apr 18, 2002•5 citations

Classical and quantum complementarity

Raquel Galazo García, Irene Bartolomé, Laura Ares +1 more

arXiv:1811.12636•Physics Letters A•Aug 28, 2020•11 citations

Quantum Complementarity Approach to Device-Independent Security

Xingjian Zhang, Pei Zeng, Ye Tian +2 more

Complementarity is an essential feature of quantum mechanics. The preparation of an eigenstate of one observable implies complete randomness in its complementary observable. In quantum cryptography, complementarity allows us to formulate security analyses in terms of phase-error correction. However, the concept becomes much subtler in the device-independent regime that offers security without device characterization. Security proofs of device-independent quantum cryptography tasks are often complex and quite different from those of their more standard device-dependent cousins. The existing proofs pose huge challenges to experiments, among which large data-size requirement is a crux. Here, we show the complementarity security origin of the device-independent tasks. By linking complementarity with quantum nonlocality, we recast the device-independent scheme into a quantum error correction protocol. Going beyond the identical-and-independent-distribution case, we consider the most general attack. We generalize the sample entropy in classical Shannon theory for the finite-size analysis. Our method exhibits good finite-size performance and brings the device-independent scheme to a more practical regime. Applying it to the data in a recent ion-trap-based device-independent quantum key distribution experiment, one could reduce the requirement on data size to less than a third. Furthermore, the operational meaning of complementarity naturally extends device-independent scenarios to advantage key distillation, easing experiments by tolerating higher loss and lower transmittance.

arXiv:2111.13855•Physical Review Letters•Oct 3, 2023•13 citations
This chapter describes the non-classical aspects of the quantum theory. The strangeness of the quantum can be traced back to the superposition principle rooted in the linearity of quantum theory. Section 2.1 recalls how this principle conditions the properties of the wave function of a quantum particle. Section 2.2 discusses the ubiquitous quantum interference phenomenon and its relations with complementarity. Section 2.3 is about the subtleties of the superposition principle when applied to a system of identical particles. Section 2.4 shows that entanglement is a direct consequence of the superposition principle applied to composite systems. It analyses the non-local nature of quantum correlations in an entangled bipartite system and relates entanglement to complementarity. Section 2.5 discusses the quantum-classical boundary and analyses the decoherence phenomenon. Finally, Section 2.6 shows how simple quantum systems can be used as elementary qubits for information processing.
We analyse the entanglement nature of quantum complementarity in individual and simultaneous continuous-variable (CV) quantum nondemolition measurements of coordinate and momentum. The complementarity expressed by the uncertainty relations is compared with an information-theoretical analysis of the quantum correlations. To demonstrate the entanglement nature, new CV quantum erasing experiments are suggested, employing only Gaussian states and feasible quantum optical devices, as parametrical processes, beamsplitters and homodyne detections.
Complementarity is an essential feature of quantum mechanics. The preparation of an eigenstate of one observable implies complete randomness in its complementary observable. In quantum cryptography, complementarity allows us to formulate security analyses in terms of phase-error correction. However, the concept becomes much subtler in the device-independent regime that offers security without device characterization. Security proofs of device-independent quantum cryptography tasks are often complex and quite different from those of their more standard device-dependent cousins. The existing proofs pose huge challenges to experiments, among which large data-size requirement is a crux. Here, we show the complementarity security origin of the device-independent tasks. By linking complementarity with quantum nonlocality, we recast the device-independent scheme into a quantum error correction protocol. Going beyond the identical-and-independent-distribution case, we consider the most general attack. We generalize the sample entropy in classical Shannon theory for the finite-size analysis. Our method exhibits good finite-size performance and brings the device-independent scheme to a more practical regime. Applying it to the data in a recent ion-trap-based device-independent quantum key distribution experiment, one could reduce the requirement on data size to less than a third. Furthermore, the operational meaning of complementarity naturally extends device-independent scenarios to advantage key distillation, easing experiments by tolerating higher loss and lower transmittance.