This chapter describes the non-classical aspects of the quantum theory. The strangeness of the quantum can be traced back to the superposition principle rooted in the linearity of quantum theory. Section 2.1 recalls how this principle conditions the properties of the wave function of a quantum particle. Section 2.2 discusses the ubiquitous quantum interference phenomenon and its relations with complementarity. Section 2.3 is about the subtleties of the superposition principle when applied to a system of identical particles. Section 2.4 shows that entanglement is a direct consequence of the superposition principle applied to composite systems. It analyses the non-local nature of quantum correlations in an entangled bipartite system and relates entanglement to complementarity. Section 2.5 discusses the quantum-classical boundary and analyses the decoherence phenomenon. Finally, Section 2.6 shows how simple quantum systems can be used as elementary qubits for information processing.
This chapter describes the non-classical aspects of the quantum theory. The strangeness of the quantum can be traced back to the superposition principle rooted in the linearity of quantum theory. Section 2.1 recalls how this principle conditions the properties of the wave function of a quantum particle. Section 2.2 discusses the ubiquitous quantum interference phenomenon and its relations with complementarity. Section 2.3 is about the subtleties of the superposition principle when applied to a system of identical particles. Section 2.4 shows that entanglement is a direct consequence of the superposition principle applied to composite systems. It analyses the non-local nature of quantum correlations in an entangled bipartite system and relates entanglement to complementarity. Section 2.5 discusses the quantum-classical boundary and analyses the decoherence phenomenon. Finally, Section 2.6 shows how simple quantum systems can be used as elementary qubits for information processing.
Optical interference is regarded as a classical phenomenon and is usually completely described in classical terms, in which optical fields are represented by classical waves. Does it mean that optical interference, which is fundamentally ascribable to the phenomenon of a superposition of wave amplitudes, cannot be applied to test quantum phenomena? The superposition principle is at the heart of quantum physics and one could expect that it should distinguish the quantum nature of light from thewave nature. Our experience based on extensive theoretical analysis and experimental observations shows that classical and quantum theories of optical interference readily explain the presence of an interference pattern resulting from the first-order coherence. However, there are interference effects involving the higher order (second-order) coherence that distinguish the quantum (photon) nature of light from the wave nature. Quantum interference has recently returned to prominence because of its utility in manipulating spontaneous emission and other radiative properties of atomic systems. In this chapter, we present elementary concepts and definitions of both the classical and quantum theory of optical interference and discuss similarities and differences between these two approaches [80].
In this section we provide a broad overview of the basic principles of quantum mechanics and how they enable modern quantum technologies. The starting point is the concept of superposition, which allows quantum systems to be in multiple states at the same time and forms the basis of quantum computation using qubits and parallel processing of information. The conversation then turns to quantum entanglement, a non-classical effect that creates strong correlations between particles, and has applications in secure communication and quantum teleportation. Also mentioned is the quantum coherence, which preserves phase relations between quantum states and makes it possible for quantum systems to function correctly. But it is also emphasized that quantum coherence is fragile to environmental perturbations. This chapter also covers quantum measurement, taking into account the probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics, and how the act of observation results in the collapse of a quantum state to a definite outcome. These principles together constitute the theoretical basis of quantum computing, where quantum gates and algorithms and qubits take advantage of superposition, entanglement and interference to offer computational benefits over classical systems. The most important algorithms like Shor’s and Grover’s algorithms that demonstrate a considerable speed-up in solving the problem are discussed along with different models of quantum computing, such as gate, adiabatic and measurement-based models. Furthermore, the section reviews some physical realizations of quantum systems, such as superconducting qubits, trapped ions, photonic systems and topological qubits, with their advantages and difficulties. Overall, this discussion shows how the basic principles of quantum mechanics are the foundation for the development of advanced quantum technologies, while also dealing with the practical difficulties that arise in their implementation.
Introduction In this chapter, we will focus on the phenomenon of quantum entanglement . Entanglement is a special property that some states of two or more quantum particles may possess. When particles are in an entangled state they are correlated. But entanglement is far more than mere correlation . Entanglement is a type of correlation that macroscopic objects cannot have, even in principle; it is what we call a ‘non-local’ correlation. Entanglement, and the non-locality that derives from it, is by now considered to be, arguably, the most important aspect of quantum mechanics. Philosophically it leads to many puzzles and to a complete change in our view of nature. At the same time, the practical implications of this type of correlation are very significant. In particular, they can lead to the dramatically enhanced information processing capabilities that quantum systems possess. The whole field of quantum information processing (Steane, 1998; Bennett and DiVincenzo, 2000; Zoller et al. , 2005) has entanglement at its core. Given the above, it is natural to ask whether biological systems make use and take advantage of the enhanced possibilities that entanglement offers. It seems natural to expect this, especially at biological molecular level, where the laws of quantum mechanics apply. Entanglement between two isolated particles is easy to obtain: almost every time two particles interact they get entangled. But entanglement is very fragile. When two entangled quantum systems interact with a third, they easily become entangled in a tri-partite way; however, any entanglement between any two of them is reduced or disappears altogether.
The restrictions that nature places on the distribution of correlations in a multipartite quantum system play fundamental roles in the evolution of such systems, and yield vital insights into the design of protocols for the quantum control of ensembles with potential applications in the field of quantum computing. We show how this entanglement sharing behavior may be studied in increasingly complex systems of both theoretical and experimental significance and demonstrate that entanglement sharing, as well as other unique features of entanglement, e.g. the fact that maximal information about a multipartite quantum system does not necessarily entail maximal information about its component subsystems, may be understood as specific consequences of the phenomenon of complementarity extended to composite quantum systems. We also present a local hidden-variable model supplemented by an efficient amount of classical communication that reproduces the quantum-mechanical predictions for the entire class of Gottesman-Knill circuits. The success of our simulation provides strong evidence that the power of quantum computation arises not directly from entanglement, but rather from the nonexistence of an efficient, local realistic description of the computation, even when augmented by an efficient amount of nonlocal, but classical communication. Finally, we note that the findings presented in this thesis support the conjecture that Hilbert space dimension is an objective property of a quantum system since it constrains the number of valid conceptual divisions of the system into subsystems.
This chapter introduces quantum mechanics through the experimental discoveries that revealed the limits of classical physics. Beginning with the historical debate over whether light is a wave or a particle, it examines Young’s double-slit experiment and its modern single-particle versions, which demonstrate that quantum objects can exist in superpositions of mutually exclusive states. The chapter explains how interference arises when alternative possibilities are not measured and how interaction with the environment suppresses these effects through decoherence, giving rise to classical behavior at macroscopic scales. A sequence of thought experiments involving interferometers and Stern–Gerlach devices highlights the counterintuitive structure of quantum measurement and the incompatibility of certain physical properties, as captured by the uncertainty principle. The chapter emphasizes that quantum mechanics does not describe particles taking multiple paths simultaneously in a classical sense but rather requires a new framework for probability based on amplitudes and interference. Finally, the discussion connects these foundational ideas to emerging technologies such as quantum computing, showing how superposition and entanglement can be harnessed to perform computations that have no classical analogue.
This chapter explains the basic concept of decoherence and how it damps out quantum interference of a superposition state. Quantum decoherence plays an important role in the interpretation of quantum mechanics. The quantum information processing fields like quantum computers, quantum communication and quantum cryptography depend very much on how to minimize and control the quantum decoherence. Quantum decoherence helps to know the fundamental reasons of understanding the very nature of quantum mechanics, the measurement process and the boundary between quantum and classical behaviour. A double-slit experiment can be used to explain the basic concept of decoherence. The chapter discusses the master equations which give the dynamical evolution of the quantum system and the environment entangled state. It also discusses some of the decoherence models. In the collisional decoherence model, a massive free quantum particle scatters environmental particles. In the spin-boson models, the quantum system is represented by qubits and the environment by collision of harmonic oscillators.