Comments on Bouda and Djama's “Quantum Newton's law”

A. Bouda, T. Djama

A. Bouda, T. Djama

Claudia Pombo, Luigi Accardi, Guillaume Adenier +5 more

A paper by Dyson, published nearly two decades ago, describing Feynman’s proof of Maxwell equations, has generated many comments, analysis, discussions and generalizations of the proof. Feynman’s derivation is assumed to be based on two main sets of equations. One is supposed to be the second law of Newton and the other a set of basic commutation relations from quantum physics.Here we present a new comment on this paper, focusing mainly on the initial arguments and applying a new method of analysis and interpretation of physics, named observational realism. The present discussion does not alter the technical steps of Feynman, but do clarify their basis. We show that Newton’s physics is not a starting point in Feynman’s derivation, neither is quantum physics involved in it, but the foundations of relativity only.

Vitaly Kuyukov

Jon Ogborn, Edwin F. Taylor

Newton was obliged to give his laws of motion as fundamental axioms. But today we know that the quantum world is fundamental, and Newton's laws can be seen as consequences of fundamental quantum laws. This article traces this transition from fundamental quantum mechanics to derived classical mechanics.

David Deutsch