Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0104092

Reply to Comment on ``Proposal for the Measurement of Bell-Type Correlations from Continuous Variables''

Timothy C. Ralph, William J. Munro

Published Apr 19, 2001• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Recently K. Banaszek, I. A. Walmsley, K. Wodkiewicz (quant-ph/0012097) commented on our Proposal for the Measurement of Bell-Type Correlations from Continuous Variables [T. C. Ralph, W. J. Munro, R. E. S. Polkinghorne, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2035 (2000)]. Their comment is based on a blatant misreading and misunderstanding of our letter and as such is simply wrong.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0104092

Related papers

Comment on "Proposal for the Measurement of Bell-Type Correlations from Continuous Variables"

Konrad Banaszek, Ian A. Walmsley, K. Wódkiewicz

In a recent paper [T. C. Ralph, W. J. Munro, R. E. S. Polkinghorne, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2035 (2000)], the authors propose a test for Bell's inequalities based on quadrature measurements for a correlated parametric source. We present here a local hidden variable model which reproduces all the expectation values predicted in the described experimental scheme, and point out that the proposal is based on an inconsistent use of Bell's inequalities.

arXiv:quant-ph/0012097•Dec 18, 2000•0 citations

Reply to the comment "quant-ph/9710002"

Luming Duan, Guang‐Can Guo

In the comment, Zanardi and Rasetti argue that several claims in our recent letter (Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 1953, 1997) are questionable. The reply shows these claims remain true.

arXiv:quant-ph/9710014•Oct 3, 1997•1 citation

Note on "A note on "Loophole-free Bell test for continuous variables via wave and particle correlations""

Se-Wan Ji, Jaewan Kim, Hai-Woong Lee +2 more

In a recent note, Cavalcanti and Scarani (CS) constructed a counter local-hidden-variable model to explain the violation of our inequalities in Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 170404 (2010). Here, we briefly discuss some issues in response to the comments raised by CS.

•Oct 28, 2010•0 citations

Proposal for the Measurement of Bell-Type Correlations from Continuous Variables

Timothy C. Ralph, William J. Munro, Rodney Polkinghorne

We show theoretically that Bell-type correlations can be observed between continuous variable measurements performed on a parametric source. An auxiliary measurement, performed on the detection environment, negates the possibility of constructing a local realistic description of these correlations.

arXiv:quant-ph/0006057•Physical Review Letters•Sep 4, 2000•54 citations

Comment on "Loophole-Free Bell Test for Continuous Variables via Wave and Particle Correlations" Reply

Se-Wan Ji, Jaewan Kim, Hai-Woong Lee +2 more

Physical Review Letters•Jan 1, 2011•0 citations

Reply to "Comment on 'Separability of quantum states and the violation of Bell-type inequalities'"

Elena R. Loubenets

It is stated by C. Simon, quant-ph/0410032, that the definition of "classicality" used in quant-ph/0310116 is "much narrower than Bell's concept of local hidden variables" and that, in the separable quantum case, the validity of the perfect correlation form of the original Bell inequality is necessarily linked with "the assumption of perfect correlations if the same (quantum) observable is measured on both sides". Here, I prove that these and other statements in quant-ph/0410032 are misleading.

arXiv:quant-ph/0502084•Feb 14, 2005•1 citation
Recently K. Banaszek, I. A. Walmsley, K. Wodkiewicz (quant-ph/0012097) commented on our Proposal for the Measurement of Bell-Type Correlations from Continuous Variables [T. C. Ralph, W. J. Munro, R. E. S. Polkinghorne, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 2035 (2000)]. Their comment is based on a blatant misreading and misunderstanding of our letter and as such is simply wrong.
It is stated by C. Simon, quant-ph/0410032, that the definition of "classicality" used in quant-ph/0310116 is "much narrower than Bell's concept of local hidden variables" and that, in the separable quantum case, the validity of the perfect correlation form of the original Bell inequality is necessarily linked with "the assumption of perfect correlations if the same (quantum) observable is measured on both sides". Here, I prove that these and other statements in quant-ph/0410032 are misleading.