Physical Review Letters

Comment on "Loophole-Free Bell Test for Continuous Variables via Wave and Particle Correlations" Reply

Se-Wan Ji, Jaewan Kim, Hai-Woong Lee, Muhammad Suhail Zubairy, Hyunchul Nha

Published Jan 1, 2011• 0 citations

OpenAlex

Related papers

Comment on “A Loophole of All “Loophole-Free” Bell-Type Theorems”

Justo Pastor Lambare

arXiv:2008.00369Foundations of ScienceAug 14, 202011 citations

Physical randomness sources for loophole-free Bell tests

Morgan W. Mitchell

Bulletin of the American Physical SocietyMay 25, 20160 citations

A loophole-free Bell test and the route to larger quantum networks

Andreas Reiserer, Bas Hensen, Hannes Bernien +5 more

Bulletin of the American Physical SocietyMay 25, 20160 citations

Comment on “Loophole-Free Bell Test for Continuous Variables via Wave and Particle Correlations”

Daniel Cavalcanti, Valerio Scarani

The inequalities proposed in [Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 170404 (2010)] are not Bell's inequalities in the usual sense: there are local classical models that violate these inequalities. Thus, their violation demonstrates nonlocality only under assumptions about the physical implementation and moreover they cannot be used as a device-independent test of nonlocality.

arXiv:1010.5358Physical Review LettersMay 20, 20117 citations

Note on "A note on "Loophole-free Bell test for continuous variables via wave and particle correlations""

Se-Wan Ji, Jaewan Kim, Hai-Woong Lee +2 more

In a recent note, Cavalcanti and Scarani (CS) constructed a counter local-hidden-variable model to explain the violation of our inequalities in Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 170404 (2010). Here, we briefly discuss some issues in response to the comments raised by CS.

Oct 28, 20100 citations

Bell-type correlations from continuous variable measurements

Timothy C. Ralph, William J. Munro, Rodney Polkinghorne

Jan 1, 20000 citations