arXiv:quant-ph/0103166

What is wrong with SLASH?

Karl Svozil

Published Mar 30, 2001• 5 citations

Abstract

In an experiment featuring nonlinear optics, delayed choice and EPR-type correlations, the possibility of faster-than-light communication appears not totally implausible. Attempts are put forward and discussed to refute this claim.

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0103166

Related papers

On EPR-type Entanglement in the Experiments of Scully et al. II. Insight in the Real Random Delayed-choice Erasure Experiment

F. Herbut

arXiv:0808.3177Foundations of PhysicsDec 24, 20098 citations

On EPR-Type Entanglement in the Experiments of Scully et al. I. The Micromaser Case and Delayed-Choice Quantum Erasure

Fedor Herbut

arXiv:0808.3176Foundations of PhysicsOct 22, 20089 citations

Faster-Than-Light Communication using Quantum Entanglement is Possible

Florentín Smarandache

In this little note we refute the statement that Faster-Than-Light Communication using Quantum Entanglement is Impossible, by proving that the alleged proof of the mainstream is irrelevant. Also, the Faster-Than-Light Communication does NOT mean sending information into the past. We recall the many paradoxes of the theory of relativity that make it unrealistic, while the Absolute Theory of Relativity [1] is the realistic one.

Information Sciences with ApplicationsDec 19, 20250 citations

A delayed-choice thought-experiment with later-time entanglement

C. F. Boyle, R. L. Schafir

It is possible to find the nonlocality type of correlations between particle pairs retrospectively, matched with the outcomes of a future entangling measurement. But this does not imply nonlocality in subensembles of product pairs, nor does it imply an influence propagating backwards in time.

arXiv:quant-ph/0107098Jul 19, 20010 citations

Comments on a recent proposal of superluminal communication

G. C. Ghirardi

We analyze critically a recent proposal of faster than light communication.

arXiv:1411.0893Nov 4, 20144 citations

On a Proposal for Quantum Signalling

Padmanabhan Murali

Present understanding of non-possibility of Quantum communication rests on analysis of possibility of signalling within a Quantum system. Is it possible to achieve signalling by a setup where the system is changed from one to another where the act of change serves as the signal and the change in the measurement probabilities would be detected and deciphered at the receiver end? A proposal is made where a variant of Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser experiment setup of Kim et al is used to achieve the same. The setup is also designed such that the speed of communication can be faster than light. NonLocality and Quantum communication Nonlocality is a feature of Quantum Mechanics that has been firmly established through experiments [Aspect et al, 1981] and well accepted now. Entangled particles separated by a distance still are part of one entity and when that entity changes state by a measurement in one part of it the change happens instantaneously across the domain the entity pervades. Is it possible to use this instantaneous state change to transmit information across at high speeds, faster than light (FTL)? This issue has been dealt with from the time the Einstein raised the EPR paradox [Einstein et al,1935] and has been claimed to be impossible and shown to be so by Peres, [Peres and Tenko, 2004] through the no-communication theorem which shows that any amount of signalling by Alice through measurements done at one end of the quantum system would not be sufficient for Bob to detect and decipher at the other end of the system. However the discussions in literature (as above) always deal with information transfer within a stable quantum system by making measurements at one end and analysing the possibility of detecting it at the other end. Peres and Tenko analyse a Quantum System S of mixed-state where Alice and Bob make measurements at their ends of the system. The authors derive the probability that Bob’s outcome is ν as

Nov 1, 20150 citations