Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:quant-ph/0103107

Functional approach to quantum decoherence and the classical final limit II: the pointer basis and the quantum measurements

Mario Castagnino, Roberto Laura, R. Id Betán

Published Mar 19, 2001• 3 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

A quantum system with discrete and continuos evolution spectrum is studied. A final pointer basis is found, that can be defined in a presised mathematical way. This result is use to explain the quantum measurement in the system.
DOI
10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0103107

Related papers

An Algebraic Formulation of Quantum Decoherence

Mario Castagnino, A. R. Ordoniez

An algebraic formalism for quantum decoherence in systems with continuous evolution spectrum is introduced. A certain subalgebra, dense in the characteristic algebra of the system, is defined in such a way that Riemann-Lebesgue theorem can be used to explain decoherence in a well defined final pointer basis.

arXiv:math-ph/0108001•Aug 1, 2001•1 citation

Quantum decoherence: Mathematical foundations, physical mechanisms, and experimental tests

Sachin .

Quantum decoherence is widely regarded as the principal dynamical mechanism through which classical behaviour emerges from quantum dynamics. This review presents a technical account of decoherence as an open-system phenomenon, emphasizing its mathematical framework, microscopic models, experimental evidence, and foundational implications. Starting from system-environment interactions and reduced density operators, we introduce completely positive trace-preserving maps and Lindblad master equations. We then discuss pure dephasing, pointer-state selection, quantum Brownian motion, spin-boson dynamics, and collisional decoherence. Experimental evidence from atom and molecular interferometry, superconducting qubits, and mesoscopic platforms is examined. Finally, the review assesses the role of decoherence in the quantum measurement problem. Decoherence explains preferred-basis selection and practical suppression of interference, but it does not independently account for the occurrence of a unique measurement outcome.

International Journal of Physics and Applications•Jul 1, 2025•0 citations

Decoherence and the Final Pointer Basis

Mario Castagnino, Roberto Laura

Using a functional method it is demonstrated that a generic quantum system evolves to a decohered state in a final pointer basis.

arXiv:quant-ph/0005098•May 24, 2000•0 citations

Quantum Decoherence

Elise M. Crull

Quantum decoherence is a physical process resulting from a system’s entanglement with an environment. This chapter examines the explanatory wealth of decoherence when brought to bear on foundational issues such as the question of why certain measurement bases seem to be preferred by nature – including the pointer basis of measuring apparatuses – the old familiar measurement problem, and the emergence of classicality. Decoherence satisfactorily explains the behavior of the ammonia molecule. Decoherence introduces no additional nonlinearity but “simply takes real, inevitable, interaction with external degrees of freedom to bear in the Hamiltonian”. The basis-specific nature of decoherence will allow for a satisfying explanation to one of quantum mechanics’ oldest mysteries: that of the pointer basis. The basis-specific nature of decoherence will allow for a satisfying explanation to one of quantum mechanics’ oldest mysteries: that of the pointer basis.

Routledge eBooks•Aug 11, 2021•18 citations

Does Decoherence Select the Pointer Basis of a Quantum Meter?

Abraham G. Kofman, Gershon Kurizki

The consensus regarding quantum measurements rests on two statements: (i) von Neumann’s standard quantum measurement theory leaves undetermined the basis in which observables are measured, and (ii) the environmental decoherence of the measuring device (the “meter”) unambiguously determines the measuring (“pointer”) basis. The latter statement means that the environment monitors (measures) selected observables of the meter and (indirectly) of the system. Equivalently, a measured quantum state must end up in one of the “pointer states” that persist in the presence of the environment. We find that, unless we restrict ourselves to projective measurements, decoherence does not necessarily determine the pointer basis of the meter. Namely, generalized measurements commonly allow the observer to choose from a multitude of alternative pointer bases that provide the same information on the observables, regardless of decoherence. By contrast, the measured observable does not depend on the pointer basis, whether in the presence or in the absence of decoherence. These results grant further support to our notion of Quantum Lamarckism, whereby the observer’s choices play an indispensable role in quantum mechanics.

Entropy•Jan 10, 2022•3 citations

The ‘Decoherence’ Approach to the Measurement Problem in Quantum Mechanics

Andrew Elby

The decoherence approach to the measurement problem invokes dissipative interactions between a measuring apparatus and its environment to explain, within the context of ‘pure’ quantum mechanics (QM), why such devices appear to possess definite pointer readings. By ‘pure’ QM, I mean Schrödinger evolution with no wavefunction collapse. Several classes of interpretations of pure QM can rely on decoherence. One class is the ‘modal’ interpretations of van Fraassen (1979), Dieks (1989), Healey (1989), and others. Another class is the relative-state and many-world interpretations. I will argue that decoherence cannot help these interpretations address the general metaphysical challenges raised against them. But decoherence can help pick out a ‘special’ basis that determines which observables receive definite values. I'll explore to what extent decoherence rescues the modal (biorthogonal) basis-selection rule, and Zurek's (environmental interaction) basis-selection rule, from the basis degeneracy problem and the imperfect measurement problem.

PSA Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association•Jan 1, 1994•16 citations
Quantum decoherence is widely regarded as the principal dynamical mechanism through which classical behaviour emerges from quantum dynamics. This review presents a technical account of decoherence as an open-system phenomenon, emphasizing its mathematical framework, microscopic models, experimental evidence, and foundational implications. Starting from system-environment interactions and reduced density operators, we introduce completely positive trace-preserving maps and Lindblad master equations. We then discuss pure dephasing, pointer-state selection, quantum Brownian motion, spin-boson dynamics, and collisional decoherence. Experimental evidence from atom and molecular interferometry, superconducting qubits, and mesoscopic platforms is examined. Finally, the review assesses the role of decoherence in the quantum measurement problem. Decoherence explains preferred-basis selection and practical suppression of interference, but it does not independently account for the occurrence of a unique measurement outcome.
Quantum decoherence is a physical process resulting from a system’s entanglement with an environment. This chapter examines the explanatory wealth of decoherence when brought to bear on foundational issues such as the question of why certain measurement bases seem to be preferred by nature – including the pointer basis of measuring apparatuses – the old familiar measurement problem, and the emergence of classicality. Decoherence satisfactorily explains the behavior of the ammonia molecule. Decoherence introduces no additional nonlinearity but “simply takes real, inevitable, interaction with external degrees of freedom to bear in the Hamiltonian”. The basis-specific nature of decoherence will allow for a satisfying explanation to one of quantum mechanics’ oldest mysteries: that of the pointer basis. The basis-specific nature of decoherence will allow for a satisfying explanation to one of quantum mechanics’ oldest mysteries: that of the pointer basis.
The consensus regarding quantum measurements rests on two statements: (i) von Neumann’s standard quantum measurement theory leaves undetermined the basis in which observables are measured, and (ii) the environmental decoherence of the measuring device (the “meter”) unambiguously determines the measuring (“pointer”) basis. The latter statement means that the environment monitors (measures) selected observables of the meter and (indirectly) of the system. Equivalently, a measured quantum state must end up in one of the “pointer states” that persist in the presence of the environment. We find that, unless we restrict ourselves to projective measurements, decoherence does not necessarily determine the pointer basis of the meter. Namely, generalized measurements commonly allow the observer to choose from a multitude of alternative pointer bases that provide the same information on the observables, regardless of decoherence. By contrast, the measured observable does not depend on the pointer basis, whether in the presence or in the absence of decoherence. These results grant further support to our notion of Quantum Lamarckism, whereby the observer’s choices play an indispensable role in quantum mechanics.
The decoherence approach to the measurement problem invokes dissipative interactions between a measuring apparatus and its environment to explain, within the context of ‘pure’ quantum mechanics (QM), why such devices appear to possess definite pointer readings. By ‘pure’ QM, I mean Schrödinger evolution with no wavefunction collapse. Several classes of interpretations of pure QM can rely on decoherence. One class is the ‘modal’ interpretations of van Fraassen (1979), Dieks (1989), Healey (1989), and others. Another class is the relative-state and many-world interpretations. I will argue that decoherence cannot help these interpretations address the general metaphysical challenges raised against them. But decoherence can help pick out a ‘special’ basis that determines which observables receive definite values. I'll explore to what extent decoherence rescues the modal (biorthogonal) basis-selection rule, and Zurek's (environmental interaction) basis-selection rule, from the basis degeneracy problem and the imperfect measurement problem.