The consensus regarding quantum measurements rests on two statements: (i) von Neumann’s standard quantum measurement theory leaves undetermined the basis in which observables are measured, and (ii) the environmental decoherence of the measuring device (the “meter”) unambiguously determines the measuring (“pointer”) basis. The latter statement means that the environment monitors (measures) selected observables of the meter and (indirectly) of the system. Equivalently, a measured quantum state must end up in one of the “pointer states” that persist in the presence of the environment. We find that, unless we restrict ourselves to projective measurements, decoherence does not necessarily determine the pointer basis of the meter. Namely, generalized measurements commonly allow the observer to choose from a multitude of alternative pointer bases that provide the same information on the observables, regardless of decoherence. By contrast, the measured observable does not depend on the pointer basis, whether in the presence or in the absence of decoherence. These results grant further support to our notion of Quantum Lamarckism, whereby the observer’s choices play an indispensable role in quantum mechanics.
The consensus regarding quantum measurements rests on two statements: (i) von Neumann’s standard quantum measurement theory leaves undetermined the basis in which observables are measured, and (ii) the environmental decoherence of the measuring device (the “meter”) unambiguously determines the measuring (“pointer”) basis. The latter statement means that the environment monitors (measures) selected observables of the meter and (indirectly) of the system. Equivalently, a measured quantum state must end up in one of the “pointer states” that persist in the presence of the environment. We find that, unless we restrict ourselves to projective measurements, decoherence does not necessarily determine the pointer basis of the meter. Namely, generalized measurements commonly allow the observer to choose from a multitude of alternative pointer bases that provide the same information on the observables, regardless of decoherence. By contrast, the measured observable does not depend on the pointer basis, whether in the presence or in the absence of decoherence. These results grant further support to our notion of Quantum Lamarckism, whereby the observer’s choices play an indispensable role in quantum mechanics.
Abstract In quantum mechanics, pointer states are eigenstates of the observable of the measurement apparatus that represent the possible positions of the display pointer of the equipment. The origin of this concept lies in attempts to fill the blanks in Everett’s relative-state interpretation, and to make it a fully valid description of physical reality. To achieve this, it was necessary to consider not only the main system interacting with the measurement apparatus (like von Neumann and Everett did) but also the role of the environment in eliminating correlations between different possible measurements when interacting with the measurement apparatus. The interaction of the environment with the main system (and the measurement apparatus) is the core of the decoherence theory, which followed Everett’s thesis. In this article, we review the measurement process according to von Neumann, Everett’s relative state interpretation, the purpose of decoherence and some of its follow-up until Wojciech Zurek’s primordial paper that consolidated the concept of pointer states, previously presented by Heinz Dieter Zeh. Employing a simple physical model consisting of a pair of two-level systems—one representing the main system, the other the measurement apparatus—and a thermal bath—representing the environment—we show how pointer states emerge, explaining its contributions to the question of measurement in quantum mechanics, as well as its limitations. Finally, we briefly show some of its consequences. This paper is accessible to readers with elementary knowledge about quantum mechanics, on the level of graduate courses.
Abstract The purpose of this article, which is our contribution to Wolfgang Schleich’s Festschrift, is to present an unconventional perspective of two fundamental, interrelated problems: the emergence of classicality and the observer’s role in quantum mechanics. In our perspective, the decoherence of quantum states of a system or its measuring device (meter) by the environment cannot replace the role of the observer, nor can it provide the ultimate explanation of the transition of the system from quantumness to classicality. The reason is that decoherence, despite appearances, typically does not irretrievably obliterate the information on the system’s state. Even in cases where the environment has the potential of erasing this information, the observer can negate decoherence effects in the meter or the system by dynamical control. We contend that the choice of measuring bases and observables is largely up to the controller-observer (CO) that need not possess unlimited resources in order to steer or freeze ( at will ) the system-state evolution and its quantumness, notwithstanding the environment effects. An analogy is drawn between the outlined approach and Lamarckism, the theory of evolution that preceded Darwinism. Quantum Lamarckism expresses our view of evolution as functional adaptation of the system to the interplay between environmental and CO effects . In our view, both conceptually and practically, decoherence may be deemed non-essential for determining the evolution of a quantum system embedded in its environment, provided the CO has an adequate, albeit limited, arsenal of resources.
Abstract: In quantum mechanics, pointer states are eigenstates of the observable of the measurement apparatus that represent the possible positions of the display pointer of the equipment. The origin of this concept lies in attempts to fill the blanks in Everett's relative-state interpretation, and to make it a fully valid description of physical reality. To achieve this, it was necessary to consider not only the main system interacting with the measurement apparatus (like von Neumann and Everett did) but also the role of the environment in eliminating correlations between different possible measurements when interacting with the measurement apparatus. The interaction of the environment with the main system (and the measurement apparatus) is the core of the decoherence theory, which followed Everett's thesis. In this article, we review the measurement process according to von Neumann, Everett's relative state interpretation, the purpose of decoherence and some of its follow-up until Wojciech Zurek's primordial paper that consolidated the concept of pointer states, previously presented by Heinz Dieter Zeh. Employing a simple physical model consisting of a pair of two-level systems-one representing the main system, the other the measurement apparatus-and a thermal bath-representing the environment-we show how pointer states emerge, explaining its contributions to the question of measurement in quantum mechanics, as well as its limitations. Finally, we briefly show some of its consequences. This paper is accessible to readers with elementary knowledge about quantum mechanics, on the level of graduate courses
We present a general analytic method for evaluating the generally time-dependent pointer states of a subsystem, which are defined by their capability not to entangle with the states of another subsystem. We explore the conditions under which the pointer states of the system become independent of time; so that a preferred basis of measurement can be realized. We relate the mathematical conditions for having time-independent pointer states to some classes of possible symmetries in the Hamiltonian of the total composite system. Indeed, our theory would serve as a generalization of the existing theory for determination of the preferred basis of measurement. By exploiting this new theory we can obtain those regimes of the parameter space for a given total Hamiltonian defining our system-environment model for which a preferred basis of measurement can be realized. Moreover, we can predict the corresponding preferred basis of measurement for each regime. We can also obtain the time-dependent pointer states of the system and the environment in most of the other regimes where the pointer states of the system are time-dependent and a preferred basis of measurement cannot be realized at all. This ability to obtain time-dependent pointer states is specifically important in decoherence studies; as these pointer states, although they evolve with time and cannot represent the preferred basis of measurement, they correspond to those initial conditions for the state of the system and the environment for which we can have longer decoherence times. In the next step, we consider a spin-boson Hamiltonian which is generalized such that the Hamiltonians for the system and the interaction with the environment do not commute with each other. Considering a single-mode quantized field in exact resonance with the tunneling matrix element of the system, we calculate the time-dependent pointer states of the system and the environment for the case that the environment initially is prepared in the coherent state. We also obtain a closed form for the offdiagonal element of the reduced density matrix of the system and study the decoherence of the central system in our model. We will show that for the case that the system initially is prepared in one of its pointer states, the offdiagonal element of the reduced density matrix of the system will be a sinusoidal function with a slow decaying envelop which is characterized by a decay time proportional to n-bar.
Quantum decoherence is a physical process resulting from a system’s entanglement with an environment. This chapter examines the explanatory wealth of decoherence when brought to bear on foundational issues such as the question of why certain measurement bases seem to be preferred by nature – including the pointer basis of measuring apparatuses – the old familiar measurement problem, and the emergence of classicality. Decoherence satisfactorily explains the behavior of the ammonia molecule. Decoherence introduces no additional nonlinearity but “simply takes real, inevitable, interaction with external degrees of freedom to bear in the Hamiltonian”. The basis-specific nature of decoherence will allow for a satisfying explanation to one of quantum mechanics’ oldest mysteries: that of the pointer basis. The basis-specific nature of decoherence will allow for a satisfying explanation to one of quantum mechanics’ oldest mysteries: that of the pointer basis.
We report and give an alternative derivation of some results on a model for a quantum measurement studied in [1]. The measured microscopic system is coupled to the position of a macroscopic pointer, which itself interacts with its environment via its momentum. The entanglement between the system and the pointer produced by their mutual interaction is simultaneous with the decoherence of distinct pointer readings resulting from leakage of information to the environment. After a discussion on the various time scales in the model we calculate the matrix elements of the system-pointer density operator between eigenstates of the measured observable with distinct eigenvalues. In general, the decay with time of these coherences is neither exponential nor gaussian. We determine the decoherence (decay) time in terms of the strength of the system-pointer and pointer-environment couplings. This decoherence time does not depend upon the details of the pointer-bath coupling as soon as it is smaller than the bath correlation time (non-Markov regime). In contrast, in the Markov regime it depends strongly on whether this coupling is Ohmic or super-Ohmic.